for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Comparing Giants' '03 draft to how '19 is shaping up.

Beezer : 11/13/2018 4:54 pm
The Giants had 11 draft choices in 2003. With news of the compensatory 4th for Omameh, that puts the Giants at 10 draft picks next April (starts April 25, ends April 27), the most since '03.

Looking back, that turned out to be a pretty damn good haul for the franchise.

Here's how 2003 went:

* First round. (25th) DT William Joseph. Underachieved, but sill received a ring for the 2007 Super Bowl win, even though he was injured that season. Started 17 games for the Giants in 4 seasons.

* Second round. (56th) DE Osi Umenyiora. Two-time Super Bowl champ. Pro Bowler. All-Pro. 85 career sacks. Instrumental in both 2007 and 2011 Super Bowl victories. A great Giant.

* Third round. (91st) TE Visanthe Shiancoe. Didn't do much for the Giants and was gone by 2007, but went on to have some good years playing for Minnesota. All-in-all, a respectable pro career.

* Fourth round. 123rd) CB Rod Babers. Cut in training camp (I believe).

* Fifth round. (160th) OT/OG Dave Diehl. Two-time Super Bowl champ.Helped anchor our last really strong O-line. Pro Bowler. Missed 4 games (4 starts, actually) in 9 seasons playing tackle and guard on both sides. A great Giant.

* Sixth round. (199th) WR Willie Ponder. A few years as a halfway decent kick returner. Overall, blah.

* Sixth round. (207th) CB Frank Walker. 5 INTs for the Giants in 3 seasons. Just missed the 2007 championship season (was with Green Bay that season.) Played for 5 teams in a 9-year NFL career.

* Sixth round. (211th) WR David Tyree. Super Bowl champion in 2007. 54 career receptions in 5 years for the Giants, but ... THE ONE catch! Not a great career. But ... a great Giant.

* Seventh round. (240th)S Charles Drake. Cut in training camp.

* Seventh round. (249th) OC Wayne Lucier. Started 20 games on the O-line in 2 seasons, but was gone by 2005.

* Seventh round. (255th) WR Kevin Walter. Cut by the Giants in training camp. Turned out NOT to be a good move, as he went on to have a pretty productive 10-year NFL career playing primarily for the Texans, where he had 326 of his 356 career catches, 4083 of his 4379 career receiving yards, and 24 of his 25 career TDs.

+++

Looking ahead a bit, and assuming the Giants don't screw this up and go on some ill-advised winning jag, I'll pencil them in for the No. 1 overall pick. I'm optimistic.

If so, or even in that ballpark, here's how things could line up. That means 4 players in the first 100 picks (or so), and a full 7 players picked by the overall 140th (or so) selection.

* First round. (1st)

* Second round. (33rd)

* Third round. (no pick)

* Fourth round. (100 range)

* Fourth round. (Saints pick - Apple)

* Fourth round. (Compensatory pick - Omameh)

* Fifth round. (138 range)

* Fifth round. (Lions pick - Snacks)

* Sixth round. (175 range)

* Seventh round. (Vikings - Jones)

* Seventh round. (Rams - Hankins)

Wouldn't it be nice to replicate the 2003 draft? I'd take it and run!



That was a crappy draft  
Larry in Pencilvania : 11/13/2018 5:02 pm : link
Three players out of 11? No depth coming from the back of the draft and Frank Walker was a joke. Anyone know where he is
Your assumption that we will pick #1 is wrong.  
Diver_Down : 11/13/2018 5:05 pm : link
We are picking 3rd as of this week. Oakland is 1 with San Fran at 2.
Does Joseph count?  
RottenApple : 11/13/2018 5:06 pm : link
He was completely useless.
I don't know, man ... crappy to have 2 of your  
Beezer : 11/13/2018 5:07 pm : link
anchor players on 2 Super Bowl championships in one draft, and another guy who made arguably-ish the greatest catch in Super Bowl history?

I guess I'll take another "crappy" draft, by your standards, Cousin Lawrence.
RE: Your assumption that we will pick #1 is wrong.  
Beezer : 11/13/2018 5:08 pm : link
In comment 14176844 Diver_Down said:
Quote:
We are picking 3rd as of this week. Oakland is 1 with San Fran at 2.


Long way to go.

I'm hopeful.

Third, still, would be fine.
I'd take  
pjcas18 : 11/13/2018 5:12 pm : link
another 2018 draft before 2003. Why would you want another 2003?

I also think the Giants will be getting at least one more pick  
gmen9892 : 11/13/2018 5:12 pm : link
If/when they trade Jenkins this offseason. Just hoping he can close the season strong to up his value.
RE: I also think the Giants will be getting at least one more pick  
Diver_Down : 11/13/2018 5:18 pm : link
In comment 14176861 gmen9892 said:
Quote:
If/when they trade Jenkins this offseason. Just hoping he can close the season strong to up his value.


I wouldn't discount OV being included in the draft equation. He has 2 years left both at $15.5M. We aren't getting good value at that price.
RE: I'd take  
Beezer : 11/13/2018 5:23 pm : link
In comment 14176860 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
another 2018 draft before 2003. Why would you want another 2003?


Reason I compared it ... 2019 we'll have the most picks since that particular one.

I agree with you, though ... combine another solid draft with tat of 2018 ... we're on the way up.
What a terrible draft  
Ten Ton Hammer : 11/13/2018 5:26 pm : link
Two legit players and one guy who played a key historical role for one moment.
Stephen I'm not your cousin  
Larry in Pencilvania : 11/13/2018 5:26 pm : link
If anything I'd take the quality of the 2005 draft where 3 out of 4 picks were hits all starters. If you have 11 picks and only 3 make it then that's not very good.

One of the issues this team has had is they haven't hit on any late picks so there is no depth. In turn they have had to turn around and over pay for mediocre talent. Sorry 🐝 they have to do better than that
Lawrence, tell Aunt Jeanie I said hi.  
Beezer : 11/13/2018 5:37 pm : link
Ya prick, ya.

Three guys with 5 rings ... is what I liked about 2003. Not that they were starters, or "made it" But that they all had huge impacts on championships.

Bottom line, 2003 had 3 champions. 2005 had 3 champions. I'll take that again in a heartbeat.
Thank God you're not the GM  
Larry in Pencilvania : 11/13/2018 5:40 pm : link
This team will be fixed by the time your kids are collecting social security
RE: RE: I'd take  
pjcas18 : 11/13/2018 5:44 pm : link
In comment 14176871 Beezer said:
Quote:
In comment 14176860 pjcas18 said:


Quote:


another 2018 draft before 2003. Why would you want another 2003?




Reason I compared it ... 2019 we'll have the most picks since that particular one.

I agree with you, though ... combine another solid draft with tat of 2018 ... we're on the way up.


quality over quantity would be my goal.

Giants have had some good drafts in their history, I get that 2003 had quite a few picks, but if Gettleman duplicates the 2003 draft in 2019 he should be fired, and then drawn and quartered like William Wallace was including having parts of his body delivered to all ends of Giants nation, and then shot.
I guess I'm looking at it from the standpoint  
Beezer : 11/13/2018 5:56 pm : link
that you that not every guy - including the high selections - is going to pan out according to expectations. So the odds are increased with the higher number of picks.

Wouldn't most fans be pleased with a 3-year draft-success run (2018/2019/2020) that produces 10 players that own a combined 17 rings?

2003 - Osi (2), Diehl (2) and Tyree (1)
2004 - Eli (2), Snee (2), Torbor (1) and Wilson (1)
2005 - Webster (2), Tuck (2) and Jacobs (2)

I'll take the Steelers 1974 draft with 4 HOF players  
Larry in Pencilvania : 11/13/2018 5:56 pm : link
Swann, Stallwarth, Lambert & Webster. That's quality
Rod Babers refused to report or something  
Greg from LI : 11/13/2018 5:57 pm : link
Something weird like that. He ended up playing a few years for the Lions, I think.
Draft Philosophy  
Diver_Down : 11/13/2018 6:08 pm : link
Quote:
Odds are increased with the higher number of picks.


While some would advocate that with more darts, they are bound to hit the target. There are others that would prefer a limited number of darts, but moving closer to the target.

Our roster needs both depth (high number of picks) and talent (choices higher in the draft). Do we opt to fill the roster with lots of depth but non-starters? Or should we target starters and rely on UDFA for depth?

If we are picking #3, well we aren't getting much higher. But with no third round pick, it would be nice if we can package some of the picks to move up into the third round.
We might also be  
TommyWiseau : 11/13/2018 6:13 pm : link
Getting a 5th for Kennard according to projections
Not Hankins  
Anakim : 11/13/2018 8:27 pm : link
Ogletree.
A mock? Why didn't you say so!  
Anakim : 11/13/2018 9:35 pm : link
First round - QB Justin Herbert (Oregon)

Second round - OT Dalton Risner (Kansas State)

Fourth round - ILB Germaine Pratt (NC State)

Fourth round - TE Zach Gentry (Michigan)

Fourth round - IOL Some Guy (no idea where)

Fifth round - FS Nas Adderly (Delaware)

Fifth round - RB Qadree Ollison (Pittsburgh)

Sixth round - CB Derrick Baity Jr. (Kentucky)

Seventh round - WR Jazz Ferguson (Northwestern State)

Seventh round - OLB/EDGE Jabari Zuniga (Florida)
Anak  
Larry in Pencilvania : 11/13/2018 9:39 pm : link
You forgot the fourth round QB
People  
Jerry in DC : 11/13/2018 10:02 pm : link
really overrate draft picks and underestimate how many busts there are. That draft is pretty solid. Pro bowl DE, solid ol starter and a several other contributing role players is pretty good, especially from the 25 slot.

Obviously not an all timer or anything. But it's decent. I would suggest that people take a look at random drafts from other teams. There are busts all over the place and a very low success rate in the late rounds.
No draft compensation for trades  
GeoMan999 : 11/14/2018 9:00 am : link
Trading Jenkins or OV in the offseason does not factor into the compensatory pick calculation.

If they chose not to resign Collins that would count.
RE: What a terrible draft  
giants#1 : 11/14/2018 9:15 am : link
In comment 14176877 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
Two legit players and one guy who played a key historical role for one moment.


Tyree was more than just that play. He was an excellent special teams player for most of his career. Wasn't a factor as a WR outside of the helmet catch, but if you get that quality of a ST player with every 6th round pick, you're ahead of the curve.

As for the draft overall, I'd probably give it a B+ largely due to where they were drafting (25th each round) and Diehl. A 10 year starting OL is outstanding value for a 5th round pick and Osi was obviously a great pick.

Shiancoe wasn't 'great' but he was probably close to average value for a 3rd round pick. If he wasn't behind Shockey and/or they kept him on a 2nd contract it would've been very good value for the slot.

The rest was pretty bad, but getting a pro-bowler, 10 year starter, ST star and solid TE depth out of a draft is a solid return.

That said, the 2018 draft looks much better, though you'd expect that since they were picking #2. Even so, getting (potentially) an all-pro, 2 long term starters (Hernandez/Hill) and LB depth (Carter) from just 6 picks is very good. And I think all those guys can exceed those projections.
Draft  
Archer : 11/14/2018 9:17 am : link
Hopefully the extra picks will help the Giants to avoid drafting players too early
They have the luxury of letting the draft come to them

I feel that a team gets in trouble by falling in love with a player and having to draft him earlier than anticipated

The extra picks allow the Giants to stay true to their board without fear of losing a preferred player
Based upon OTC  
Archer : 11/14/2018 9:19 am : link
The Giants may get an additional 5 th round
....  
Britt in VA : 11/14/2018 9:25 am : link
Quote:
* Sixth round. (211th) WR David Tyree. Super Bowl champion in 2007. 54 career receptions in 5 years for the Giants, but ... THE ONE catch! Not a great career. But ... a great Giant.


A lot of people forget what a great special teams player Tyree was. He made the NFL All Rookie Team for it in 2003, and was an All Pro and Pro Bowler for it in 2005.
True.  
Beezer : 11/14/2018 9:37 am : link
I did forget that, but reminded, yes ... a very good ST'er.
Back to the Corner