Is a win really so bad? By all indications this isn’t really a strong year for QB prospects anyway, and I’m sure we will still be in position to draft a top defender or o-lineman. I think 2020 should be the year we look towards drafting a QB.
Football seasons have such a finite amount of games to experience. This game was fun, and I enjoy any wins the Giants can muster. I don’t believe winning really hurts us draft-wise this season, so let’s enjoy the wins.
I look all year to these games, and I can’t fathom being upset with a win in a game as exciting as this.
Thank-you Sy.
Moew importantly, the Giants are still trying to win games while the Raiders are openly tanking.
Exactly. Especially with a new regime.
Wins = progress. This isn’t the nba and even then, the win still goes a long way.
The giants have been mired in a shit bath. They simply have to win and right the ship or it won’t improve. Win games. That’s it.
That s not really foolish...... is it?
Amen brother.
Keep evaluating, keep teaching. Loved the piece by Spielman about Shurmur showing Barkley other great RBs running North/South. He sure did it today.
Seemed Brown and Hernandez were opening holes today that Barkley could use.
In order to improve the Giants need to make major changes
Subtle tweaks will not work
Winning not only reduces the chance of getting a premiere player but it reinforces a false narrative
In two weeks the Giants draft position has gone from 1 to 5-6
The Jets now draft before the Giants
I hate when the Giants lose, but, I hate more the thought of having to go through another year of this awful play
I am in favor of anything that makes the Giants a championship team
Exactly. My philosophy as a fan in a season like this is I want to win each week, but I don't get worked up over a loss
And it looks like Chubb and Fitzpatrick will be stud All PRo or at least Pro Bowl types as well. Both of those guys were rated ahead of the QBs if peopel were being honest.
IMO forcing a QB pick is always a mistake.
Lastly without a solid OL you arent winning shit.
Name the QB better than Andrew Luck since he was drafted. No OL and no running back. BPA again. and with the studs coming out on the DL its need meets rating thankfully again this year
Yes this horse is beat to death but Reese and his staff rarey found them. Reese and Ross were horrific after RD one and were hit and miss there. Gettleman's first draft seems to have been good to very good. He does well again this team will be OK
But the Reese drove the franchise into the mess its in.
Statistically the earlier a player is drafted the greater chance of his being an impact player
This has been documented and is empirical
There are always teams that are outliers and they are successful despite drafting low this is the exception and not the norm
The best way to improve a team is through the draft so draft position is important
Statistically the earlier a player is drafted the greater chance of his being an impact player
This has been documented and is empirical
There are always teams that are outliers and they are successful despite drafting low this is the exception and not the norm
The best way to improve a team is through the draft so draft position is important
None of this changes the fact that the last GM sucked.
Every other team found players and yest starter level players all over the draft. Reese after RD 1 barely found special teamers.
Its this type of excuse that people used to alibi for the last group. Your post is an over simplification.
Quote:
I think the hope going forward should be for more wins as well as smart picks regardless of draft position. Teams like the Saints seem to find premier players no matter where they are drafting. I dont think a high pick guarantees anything.
Yes this horse is beat to death but Reese and his staff rarey found them. Reese and Ross were horrific after RD one and were hit and miss there. Gettleman's first draft seems to have been good to very good. He does well again this team will be OK
But the Reese drove the franchise into the mess its in.
A lot of it is scouting too......Scouts have a tough job, but in order to find those late rounders that can be contributors the Scouts have to really have an eye for talent.
By the way I was rooting for . a victory today. I m convinced Giants are not going quarterback in first round and this season that is only thing that would get me rooting for losses at this pt.
Now if they lose next two, at 9'losses I might be back rooting for losses.
NEVER....
root for a loss.
EVER.
Quote:
In comment 14182601 Keaton028 said:
Quote:
I think the hope going forward should be for more wins as well as smart picks regardless of draft position. Teams like the Saints seem to find premier players no matter where they are drafting. I dont think a high pick guarantees anything.
Yes this horse is beat to death but Reese and his staff rarey found them. Reese and Ross were horrific after RD one and were hit and miss there. Gettleman's first draft seems to have been good to very good. He does well again this team will be OK
But the Reese drove the franchise into the mess its in.
A lot of it is scouting too......Scouts have a tough job, but in order to find those late rounders that can be contributors the Scouts have to really have an eye for talent.
Agree. along with marrying skill set to scheme. But lets face it. late rounders is 4th or even 5ht round or later. The parade of stiffs in Rds 2 and 3 were a hallmark of Reese and Ross. Jernigan Hosely Marvin Austin etc
Draft picks are equity that can used or traded for other assets
There is a value to each selection
A team has a better chance to improve with more and better picks
No, it's not, and I will tell you why:
1) With each win, we miss on valuable time to potentially evaluate Lauletta;
2) With each win, this coaching staff and GM potentially believe that Eli is the answer in 2019, so we will endure another horrific season next year; and
3) The top prospects often resided at the top of the draft. That is not always the case, but it is often the case. You think you're getting a guy like Bosa or Williams between 5-10? Because that is where we are headed right now.
2) 2019 might not be the year to get a QB. Seems to be a weak pool.
3) The Giants will likely still be picking within the top ten range anyway
I say enjoy the wins when they come.
However, I AM worried that if we string a few wins together at the end, the Giants FO will misinterpret the season and think the team is relatively fine, just in need of a few tweaks.
Draft picks are equity that can used or traded for other assets
There is a value to each selection
A team has a better chance to improve with more and better picks
No one is saying that more and higher picks are not more valuable. The stats alos show most players picked don't make it. Cleveland has had all kinds of early picks due to trades. Why do they still suck? You need to pick the right players. Something even the best GMs and scouts don't always do
Quote:
is downright foolish.
No, it's not, and I will tell you why:
1) With each win, we miss on valuable time to potentially evaluate Lauletta;
2) With each win, this coaching staff and GM potentially believe that Eli is the answer in 2019, so we will endure another horrific season next year; and
3) The top prospects often resided at the top of the draft. That is not always the case, but it is often the case. You think you're getting a guy like Bosa or Williams between 5-10? Because that is where we are headed right now.
Greedy or Jonah? Both should be there between 5-10.
That's really what this comes down to. Fans want the feel good and will use any justification they can to argue for it. It's fine for fans to fell that way, but arguing that it's also good football management is what people take objection to.
That s not really foolish...... is it?
What about the teams that started off a season badly only to see those same teams rip off 8 in a row while salvaging something tangible? Do we ignore those teams?