Dan Duggan just tweeted this - promoting a film review session with Geoff Schwartz in the Atlantic -- and I'm scratching my head over it. Haven't we been preached to - relentlessly for years now - that an Offensive line has to work & gel together? WTF?
Dan Duggan @DDuggan21
OL coach Hal Hunter said last week that their approach with Nate Solder is "You're on your own, big boy." That was the case against Khalil Mack on Sunday and Solder was up to the challenge. ... |
link to tweet - (
New Window )
We have a poor offensive line and Wheeler needs more help sometimes, that is how I am taking it.
Not that I'm a huge fan of Hunter's, but not sure what there is to see here besides Geoff Schwartz trying to self promote himself again.
I feel like like the OL is one good to great player away from stability assuming the depth is retained going into 2019.
This doesn't say anything about the teamwork along the line or in the run game.
And another realization that judging things way too soon is moronic
And another realization that judging things way too soon is moronic
What exactly has DG fucked up? Stewart? Didn’t like the signing, but understood his reasons. Solder? we needed an OLT desperately. The money was ridiculous, but that’s today’s NFL economics.
Omameh? Yes. Ogletree? Loved the trade, and gets too much shit, imo. Looks like a very good draft, but time will tell..He turned over 60% of the roster.
He’s the only GM in the NFL who has made a mistake or two
And another realization that judging things way too soon is moronic
I'm in the minority that liked the DG hiring, but he deserves all the sh!t he's gotten for the Stewart, Omameh and even Martin signings.
Solder was a definite overpay, even with Solder's improved play the last few games, but they were pretty desperate thanks to Reese's OL failures.
Also was pretty clear that Solder forced him back which allowed Eli to step up into the pocket. The problem earlier in the year was that there was no place to step up into with the center/right guard play falling regularly for stunts.
The point was that they had to help the RT and slid the extra protection in that direction.
Too many, the book is already out on Shurmur, he stinks. Yet his 1-7 team is now 4-8 and looking better.
Fans have always been unduly influence by the last thing they ve seen and they always will be.
Game threads are perfect example. It s why fans while fun to engage should,never be taken too seriously
We have a penchant for stating our opinions as facts and the facts change as we change our opinions.
Too many, the book is already out on Shurmur, he stinks. Yet his 1-7 team is now 4-8 and looking better.
Fans have always been unduly influence by the last thing they ve seen and they always will be.
Game threads are perfect example. It s why fans while fun to engage should,never be taken too seriously
We have a penchant for stating our opinions as facts and the facts change as we change our opinions.
There's some truth in what you're saying, but it's perfectly reasonable to be on the fence about Shurmur. He's not some young rookie learning the ropes. He's 14-31 for his coaching career and there's plenty of in-game moves to second-guess.
And their record isn't an indicator of much. It's plain as day that they've gotten fat off some really bad teams, but the optimist can choose to see it any way they want. I'm sure there are people who think winning against Chicago is some sort of statement win, but for me it's the same as beating Denver last year. They got some good breaks, and Chicago didn't have their starter in at QB.
Quote:
Is what fans as a whole do. Even when proven wrong it will not prevent them from doing it the very next chance they get.
Too many, the book is already out on Shurmur, he stinks. Yet his 1-7 team is now 4-8 and looking better.
Fans have always been unduly influence by the last thing they ve seen and they always will be.
Game threads are perfect example. It s why fans while fun to engage should,never be taken too seriously
We have a penchant for stating our opinions as facts and the facts change as we change our opinions.
There's some truth in what you're saying, but it's perfectly reasonable to be on the fence about Shurmur. He's not some young rookie learning the ropes. He's 14-31 for his coaching career and there's plenty of in-game moves to second-guess.
And their record isn't an indicator of much. It's plain as day that they've gotten fat off some really bad teams, but the optimist can choose to see it any way they want. I'm sure there are people who think winning against Chicago is some sort of statement win, but for me it's the same as beating Denver last year. They got some good breaks, and Chicago didn't have their starter in at QB.
Belichick Cleveland record including 1st year in NE the year before Brady took over 43-55
I m undecided about Shurmur. But not convinced he s a bust
And another realization that judging things way too soon is moronic
Lol - Even Gettleman realized Gettleman made some serious errors and cut 2/5 of the opening day starters mid-season. Not to mention moving a very decent back-up center, and having to rely on the incomparible Spencer Pulley.
I genuinely give him credit for cutting his losses and seeking better players, but that churn and burn approach is not without consequences to the cap with dead money or the continuity and evaluation of the team.
Gettleman deserves plenty of flack for Omameh and Flowers, and no one who thought those were dead ends looks foolish.
And another realization that judging things way too soon is moronic