Caller on postgame ripped ownership and blamed Chris Mara in part. Papa went off on him, cited people from “that Big Blue Interactive group” who blame Chris Mara for the state of the roster and said they have no clue what they’re talking about. According to Papa, when Parcells and Coughlin went elsewhere, the first guy they called was Chris Mara. Nevertheless, Papa said he didnt make the final call on anyone, and the state of the roster cant be laid at his doorstep.
a) after a loss
b) eli has a bad game
c) combo of A and B.
a) after a loss
b) eli has a bad game
c) combo of A and B.
So essentially you?
In comment 14222155 dep026 said:
a) after a loss
b) eli has a bad game
c) combo of A and B.
Because if it’s only posters who post after a and b of your statement, that is you included.
Because if it’s only posters who post after a and b of your statement, that is you included.
The voices are a little louder in my scenarios. Check the poster above you.
"It depended on if they knew what they were doing," he said. "Were they experienced enough to have a good opinion? You listen to people whose opinions you respect."
When Chris Mara told Parcells that Dave Meggett could help the Giants in 1989, Parcells was skeptical. Meggett was 5'7", and the Giants already had a 5'7" running back in Joe Morris. Parcells was adamant—he did not want another back who couldn't pass protect or function as a receiver. But Mara kept working him.
"Meggett could help on third downs," Mara told him. "He can return punts. He can return kicks. You could develop a role for him."
Parcells respected Mara. He listened. He relented.
Meggett was voted an All-Pro three times and ended his career with the most punt-return yards in history. After Parcells left the Giants to become coach of the Patriots, he signed Meggett in New England.
How NFL Teams Really Make Their Draft Picks - ( New Window )
a) after a loss
b) eli has a bad game
c) combo of A and B.
This is 100% correct
Thrown in there is one of the worst years in franchise history.
But no, the Vice president of player personnel shouldn't be criticized.
He responded to a caller who brought it up. And I’m glad he did because this board is fucking clueless about many things, personnel decision being at the top of the list.
Do a word search and see how often Chris Mara is mentioned on BBI. He’s rarely mentioned here. And maybe Papa is right, and Chris Mara has little input on personnel decisions, but then why the fuck is he the SVP of Personnel?
You can’t have it both ways. You can’t say that Chris Mara has little input on personnel decisions and then say he is qualified for his position. The problem many have with him is that he can never be fired, no matter how shitty the roster gets.
A - a quality analyst who isn't listened to, by two different regimes, which begs the question of why
B - a token figure with a fancy title
C- a guy with a real leadership position who is part of the problem.
take your pick. Whoever holds the de facto position, regardless of actual title is part of the problem. So either CM is the man who matches the title, or he's a guy with an empty title. Bob can't say he's the former and say he escapes a lot of responsibility for this team.
Good post fkap. That's basically how I see it.
Thrown in there is one of the worst years in franchise history.
But no, the Vice president of player personnel shouldn't be criticized.
Yup. We’re the browns but we have Lombardis so we’re not a total laughing stock.
And to be fair, I don't know if you should expect that given his job title.
As to what Chris Mara is or isn't - it's hard to take anything the Giants do seriously when they relieve TC, Reese and Ross of their responsibilities but he's sitting there with a Sr VP of Pro Personnel title. If it's a title in name only, there'd be no problem in reassigning him. If he's actually responsible for decisions on players, he's every bit as responsible for this shitshow as anyone else.
The real focus should be on the small subset of Giants FANS complaining on an internet message board about it. That’s the real problem.
Bob Papa vs. BBI - ( New Window )
The real focus should be on the small subset of Giants FANS complaining on an internet message board about it. That’s the real problem.
It wasn’t a focus, it was a response to a caller. Why is this so difficult for people to understand? This was something brought to his attention, he didn’t seek it out.
Quote:
He responded to a caller who brought it up. And I’m glad he did because this board is fucking clueless about many things, personnel decision being at the top of the list.
Do a word search and see how often Chris Mara is mentioned on BBI. He’s rarely mentioned here. And maybe Papa is right, and Chris Mara has little input on personnel decisions, but then why the fuck is he the SVP of Personnel?
You can’t have it both ways. You can’t say that Chris Mara has little input on personnel decisions and then say he is qualified for his position. The problem many have with him is that he can never be fired, no matter how shitty the roster gets.
He has no say, *but*, he's the first guy that Parcells and Coughlin wanted in their FO. Then, went on to say that he's part of the drafting and evaluation process, but since he doesn't sign on the bottom line he's not responsible.
Papa hopped in the company truck and mowed down logic during that call.
Bob obviously reads the posts here. He probably logged on one day when there was a thread about Chris Mara
His call of the game-clinching play was pretty bad also. For a very awkward moment it was like he forgot Brady's 2nd heave to Moss was on 4th down.
He's not a very good play by play man.
Is that it?
Then lets rip this DMF.
What the fu*k do you think he would say? "Chris Mara is a stooge who only works for the Giants because he can't get a job doing the same thing anywhere else?"
Yea, that would go over well.
C'mon. This isn't even worthy of being called "news".
What the fu*k do you think he would say? "Chris Mara is a stooge who only works for the Giants because he can't get a job doing the same thing anywhere else?"
Yea, that would go over well.
C'mon. This isn't even worthy of being called "news".
I don't think it was defending Mara that got this here, it's that Papa decided to pin it on BBI.
As if BBI is where bashing the Mara's for being incompetent got it's start. Maybe Bob's never been to a tailgate?
I have been talking about this over and over
Chris Mara became Senior Vice President of Player Personnel in 2011.
Since then this franchise has been mostly terrible
The fact is this franchise is a mess and has replaced coaches and GMs yet CHRIS MARA CAN'T BE FIRED
I wonder what the handles of there operatives are? Do they have meetings on what to post?
Go!
We’re only what? 8 players away from a good defense ?
In Japan it is Monday, et.
There are two thing you can get concensus on
1. Buy a Weber grill
2. Chris Mara sucks
But then he says Chris Mara is such a great talent evaluator that Parcells and Coughlin were essentially desperate to hire him.
So what Papa is suggesting is that many of the personnel problems would be solved if Chris Mara was actually in charge. And if John Mara ever figures this out this organization will soar.
Let’s hope Papa has a good working relationship with his employer, the Maras, and finally makes this brilliant recommendation.
Papa is dead on about a lot of people on the board being morons as to how the team is run and a lot of the jackasses who are guilty of said behavior flock here to rip on Papa.
There's probably not much debate that Papa and Banks are the two most plugged in guys to the team and who have been professional broadcasters for years. Both have praised the team and both have been critical of the team.
But then again - we are talking about a board who has mischaracterized Gettleman and Shurmur as "Yes men", and who think ownership had a mandate to keep Eli Manning and build around him.
Is Papa right that a lot of BBI'ers are clueless about the organization? Definitely.
And not surprisingly, there's a couple "Jints Central" mentions here, which is probably one source of the jackassery he refers to.
This site is great. I love it. Having said that, there are too many over-reactive fans here at times. I have to skim threads to find ones that are worthwhile discussions of football. Too many experts. Not enough facts. Not enough rational discussion.
Not sure how many people really listen to Bob. I listen to the radio broadcast and I also listen to him in the mornings on Sirius. He is often critical of the team. He is not criticizing ownership of course and maybe because he believes the players and coaches are responsible for the performance on the field. I have also heard him criticize draft picks and free agent signings in the past.
If anyone (not talking specifically to you Dan) here thinks Bob is going to go on some rant destroying the Giants then that is not realistic.
FYI.. If I did that openly about my employer they would probably can my ass too and I am not on the radio or TV.
Quote:
think he's a very good listen. Is he a homer, of course. I don't care.
Not sure how many people really listen to Bob. I listen to the radio broadcast and I also listen to him in the mornings on Sirius. He is often critical of the team. He is not criticizing ownership of course and maybe because he believes the players and coaches are responsible for the performance on the field. I have also heard him criticize draft picks and free agent signings in the past.
If anyone (not talking specifically to you Dan) here thinks Bob is going to go on some rant destroying the Giants then that is not realistic.
FYI.. If I did that openly about my employer they would probably can my ass too and I am not on the radio or TV.
I'm on the same page as you. I think he often is more critical than many here give him credit for. He's not just a mouthpiece for Giants ownership.
Having said that, he tends to be more conservative in his criticism than most all Giants fans, and with good reason.
Gotta do something to keep the base interested until the team turns around.
Not insinuating that Eric had a thing to do with it.