who do you want back on defense?

Chandler's coverage skills and Riley's ferocious hitting are hard to replace.

maybe Collins if the price is right.

Hill, Tomlinson, Carter, Davis, Ogletree, maybe Collins if reasonable.

seems to be getting better.

seriously! lol

In comment 14239314 LeftHook said:

Quote:

seriously! lol

Your sarcasm detector is malfunctioning

I'd like Jenkins back. I think they'll have trouble replacing him.

The Giants defense can’t make critical plays. The guys who are paid to step up in game changing situations (Vernon) can’t. The defense has no playmakers... any of these clowns can be replaced.

He’s horrible.

The real question is who do you not bring back. I’m getting rid of OV without any hesitation. Yeah, I’m keeping the Jackrabbit because he’s fine if there’s a pass rush. I’m franchising Collins because, why fucking not? We really need a playmaker from the draft because right now we have a lot of JAGs and a few decent players but no one who can really turn a game around.

Because they are just fine

Have to make some kind of argument for Stupar & Riley

huge hits this season. but has missed a lot of tackles, covers like a swiss chese blanket. and the play today - wtf?

has played well in spots, but not equal to the contract

.

In comment 14239305 PetesHereNow said:

Quote:

Hill, Tomlinson, Carter, Davis, Ogletree, maybe Collins if reasonable.

Add Jackrabbit, Haley, Goodson, McIntosh and Mauro.

In comment 14239444 section125 said:

Quote:

In comment 14239305 PetesHereNow said: Quote: Hill, Tomlinson, Carter, Davis, Ogletree, maybe Collins if reasonable. Wynn Add Jackrabbit, Haley, Goodson, McIntosh and Mauro.

Don't want to see Webb. Plain stinks. Riley is bad and his attempt at a tackle or lack of on Dallas TE TD today speaks volumes. Barwin needs to go.

...blown 2-minute leads against Dallas at home are as mortal a fucking sin as a Giant defense can commit.

Ask again at draft time.

His production is not commensurate with his contract. But releasing him creates another hole to fill on a team that has more holes than can be patched. He has no roster bonus that forces our decision on him in the short term. I hold on to him and approach him to restructure. He can keep all the money that is coming to him, but he has to earn it. I would attach a $100K game day RB. If he plays all 16 games, then he makes $1.6M. Attach incentives based on his sack production. 8 sacks - $500K; 12 sacks - $1M; 15 sacks - $1.5M and so on. Fumbles, interceptions, etc. tack in on. But the restructure would lower his salary to $10M. If he wants his $15M, then earn it.

If he doesn't agree to a restructure, then we try and trade him. 3rd rounder? If we can't get a pick, then just eat the $8M in dead money and wish him well.

Vernon is a disappointment but our best pass rusher. The giants should try to keep him at fair value.

Probably in the 4-8 million range. I don't see why a team would trade for him.

He has to accept a salary cut to stick and accept incentives to make some of his salary.

He is not making anywhere close to what he is making now elsewhere in the league.

Stay the course..continuity

In comment 14239400 arniefez said:

Quote:

He’s horrible.

i'm onboard with this, if you take away his 3 interceptions he had just about as bad a year as a LB can have. He cant tackle and he cant cover