I'd be frustrated by Fiz's line-up management. Obviously he knows way more about basketball than I do, but regardless, I cannot for the life of me understand what he is doing late in some of these games.
It seems like Mudiay just doesn't play well in Denver. How many times has Timmy been stripped on a key play late in a game? The Knicks should lie to Knox and tell him it's the first quarter throughout the game.
That all said, I guess it's easy to whine during a rebuilding year. Hopefully the young guys keep improving.
But can we please unload some of this dead weight? Kanter, THJ, Lance Thomas, Courtney Lee...Let them go to contenders.
I'm guessing no one wants their contracts. THJ in particular.
I think they wait for February, but given the Bulls apparent preference for guys who don't play defense and like to chuck up a TON of 3s, Hardaway for Parker makes a ton of sense for both teams.
Chicago gets their long term "2/3" combo guy and the Knicks get a big expiring (remember that Parker's contract isn't really a 2 year deal, but is a one year deal with a team opt out).
I don't think there's anyway the Bulls deal Parker for Hardaway
straight up without the Knicks including a future first. They structured the Parker deal the way that they did to maximize cap space moving forward so I don't see why they would forego it for Tim Hardaway Jr of all players. Especially since LaVine is locked in for the foreseeable future at the 2.
RE: I don't think there's anyway the Bulls deal Parker for Hardaway
straight up without the Knicks including a future first. They structured the Parker deal the way that they did to maximize cap space moving forward so I don't see why they would forego it for Tim Hardaway Jr of all players. Especially since LaVine is locked in for the foreseeable future at the 2.
A lot of good it did them last year. They had cap space they couldn't give away- and were only able to get Parker to bite when no one else would give Parker a deal.
RE: RE: I don't think there's anyway the Bulls deal Parker for Hardaway
straight up without the Knicks including a future first. They structured the Parker deal the way that they did to maximize cap space moving forward so I don't see why they would forego it for Tim Hardaway Jr of all players. Especially since LaVine is locked in for the foreseeable future at the 2.
A lot of good it did them last year. They had cap space they couldn't give away- and were only able to get Parker to bite when no one else would give Parker a deal.
I'm not saying they'll be able to put it to use but every couple of years it seems like Chicago is big game hunting in FA. Usually to fall short but they do go for it.
Now he's pushing the narrative that KP is gonna force his way out.
Quote:
At this point, the question isnt just whether the Knicks should offer Porzingis a max contract but also whether he should sign one. Because the word on Porzingis is that he loves New York but is skeptical about the Knicks. And who wouldnt be?
The team has been an awful mess for his entirety of the Latvians NBA career, shuffling in four coaches over four seasons with Mills representing the constant as either GM or president.
The Knicks record since Porzingis tore his ACL is 15-51, an indictment on the talent or lack thereof assembled by Mills. The prime of a players career lasts about 10 years. Porzingis has already wasted 1/3 of it on a team that hasnt sniffed the playoffs.
straight up without the Knicks including a future first. They structured the Parker deal the way that they did to maximize cap space moving forward so I don't see why they would forego it for Tim Hardaway Jr of all players. Especially since LaVine is locked in for the foreseeable future at the 2.
What about Frank and TH Jr for Parker? Don't really want to move frank but if it means ridding us of TH Jr I would consider it
Woah, digging the 2019 version of B.
Trier looked the best he has since coming back.
Knicks did not score last 4:27 of half. They have not won in Denver in 12 years.
Thx for the sarcasm B. Did I use the quote version properly
Hows my grammar ?
West coast offenses do suck
Trier looked the best he has since coming back.
Knicks did not score last 4:27 of half. They have not won in Denver in 12 years.
with kanter it is not about offense
Quote:
How's the new year treating you so far? Hope you're well!
Thx for the sarcasm B. Did I use the quote version properly
Hows my grammar ?
West coast offenses do suck
Wasn't being sarcastic, Earl. Hope you're doing well.
he is damn good but he gets away with a lot, he is damn good at using his elbows and pushing off and the refs miss it every time...
he is like the tall old guy at the park who cant move anymore but still has skills
hopefully kanter asks for a trade..
no reason to trade lance...
lee and hardaway absolutrly need to be traded
It seems like Mudiay just doesn't play well in Denver. How many times has Timmy been stripped on a key play late in a game? The Knicks should lie to Knox and tell him it's the first quarter throughout the game.
That all said, I guess it's easy to whine during a rebuilding year. Hopefully the young guys keep improving.
I'm guessing no one wants their contracts. THJ in particular.
▪️ORtg: 100.2
▪️DRtg: 118.4
▪️Net: -18.2
Kornet + Vonleh/Knox/THJ/Mudiay
▪️ORtg: 125.7
▪️DRtg: 102.8
▪️Net: +22.9
Quote:
But can we please unload some of this dead weight? Kanter, THJ, Lance Thomas, Courtney Lee...Let them go to contenders.
I'm guessing no one wants their contracts. THJ in particular.
I think they wait for February, but given the Bulls apparent preference for guys who don't play defense and like to chuck up a TON of 3s, Hardaway for Parker makes a ton of sense for both teams.
Chicago gets their long term "2/3" combo guy and the Knicks get a big expiring (remember that Parker's contract isn't really a 2 year deal, but is a one year deal with a team opt out).
A lot of good it did them last year. They had cap space they couldn't give away- and were only able to get Parker to bite when no one else would give Parker a deal.
Quote:
straight up without the Knicks including a future first. They structured the Parker deal the way that they did to maximize cap space moving forward so I don't see why they would forego it for Tim Hardaway Jr of all players. Especially since LaVine is locked in for the foreseeable future at the 2.
A lot of good it did them last year. They had cap space they couldn't give away- and were only able to get Parker to bite when no one else would give Parker a deal.
I'm not saying they'll be able to put it to use but every couple of years it seems like Chicago is big game hunting in FA. Usually to fall short but they do go for it.
Now he's pushing the narrative that KP is gonna force his way out.
The team has been an awful mess for his entirety of the Latvians NBA career, shuffling in four coaches over four seasons with Mills representing the constant as either GM or president.
The Knicks record since Porzingis tore his ACL is 15-51, an indictment on the talent or lack thereof assembled by Mills. The prime of a players career lasts about 10 years. Porzingis has already wasted 1/3 of it on a team that hasnt sniffed the playoffs.
Link - ( New Window )
What about Frank and TH Jr for Parker? Don't really want to move frank but if it means ridding us of TH Jr I would consider it