for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Gettleman and Eli Manning situation.

Josiah31 : 1/2/2019 8:13 pm
I know there’s a ton of posts about Eli. I haven’t seen any comments with this way of thinking. Anyone else think Gettleman is playing the media? Eli isn’t going anywhere. There’s no way that him and Shurmur are not on the same page. I also don’t buy that he needs to look at film before evaluating Eli. I think he’s just trying to get other GM’s that may want a QB to think we are drafting a QB so they will possibly trade up and select a player we never wanted in the first place. To me it’s so obvious. He pretty much said Eli played well once the OLine was settled. Talked about how we scored points, just didn’t defend. I’m pretty convinced we do not go QB this draft though.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Part of me wants to believe that DG is clouding his intentions  
Rjanyg : 1/2/2019 8:21 pm : link
And Eli is in on it and makes vague statements on WFAN, but I don’t buy it.

DG has to keep his cards close to the vest for many reasons. He can’t just come out and say “ we are going in a new direction “. He basically said he doesn’t know the field of options yet so he can formulate a plan until he has met with the coaches and evaluators.

I think if he thinks Eli is better than the options prior to Free Agency then he will hold onto him. He will draft a QB if he thinks he is worth the pick.
Still think Eli is the odds on favorite to start next season.  
Britt in VA : 1/2/2019 8:22 pm : link
.
RE: Part of me wants to believe that DG is clouding his intentions  
Josiah31 : 1/2/2019 8:25 pm : link
In comment 14245100 Rjanyg said:
Quote:
And Eli is in on it and makes vague statements on WFAN, but I don’t buy it.

DG has to keep his cards close to the vest for many reasons. He can’t just come out and say “ we are going in a new direction “. He basically said he doesn’t know the field of options yet so he can formulate a plan until he has met with the coaches and evaluators.

I think if he thinks Eli is better than the options prior to Free Agency then he will hold onto him. He will draft a QB if he thinks he is worth the pick.


Eli would do what’s best for the team. If Gettleman thought there was a player they could get with a little deception, Eli would follow. That’s my guess.
I don’t think...  
bw in dc : 1/2/2019 8:27 pm : link
Jints Central has the courage to cut the cord. There is just too much history and the sting of last year’s debacle still looms.

So I expect Eli to be back.

If they actually go the other direction, I’ll be shocked. And pleasantly surprised.
The idea that DG is playing some kind of 3D chess game  
twostepgiants : 1/2/2019 8:37 pm : link
And masking his intentions went out the window last year. He was an open book.
RE: The idea that DG is playing some kind of 3D chess game  
Giants38 : 1/2/2019 8:53 pm : link
In comment 14245153 twostepgiants said:
Quote:
And masking his intentions went out the window last year. He was an open book.


Agreed. DSG is incapable of playing a regular chess game, let alone a 3D chess game. He thinks this is 1968 football; he probably doesn't believe in chess. He's probably just playing checkers. That's why it is so hard to believe in our joke of a front office.
I don't think DG has a clue yet what he wants to do  
Jimmy Googs : 1/2/2019 9:30 pm : link
at QB/Eli until he is done assessing what the first 6 picks have to offer...
He doesn't have to play a chess game for the draft  
JOrthman : 1/2/2019 9:43 pm : link
Teams are going to think we a want a QB regardless if Eli is here or not.
Fans come up with some screwy theories  
joeinpa : 1/2/2019 10:17 pm : link
Gettleman was just being forthright, there were no games being played

Sometwhat you see or what you hear is what you get.

I don’t think Eli, Shurmur or Eli know how this is going to play out. They have preferences, but lots of moving parts.
You really don't understand DG  
ZogZerg : 1/2/2019 10:22 pm : link
..
Could the Giants get their  
Doomster : 1/2/2019 11:15 pm : link
QB with the 6th pick? Sure, if the planets are in the correct alignments, and our QB of choice is there at 6.....

But some GM passed the 6th round will trade up.....If the Golden Child is there...

This mentoring thing is so overblown......I think a good QB coach is more valuable.....

Eli's guaranteed money comes into play BEFORE THE DRAFT, also....
My take on all of this,  
colin : 1/2/2019 11:44 pm : link
(Full disclosure, I’m nothing more than a fan, and not a particularly smart one at that, who’s making a lot of assumptions) All of us are looking at this from a fans perspective, some overly sentimental when it comes to Eli, some of us fed up with him. The truth is, plain and simple, both DG and Eli have jobs and legacies to look out for.

DG’s job is to make this a winning franchise. That means a rebuild that will take time, which Eli is running out of. Eli may give them the best shot to win right now, but realistically, this team will not win anything significant right now.

Eli’s job, and legacy at some level, is contingent on winning right now. I think that’s what he approached Gettleman about. Can this franchise give Eli that opportunity?

I’m willing to bet that Gettleman told him that he wants him back, but on his terms. He can’t be willing to hemorrhage the future of the franchise for a long shot at creating a contender next year by trying quick fix FA signings, draft picks to compensate for a good, but no longer great QB who’s not in their long term plans, and keeping Eli’s contract as is. Gettleman has to think long term, Eli has to think immediate future.

Basically, Eli has to choose whether he thinks he can find immediate success another team, weather another year of probable mediocrity in a franchise that is planning for life after him, or retire. I think Eli, not DG, is the one who has to make the tough decision here.

Eli’s my favorite Giant I’ve ever gotten to watch play, and it infuriates me that the second half of his career was wasted through horrific front office decisions, but the time has come that the horrible front office decision would be to make Eli the focal point any longer. It’s not going to be a happy ending, but most endings rarely are. His brother is the exception, but even then, his career ended winning a Super Bowl, then kissing a pizza guy on national television who said the N word, so even that’s bitter sweet.
For the tl;dr crowd,  
colin : 1/2/2019 11:51 pm : link
I think Eli’s gotta decide does he want to go from franchise QB to a stop gap on a team that can’t offer him what he wants or needs to win, go somewhere he can contend, or retire.
Whoops  
colin : 1/3/2019 12:00 am : link
Kinda meant to put this on the “Eli on WFAN” thread. Still mildly coherent response, but just proving the “not particularly smart” thing, haha.
good post Colin  
plato : 1/3/2019 12:23 am : link
!
I believe DG was very open except when there was a need not to be  
baadbill : 1/3/2019 12:41 am : link
... and why in the world would he tell the public what his thinking is about Manning before he finishes dealing with Manning?

My goodness, he'd have to be a fucking idiot to tell everyone publicly his strategy for dealing with Manning. Duh.

As an aside, I am going to guess that his position with Manning will be: although Manning still has gas left in the tank, if he wants to still play for the NY Giants for another year, he's going to have to show he wants to win by helping with the cap situation and be willing to sacrifice financially (as far as I'm concerned, this is gravy time for Manning - he should be playing for free or go home... he doesn't need the money... and the team clearly can proceed without him in 2019... so if he wants to play in 2019 for the NYG he needs to take a radical pay cut to create cap space).
What's a radical paycut?  
BlueLou'sBack : 1/3/2019 2:06 am : link
Going from 17 mil to 12? to 7? Even less, 4?
RE: RE: The idea that DG is playing some kind of 3D chess game  
Giantology : 1/3/2019 5:31 am : link
In comment 14245190 Giants38 said:
Quote:
In comment 14245153 twostepgiants said:


Quote:


And masking his intentions went out the window last year. He was an open book.



Agreed. DSG is incapable of playing a regular chess game, let alone a 3D chess game. He thinks this is 1968 football; he probably doesn't believe in chess. He's probably just playing checkers. That's why it is so hard to believe in our joke of a front office.


DSG... hmmm, what was your last handle?
The pay cut idea makes no sense...  
Scuzzlebutt : 1/3/2019 8:03 am : link
Who are they going to sign to a 1 year deal for less money than the cap savings from cutting Eli?
RE: RE: The idea that DG is playing some kind of 3D chess game  
LakeGeorgeGiant : 1/3/2019 8:06 am : link
In comment 14245190 Giants38 said:
Quote:
In comment 14245153 twostepgiants said:


Quote:


And masking his intentions went out the window last year. He was an open book.



Agreed. DSG is incapable of playing a regular chess game, let alone a 3D chess game. He thinks this is 1968 football; he probably doesn't believe in chess. He's probably just playing checkers. That's why it is so hard to believe in our joke of a front office.


You are a sad little man.

DG mentioned the cap in his presser  
mattlawson : 1/3/2019 8:31 am : link
If he wants to give Eli a 2 year extension and a team friendly deal to build “sustained success” then that’s what he’ll do.

The field of options is not clear yet.
Great..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 1/3/2019 8:31 am : link
the DSG fuckhead is back.

For the uninformed, this tool created the derogatory term DSG for some unknown fucking reason.
here's how I read the situation  
dd in Mass : 1/3/2019 8:39 am : link
Even though people on here will disagree. DG can be cold blooded, he will cut bait with anyone to improve the team.

So as far as Eli is concerned, DG is waiting to see what his coaches and scouts have to say. If Shurmur wants Eli back, then he gets Eli to restructure to reduce the cap hit. If Shurmur is fine with moving on, then I think DG will do what he can to get Eli on another team. This way if he leaves, it was a mutual decision in the best interest of all.

Eli is starting next year  
micky : 1/3/2019 8:45 am : link
To think otherwise is being naive
RE: My take on all of this,  
bigbluehoya : 1/3/2019 8:45 am : link
In comment 14245398 colin said:
Quote:
(Full disclosure, I’m nothing more than a fan, and not a particularly smart one at that, who’s making a lot of assumptions) All of us are looking at this from a fans perspective, some overly sentimental when it comes to Eli, some of us fed up with him. The truth is, plain and simple, both DG and Eli have jobs and legacies to look out for.

DG’s job is to make this a winning franchise. That means a rebuild that will take time, which Eli is running out of. Eli may give them the best shot to win right now, but realistically, this team will not win anything significant right now.

Eli’s job, and legacy at some level, is contingent on winning right now. I think that’s what he approached Gettleman about. Can this franchise give Eli that opportunity?

I’m willing to bet that Gettleman told him that he wants him back, but on his terms. He can’t be willing to hemorrhage the future of the franchise for a long shot at creating a contender next year by trying quick fix FA signings, draft picks to compensate for a good, but no longer great QB who’s not in their long term plans, and keeping Eli’s contract as is. Gettleman has to think long term, Eli has to think immediate future.

Basically, Eli has to choose whether he thinks he can find immediate success another team, weather another year of probable mediocrity in a franchise that is planning for life after him, or retire. I think Eli, not DG, is the one who has to make the tough decision here.

Eli’s my favorite Giant I’ve ever gotten to watch play, and it infuriates me that the second half of his career was wasted through horrific front office decisions, but the time has come that the horrible front office decision would be to make Eli the focal point any longer. It’s not going to be a happy ending, but most endings rarely are. His brother is the exception, but even then, his career ended winning a Super Bowl, then kissing a pizza guy on national television who said the N word, so even that’s bitter sweet.


I think this makes a lot of sense, especially in the context of both DG's (presser) and Eli's (WFAN) comments yesterday about "completely open and honest conversation" (or whatever the exact words were).

Reasonable minds could interpret it differently...what I took away from it was that there's clearly a path to Eli being the QB next season, and it's probably the path that DG and NYG most prefer, but it requires a bit of concession on Eli's part.
Don't think its very complex  
Dave on the UWS : 1/3/2019 9:13 am : link
The Giants would like Eli back for 2019, but not at his current salary.
RE: What's a radical paycut?  
baadbill : 1/3/2019 9:23 am : link
In comment 14245431 BlueLou'sBack said:
Quote:
Going from 17 mil to 12? to 7? Even less, 4?


Hey Lou. I would approach Eli as follows:

Quote:
Eli, the time has come for the NY Giants to address our future QB needs... to prepare for "life after Mannning". As part of that we are absolutely prepared to have you be part of that process and start 2019 as our starting QB and be the starting QB as long as we are in serious competition for the playoffs. But, we are also prepared to move on without Manning in 2019 if we are not on the same page regarding the following:

1. We are dedicated to 2019 being a "laying down of the foundation" for life after Manning. We want a commitment that you agree to be part of that process... be a mentor to your replacement about what it means to play QB in NYC and for the NYG on and off the field and what it means to have a personal commitment to the Giants organization "for life".

2. We are equally dedicated to building our team to be as competitive as we can so long as doing so squares with the long term interests of the team. In that regard, we expect the NYG to have a more competitive 2019 season than the 2018 season was. We would love to have you lead the Giants in a playoff run in 2019.

3. If you come back in 2019, it will not be because of the money. It will be because we are giving you an opportunity to announce your last year with the NY Giants before the season starts (because, btw, this will be your final year) and to allow you to have a "Goodbye Tour" for the Giants fans both here at home and in every city in the League. That is our offer to you so you can properly retire as a Giant.

Meanwhile, you re one of the richest human beings on earth today. You clearly do not need a penny more from the NY Giants and money is only a matter of pride, not necessity, for you at this point in life. In that regard, we expect you to work with me to adjust your salary so it is more cap friendly to enable us to improve the quality of the rest of the team.

In essence I want a commitment from you that you are not playing 2019 for reasons of money, but for your "last hoorah" - and that you agree to adjust your salary to anything we request and that the balance of your salary is donated to charity.

Those are my criteria. If you have strong objections to the monetary part, but you need to understand the monetary part is probably the one thing I will not budge on. If you, a multi-multi-millionaire feel that the reason you will play football is for money, then you need to go elsewhere. On the other hand, if you want to retire a NY Giant and have a chance to go out in class, then we are offering that to you.


My approach is based upon my belief, and based upon the assumption, that Manning's net worth is, at a minimum, several multiples of hundreds of millions of dollars... and that whatever compensation he is scheduled to earn playing football in 2019 would be a minuscule percentage of his overall net worth... that the compensation is more an ego thing than a financial need.
I'm just not sure what the upside of disinformation is  
jcn56 : 1/3/2019 9:34 am : link
Is it to hide draft intentions? Doesn't seem to be necessary, to be honest - there are enough holes on the team, and all he'd need to say is they haven't made any decision at QB yet. The roster bonuses are due well before the draft, so that'll be decided by that point anyway.

I don't think this was some kind of smoke screen.
None  
Photoguy : 1/3/2019 9:46 am : link
of us know what's going on behind the scenes. What we have here is a lot of conjecture.....which is ok, but MY belief is that this will all be addressed in due course. There's no need to speed up the process until Gettleman is done with his evaluations, and then discusses what should be the proper course with Shurmer and Manning.
If Shurmur wants Eli to stay and the team sucks in 2019, Shurmur  
Ivan15 : 1/3/2019 10:04 am : link
Is probably out. If The team does well with Eli in 2019, Shurmur’s firing is probably postponed until 2020 or 2021 as he develops Eli’s replacement.

At some point, Eli is injured, flops or retires.

If Eli retires or is released now, Shurmur has a job at least through 2020.
sorry  
giantfan2000 : 1/3/2019 10:10 am : link
the situation is simple and this

Eli might be worth keeping next year
but Eli making 22 million is NOT worth keeping next year.

Eli needs to take a serious pay cut for him to be starting QB of Giants next year

The cap hit has to be a huge issue here  
5BowlsSoon : 1/3/2019 10:11 am : link
I believe I read Eli is 23 m. That is a lot for a guy who is okay but not great anymore. However, it seems to me leaving out the cap issue the best thing for NY would be for Eli to play one more year here, then draft a qb in 2020, not in 2019.

This way we could draft two quality guys at one and two who fill huge needs. I don’t believe qb is a huge need for us next year. Eli is good enough....not great, but good enough.

Again, I’m leaving out the cap issue....which could easily change things.
Brutally Honest?  
Reale01 : 1/3/2019 10:20 am : link
Eli -
I can still play
The last 6 years have been a shit show
I need a better OL
The team needs a better defense
Are you committed to winning now?

Dave
We are rebuilding. We need to look at other options.
You are not part of the future. You are likely gone in 2020, 2021 at the latest.
We want you to be part of 2019
Your 2019 cap hit is too high and you will need to take a pay cut to stay. Otherwise keeping you hurts our future.
We may draft a successor - the better man will play as long as we are in contention.
We are committed to putting better players around you in 2019, but we are likely two years away.

Eli takes him to the low post:
Get me better protection and I will produce.
The OLs I have played behind before you came have sucked.
Even the "line" you put together sucked.
It got better but still needs work
BM was a joke as a coach/OC
Shurmer is better but it took him a while to figure things out.
I am not the problem.



I just find it  
Josiah31 : 1/3/2019 10:33 am : link
Hard to believe that Eli is done here. Like Eli or not, anyone of us fans could point the finger in other areas, specifically the horrible oline he played with the last 5 years and lately defense. You don’t force Eli to end his career without an announcement a few weeks before to allow him to say his goodbyes. I have no idea what they talked about behind closed doors, but he alluded to Eli wanting to talk. If anything, Eli is sick of losing and probably explained his desire to be traded if Giants couldn’t give him a good enough roster. I’m my opinion, Eli is holding the cards here and will decide if he plays in NY.
There are 4 possibilites. Pick your favorite  
HomerJones45 : 1/3/2019 10:49 am : link
A) The Les-Terps-bw plan
Cut Manning. Go get a fill-in for a year or two for a couple of million and either draft a qb or hope to find the next Kerry Collins. Use the savings to buy a player or two.

B. The mid-level plan
Pay Manning his roster bonus so he is on the roster at the draft. Try and get a qb in the first round and make a trade for Manning. If not, Manning plays out his contract. If so, cut Manning post June 1 for some cap relief.

C. The Contract plan
Manning plays out his contract. A raft of qb's are brought in to see if there are any possibilities for the year after in the hopes of finding a Kerry Collins.

D. The cap relief plan
Extend Manning by paying his $17 mill up front and add a couple of years at a modest dollar amount. Cap relief comes in the form of averaging over the extended term. Use cap relief to sign some players.

Tanney and Lauletta are expendable in all of these scenarios.
anything but D  
LG in NYC : 1/3/2019 11:23 am : link
but more likely A or B.

It doesn't appear there is a franchise level QB in this year's draft (at least not an obvious one), so you are either waiting until 2020... still think Kyle could be the future... or you are going to get a FA QB that you think can be the answer medium/long term.

But I do not see us drafting a QB in Rd 1 this draft.
i meant more likely  
LG in NYC : 1/3/2019 11:24 am : link
A or C
This is hysterically funny that a person living in america would write  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/3/2019 11:32 am : link
this.

'Meanwhile, you re one of the richest human beings on earth today. You clearly do not need a penny more from the NY Giants and money is only a matter of pride, not necessity, for you at this point in life. In that regard, we expect you to work with me to adjust your salary so it is more cap friendly to enable us to improve the quality of the rest of the team. '

I'd love to see your reaction if your employer hit you with something like this. Who doesn't love the boss that tells you what salary you 'need'.
RE: This is hysterically funny that a person living in america would write  
Britt in VA : 1/3/2019 11:43 am : link
In comment 14245899 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
this.

'Meanwhile, you re one of the richest human beings on earth today. You clearly do not need a penny more from the NY Giants and money is only a matter of pride, not necessity, for you at this point in life. In that regard, we expect you to work with me to adjust your salary so it is more cap friendly to enable us to improve the quality of the rest of the team. '

I'd love to see your reaction if your employer hit you with something like this. Who doesn't love the boss that tells you what salary you 'need'.


That's what I'm talking about lately.

People are living in reality when it comes to talking about the team. That's pure fantasy land.
Not only would I write it ... but that's the exact position I'd take  
baadbill : 1/3/2019 12:07 pm : link
with Manning... the point being... your time is up here unless you are willing to adjust your compensation to our needs ... and the fact is, he doesn't need the money ... any compensation he gets, he won't even notice it... his annual compensation to him would be the like paying you $10 - that is how much money he has already.
Furthermore, Manning is probably in a position where he either  
baadbill : 1/3/2019 12:09 pm : link
accepts the Giants terms to play football or he retires... the odds of his starting for another team probably are remote.
RE: Not only would I write it ... but that's the exact position I'd take  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/3/2019 12:18 pm : link
In comment 14245958 baadbill said:
Quote:
with Manning... the point being... your time is up here unless you are willing to adjust your compensation to our needs ... and the fact is, he doesn't need the money ... any compensation he gets, he won't even notice it... his annual compensation to him would be the like paying you $10 - that is how much money he has already.


I would guess that you believing that this is a solid form of negotiation is why you likely dont have a career in contracts.

"C'mon, you dont need all that money' gets you laughed out of the room.
hmmm  
giantfan2000 : 1/3/2019 12:34 pm : link
Quote:
"C'mon, you dont need all that money' gets you laughed out of the room.



yes that would get your laughed out of the room what Gettleman will say is

"Eli you are not WORTH the money anymore".
which is very different statement and will stop Eli's laughter

There's a reason..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 1/3/2019 12:37 pm : link
the Players Association has put protections in place to keep straight pay cuts from happening.

It is because the salary leverage is predominantly with the team. Players are only guaranteed their guaranteed money and salary in future year's is on paper only.

those protections aren't put in place for the Eli Mannings of the world, they are put in place fro the average player, but everyone is afforded those protections.

it is most definitely a laughable position to take
If you've ever had to negotiate anything  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/3/2019 12:43 pm : link
I can promise you that no agent is going to take you seriously if your points are "You don't need all that money" or "you're not worth ___"
RE: There are 4 possibilites. Pick your favorite  
bw in dc : 1/3/2019 12:46 pm : link
In comment 14245822 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
A) The Les-Terps-bw plan
Cut Manning. Go get a fill-in for a year or two for a couple of million and either draft a qb or hope to find the next Kerry Collins. Use the savings to buy a player or two.

B. The mid-level plan
Pay Manning his roster bonus so he is on the roster at the draft. Try and get a qb in the first round and make a trade for Manning. If not, Manning plays out his contract. If so, cut Manning post June 1 for some cap relief.

C. The Contract plan
Manning plays out his contract. A raft of qb's are brought in to see if there are any possibilities for the year after in the hopes of finding a Kerry Collins.

D. The cap relief plan
Extend Manning by paying his $17 mill up front and add a couple of years at a modest dollar amount. Cap relief comes in the form of averaging over the extended term. Use cap relief to sign some players.

Tanney and Lauletta are expendable in all of these scenarios.


I would say A could go two ways for me. I could live with the way you described it, but would personally prefer to draft a guy - this year, or even try Lauletta - so that player could immediately get the critical experience the position requires.

I've become less and less interested in trying to set-up these clean transition plans. Get in there, get live reps, take the lumps, and learn from real mistakes.
Here's the deal...  
baadbill : 1/3/2019 12:51 pm : link
Facts:
(1) DG & the Giants do not need Eli Manning in 2019.
(2) DG might be interested in Eli Manning in 2019 only if:
(a) Manning reduced his compensation to an extent that it made a major impact on cap space
(b) Manning convinced DG he was chomping at the bit for one thing - a shot at a 3rd Lombardi.

(3) $23 million dollars means zero to Manning's net worth. Not only is it no life changing money to him ... it is literally not noticeable to his overall net worth... it is chump change.

(4) Blue Lou asked me how much money would I expect Manning to agree as a reduction to his compensation package. DG undoubtedly can answer that - I cannot because I don't know about cap space. But I do know #3 above is true - that haggling with Manning about money when Manning doesn't give one shit about the money - only tells me Manning isn't serious about any burning desire to take one last shot at the SB - because if he was, he would tell me (DG) that the Giants can have all the reduction they need to help on the cap.

As a professional negotiator, when you hold all the cards, you play them and there is zero reason to bluff. You simply lay out your cards and tell the other side it is "take it or leave it" - and you do that because you honestly don't give a rats ass if they don't take it.

Lastly, I am in no way, shape or form indicating I believe Gettleman and the Giants will approach negotiations that way. I am saying that is how I have handled my negotiations as a litigator when I was trying cases. When I had a losing hand, I paid fair value to settle. When I had a winning hand, I laid down my terms and took a "take it or leave it position" - but made clear that I would not negotiate one penny off my terms. And I never did.
RE: There's a reason..  
baadbill : 1/3/2019 12:54 pm : link
In comment 14246010 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
the Players Association has put protections in place to keep straight pay cuts from happening.

It is because the salary leverage is predominantly with the team. Players are only guaranteed their guaranteed money and salary in future year's is on paper only.

those protections aren't put in place for the Eli Mannings of the world, they are put in place fro the average player, but everyone is afforded those protections.

it is most definitely a laughable position to take



Well, I know zero about the protections of the Union - they may very well make it impossible to negotiate on a take it or leave it basis. But I don't see why DG (who knows the cap savings he would want - unlike me) couldn't adopt a "take it or leave it" position with Manning on the money issue (whatever DG's bottom line is). My point being the money is relevant to Manning's agent, but it isn't relevant to Manning himself - at least not financially relevant to Manning.
They don't..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 1/3/2019 12:56 pm : link
hold all the cards since Eli is under contract.

If Eli wanted a paycut, he'll keep the guaranteed money if he's released. There is very little motivation for him to reduce his salary.

There isn't really a negotiation to be had. There is a decision on whether or not to release him and suffer the cap consequences.
baadbill...  
bw in dc : 1/3/2019 1:00 pm : link
I hate to nit-pick here by $23M is material to Eli's net worth. Even after taxes.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner