Just curious and saw a couple comments here and social media how Mack didn't show up much on the stat sheet. I didn't watch most of the game so I was wondering according to BBI how or what they did to hold Mack down? Was it a bad performance no show in the playoffs?
Or did he have a good game and people were just judging his games by the box score? Thanks. Wont delete if already posted.
At his age, his size, and his injury history, you gotta think he's gonna fall off that cliff soon. And he's had some down games this year. But by and large the guy is still getting it done at a high level.
Floyd had a bigger impact than Mack did
Close to dominant. Unfortunately, he disappeared during the Eagles game winning drive.
That was embarrassing. Two firsts plus no fat contract for a 27 year old when the team needs a rebuild. Doesn't look so stupid now. The guy is no Aaron Donald.
In comment 14252842
| At his age, his size, and his injury history, you gotta think he's gonna fall off that cliff soon. And he's had some down games this year. But by and large the guy is still getting it done at a high level.
Peters did an excellent job without a lot of help, mostly one-on-one, the Eagles O-line is so much better than the giants , itís ridiculous.
Peters and Foles threw the ball. Peters was reaching across Mack's body and had him by his shoulder pad in his armpit. No flag though.
against the Giants. He played last night, but nothing special. Saw a couple Bears games and frankly I don't see it.
He didnít have an excellent game and was largely neutralized early on, so I retract my post above. I thought he really started to make an impact In the 4th quarter, though. He really depends on his quickness and I am wondering whether heíd benefit from playing at a lower weight.
in his era, or Butkus either. These guys dominated . He makes plays but does not change game plans like those two did from that position. MO