for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

I have complete faith in our GM

superspynyg : 1/19/2019 9:22 am
I liked what he did in his first year. I think our 2018 draft was awesome. We got 3 starters and a very solid rotation guy. He wanted to solidify the lines and we are well on our way to do that. Hill is awsome I love that he used a third in the supplemental draft on Beal. He did not help us but I feel that he has the talent have been a 2nd round cb in the 2019 draft and we got him for a 3rd.

I like the way DG made trades and got us a lot of late round picks in this draft that we can use to move up should we want to.

I like most of the FA moves he made. While we missed out on our top choice for the oline. And he did take a swing and missed on Pat Omameh but he realized his mistake and cut him. I also think better of Solder than most of you. He is not pro bowl LT and we did overpay but he provides a veteran leader on a line that had none. I do think his play got better as the year went on. He also claimed OG Jamon Brown off waivers who I would love to have back on a 2 year deal. He helped the interior line and Eli's play went up as a result.

I cant wait to see what he does this off season.

I think the thing I like the most....  
Britt in VA : 1/19/2019 9:23 am : link
was his willingness to cut bait and make changes.
I'm cautiously optimistic.  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 1/19/2019 9:26 am : link
Giving him the benefit of the doubt. Time will tell.
No reason to think in absolutes  
CromartiesKid21 : 1/19/2019 9:34 am : link
Seems like just yesterday we were all parroting "In Reese We Trust"
Here’s what I’m hoping DG will do  
Earl the goat : 1/19/2019 9:35 am : link
Draft Haskins at 1
Draft Dalton Risner at 2
Sign Daryl Williams for RT
Use the rest of the cap space and draft capital on defense
Cut Vernon. Keep Jenkins
I’m optimistic  
UConn4523 : 1/19/2019 9:36 am : link
he did some good and some bad, but I think the good was more significant. Very interested to see how QB is handled this year and what he does to continue to bolster the two lines.

He had a mammoth of a task ahead of him last year, this wasn’t changing overnight.
I too have faith that the team picks up at least a couple of good  
Giants61 : 1/19/2019 9:38 am : link
O linemen and at least one strong pass rusher. I believe DG will not over draft by getting high risk high reward players like the previous regime. Gettleman seems to have a better understanding of team needs and a better eye for talent.
RE: Here’s what I’m hoping DG will do  
superspynyg : 1/19/2019 9:39 am : link
In comment 14268240 Earl the goat said:
Quote:
Draft Haskins at 1
Draft Dalton Risner at 2
Sign Daryl Williams for RT
Use the rest of the cap space and draft capital on defense
Cut Vernon. Keep Jenkins


Do expect him to cut Vernon. While he is not worth his contract he is the only pass rush we have. I think we keep him for 1 more year. We should still draft a ER this year though.
Enjoying watching the process  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 9:39 am : link
Looking forward to the all defense draft in 2019, free agent OLs ..and then the QB in 2020.
RE: I’m optimistic  
X : 1/19/2019 9:42 am : link
In comment 14268242 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
he did some good and some bad, but I think the good was more significant. Very interested to see how QB is handled this year and what he does to continue to bolster the two lines.

He had a mammoth of a task ahead of him last year, this wasn’t changing overnight.


Agree, what DG does with the QB situation will determine if he is a success or not.
I don’t think faith is the way to go here.  
eugibs : 1/19/2019 9:47 am : link
I favor a “trust, but verify” approach.
It's still a two year process  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 9:50 am : link
Otherwise you fail to work the market
His draft was good  
arniefez : 1/19/2019 9:51 am : link
if you're ok with a RB with the #2 pick. Everything else he did was absolutely horrible including cutting players who were better than their replacements. I have little to no faith that the Giants can compete in the 2019 NFL with this front office and this coaching staff. The NFL has become a high tech F1 sport and the Giants are driving an old pickup with 150,000 miles on it.
Not a fan of the signing, but he seemed to have drafted very  
Big Blue '56 : 1/19/2019 9:51 am : link
well. Cutting bait was a nice change of pace. I liked the Ogletree trade and the Solder pick up. I wasn’t concerned about the money paid to Solder because it’s the age of outrageous contracts and I’ve made peace with that.

I liked that he had a conviction on Beal by giving up a previous 3rd..

Yeah, he made mistakes as EVERY GM in the NFL DOES and will do..

On balance, a good first year here, imo
previous 3rd=precious 3rd  
Big Blue '56 : 1/19/2019 9:53 am : link
.
The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
Ira : 1/19/2019 9:54 am : link
left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?
RE: RE: I’m optimistic  
mfsd : 1/19/2019 9:54 am : link
In comment 14268250 X said:
Quote:
In comment 14268242 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


he did some good and some bad, but I think the good was more significant. Very interested to see how QB is handled this year and what he does to continue to bolster the two lines.

He had a mammoth of a task ahead of him last year, this wasn’t changing overnight.



Agree, what DG does with the QB situation will determine if he is a success or not.


+2

I like what he’s done to start changing the culture in year 1. This is hard to measure as a metric, but the way the team kept playing hard down the stretch was noticeably different that other recent losing seasons.

But as said above, his tenure will come down to the Eli transition. Can he set us up with a replacement, or will he leave us in his self described “QB hell”?
...  
christian : 1/19/2019 10:00 am : link
Of the free agents the Giants signed last year, Solder is the only one I'd file under "average" and with 34.8M in guarantees I'd sure hope so.

Omameh, Martin, Stewart, and Latimer all things considered had bad years.

Michael Thomas, Josh Mauro, BW Webb, Russel Shepard were serviceable but unremarkable.

With the number of holes on the roster and without the luxury of 4 top 70 picks, Gettleman has a very big offseason in front of him.
RE: Here’s what I’m hoping DG will do  
Beer Man : 1/19/2019 10:06 am : link
In comment 14268240 Earl the goat said:
Quote:
Draft Haskins at 1
Draft Dalton Risner at 2
Sign Daryl Williams for RT
Use the rest of the cap space and draft capital on defense
Cut Vernon. Keep Jenkins
Great, we've already create two additional holes on the D by trading away starters at DT and CB, now lets create two more holes by cutting our other starting CB and the teams only ER.
RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
christian : 1/19/2019 10:13 am : link
In comment 14268261 Ira said:
Quote:
left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?


That's a very troubling way to approach roster management.

The counter is the Giants were still 5-11, and now that average tackle at ages 31, 32, 33 will have cap hits of 17, 17, 18M.

The Giants could have stemmed the tied at LT with Flowers and Wheeler in 2018, and signed an average tackle like Donovan Smith for far less money this year.
I have no issues with DG so far...  
EricJ : 1/19/2019 10:14 am : link
1. Inherited a "knock down" in real estate terms
2. Did what he could in free agency with what was available on the market and based upon our cap space
3. Had a decent draft and it has been a while since we could say that.

If he continues to have decent drafts, then THAT is the key to our long term success. The poor drafts under Reese meant we had to try to over spend in free agency and we had no depth on the roster. It is like a leaky bucket.

Too many people here expected miracles in ONE off season. We had (and still are) a bad team. Barkley and OBJ are not enough to make us a contender.
Don't fall in love with the upside  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 10:22 am : link
Of having barks and Odell, tryingbto leverage that and therefore fail to rebuild the defensive core and defensive upside.

Otherwise, by start if the the transition era, you will be hamstrung or betrayed by crap D.
RE: RE: RE: I’m optimistic  
lax counsel : 1/19/2019 10:26 am : link
In comment 14268262 mfsd said:
Quote:
In comment 14268250 X said:


Quote:


In comment 14268242 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


he did some good and some bad, but I think the good was more significant. Very interested to see how QB is handled this year and what he does to continue to bolster the two lines.

He had a mammoth of a task ahead of him last year, this wasn’t changing overnight.



Agree, what DG does with the QB situation will determine if he is a success or not.



+2

I like what he’s done to start changing the culture in year 1. This is hard to measure as a metric, but the way the team kept playing hard down the stretch was noticeably different that other recent losing seasons.

But as said above, his tenure will come down to the Eli transition. Can he set us up with a replacement, or will he leave us in his self described “QB hell”?


Agreed, his tenure will largely be dictated by the qb position. He’s never had to draft a potential franchise qb as GM, so we don’t really know what he values in the position. Let’s see what he does, so far an incomplete on the job, made some decent moves and some had moves.
RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/19/2019 10:27 am : link
In comment 14268261 Ira said:
Quote:
left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?


If you need a car, you're not paying 80k for a pre-owned Lexus just because it's the only thing on the lot and you need a car. That's a bad way to look at things.
It’s the coaching staff I’m more worried about  
Ssanders9816 : 1/19/2019 10:28 am : link
.
RE: No reason to think in absolutes  
Dr. D : 1/19/2019 10:30 am : link
In comment 14268236 CromartiesKid21 said:
Quote:
Seems like just yesterday we were all parroting "In Reese We Trust"

Doesn't seem like yesterday to me. I know time flies, but that seems like a long time ago.
RE: RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
Bruner4329 : 1/19/2019 10:37 am : link
In comment 14268287 christian said:
Quote:
In comment 14268261 Ira said:


Quote:


left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?



The Giants could have stemmed the tied at LT with Flowers and Wheeler in 2018, and signed an average tackle like Donovan Smith for far less money this year.


Seriously? Neither one are NFL players and you wanted to plug them in. Flowers is a bust and Wheeler can't block a paper bag.
RE: RE: Here’s what I’m hoping DG will do  
Earl the goat : 1/19/2019 10:46 am : link
In comment 14268279 Beer Man said:
Quote:
In comment 14268240 Earl the goat said:


Quote:


Draft Haskins at 1
Draft Dalton Risner at 2
Sign Daryl Williams for RT
Use the rest of the cap space and draft capital on defense
Cut Vernon. Keep Jenkins

Great, we've already create two additional holes on the D by trading away starters at DT and CB, now lets create two more holes by cutting our other starting CB and the teams only ER.



Where did I say cut Jenkins I said keep him.
With Vernon’s injury history he’s better off being cut and saving the 11 million
RE: RE: RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
christian : 1/19/2019 10:55 am : link
In comment 14268312 Bruner4329 said:
Quote:
In comment 14268287 christian said:


Quote:


In comment 14268261 Ira said:


Quote:


left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?



The Giants could have stemmed the tied at LT with Flowers and Wheeler in 2018, and signed an average tackle like Donovan Smith for far less money this year.



Seriously? Neither one are NFL players and you wanted to plug them in. Flowers is a bust and Wheeler can't block a paper bag.


You are missing the point -- the Giants were lucky to squeeze 5 wins out of the season. And the Giants did just that at right tackle.

What was the worse outcome of the Giants had done it at left tackle?
Good drafting  
XBRONX : 1/19/2019 11:00 am : link
shitty at FA
agreed, I have way more confidence in DG than I ever did with Reese  
dd in Mass : 1/19/2019 11:09 am : link
Every GM is going to whiff, the speed on how he cuts bait is amazing. It's definitely going to be an interesting year. He now knows what he's got with the players on the roster. He understands what types of players the coaching staff is looking for.

I see a restructure for Eli or he's gone. I think 2-3 FA signings mostly OL/DL. If Eli is off the team then he will bring in a vet replacement.

I'm hoping in the draft that he gets us a QB, ER in the first 2 rounds, then goes mostly D.
Complete faith in our GM  
Jimmy Googs : 1/19/2019 11:37 am : link
is nonsensical and too extreme. He hasn't earned that level of deference at all with some of the poor moves from last season, several of which were whoppers.

I do, however, look forward to him moving up the learning curve on restructuring this franchise in 2019 after seeing it operate last year...
DG has less funds and less premium picks  
George from PA : 1/19/2019 11:39 am : link
So his work is cut out for him....

RT
RG
ER
FS
LB
DL
And QB.

If Beal works out
RE: DG has less funds and less premium picks  
Beer Man : 1/19/2019 11:52 am : link
In comment 14268359 George from PA said:
Quote:
So his work is cut out for him....

RT
RG
ER
FS
LB
DL
And QB.

If Beal works out
Add SS, as there is no guarantee that Collins will be resigned
I wanted John Dorsey as GM  
Jay on the Island : 1/19/2019 11:58 am : link
but unfortunately the Browns struck before the Giants could interview him. Gettleman is a decent GM. His draft was excellent last year as we already have three starters with a possible fourth, Lorenzo Carter. McIntosh flashed a bit as well and he could be a solid rotational DE with a chance for more. If Lauletta develops into a solid backup then that is a solid 5/5 in draft picks.

Unfortunately his first FA signing period was a miss. I will not fault him for Stewart as it was essentially a 1 year deal that was intended to help with the locker room more than anything else. Gettleman was hoping that Omameh was a late bloomer after a solid season in Jax but that was clearly a miss. It's encouraging that he was willing to admit his mistake early on and move on. That was one of Reese's biggest faults. He often hung onto his draft picks longer than he should have in hopes that the player would turn around and justify the pick.

If Gettleman find his franchise QB then I will be very excited about the future because the roster is in better shape than it was a year ago.
Jury is still out  
PhilSimms15 : 1/19/2019 12:06 pm : link
DG made one major miscalculation as he decided the team was ready to compete now and to be confident in Eli because he looked great in an Eagle game. The result was five wins.

Can he acquire a starting RT, RG (no fan of Brown) a serious ER, a safety AND a QB.

Also, does he keep Eli’s $23m on the books or does he cut him? Restructuring is just kicking the decision down the road.

So in total, he won 5 games. Signed a questionable HC, drafted a terrific RB and drafted 2-3 potential future starters. Not bad but definitely not good enough to believe we should have confidence in his plan.
This GM expected to win in 2018  
giantstock : 1/19/2019 12:07 pm : link
How anyone can say they are confident after he blundered so badly in that belief which caused him to blunder with getting an older LT and trade youth for Ogeltree and ofc Omameh - is just not being rational.

I'm hopeful he'll have a strong 2019 from our GM despite the team not going anywhere.
He grossly over-evaluated the roster last year thinking we could win  
The_Boss : 1/19/2019 12:25 pm : link
I’m willing to give him another chance. Looking to supplant Dallas and/or Philadelphia this coming season isn’t realistic. Getting to .500 should be the plan. If this thing ends up going 5-11 or worse again, everyone should be wiped clean.
Calm confidence in this regime  
giantsFC : 1/19/2019 12:31 pm : link
As a steady ship...including the HC.

but will steady get this team over the top? Focusing too much on one specific philosophy can be a downfall.

But I have enjoyed the calm and solid personnel moves for most part so far.
I like George in PA.s thinking in this and  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 12:35 pm : link
If I may add to it a bit.

Two things. Just accept that we are not going for QB or RT this year.

We have 11 picks. Trade to have more in 2-3 yet less overall

Say, 6 between #6 and the end if the 5th round, instead of 11, including two in round 2 as opposed to only 1. Moving up within 4 and 5 if possible.

Then add a free agent or two.

That makes your list draftable with quality all the way down in no particular order:

DT,DL,OLB,ILB,FS,SS

Free agency - best center available

If careful one could target "starter +'' quality for the entire draft  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 12:38 pm : link
If one limits ones targets like that and trades up into rd 2
In order to get Haskins  
5BowlsSoon : 1/19/2019 12:48 pm : link
We would have to move up to maybe 3. So what do we give up to move up those three spots?
RE: His draft was good  
Giants_Rock : 1/19/2019 12:51 pm : link
In comment 14268256 arniefez said:
Quote:
if you're ok with a RB with the #2 pick. Everything else he did was absolutely horrible including cutting players who were better than their replacements. I have little to no faith that the Giants can compete in the 2019 NFL with this front office and this coaching staff. The NFL has become a high tech F1 sport and the Giants are driving an old pickup with 150,000 miles on it.


I'm not ok with any of those things. He failed miserably in year one IMO. I think he felt he could make us competitive his first year. Like Reese he thinks he's smarter than everyone else boy neither of them are. Now we're going to be the doormat of the nfl east until we find a franchise qb while obj and Barkley got older and more banged up.
Trading away a young starting CN during a rebuild makes little sense. Snacks is older so that would be understandable if we got more for him but trading him for a pick that the odds say probably won't make the team is idiodic.
RE: In order to get Haskins  
giantstock : 1/19/2019 12:57 pm : link
In comment 14268403 5BowlsSoon said:
Quote:
We would have to move up to maybe 3. So what do we give up to move up those three spots?


Why?

You think Jets are trading down or Oakland will take a QB?

I'm not sure Mayock had Haskins that high.
Looks like raiders have  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 1:03 pm : link
4
24
27
35
66

Assuming we stick at 6 and draft a great, great DT, adding any one of those 24-27-35 would probably land us a legitimate or better pass rusher or ILB.
.
We have plenty if trade fodder and raiders may be in building mode.

I personally like what The Getts has done visa vis role players on both sides.

We may be ready to add some great ones.

6
(24/27 or 35)
37

All used on front 7, given apparent type of supply this year, radically changes the team
The jury is very much out on both Gettleman and Shurmur  
cosmicj : 1/19/2019 1:03 pm : link
I have no doubt that at one point DG was a satisfactory to good GM, but he is battling cancer and getting up there in years. Like lax counsel pointed out, he has never made a big QB selection before. Never. And if we are to take his public statements at face value, he badly misevaluated Eli last off season. In his recent organizational career over the last two decades, the only QB transitions he would have been involved with were both spearheaded by Ernie Accorsi (Collins, Manning).

I don’t think he’s a fool and we know he’s very experienced, but he is competing against the best football evaluators. I am not convinced we have an edge.
There are always smart or smarter people  
idiotsavant : 1/19/2019 1:17 pm : link
And, ironically, smart people often have or base their thinking, on the wrong idea or ideas. It's so frequent that it's almost the story of mankind.

The Getts may not be a genius, but he has the right idea for us, right now, on this team (trenches, lines, pass rush) works hard, and seems to be humble enough to learn from his mistakes.

I'll take it.
Yes, his draft did look good.....  
Doomster : 1/19/2019 1:18 pm : link
But was it because he had the second pick?

We will see this year....

How you can say he had a good free agency is beyond me.....name one free agent that was a head turner?

A lot of his guys were one year fillers, which was to be expected with our cap space...but did the guys he brought in make us forget the guys he let go? In some cases yes, some no....the only guy he brought to this defense that made some plays, was Ogletree......not a bad deal for a cap hit of 4.75M for 2018, but not a good deal for 2019 at 11.75M.....

And who were the free agent head turners on Offense? While Brown fell into his lap, he is not the answer at RG....he is just better than what we had.....a very low bar to jump....

DG has to do a lot better putting together this roster this year.....last year was to clean house.....this year is to make important decisions on OV, Jenkins, Collins, Eli, Ellison, Martin, etc., and make this a better team.....
The second half of  
St. Jimmy : 1/19/2019 1:40 pm : link
The season was very good for him. It looked like a disaster for the first half. The team coming together definitely changed my feelings of him.
RE: His draft was good  
UConn4523 : 1/19/2019 1:52 pm : link
In comment 14268256 arniefez said:
Quote:
if you're ok with a RB with the #2 pick. Everything else he did was absolutely horrible including cutting players who were better than their replacements. I have little to no faith that the Giants can compete in the 2019 NFL with this front office and this coaching staff. The NFL has become a high tech F1 sport and the Giants are driving an old pickup with 150,000 miles on it.


I guess Hernandez and Hill suck. Who knew. Nice analogy though.
Lax has it right...  
bw in dc : 1/19/2019 1:55 pm : link
Gettleman's work to date is incomplete.

There is a huge gray cloud floating over Jints Central about the Barkley vs QB decision. That still needs to play out. And that could get further complicated if we use the #6 pick this year on a QB. Then that selection will be compared to the players we passed on to select Barkley.

This is why last year's biggest off-season decision was the selection of a GM. It was a watershed moment to select the person to bridge this organization from one legacy to the next.

If could be an enormous setback if Ernie got this wrong...
RE: Yes, his draft did look good.....  
superspynyg : 1/19/2019 1:56 pm : link
In comment 14268423 Doomster said:
Quote:
But was it because he had the second pick?

We will see this year....

How you can say he had a good free agency is beyond me.....name one free agent that was a head turner?

A lot of his guys were one year fillers, which was to be expected with our cap space...but did the guys he brought in make us forget the guys he let go? In some cases yes, some no....the only guy he brought to this defense that made some plays, was Ogletree......not a bad deal for a cap hit of 4.75M for 2018, but not a good deal for 2019 at 11.75M.....

And who were the free agent head turners on Offense? While Brown fell into his lap, he is not the answer at RG....he is just better than what we had.....a very low bar to jump....




A lot of his guys were one year fillers, which was to be expected with our cap space.

Interesting statement. Look I cant hold Solder and Omameh against DG too much. Our oline was terrible. We knew we were not bringing back Pugh and Richburg. We lost out on Norwell so we signed the next best guy Solder. Did we overpay..YES..but he brings more that just play to the oline he brought Vet leadership, a winning mentality, and he wanted to be here. Would you rather our line still depent on Flowers????
Omameh was a risk but he played decent for the Jags. it did not work out. The rest was based on limited cap space. We went with Guys that knew our new DC's scheme.

So I guess we differ. And I believe that Brown is worth a 2 year deal. We still have limited cap room. Its not like we have 100 mil and DG has tons to choose from.
RE: agreed, I have way more confidence in DG than I ever did with Reese  
GoBlue6599 : 1/19/2019 1:59 pm : link
In comment 14268334 dd in Mass said:
Quote:
Every GM is going to whiff, the speed on how he cuts bait is amazing. It's definitely going to be an interesting year. He now knows what he's got with the players on the roster. He understands what types of players the coaching staff is looking for.

I see a restructure for Eli or he's gone. I think 2-3 FA signings mostly OL/DL. If Eli is off the team then he will bring in a vet replacement.

I'm hoping in the draft that he gets us a QB, ER in the first 2 rounds, then goes mostly D.

This is Really a head scratching comment... The Giants were actually at one time pretty good under Jerry Reese all things considered.. DG has had one year were the Giants won 5 games and the FA was questionable at best the draft outside of Barkley is a wait and see.
Nothing so far makes me more confident in DG then in Reese tenure here when the Giants for a period of time were actually good
RE: Enjoying watching the process  
TMS : 1/19/2019 2:14 pm : link
In comment 14268246 idiotsavant said:
Quote:
Looking forward to the all defense draft in 2019, free agent OLs ..and then the QB in 2020.
Like that plan. OL should be established and have a body of field work in the NFL to show, before we draft them and have to develop them ourselves. We have been burned too many times doing this before. The better measurable athletes are on defense and easier to identify. This was not the case with Hernandez but sure was with Flowers. ELI will be our QB next year and think DG wants to win now not in 2/3 years.
Hope is not a strategy  
PhilSimms15 : 1/19/2019 2:17 pm : link
It feels like the Giants don’t have a comprehensive strategy. They have won 8 games over the past two seasons and have a 38 year old QB, a 68 year old GM and a 53 year old coach. This smacks of a win now plan.

However, the personnel make-up is definitely not ready to win now.

Do the Giants try to squeeze another year from Eli, eat the $23m limiting their cap, do they hope their Eli can avoid the rush enough to get the team to 9 or 10 wins and a possible playoff series? Or do they say, screw it, cut Eli, use the $23m to find additional talent and have a young QB learn as they go.

I know the Giants have no obligation to tell the fans what their strategy is so I am just rooting that DG has the long term success of the franchise in mind.
GM Strategy  
Jimmy Googs : 1/19/2019 2:43 pm : link
I agree it is tough to understand if DG actually has one. Being lost at the QB position doesn't help his cause

DG may indeed have a strategy but until they determine what college arm they are going to pin their hopes on in this draft or next, it won't be on display.



RE: RE: Yes, his draft did look good.....  
giantstock : 1/19/2019 3:49 pm : link
In comment 14268439 superspynyg said:
Quote:
In comment 14268423 Doomster said:


Quote:


But was it because he had the second pick?

We will see this year....

How you can say he had a good free agency is beyond me.....name one free agent that was a head turner?

A lot of his guys were one year fillers, which was to be expected with our cap space...but did the guys he brought in make us forget the guys he let go? In some cases yes, some no....the only guy he brought to this defense that made some plays, was Ogletree......not a bad deal for a cap hit of 4.75M for 2018, but not a good deal for 2019 at 11.75M.....

And who were the free agent head turners on Offense? While Brown fell into his lap, he is not the answer at RG....he is just better than what we had.....a very low bar to jump....






A lot of his guys were one year fillers, which was to be expected with our cap space.

Interesting statement. Look I cant hold Solder and Omameh against DG too much. Our oline was terrible. We knew we were not bringing back Pugh and Richburg. We lost out on Norwell so we signed the next best guy Solder. Did we overpay..YES..but he brings more that just play to the oline he brought Vet leadership, a winning mentality, and he wanted to be here. Would you rather our line still depent on Flowers????
Omameh was a risk but he played decent for the Jags. it did not work out. The rest was based on limited cap space. We went with Guys that knew our new DC's scheme.

So I guess we differ. And I believe that Brown is worth a 2 year deal. We still have limited cap room. Its not like we have 100 mil and DG has tons to choose from.


1-- Regarding Soldier and Omameh I preferred Hubbard and Fulton.

2-- WHen do you expect the Gmen to be a title contender?
RE: RE: agreed, I have way more confidence in DG than I ever did with Reese  
arcarsenal : 1/19/2019 4:14 pm : link
In comment 14268440 GoBlue6599 said:
Quote:
In comment 14268334 dd in Mass said:


Quote:


Every GM is going to whiff, the speed on how he cuts bait is amazing. It's definitely going to be an interesting year. He now knows what he's got with the players on the roster. He understands what types of players the coaching staff is looking for.

I see a restructure for Eli or he's gone. I think 2-3 FA signings mostly OL/DL. If Eli is off the team then he will bring in a vet replacement.

I'm hoping in the draft that he gets us a QB, ER in the first 2 rounds, then goes mostly D.


This is Really a head scratching comment... The Giants were actually at one time pretty good under Jerry Reese all things considered.. DG has had one year were the Giants won 5 games and the FA was questionable at best the draft outside of Barkley is a wait and see.
Nothing so far makes me more confident in DG then in Reese tenure here when the Giants for a period of time were actually good


Yours might be more head scratching.

Jerry Reese is the reason we are where we are right now. This is what happens when your GM whiffs on entire drafts.

Gettleman is still "incomplete" as far as I'm concerned. He did some things I liked, he also did some things that made me unsure if he was the man for this job.

I need to see continual improvement from here, though.

If NYG finish under .500 again next year, I'll be more skeptical of the GM and coach. This always needed more than one year, though. It really cannot be understated how badly Reese fucked this team up by having zero-yield drafts.
We should know..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 1/19/2019 4:35 pm : link
by now that the answer is almost always in the middle ground:

Quote:
Complete faith in our GM
Jimmy Googs : 11:37 am : link : reply
is nonsensical and too extreme.


Complete faith or complete disgust are such radical statements that they should be dismissed completely.
RE: We should know..  
superspynyg : 1/19/2019 4:58 pm : link
In comment 14268490 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
by now that the answer is almost always in the middle ground:



Quote:


Complete faith in our GM
Jimmy Googs : 11:37 am : link : reply
is nonsensical and too extreme.



Complete faith or complete disgust are such radical statements that they should be dismissed completely.


Valid point so I amend it to I have high faith in our GM
I definitely have faith in him.....  
BillKo : 1/19/2019 5:09 pm : link
....he's got a track record and he's been on the job for exactly one year. He's not a miracle worker.

Furthermore, what's gone around here the sine 2012 is not really his concern......sucks that we haven't been winning for awhile but he's got to go about it the way he thinks is best.
RE: No reason to think in absolutes  
Paulie Walnuts : 1/19/2019 5:09 pm : link
In comment 14268236 CromartiesKid21 said:
Quote:
Seems like just yesterday we were all parroting "In Reese We Trust"

Not Me, Reese, and especially Ross should have been fired in 2013
RE: RE: RE: agreed, I have way more confidence in DG than I ever did with Reese  
GoBlue6599 : 1/19/2019 5:12 pm : link
In comment 14268485 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 14268440 GoBlue6599 said:


Quote:


In comment 14268334 dd in Mass said:


Quote:




I see a restructure for Eli or he's gone. I think 2-3 FA signings mostly OL/DL. If Eli is off the team then he will bring in a vet replacement.

I'm hoping in the draft that he gets us a QB, ER in the first 2 rounds, then goes mostly D.






Yours might be more head scratching.

Jerry Reese is the reason we are where we are right now. This is what happens when your GM whiffs on entire drafts.

Gettleman is still "incomplete" as far as I'm concerned. He did some things I liked, he also did some things that made me unsure if he was the man for this job.

I need to see continual improvement from here, though.

If NYG finish under .500 again next year, I'll be more skeptical of the GM and coach. This always needed more than one year, though. It really cannot be understated how badly Reese fucked this team up by having zero-yield drafts.

No I agree late in Jerry’s tenure the Giants were a train wreck.
All I’m saying there was a time when the Giants were actually good under Reese that was the last time this organization had any sustained success. Nothing so far DG has done gives me any more confidence than that time. The Giants won 5 games after we were all but told they can “make a run” no one seems to care that this guy traded away JPP Apple and Snacks for what look like meager returns
He also brought in some awful FA to play on our defense. Curtis Riley Conner Barwin Kareem Martin are you kidding me?
RE: RE: We should know..  
Jimmy Googs : 1/19/2019 5:35 pm : link
In comment 14268495 superspynyg said:
Quote:
In comment 14268490 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:


by now that the answer is almost always in the middle ground:



Quote:


Complete faith in our GM
Jimmy Googs : 11:37 am : link : reply
is nonsensical and too extreme.



Complete faith or complete disgust are such radical statements that they should be dismissed completely.



Valid point so I amend it to I have high faith in our GM


Fair enough... :-)
Mixed bag thus far.  
Dave in Hoboken : 1/19/2019 5:53 pm : link
How he fixes and handles the QB situation in the future is what will determine his run here. I'm encouraged on that front based on his comments a few weeks ago re: QB.
RE: The jury is very much out on both Gettleman and Shurmur  
jcn56 : 1/19/2019 6:02 pm : link
In comment 14268417 cosmicj said:
Quote:
I have no doubt that at one point DG was a satisfactory to good GM, but he is battling cancer and getting up there in years. Like lax counsel pointed out, he has never made a big QB selection before. Never. And if we are to take his public statements at face value, he badly misevaluated Eli last off season. In his recent organizational career over the last two decades, the only QB transitions he would have been involved with were both spearheaded by Ernie Accorsi (Collins, Manning).

I don’t think he’s a fool and we know he’s very experienced, but he is competing against the best football evaluators. I am not convinced we have an edge.


I'm in the same boat as cosmic, with some additional concern from the fact that he inherited a scouting department that has remained almost entirely unchanged (from a personnel perspective at least). I feel that the team's weakness has been scouting for some time, dating back to the middle of Reese's tenure, and that hasn't changed since.

Further, the pro personnel department failed miserably last year. A lot of money was spent, and very little was gained in return. One player got a good sum of money and was cut before the year was over. I see several lauding that as a positive that Gettleman doesn't hold on to his own mistakes - but seem to overlook the magnitude of the mistake in the first place. That, along with $3M wasted on a Jonathan Stewart who was so clearly cooked before he got here makes you question the ability of those running pro personnel.

I hope I'm wrong, but I see a lot more reasons to be pessimistic than optimistic. Not all that Gettleman has done is bad of course - Barkley had a fantastic year, and Hernandez looks like a keeper. BJ Hill had a good season. Lauletta seems to be yet another wasted mid round QB pick.

Hopefully Gettleman has a stronger second year.
Do you really think he didn’t evaluate Eli properly  
UConn4523 : 1/19/2019 6:10 pm : link
or was it A. implied he’d get the job with Eli as a starter or B. assumed his “upgrades” on the OLine would provide enough for Eli to get the job done despite his decline.

I don’t know the answer, gun to head it’s a little of both. But to suggest he didn’t know how much Eli declined is, IMO, ridiculous.
If DG could go back to last year when he was hired and do it all over  
SGMen : 1/19/2019 6:31 pm : link
....yeah, lets not go there.

We seem to have done well with the draft. We have upside with our last 2 drafts really, though cutting QB Webb was a 3rd round blow.

DG will be the first to admit that he made some mistakes with UFA but he had little choice in who he could sign. We made a mistake not cutting Flowers at the end of training camp.

My whole thing is continue with your "best player available" philosophy. I would hate if DG "fell in love with the potential" of either Haskins or Murray and trade up. Potential is great but please don't reach if you aren't 100% sure your man has the good. He took Saquon last year over Donaldson, Rosen for a reason: he was the highest rated player on his draft board and it wasn't even close. Saquon has 7 or more years left in him if he stays healthy.

My gut tells me a team or two will move up ahead of the Giants to take Haskins and / or Murray. DG won't over-pay so we'll have a defensive player for #6 who is HIGH on our draft board. Round 2, I hope a top OL is there.

I have more faith in DG than Shurmur right now. As a fan, I am torn on Eli the most. If Lauletta or Webb had shown any promise, he'd be easier to part with for this year and you build on the future in 2019.

I'd hate to see us "bandaid" this team with hopes we have just enough & get lucky enough to get a winning season and a playoff game. We should make sure we have cap space in 2020 rather than mortgage our future.
RE: Complete faith in our GM  
gmenatlarge : 1/19/2019 7:41 pm : link
In comment 14268355 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
is nonsensical and too extreme. He hasn't earned that level of deference at all with some of the poor moves from last season, several of which were whoppers.

I do, however, look forward to him moving up the learning curve on restructuring this franchise in 2019 after seeing it operate last year...


+1 His FA moves were questionable at best, who did he bring in that was better than what they had.....not much!
Gentlemen's had excellent results in Carolina.  
idinkido : 1/19/2019 8:11 pm : link
In 4 seasons under Gentlemen the Panther's record was 40-23-1, and won 3 consecutive NFC South Championships and made it to one Super Bowl. The Giants' last draft under him was excellent. Exactly which of those QBs that followed Mayfield in the draft are going to make our team forget Eli? No young QB would have survived starting for us last season. Gentlemen changed the heads of our scouting staff and, most important of all, changed the way we draft and appraise picks. He made lots of changes and some did not work out, but can anyone say he should have stuck with the previous personnel? This team is a work in progress, because Gentlemen still needs to add better players and also, build team depth. Most important of all, he has to get us a QB to follow Eli, and one that can succeed in Shurmur's system. Getting that QB will not be an easy task. So, YES, I trust Gentlemen, knowing that he has a difficult course ahead.

I think he thought this team was competing in 2018  
Go Terps : 1/19/2019 8:40 pm : link
I also don't think he's too long for the job, given his age. He was also hand picked by Accorsi. I think those factors led to:

1. Keeping Eli
2. Drafting a running back #2
3. Paying Beckham instead of trading him

People keep saying he had a great draft, but I don't agree. The decision to draft Barkley over Darnold, Chubb, or Nelson is highly questionable given that in 2018 we were weak at QB, pass rush, and OL. Remember his opening statement: "We have to fix the offensive line." If that were the case then why pass on one of the best guard prospects in many years in Nelson?

And how about the fact he helped hire Shurmur? How did that decision look in year 1? Maybe he's "an adult", but if he were would he have mocked his backup quarterback to take a shot at the media? Wouldn't an adult manage the clock and his timeouts?

Part of the GM's job is to best situate the team for the next few years. I don't feel as though he did that in year one. I think we're on the brink of more uncertainty and changes in direction.
...  
christian : 1/19/2019 9:08 pm : link
Thankfully Gettleman gets more shots. He did plenty of good to clean up the roster and the cap.

Whether he went into the season thinking the team was close to competing, I assume he came out of it after purging 3/5 the roster, cutting and trading at least 4 starters, and losing 11 games, knowing this team isn't very close.
RE: Do you really think he didn’t evaluate Eli properly  
jcn56 : 1/19/2019 10:35 pm : link
In comment 14268528 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
or was it A. implied he’d get the job with Eli as a starter or B. assumed his “upgrades” on the OLine would provide enough for Eli to get the job done despite his decline.

I don’t know the answer, gun to head it’s a little of both. But to suggest he didn’t know how much Eli declined is, IMO, ridiculous.


I don't think it's unfair to suggest he miscalculated the level of decline. I think Gettleman came in figuring he needed to bolster the OL, and that with some incremental improvements he would get a significant improvement in Eli's game as well.

I believe that the OL and Eli are tied together bidirectionally. People figure Eli's poor performances are due to the OL's performance, which is true. I think they neglect to consider how much more difficult it is for the OL to block for Eli given the current state of his agility and decision making. He needs more blocking than he did in the past, and with OL play going right into the toilet, that's a luxury most teams don't have. I think Gettleman went in figuring Solder and Omameh (plus shifting Flowers to RT) would result in enough of a bump in OL play to bring Eli closer to his pre-2012 form, and that very clearly wasn't the case.
...  
christian : 1/19/2019 10:47 pm : link
I genuinely hope Gettleman would never make a bad financial or fit decision because of the "who else?" was available argument.

The objective isn't to field the best team possible in the immediate term at all costs. The objective is to build a strong core of talent and create a window where the team can compete for a championship.

Accepting reality and improving upon it is the first step of good management.

I think Gettleman gets it. I do think however he was wrong in his assessment of reality last Spring.
Over the course of their stay at an NFL team, most GM's  
Reese's Pieces : 1/19/2019 11:53 pm : link
are going to grade out as about average. If management hires one above average, that's great.

During the first half of Reese's stay with the Giants it was on this board "In Reese We Trust." During the second half that turned into "Reese, You Suck."

But in 2016 Reese managed something in free agency that received the praise of about everyone in the NFL world. He signed Harrison, Jenkins and DRC. That year the Giants' defense was third best in giving up points, and, almost incredibly, all three made either first team or second team AP All Pro, to which I give more respect than the Pro Bowl.

Somehow the new management traded two of them, and I use the word "trade" loosely since the Giants really didn't receive anything in return. The defense in one year went back to being lousy. I never understood Gettleman's logic in ridding the defense of above average players when he had no one even as good to replace them.

This applies to JPP also. Not because he was a dominant player, but he was a productive above average player who elevated Vernon's game when both were in the lineup. and we had no one even as good to replace any of them.

Say what you will about the others, but the Harrison trade was I think the stupidest trade the Giants have made since they shipped the overall 2nd pick in the 1975 draft to the Cowboys for Dallas backup quarterback Craig Morton. Morton went on to suck with the Giants while Randy White terrorized the Giants and the rest of the league for the next decade.

So after he unloaded Snacks the Lions' run defense got better and the Giants' run defense got worse. What a surprise. But at least in exchange for Harrison the Giants got a fifth round draft pick. Fifth round. There would have been better value for Harrison if the Lions had given the Giants two lottery tickets for the Powerball Million.

And don't give me that bit about "cancer in the locker room." He wasn't that.

If Gettleman has as good a draft this year as he had last year then I'll ease up on him.
I have...  
silverfox : 1/20/2019 7:07 am : link
... none.
Don't have complete faith in him  
bc4life : 1/20/2019 8:44 am : link
everyone is fallible, but, really liked the draft. Liked some of the FA moves and his willingness to fix things on the move.

IMO, he's got two real tests this year. First, I really think his 2nd and 3rd day picks will have a lot to do with his legacy here.

And, of course his plan for the post Eli Giants.
RE: Over the course of their stay at an NFL team, most GM's  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 9:11 am : link
In comment 14268758 Reese's Pieces said:
Quote:
are going to grade out as about average. If management hires one above average, that's great.

During the first half of Reese's stay with the Giants it was on this board "In Reese We Trust." During the second half that turned into "Reese, You Suck."

But in 2016 Reese managed something in free agency that received the praise of about everyone in the NFL world. He signed Harrison, Jenkins and DRC. That year the Giants' defense was third best in giving up points, and, almost incredibly, all three made either first team or second team AP All Pro, to which I give more respect than the Pro Bowl.

Somehow the new management traded two of them, and I use the word "trade" loosely since the Giants really didn't receive anything in return. The defense in one year went back to being lousy. I never understood Gettleman's logic in ridding the defense of above average players when he had no one even as good to replace them.

This applies to JPP also. Not because he was a dominant player, but he was a productive above average player who elevated Vernon's game when both were in the lineup. and we had no one even as good to replace any of them.

Say what you will about the others, but the Harrison trade was I think the stupidest trade the Giants have made since they shipped the overall 2nd pick in the 1975 draft to the Cowboys for Dallas backup quarterback Craig Morton. Morton went on to suck with the Giants while Randy White terrorized the Giants and the rest of the league for the next decade.

So after he unloaded Snacks the Lions' run defense got better and the Giants' run defense got worse. What a surprise. But at least in exchange for Harrison the Giants got a fifth round draft pick. Fifth round. There would have been better value for Harrison if the Lions had given the Giants two lottery tickets for the Powerball Million.

And don't give me that bit about "cancer in the locker room." He wasn't that.

If Gettleman has as good a draft this year as he had last year then I'll ease up on him.


You may not like the Harrison trade, but it was the correct decision. And every report suggests he was a bad locker room guy so what exactly are you talking about?

Maybe the return was light but it was clear he was going to be cut this offseason, so they got something for him during a lost season. As for the Lions, they improved a bit with their rushing D, but nothing to write home about. They still sucked and went 3-7 after trading for him, 3-3 before acquiring him. So yeah, no ide what you are complaining about.
Snacks Harrison with the Lions  
Jimmy Googs : 1/20/2019 9:15 am : link
Seems impactful to me. Still could have been the right move by DG butwe shall see...


https://www.cover1.net/damon-harrison-rejuvenating-the-detroit-lions-run-defense/
Yeah their rush D improved  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 9:21 am : link
but they then sucked. Not saying he’s the reason why but it’s clear the trade didn’t impact the W/L record for the Lions. Meanwhile, we were 1-6 when we traded him away, then got much better once DG made the changes he did mid season. Collectively some of bad Apples (pun intended) were removed the lineup or roster completely and we got better.

I really liked Snacks. But it just wasn’t working anymore. We got back a pick and moved on from a player that was going to get cut.
Really wanted  
Coach Red Beaulieu : 1/20/2019 9:26 am : link
For DG to find a gem in FA, like OHara, McKenzie or Norwell. Obviously a complete whiff.

Still DG > douchy micrtransgression Reese wearing sweatpants and a stained tshirt to a HoF coach's ass canning press conference.

We as Giants fans have noe become very fashion conscious.
Yeah, not really. The Lion rush defense improved from 26th  
Jimmy Googs : 1/20/2019 9:53 am : link
to #10 in the league by year end.

Again, not saying he wasn't a pain in the ass or that i don't want the pick. But he clearly made an impact on their rush defense...
Meh  
HomerJones45 : 1/20/2019 9:54 am : link
He didn't blow the #2 and #34 picks in the entire draft. Bravo, I guess.

His FA signing were not good. The jury is out on the trades depending on what he gets instead.

He's made the moves, like cleaning out the roster, that any new GM would have made.

Then again, compared to Reese, a hamster as GM would have been an improvement.
RE: Yeah, not really. The Lion rush defense improved from 26th  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 9:57 am : link
In comment 14268894 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
to #10 in the league by year end.

Again, not saying he wasn't a pain in the ass or that i don't want the pick. But he clearly made an impact on their rush defense...


What do you mean “not really”? He helped improve the rush defense. Just like ours got worse when he left. I’ve stated that. But we got better and they got worse, isn’t that the more important part of this and why moves are made? This is a thread about our GM and he made a move that not only got us back a pick, but we improved as a AFTER losing the player/s.

Goes to show you that team cohesion and locker room stuff matters more than many think it does, which is the reason why I replied to the post that said it didn’t matter. It does.
Sorry, I am not buying that moving Snack is why Giants got better  
Jimmy Googs : 1/20/2019 10:02 am : link
Hell, even "better" is subjective...

No worries though, I understand your view.
And that’s not what I’m selling  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 10:39 am : link
which I’ve said as much. I said he was no longer working out here and getting rid of him and Apple and finally becnhing Flowers got rid of a lot of the problematic players.
Has there been an actual report - an article, a concrete statement  
jcn56 : 1/20/2019 11:49 am : link
somewhere that's been posted from a reliable source that spells out that Harrison was traded for off the field behavior (locker room, non-football related stuff)?

I don't doubt it - but so far, I've only seen throwaway quotes that required a lot of reading between the lines and in the form of tweets. They seem to imply it wasn't his play or his salary that got him traded, but nobody has come right out (that I've seen) and said that he was either a bad apple or not cooperating somehow.

Apple I get - very little in return for a guy that needed a change of scenery, but he needed to go and his production to that point wasn't going to yield much.

In addition to the misses in FA - I think overlooked in the part about the roster turnover is that players that went elsewhere tended to produce a lot better than the players that were brought in, which included paying both a pick and a big salary for Ogletree.
I think they 100% weren’t bringing him back  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 11:53 am : link
and then this offseason there’s already been several people who’ve stated he putwore his welcome. I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that playing 2 downs, being old, being expensive, as well as the supposed locker room problems were all factors on why he was dealt. It also makes room for new players to get experience headin into 2019, a team he was never going to be on anyway.
Think DG and the rest know they are on the clock  
TMS : 1/20/2019 11:54 am : link
in this town. Win or be gone. These guys are no fools. Long term rebuilding will not work here. Already after only one season of losing, with a huge turnover top to bottom, they are on trial. Even after a good draft. Just the way it is here. How we handle the ELI situation will tell a lot. The safe bet is to stay with ELI rather than try a new QB and wait two years for him to develop. MO
RE: I think they 100% weren’t bringing him back  
jcn56 : 1/20/2019 11:58 am : link
In comment 14269013 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
and then this offseason there’s already been several people who’ve stated he putwore his welcome. I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that playing 2 downs, being old, being expensive, as well as the supposed locker room problems were all factors on why he was dealt. It also makes room for new players to get experience headin into 2019, a team he was never going to be on anyway.


If you want to make that case - fine and dandy. Then there's no need to throw in the 'and the guy's a bad locker room presence'.

If that accusation is going to be made - I think it should be qualified somehow. As I said, I've only seen it in tweets here or there, and not laid out clearly (one was trying to read between the lines from a press conference after the trade).

As for his age and his cost and 2 down role - another team (with a better defense) made the investment and it paid off for them. This team has plenty of tough decisions to make, and it starts with two of the highest paid players on the roster (Eli and Vernon). Let's hope they approach the return on investment in a similar manner with those two.
How did it pay off for them?  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 12:08 pm : link
Are we going off their team rushing ranking or the fact that they went 3-7 with him? They traded for him hoping to go to the playoffs when they were 3-3 and it wasn’t good enough. They may even cut him.

As for the locker room stuff, I have no access to sources, just reading between the lines. Just because there isn’t a formal announcement doesn’t mean nothing happened. It’s not something to get hung up on anyway, the other reasons I listed are plenty.
Regarding the Shurmur hire...  
Go Terps : 1/20/2019 12:11 pm : link
Consider this recent Parcells quote on the recent coaching hires around the league:

Quote:
When Bill Parcells talks about coaching, I make it a point to listen. What he said about the NFL’s latest head-coaching hiring cycle, in an interview with SiriusXM NFL Radio, should be must listening for many owners. “I think you can tell what the intent is on the part of the owners; they’re trying to duplicate a couple of things they’ve seen, and you just can’t go get a guy that’s an offensive coach. You have to have a team leader that stands up in front of the team and can command respect -- both sides of the ball and understands how a team should play the game with the particular athletes they have to give that team, that year, in this game, the best chance to win. That’s never going to change. ... They come in all shapes and sizes, but I don’t think you can just say, ‘We’re going to get an offensive guy and that’s going to be the key to our success.’ It just never works out like that."


Does Shurmur feel as though he meets the standard laid down by Parcells?
Link - ( New Window )
RE: RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
SJGiant : 1/20/2019 12:12 pm : link
In comment 14268302 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
In comment 14268261 Ira said:


Quote:


left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?



If you need a car, you're not paying 80k for a pre-owned Lexus just because it's the only thing on the lot and you need a car. That's a bad way to look at things.


Interesting comment. I could say if your buisness was to chauffeur rich people who expect high end transportation, and you were paid in advance to provide this service, you might be forced to buy this last car in the lot. Just like some of the season ticket holders for the Giants would expect.
I was against the Gettleman hire  
mattyblue : 1/20/2019 12:13 pm : link
and am not a huge fan of his yet. That being said, I think it’s pretty hard to argue that he didn’t do a good job this year. His free agency moves weren’t good, which is surprising as he came from the pro scouting when he was with us. However his draft and in season moves were pretty damn good. My concern with him is it appears from his pressers that he is very hesitant to draft a QB. I am not arguing that he should draft Haskins or should have drafted Darnold/Rosen. I am saying he seems to quickly make the same excuse about drafting a QB whenever asked. He essentially says “if you miss on a guy you will set your franchise back four years” which is true, but not having a QB playing at able to play at a high level (not talking about Eli) for the next four years is just as bad. Maybe not last year, maybe not this year, but eventually like it or not he has to take that risk. Missing is definitely the death of a GM, but signing a barely mediocre QB (Bridgewater type) sets the franchise back even further. Odds are there is a clock on Odell and Saquon (our best players) that is already starting, that makes the need for a QB of the future very important. We also won’t always have top 10 draft picks (hopefully) to make the move. Eli cost us a lot and while it was a player trade it was the same as moving up very few spots. It worked out great than and those draft picks shined and fizzled fast for the Chargers. I hope I am wrong and Gettleman is willing to roll the dice in the near future to find the next franchise QB.
RE: How did it pay off for them?  
jcn56 : 1/20/2019 12:23 pm : link
In comment 14269020 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
Are we going off their team rushing ranking or the fact that they went 3-7 with him? They traded for him hoping to go to the playoffs when they were 3-3 and it wasn’t good enough. They may even cut him.

As for the locker room stuff, I have no access to sources, just reading between the lines. Just because there isn’t a formal announcement doesn’t mean nothing happened. It’s not something to get hung up on anyway, the other reasons I listed are plenty.


Their defense improved - that was the point of trading for him.

As for shitting on the guy on his way out with no proof - it's pointless. It's only necessary if you feel the case for trading him on the basis of his play or salary isn't strong enough. I've seen this thrown around a bit, and like I said - never without having to read between a lot of lines and do a lot of assuming.
RE: RE: RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
christian : 1/20/2019 12:37 pm : link
In comment 14269028 SJGiant said:
Quote:
In comment 14268302 Ten Ton Hammer said:


Quote:


In comment 14268261 Ira said:


Quote:


left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?



If you need a car, you're not paying 80k for a pre-owned Lexus just because it's the only thing on the lot and you need a car. That's a bad way to look at things.



Interesting comment. I could say if your buisness was to chauffeur rich people who expect high end transportation, and you were paid in advance to provide this service, you might be forced to buy this last car in the lot. Just like some of the season ticket holders for the Giants would expect.


If the Giants are basing personnel decisions on the expectations of seasonal ticket holders, the future of the team is in grave danger.
I’m not “shitting on him”  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 12:40 pm : link
I’m not cursing him, saying I hated him, or anything of the sort. He was a really good Giant for 2 years and then he declined. Sorry if the assumptions on his attitude are a problem for you.
RE: RE: RE: The thing about the Solder signing was we desperately needed a  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/20/2019 12:55 pm : link
In comment 14269028 SJGiant said:
Quote:
In comment 14268302 Ten Ton Hammer said:


Quote:


In comment 14268261 Ira said:


Quote:


left tackle and did for a few years. Who else was there?



If you need a car, you're not paying 80k for a pre-owned Lexus just because it's the only thing on the lot and you need a car. That's a bad way to look at things.



Interesting comment. I could say if your buisness was to chauffeur rich people who expect high end transportation, and you were paid in advance to provide this service, you might be forced to buy this last car in the lot. Just like some of the season ticket holders for the Giants would expect.


If your business was to chauffer rich people around, and you don't already have a car before taking advance payment, you have failed many steps before this point. Strange analogy.
What if your car broke down  
UConn4523 : 1/20/2019 1:35 pm : link
and needed a new one right away and it was the only one available?

This whole thing is weird.
An 80K car was the only one available?  
Doomster : 1/20/2019 2:03 pm : link
I'd take the bus....
RE: I was against the Gettleman hire  
lax counsel : 1/20/2019 10:35 pm : link
In comment 14269030 mattyblue said:
Quote:
and am not a huge fan of his yet. That being said, I think it’s pretty hard to argue that he didn’t do a good job this year. His free agency moves weren’t good, which is surprising as he came from the pro scouting when he was with us. However his draft and in season moves were pretty damn good. My concern with him is it appears from his pressers that he is very hesitant to draft a QB. I am not arguing that he should draft Haskins or should have drafted Darnold/Rosen. I am saying he seems to quickly make the same excuse about drafting a QB whenever asked. He essentially says “if you miss on a guy you will set your franchise back four years” which is true, but not having a QB playing at able to play at a high level (not talking about Eli) for the next four years is just as bad. Maybe not last year, maybe not this year, but eventually like it or not he has to take that risk. Missing is definitely the death of a GM, but signing a barely mediocre QB (Bridgewater type) sets the franchise back even further. Odds are there is a clock on Odell and Saquon (our best players) that is already starting, that makes the need for a QB of the future very important. We also won’t always have top 10 draft picks (hopefully) to make the move. Eli cost us a lot and while it was a player trade it was the same as moving up very few spots. It worked out great than and those draft picks shined and fizzled fast for the Chargers. I hope I am wrong and Gettleman is willing to roll the dice in the near future to find the next franchise QB.


I think there is a ring of truth to this. I think DG is reluctant to draft a an high out of complete fear of missing. It’s possible he’s perfectly content with mediocrity at the position post Eli, and I’ve said before it wouldn’t surprise me if a Foles or Bridgewater is the next Giants qb post Eli. We’ll see, and I highly doubt he selects a qb in this draft.
Back to the Corner