Apparently the WSJ reviewed all Tony’s broadcast and determined that when he predicts a play presnap on the broadcast he’s right about 68% of the time.
I know there’s a lot of people here who like this aspect of Romo’s calls. Me? I think predicting plays before they happen isn’t very useful to someone watching the game. In fact, I think calling a play before it happens kind of takes some of the fun out of watching.
Romos right rate - (
New Window )
Romo is a good broadcaster though. I am a big believer that former team affiliation goes out the window when these guys retire and go on TV. I like Romo and Aikman as broadcasters and don’t like Simms. Eli would be terrible at it but he’ll never do it I don’t think. Tiki is bad at it. Strahan is good in the studio.
Absolutely hate ESPN baseball team yapping it up all the time, for example because they rarely talk baseball.
Agree.
He doesn't try to dumb things down.
I never have one of those moments with him where I'm screaming at the tv wondering how the broadcasters aren't mentioning something.
No one better.
He has found his calling, no pun intended.
A color analyst should add insight to the game/play, not overwhelm the broadcast.
The opposite actually.
A color analyst should add insight to the game/play, not overwhelm the broadcast.
Old school thinking...most of the time I'd say you are right. But Romo is just good. I'm trying to follow what he is saying compared to what I see.
He called those three straight plays that led to the Patriots TD.
It isn't how much you talk - it's how much of what you say is relevant.
I want to hear his commentary - it adds to the broadcast.
Other guys chatter simply to burn nervous energy.
Romo is for real.
One other point.
Other ex-Cowboy announcers keep mentioning their affiliation with that evil team from Texas.
Romo doesn't go there.
Good on you, Tony.
I bet that 68% accuracy number goes way the fuck up.
Bwahahaaaaaaaa
And the guy won't shut up.
I do like that he reads the play, but he's talking so much, that it seemingly gets lost in the shuffle.
I WAS impressed with his observation of how McVay wouldn't line up to the LOS so as to keep Belichick from adjusting his defense with the communication systems (turned off with 15 seconds remaining in play clock).
He's not the greatest (Madden was) and he is far from a screeching girl. While talking too much is subjective, he is far closer to Madden than he is to screeching girl. Clearly talking too much is the biggest complaint, but I actually don't "hear" him. (FWIW, I read lots of writers praising him - all most universal. Cannot remember a negative article). I think Aikman is the next best and he is pretty quiet, but I just don't get the insight from Aikman I get from Romo.
Let's compare him to the Baseball Tonight ESPN crew - now that is talking too much, and talking about little that pertains to the game.
I'd rather a guy sound smug and talk only when needed than talking more than the play-by-play guy.
And Romo has too much Dick Enberg in him in getting overly excited about pedestrian plays. and Enberg was a play-by-play guy which is doubly bad for Romo.
When he starts getting high pitched about a stutter step move that nets an additional 2 yards, I just can't take him too seriously.
I did notice on a few plays, he was calling for player X at such and such a spot, and when the play went elsewhere, he would claim credit for being right because the play came out of the same setup presnap. I'm guessing that most people who play or coach the game (and with a full view of the field) know a majority of the likely outcomes based on a set up. it's getting the last few percent of the play predictions right that separate the men from the boys in the pros.
I don't pretend to know X's and O's, but 60% should be child's play for a professional, high caliber, QB. He's making his mark going with this angle, while other announcers try to make their mark in other angles. As noted above, some like it, some don't. If enough people like it, he'll keep doing it, and other ex pros will think 'why the hell didn't I do that?'. If they don't, the producers will tell him to knock it off.
When he was challenged to do so, he pretty much shut up.
Can't remember who that was.
The game stunk though.
So maybe Romo reminds me of that guy. It's ok occasionally to predict a play but gets annoying every down. And save the excitement for big plays.
The times when Tony is wrong though makes me think "well maybe that's why you never won anything".