for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Is there a difference between Barry Bonds and Julian Edelman

GMAN4LIFE : 2/11/2019 8:59 am
?

one is suspected for doing PED's. Literally hasnt been getting a shot to go to the Hall of Fame

Julian Edelman has a monster game in the SuperBowl. Literally failed a test for PEDs. Has been in discussion for the Hall of Fame.


i mean there has to be some irony here. I know one is the MLB and the other is NFL. Both two different sports and hold their players standards differently but still.

what are your thoughts?
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Maybe my standards are tougher than most  
Big Al : 2/11/2019 2:09 pm : link
Babur Phil Simms should not be in HOF. Eli should not be in HOF. Now someone actually mentions Edelman. How trivial and worthless are some people trying to make this “honor”?
.  
arcarsenal : 2/11/2019 2:16 pm : link
Bonds was a great player as it was that basically turned into a video game when he was BALCO Barry.

The guy had OBP's near and even over .600 during those prime SF years. Just absolutely insane.

.330 hitter with 73 HR's in 2001. Stuff I thought I'd only see playing video games on rookie as a kid.
RE: For years..  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:26 pm : link
In comment 14292980 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
the NFL has avoided the scandal baseball went through regarding steroids.

A focused investigation on it could probably bring the league down, but they put on the good face of performing testing and suspending people, so they avoid the scrutiny, much like baseball has since they started giving the appearance of cracking down.

By the way - look into exactly how hard it is to fail a test in the NFL. You need to have an insane level of certain markers to fail.
The joke of it is, I recall MLB saying they would turn to the NFL as the model for PED testing. The NFL testing allows for levels of testosterone that are impossible to reach naturally; they allow insane levels.
RE: Bonds  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:36 pm : link
In comment 14292978 Archer said:
Quote:
You cannot compare players from different sports.
If you want to compare Edelman to another player who took PEDs in football that would be a better comparison.
There are plenty to choose from.

As for Bonds vs. Edelman as PED abusers it is not close.
Bonds took PEDs on a systematic basis over a period of years.Bonds took shots, cream, (3-4) times a day. He clearly took the PEDs to enhance his capabilities at the expense of the people he played against.

Edelman took an over the counter supplement for less than (4) months.
Technically, none of that about Bonds is proven to be true. This is what people suppose, but he never failed a test.

This isn't a defense of Bonds, but I believe he used purely out of jealousy and vanity. He was still one of the top 1 or 2 players in the game before he supposedly started using. However, coming back from the strike Mcgwire and Sosa were getting most of the attention, and the discovery of Andro in Mcgwire's locker was brushed over. I think bonds knew he was head and shoulders a better player than either and started taking to prove a point, and he did. He allegedly used at the same time countless other players were allegedly using and he blew them all out of the water with his production. It will be a big injustice (in the baseball world anyway) when Ortiz is elected to the HOF next year and Bonds and Clemens are still on the outside looking in. He was not anywhere near the player they each were and for a much longer period of time.
RE: It wasn't..  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:39 pm : link
In comment 14293009 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
just the Bonds effect:



Quote:


My sons were playing sports at the end of Bonds career.
It was sad to see how many of their teammates were taking illegal steroids to improve their game and enhance their chances of playing college ball.



I was playing college baseball in the late 80's and early 90's. We had several guys on the team taking stuff, and I was only at a division i-AA school, although for baseball purposes, we played a predominantly D1 schedule and were eligible for the College World Series.
And Bonds wasn't not likely using for 3/4 of his career, when he was well on his way to the HOF and 600 HRs.
And it goes without saying that we don't know when...  
Dunedin81 : 2/11/2019 2:43 pm : link
McGwire or Bonds started using. Bonds could have been using all along. But it's easier to pinpoint the decision to add 30-40 lbs of muscle and start trying to break records.
RE: RE: There is definitely a double standard with PED use  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:49 pm : link
In comment 14293058 FStubbs said:
Quote:
In comment 14293030 Section331 said:


Quote:


in the NFL v. MLB. Maybe because it is less obvious in the NFL due to all the equipment players wear, but I think PED use has been far more prevalent in the NFL than MLB.

Barry Bonds was a great player before he started using, he should be in. McGwire, Sosa, Canseco and others probably don't sniff the HOF without steroids, so I don't think they should get in.



The irony is that Bonds is a hate sink. If he hadn't juiced, McGwire, Clemens and the others would be in the Hall of Fame right now. I still think McGwire eventually gets in.
I disagree on McGwire primarily because his usage seriously elongated his career. Personally, I thought he was too one dimensional to be a HOF candidate before using, but he was a premier power hitter for a good chunk of that first period in his career. However, when he started seriously using his career was almost over due to injuries. He couldn't play a full season. Then, all of a sudden, 97-99 he is a full time player and at an obscene level at ages 33-35. Without those 3 seasons, he was likely out of baseball a little earlier and with about 50-100 less HRs, at least. He was not a HOFer without that late career usage.

Now, the big question is was he using while in Oakland earlier in his career.
RE: RE: It amaze me that people don't realize that almost every player  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:51 pm : link
In comment 14293193 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 14293102 Zeke's Alibi said:


Quote:


In NFL juices or has juiced.



I think the untold story - well, a story not discussed enough - is the steroid use at the high school level. No testing there.

And I know parents who condone it..."If it helps my son get a scholarship, then it may be worth it..."
+1...and any parent that condones it is a real piece of shit. That is right up there with parents asking for elective Tommy John surgery thinking it will add 5+ MPH to the fastball of a perfectly healthy teen.
RE: I think there is a difference....  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:53 pm : link
In comment 14293220 BillKo said:
Quote:
...Edelman took whatever he was taking for a short period - I believe that because he wasn't caught before or after his suspension. On that fact, I have to consider him clean.

Bonds, on the other hand, was taking his drug enhancement for a much longer period of time and benefiting it exponentially (as Arc said above - he was simply unreal). I mean, you had to be blind not to see it.

And Edelman is just a good WR IMO....no where near a HOF player. Very clutch, but not an all time great. Not. Even. Close.
He wasn't caught because he adjusted his cycle. The NFL allows an insane amount of testosterone; he just took less enough to not get caught.
RE: RE: I think there is a difference....  
BillKo : 2/11/2019 2:53 pm : link
In comment 14293227 Dunedin81 said:
Quote:
In comment 14293220 BillKo said:


Quote:


...Edelman took whatever he was taking for a short period - I believe that because he wasn't caught before or after his suspension. On that fact, I have to consider him clean.

Bonds, on the other hand, was taking his drug enhancement for a much longer period of time and benefiting it exponentially (as Arc said above - he was simply unreal). I mean, you had to be blind not to see it.

And Edelman is just a good WR IMO....no where near a HOF player. Very clutch, but not an all time great. Not. Even. Close.




Most observers estimate PED use in the NFL at well over 50%. Believing that Edelman's was an inadvertent ingestation or a short-term use is like believing Papi happened upon some off-brand cough syrup.


With Edelman, the point I was trying to express was he basically playing within the NFL limits - except for this one time. The guy came back from an ACL and looks better than ever, of course he's doing something.

With Bonds, the aura of steroids was all around him.....and as other have said it was like a video game watching him play. And how he was acquiring his stuff was controversial too as I remember........

I don't get that feeling with Edelman.

Maybe the title of this thread should have been is there a difference between Barry Bonds and the entire NFL lol...
A few more thoughts  
Matt M. : 2/11/2019 2:56 pm : link
1) The real comparison is Bonds to a guy like A-Rod, who also has unreal seasons and unreal career numbers. However, the only difference is not that A-Rod got caught and then admitted use. To me, the bigger difference is that there are a lot of different stories about when A-Rod began using that range from HS to early in Seattle to Texas. Any way you slice it, most to all of his career is now tainted.

2) It is also disgusting that Mcgwire is allowed to coach at the MLB level. He shouldn't allowed anywhere near a MLB clubhouse or a minor league or NCAA clubhouse for that matter.
Edelman's test was triggered by a designer peptide more than likely  
Zeke's Alibi : 2/11/2019 3:25 pm : link
which is all the rage now apparently amongst athletes due to the fact that you can say well I want to increase this, this, and this and they'll give you a peptide for exactly that. They also can't test for them because they have no idea what to test for. A substance came back that was unrecognizable in Edelmann's test. Just shit luck on his part. Not all PED's are test boosters.
RE: A few more thoughts  
Dunedin81 : 2/11/2019 3:33 pm : link
In comment 14293518 Matt M. said:
Quote:
1) The real comparison is Bonds to a guy like A-Rod, who also has unreal seasons and unreal career numbers. However, the only difference is not that A-Rod got caught and then admitted use. To me, the bigger difference is that there are a lot of different stories about when A-Rod began using that range from HS to early in Seattle to Texas. Any way you slice it, most to all of his career is now tainted.

2) It is also disgusting that Mcgwire is allowed to coach at the MLB level. He shouldn't allowed anywhere near a MLB clubhouse or a minor league or NCAA clubhouse for that matter.


Why is McGwire uniquely awful? I'd wager a substantial sum of money he's not the only guy in coaching - big leagues or otherwise - who has been implicated in PED use. At least he didn't try to blame his wife.
Bonds was a cheat on a team with no history of cheating  
since1925 : 2/11/2019 4:41 pm : link
Edelman was on a team with a long and demonstrated culture of cheating.

That's the difference.
But here's the thing..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/11/2019 7:20 pm : link
you have no way of knowing this:

Quote:
With Edelman, the point I was trying to express was he basically playing within the NFL limits - except for this one time.


The way NFL testing is given, it is very hard to get caught. The offseason testing window is mandated by the collective bargaining agreement. Ironically, it opens on 4/20 to the week before camp, and because of the difficulty in having resources for testing every player, you have a pretty good idea exactly when that test will happen.

that is the only guaranteed test you may have to take. There are random drug tests, but unless the league has you in their crosshairs, the randomness of them and the idea that there is no prior notification is up for debate
RE: RE: RE: what Dunedin said  
LauderdaleMatty : 2/11/2019 9:40 pm : link
In comment 14293404 Gatorade Dunk said:
Quote:
In comment 14293047 LauderdaleMatty said:


Quote:


In comment 14292973 giants#1 said:


Quote:


Baseball's records are sacred, football barely cares about their's.

And Edelman shouldn't sniff the HOF.



Want to see where anyone ever has said HOF and Edelman other than the OP

Link - ( New Window )


Ah. My favorite stalker. Hope you are well. Saw you on the dupe thread Irony.
RE: RE: RE: RE: what Dunedin said  
Gatorade Dunk : 2/12/2019 9:44 am : link
In comment 14293935 LauderdaleMatty said:
Quote:
In comment 14293404 Gatorade Dunk said:


Quote:


In comment 14293047 LauderdaleMatty said:


Quote:


In comment 14292973 giants#1 said:


Quote:


Baseball's records are sacred, football barely cares about their's.

And Edelman shouldn't sniff the HOF.



Want to see where anyone ever has said HOF and Edelman other than the OP

Link - ( New Window )



Ah. My favorite stalker. Hope you are well. Saw you on the dupe thread Irony.

I'm a dupe? Who exactly do you think I'm a dupe of? Or is it just that you don't know what "dupe" means? I've been on here and other Giants boards with one and only one handle for close to 20 years - I've never posted under any other name than Gatorade Dunk (I'm sure the mods can verify this). And I'm hardly a stalker - just a regular poster with a very low tolerance for stupidity. Sorry that your posts tend to catch my eye for that reason.

Besides, I was just trying to help, since you obviously had no idea that several people had been talking about Edelman and the HOF.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner