6th an 17th Pick? Haskins fans want to trade up?

You would waist 2 picks for him??? If he is there at 6 and they like him fine. But I’m not waistibf this chance to fill 2 needs.

I also really want no part of Daniel Jones at 17, which a few beat writers have suggested.

Draft Sweat or Gary.

Trade down from 17. Even moving down 3-5 spots will net them a third round pick.

And do you want white at 6 after you just traded Vernon? Wouldn;t you want a passrusher as a priority?

As far as QB as long as they get the move right. I'll wait until I see with QB.

actually hoping two teasm trade up in front of Giants and take QBs - will sweeten the pot for Giants

.

If anything try to get some ammo for next season. The Qbs this cycle absolutely blow.

I don’t mind them drafting him at 6. The reality is they now have a gaping hole at WR as well. So there are a lot of spots to draft for, including looking for Eli’s successor.

If that happens....i will get pissed.

I am ok with trade...as long as we get 3 to 4 starters

In comment 14331041 BigBlueDownTheShore said:

Quote:

If anything try to get some ammo for next season. The Qbs this cycle absolutely blow.

I think our record next year will be enough ammo to have a top 3 pick.

This place is going to burn to the ground. Questionable ability aside, the market doesn’t really warrant that type of move. Who are you worried about taking a quarterback? Arizona maybe; SF, Oakland, NYJ, Tampa all no; Jags, Lions, Bills - No.

Maybe Denver, Miami or Washington. While there is some risk of one of them jumping up I don’t think it’s worth dumping an extra first round pick as insurance. Stick at #6, if you want Haskins take him but don’t dump #17 (effectively Odell Beckham) for the right to move up a few spots.

No and No.

for any of the QBs. If they stay at 6 and take Haskins I am ok with that. But no on Jones at 17 and certainly no to both picks on one QB.

Metcalf at 17
Safety at 37

Lets get it.

In comment 14331099 dep026 said:

Quote:

Metcalf at 17 Safety at 37 Lets get it.

Yes except replace Metcalf with Bradbury
Solder-Hernandez-Bradbury-Zeitler-Williams....wow

that Metcalf is not around at 17.

Either Nick Bosa or Quinenn Williams. I wouldn't trade 17 though. Maybe our 3rd and a out late 4th.

In comment 14331877 jeff57 said:

Quote:

that Metcalf is not around at 17.

Metcalf changes directions like an oil tanker. Check out his triangle numbers and its shows up on tape how he struggles to separate vs good CBs. Much prefer Hakeem Butler.

Haskins isn’t that good. By the way, Lock can be just as good if not better.

In comment 14330999 superspynyg said:

Quote:

You would waist 2 picks for him??? If he is there at 6 and they like him fine. But I’m not waistibf this chance to fill 2 needs.

Is this a fat joke?