Guys he has moved on from all seemed to have the 'I' gene instead of team.
Beckham due to his insane talent level was given more rope, hoping to see him mature. A couple asshats even talked about it.
It never happened and they finally gave up on him maturing especially after how he reacted after receiving the big contract.
This trade is not a surprise when you pay close attention to DGs M.O. both here and Carolina.
Look for stronger character guys to be brought in here that also are good football players.
Agreed with the threadstart, that is.
Exactly. Dumpster fire.
Yep, I WANT CHANGE, BUT ONLY WANT IT MY WAY!
It's amazing how that seems to have escaped so many people. Instead, we're stuck on 'culture' posts - as if the entire roster was just riddled with bad apples.
The Giants thought they had a cancer they were trying to address, but they misdiagnosed it. It wasn't the roster, it was the FO.
People can want a change that doesn't include giving away the greatest WR in franchise history at age 26...
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
Yep, I WANT CHANGE, BUT ONLY WANT IT MY WAY!
would you say the formula worked in Carolina?
We're going to pass on the most talented players because they don't fit into some bullshit idea of what old, white guys think players should act like?
If you're a manager, you're job is to manage personnel. If you can't do that, maybe it's time to seek other employment.
People want change that is competent and well thought out, I would love to hear the case for that under these circumstances. DG has totally mismanaged the roster he got and resources that come with it, that is not change anyone signed up for. In fact, if anything, its the same half measure crap that we have been arguing against the Giants utilizing for many years. Fire Gilbride, then Coughling but keep Reese, then fire Reese, then hire a familiar person, then not trade LC (which before this move I gave him the benefit of the doubt) then let him go for nothing, then resign OBJ and then trade him probably for less and with a 16 million cap hit. I can go on and on about the mismanagement of this franchise, but this is not change I can believe in or get behind. This is just more incompetence.
Quote:
In comment 14331761 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
Yep, I WANT CHANGE, BUT ONLY WANT IT MY WAY!
would you say the formula worked in Carolina?
I don't have enough information to know better. I honestly don't spend near the same amount of time researching other teams as I do the Giants.
Culture is real - ( New Window )
WTF.. With Beckham the Giants have won NOTHING... Christ almighty...
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
People can want a change that doesn't include giving away the greatest WR in franchise history at age 26...
They didn't give him away.
Pittsburgh gave Antonio Brown away.
More than you realize and probably know, actually.
ummm, won SB's with Gmen, redid Panthers and got them back to SB.. I would say he knows..
LOL hiring the 70 year old guy thats been with the org for years is "change"?
Lol. Well thats one way to put it. No question he is eliminating the distractions and hasnt been afraid to make an unpopular move
Quote:
What the hell does DG know about a winning culture? Kind of hilarious.
ummm, won SB's with Gmen, redid Panthers and got them back to SB.. I would say he knows..
He wasn't GM for the Giants when they won. He took over a Panthers team that was already pretty much established by the time he got there. So, uhhhh...nope.
You're being a bit dramatic about this whole thing don't ya think?
We're going to pass on the most talented players because they don't fit into some bullshit idea of what old, white guys think players should act like?
If you're a manager, you're job is to manage personnel. If you can't do that, maybe it's time to seek other employment.
Saquon and Sterling are strong character guys. You also see it manifest in the way Shep gives it all up to block for Saquon in the run game.
Remember when the Giants were drafting nothing but team captains?
But somehow the same scouting department is going to come back with winning personalities, because now, we're taking it seriously!
Quote:
Saquon wears white after Labor Day. We'll have to ship him out too...
You're being a bit dramatic about this whole thing don't ya think?
No. No, I don't. Thank you for asking, though.
Those aren't my words, they're Bill Belichick's. I'd recommend the 45 minute interview from 2017 linked below.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
People want change that is competent and well thought out, I would love to hear the case for that under these circumstances. DG has totally mismanaged the roster he got and resources that come with it, that is not change anyone signed up for. In fact, if anything, its the same half measure crap that we have been arguing against the Giants utilizing for many years. Fire Gilbride, then Coughling but keep Reese, then fire Reese, then hire a familiar person, then not trade LC (which before this move I gave him the benefit of the doubt) then let him go for nothing, then resign OBJ and then trade him probably for less and with a 16 million cap hit. I can go on and on about the mismanagement of this franchise, but this is not change I can believe in or get behind. This is just more incompetence.
The franchise was definitely mismanaged, but I don’t think much of that is on DG. You seem to hate whatever he does no matter what so it’s poibtless to argue with you.
One thing to keep in mind is he doesn’t have full reign here and neither would whoever else we brought in. That’s an ownership issue not a FO issue. You can only do so much if you still need approval on major changes.
Ugh.
You might want to actually know his background.
As executive
2× Super Bowl champion (XLII, XLVI)
4× NFC Champion (2000, 2007, 2011, 2015)
As administrator
5× AFC Champion (1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1997)
Super Bowl champion (XXXII)
Look at the structure of that contract. That structure allowed him to be traded right now and we'll be done with it after this year.
Of that 90 million, only 16 million guaranteed. Compare that to the 50 million guaranteed Brown just got. Beckham definitely is right now.
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
LOL hiring the 70 year old guy thats been with the org for years is "change"?
Yeah let’s not look at what he’s done, let’s harp on his age. Talk about clueless.
Those aren't my words, they're Bill Belichick's. I'd recommend the 45 minute interview from 2017 linked below. Link - ( New Window )
I think of players like Jake Ballard and Kevin Boss when I think of quotes like that.
Signing Beckham was galactically stupid.
Right or wrong, They were still cutting him slack. When he showed up to camp despite no contract and played 'good soldier' they went ahead and signed him (a poster here maybe hitdog spoke about this). They knew the talent was incredible and were hoping against hope he would mature. When he reacted the way he did after signing they realized it isn't going to get better but likely worse.
Quote:
all fine and good, but why re-sign him to a 5-year, $95 million contract less than a year ago? Why didn't they trade Landon Collins in October? Then you have moves like signing Omameh and cutting him before half the season is out.
Look at the structure of that contract. That structure allowed him to be traded right now and we'll be done with it after this year.
Of that 90 million, only 16 million guaranteed. Compare that to the 50 million guaranteed Brown just got. Beckham definitely is right now.
That is an inarguably idiotic business decision.
Quote:
all fine and good, but why re-sign him to a 5-year, $95 million contract less than a year ago? Why didn't they trade Landon Collins in October? Then you have moves like signing Omameh and cutting him before half the season is out.
Signing Beckham was galactically stupid.
But they gave themselves an out. And they actually took it.
Because they thought it would work, what else are you looking for? We take it on the chin now and move on, we are going to suck this year anyway. Omameh was a bad signing, and he got rid of him - Reese would have moved him to Left Tackle and given him an extension.
Believe it or not it’s possible to learn from mistakes. Some of the most successful people in football are retreads.
Gettleman has guts for sure but will it pay off?
Right now he is 5-11 as the GM. We’ll see in two years if that turns.
Quote:
In comment 14331842 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
all fine and good, but why re-sign him to a 5-year, $95 million contract less than a year ago? Why didn't they trade Landon Collins in October? Then you have moves like signing Omameh and cutting him before half the season is out.
Look at the structure of that contract. That structure allowed him to be traded right now and we'll be done with it after this year.
Of that 90 million, only 16 million guaranteed. Compare that to the 50 million guaranteed Brown just got. Beckham definitely is right now.
That is an inarguably idiotic business decision.
Well, if it's any consolation, sounds like Gettleman was willing to let him walk and not pay him. Shurmur convinced them.
It didn't work, they gave themselves an out, they took it.
I'm not gonna lie, there was a little bit of snarkiness in there. But I like you, so it wasn't full snark. I save full snark for certain posters...
Quote:
all fine and good, but why re-sign him to a 5-year, $95 million contract less than a year ago? Why didn't they trade Landon Collins in October? Then you have moves like signing Omameh and cutting him before half the season is out.
Right or wrong, They were still cutting him slack. When he showed up to camp despite no contract and played 'good soldier' they went ahead and signed him (a poster here maybe hitdog spoke about this). They knew the talent was incredible and were hoping against hope he would mature. When he reacted the way he did after signing they realized it isn't going to get better but likely worse.
Collins I have no idea about. Lots of rumors what we were truly offered. If we did get offered a 2nd thats a miss on DGs part. If a 3rd its a miss only if we dont get that back as a comp pick. Other things could have been at play too that we are unaware of.
Quote:
A sincere thank you or a snarky thank you?
I'm not gonna lie, there was a little bit of snarkiness in there. But I like you, so it wasn't full snark. I save full snark for certain posters...
Like me!
Look, Gettleman has had a good couple days here, but he had a brutal first year as GM. I'm as happy as anybody to see the idiot sent packing to Cleveland, but Gettleman's presence as GM has still been a net negative. He's got a lot of work to do just to get back to even.
Quote:
A sincere thank you or a snarky thank you?
I'm not gonna lie, there was a little bit of snarkiness in there. But I like you, so it wasn't full snark. I save full snark for certain posters...
I have to admit I would have been honored if I had been fully snarked.
Perhaps next time
Quote:
In comment 14331865 crick n NC said:
Quote:
A sincere thank you or a snarky thank you?
I'm not gonna lie, there was a little bit of snarkiness in there. But I like you, so it wasn't full snark. I save full snark for certain posters...
Like me!
Look, Gettleman has had a good couple days here, but he had a brutal first year as GM. I'm as happy as anybody to see the idiot sent packing to Cleveland, but Gettleman's presence as GM has still been a net negative. He's got a lot of work to do just to get back to even.
Yes, but his hands were tied. You of all people have to give him credit for pulling this.
It should buy him some time with you to see what happens next.
Quote:
In comment 14331906 Chris in Philly said:
Quote:
In comment 14331865 crick n NC said:
Quote:
A sincere thank you or a snarky thank you?
I'm not gonna lie, there was a little bit of snarkiness in there. But I like you, so it wasn't full snark. I save full snark for certain posters...
Like me!
I still got love for ya. Even if we had a little tiff earlier.
^This.
I think Mara had had enough at that point, and he hired the right man in Gettleman to rid the franchise of him.
Mara being Mara he didn't want to rock the boat on his 1st year HC after Shurmur campaigned to keep him around. That was the mistake.
Look, Gettleman has had a good couple days here, but he had a brutal first year as GM. I'm as happy as anybody to see the idiot sent packing to Cleveland, but Gettleman's presence as GM has still been a net negative. He's got a lot of work to do just to get back to even.
His draft has the makings of an incredibly strong one. Yes some misses in FA but he had limited money to work with and needed to be creative. Solder improved as the year went on and should be solid year 2 here with a maturing Hernandez next to him. Ogletree was better than what people credit him for. Others guys were pretty bad but we arguably didnt have the cap to pay for better players.
Peppers is a great addition to the D and will be Bettchers dynamic jack knife guy. We essentially got 2 firsts in the Beckhum deal with Peppers coming aboard.
I think Mara had had enough at that point, and he hired the right man in Gettleman to rid the franchise of him.
Mara being Mara he didn't want to rock the boat on his 1st year HC after Shurmur campaigned to keep him around. That was the mistake.
Good points
I have been saying for years that big contract decisions ripple out and have major impacts down the line. Gettleman doesn't deserve major kudos for trading Beckham a year after signing him to the richest WR deal in history...not when there were so many public red flags (who knows how much Beckham horseshit they knew about behind the scenes?).
Gettleman's tenure has been too filled with complete messes to call him anything other than a mistake to this point.
The next move is to deal with Eli. Paying him this season is indefensible.
Quote:
In comment 14331761 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
LOL hiring the 70 year old guy thats been with the org for years is "change"?
Yeah let’s not look at what he’s done, let’s harp on his age. Talk about clueless.
this is outstanding. What's he done?
numbers and position . The past two seasons he went
to IR . its a wash . Yes agree maybe they could have
traded him for a 3rd but it's hindsight now .
OBJ has had a history of injuries . We have seen his antics
do we need him around Barkley ? The boat trip has always
stuck in my craw instead of being ready for the biggest
game of his career . He went Hollywood and with Cruz and
Sheppard in lock step they fell flat on there faces in Green Bay . Omameh was a disaster no getting around it but
it happens Free agents don't always pan out .
DG has his work cut out for him . If we add RT Williams
and have another impressive draft we will be well
on our way to a total rebuild .
Quote:
In comment 14331807 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
What the hell does DG know about a winning culture? Kind of hilarious.
ummm, won SB's with Gmen, redid Panthers and got them back to SB.. I would say he knows..
He wasn't GM for the Giants when they won. He took over a Panthers team that was already pretty much established by the time he got there. So, uhhhh...nope.
Umm, you are wrong... Yes, not the GM but was part of the organization. Come on now. I get it, you love OBJ and hate DG...
I have been saying for years that big contract decisions ripple out and have major impacts down the line. Gettleman doesn't deserve major kudos for trading Beckham a year after signing him to the richest WR deal in history...not when there were so many public red flags (who knows how much Beckham horseshit they knew about behind the scenes?).
Gettleman's tenure has been too filled with complete messes to call him anything other than a mistake to this point.
The next move is to deal with Eli. Paying him this season is indefensible.
He had literally just taken over the roster and all of the sudden he's faced with Beckham.
To his credit, apparently he wanted to let him walk. Shurmur convinced him otherwise, and he trusted his coach. But he structured the contract accordingly.
Like he has done several times already in his short time here, he has acknowledged mistakes and cut bait.
This is another example, and a BIG one at that.
OBJ was/is a supreme talent, but if we're trading him so as to get more players who can block, cover and tackle, I'm for it even if I hate to see OBJ go.
Skill players are great but I think the last few years showed they're all for naught if the offensive line can't block and the defense can't cover or tackle.
Not justifying each of the DG trades/signing/cuts, I agree some are bewildering. And I don't care about "culture" per se. I just know what I like to watch football-wise, and the recent Giants have not been that.
How about we let it play out. He had the balls to make a trade that you've advocated for and acknowledged nobody had the balls to make.
Cut the guy a little slack.
OBJ was/is a supreme talent, but if we're trading him so as to get more players who can block, cover and tackle, I'm for it even if I hate to see OBJ go.
Skill players are great but I think the last few years showed they're all for naught if the offensive line can't block and the defense can't cover or tackle.
Not justifying each of the DG trades/signing/cuts, I agree some are bewildering. And I don't care about "culture" per se. I just know what I like to watch football-wise, and the recent Giants have not been that.
Shep was huge on downfield blocking for Barkely. Get more guys like that...Hakeem Butler obliterates guys in the run game and is the big bodied type that DG seems to really like.
Man people have been giving me shit all offseason for being negative, and it's never made sense. The team has been a complete shitshow...negativity is the reality.
I'll say Gettleman is doing a good job when he's done a good job.
First asshat moment for me. Could be my last lol.
First asshat moment for me. Could be my last lol.
I have trouble with this one if true. Why not go after Foles then? Why not release him earlier and sign a couple of the better FAs. I guess we'll wait and see.
Terps, I hear what you are saying and generally agree about Beckham and Manning. But you act like these are all easy decisions and you have all the answers. The fact is there are always lots of factors, public and private, and there are negotiations among numerous stakeholders, and some things are going to go better than others. There are future uncertainties, injuries, draft order and you have to hedge against risks.
You don't know what we could have gotten for Beckham last year with a short leash on his contract. We would have gotten less or paid more if we kept him and let him hit FA. My point is that these are all difficult decisions and while you can certainly disagree with whatever you want, you do not have all the answers.
You could choose to emphasize that while it was a year too late, the Giants lost the player you wanted them to lose, they traded out Collins for a better younger cheaper prospect that can actually cover, they rid themselves of the Vernon contract, and in exchange got a top guard at a fair price. We have a heightened need at WR but have 12 picks in the draft.
I hear the hindsight on a Collins and/or OBJ trade last year, but it just does not always go your way. Things are not that simple in the real world.
Quote:
In comment 14331821 The Dude said:
Quote:
In comment 14331761 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
LOL hiring the 70 year old guy thats been with the org for years is "change"?
Yeah let’s not look at what he’s done, let’s harp on his age. Talk about clueless.
this is outstanding. What's he done?
Clearly nothing you like. I happen to like his approach, especially given the confines likely mandated to him.
You guys that want some 35 year old kid out of MIT to run the show need to understand that Mara isn’t hiring that. Hate Mara for that, don’t hate Gettleman.
I happen to like the trades he’s pulled off. We have a ton of draft capital and future cap room and build a team that dictates TOP. Maybe you disagree with that, we’ll see what happens, but he’s getting rid of players who didn’t have a future here regardless, why is that not a good thing?
Apple stunk
Vernon wasn’t worth his price tag
Snacks was a 2 down specialist that was a likely cut this offseason
Flowers stunk
Omameh got cut without blinking
What would you have done differently with these rostered players?
His biggest mistake has been Eli and I actually think he wants to move on and isn’t allowed to. That’s just my opinion, I have nothing to back that up but I don’t think I’m wrong on that one.
Quote:
What the hell does it even mean?
We're going to pass on the most talented players because they don't fit into some bullshit idea of what old, white guys think players should act like?
If you're a manager, you're job is to manage personnel. If you can't do that, maybe it's time to seek other employment.
Agree. The trade may work out and the locker room may be better but if you can’t stand gifted prima donnas, you’re not the guy to handle elite players.
This !!!
Quote:
Saquon wears white after Labor Day. We'll have to ship him out too...
Saquon and Sterling are strong character guys. You also see it manifest in the way Shep gives it all up to block for Saquon in the run game.
Fwiw, so did Beckham.
The list with OBJ is long.
Those aren't my words, they're Bill Belichick's. I'd recommend the 45 minute interview from 2017....
What does BB know! This is BBI!
Quote:
One of my oldest and most trusted of friend’s just told me he knows a guy that works closely with the giants and this guy stated eli will be released shortly. I am not sure I even buy it, but who knows. Take it for what it’s worth.
First asshat moment for me. Could be my last lol.
I have trouble with this one if true. Why not go after Foles then? Why not release him earlier and sign a couple of the better FAs. I guess we'll wait and see.
Who knows... I don’t even buy it but figured it was worth sharing. They could be thinking long view and just want to reset things with the new qb this year.
Quote:
all fine and good, but why re-sign him to a 5-year, $95 million contract less than a year ago? Why didn't they trade Landon Collins in October? Then you have moves like signing Omameh and cutting him before half the season is out.
Signing Beckham was galactically stupid.
Jesus would you just stop already? Why? You make it sound so easy. If they let him walk they get NOTHING in return. If they do try and trade him before that extension, and for all we know they did try, they might not not get the return they got now that he is signed long term.
Dead money bla bla bla bla bla. You don’t even want to spend the money anyway so relax already. They aren’t spending money this offseason anyway, they are taking the long game approach — who cares about the cap hit this season.
You love to bitch dude.
You have wanted this guy gone since the jump. They traded him. Got back good chips. What’s the problem? Spin this anyway you want.
Quote:
In comment 14332089 djm said:
Quote:
One of my oldest and most trusted of friend’s just told me he knows a guy that works closely with the giants and this guy stated eli will be released shortly. I am not sure I even buy it, but who knows. Take it for what it’s worth.
First asshat moment for me. Could be my last lol.
I have trouble with this one if true. Why not go after Foles then? Why not release him earlier and sign a couple of the better FAs. I guess we'll wait and see.
Who knows... I don’t even buy it but figured it was worth sharing. They could be thinking long view and just want to reset things with the new qb this year.
Given everything else,, it would actually be the move that would make the most sense. But, the smart thing to do would be to turn it over to Lauletta (or, I suppose Tanney). It would compound any stupidity he has exhibited to go for Haskins, Murray, Or Rosen, *especially* if he had to use accumulated assets to do so. He's put in the moves that gives them a great entree to an elite QB (and none of those guys are it) next year.
What?
Awesome platitude. One of your best. And I never ever said this.
That’s fucking it. Deal with it.
That's what they've been doing...
They cut a ton of guys although are inexplicably hanging on to McCoy. The parallels are interesting.
Go play Mega Millions since you must know what numbers are going to be drawn.
Because they lack talent, plain and simple. They won a Super Bowl when they had Strahan skipping training camp and Plax ditching practice for an entire season.
I've been saying this for awhile - the biggest issue the last 5 years is below average coaching. There have been personell issues, and injury issues, but one can't say McAdoo is a lousy coach, the team has no talent, and yet goes 11-5. The '16 and '17 teams had talent. Piss poor management of that talent, along with catastrophic injuries to WR in '17 were the primary reasons for 3-13.
So far I have seen no evidence that Gettleman and Shurmer can right the ship, we shall see in the next year or 2.
Quote:
the same responses are so tiresome.
LOL hiring the 70 year old guy thats been with the org for years is "change"?
If you can't see a change in the approach to personnel after all that has happened I don't know what to tell you. Just because he is 70 doesn't mean he doesn't have a strategy or doesn't know how to build a team.
Quote:
That's what they've been doing...
Because they lack talent, plain and simple. They won a Super Bowl when they had Strahan skipping training camp and Plax ditching practice for an entire season.
And that nfl doesn’t exist anymore. You want our GM to be forward thinking, I suggest doing the same. What Strathan and Plax got away with doesn’t work anymore. You just saw that with 2 top WRs and to an extent, Khalil Mack. Got a problem with practicing, there’s the door.
I really don’t know what else to tell you.
Culture doesn't matter...tell that to the Pats....
He has been purging those players, and it's a necessary purge. If you want to build a winner, you need players with the right attitude. Make no mistake, with or without Eli, this is a rebuild.
I know many on here still love Shockey, but look at the jump in production the team made from the end of 2007 though 12 games in 2008 with a lesser player who was more coachable and had a good attitude (Boss).
Attitude matters.
That said with Beckham in particular, his dollar cost went up dramatically with the new deal, and his production went down enough that it didn't cover his $ cost together with his bullshit cost.
I posted yesterday that he cost us $3,000,000 per TD last year. A team should target about 60 TDs a year, extrapolating that out if every TD cost $3,000,000 then the total cost of TDs would be $180,000,000. There goes your whole cap for offensive skill players. It leave not room for QB, Oline, the entire defense and special teams. THe production alone simply didn't justify the cost. Add in the bullshit factor and OBJ had to go.
Add to that, the fact that the idiot wants even more money. That was just one last FU to the Giants. He had to go. Asking for more money also dropped his value as trade bait unfortunately.
But I am willing to be patient and give this some time to play out. He was hired and he deserves his 3 years.
But I am willing to be patient and give this some time to play out. He was hired and he deserves his 3 years.
Agreed, salient points. Let his plan unfold a little more before judging it as a disaster.
The most celebrated Giants teams of the 80s won on the back of a cocaine crazed hall of Famer who slept in team meetings, sent prostitutes to opposing team hotel rooms, and failed drug tests in a scandal. And hes a hero, because you dont actually care about "team" when it results in wins. When theres nothing but losses you become guardians of a behavior standard you dont even live by yourselves.
But I am willing to be patient and give this some time to play out. He was hired and he deserves his 3 years.
McL don't you think the point might have merit that some of these "malcontents" are the result of clashing with our traditional and possibly dated styles.
Don't you find that culture shifts and innovation improvements typically go hand in hand?
Don't we have an alarming number of players with attitude problems compared to other teams? Isn't this potentially very alarming from a numerical perspective?
To this end. Isn't there a case to be made that since much of the scouting staff has remained the same and there is no real evidence that our decision making processes have change that this idea that we are somehow NOW able to assess character might be a far fetched idea?
I agree by the way that this is potentially the right way to go by investing in the lines, I know we share this. However, both the returns we have gotten on these deals. And the way we undermine our players and handle things at the time might indeed affect the returns we get?
I'm linking an article on traits of bad leaders and I think we can see a lot of that here. But "permitting negative gossip" is one that really stands out to me. Any objective analysis that we make that this was a fair return has to include the fact that we shot ourselves in the foot in the way we've handled some of our most high value assets. (Even if you want to color them all as bad seeds)
15 Traits of a Terrible Leader - ( New Window )
The most celebrated Giants teams of the 80s won on the back of a cocaine crazed hall of Famer who slept in team meetings, sent prostitutes to opposing team hotel rooms, and failed drug tests in a scandal. And hes a hero, because you dont actually care about "team" when it results in wins. When theres nothing but losses you become guardians of a behavior standard you dont even live by yourselves.
Odell, not so much from the onside kick against the Bears to the sudden desire for an IV before the half ended to sitting out the last 4 games.
Year 1
1. Say you can have a winning team (even though you are lying and this is "what you have to do")
2. Accuse all players you didn't draft of high talent of being malcontents, deal out of desperation and get below value
3. Overpay for veterans while saying you don't have money to fill other holes on team, some that you created
Year 2
1. Purge team of most remaining talent, create culture of fear for anyone that isn't willing to question your authority unequivocally
2. Bring in younger more impressionable players that you make call you sir because they don't know any better
The epic Packers under Lombardi were hard core party hounds too. That's not the point. The point is would they sacrifice their bodies for each other and in the case of the Packers, the LT Giant teams and out 2007-2012 team, the answer was "yes."
Odell, not so much from the onside kick against the Bears to the sudden desire for an IV before the half ended to sitting out the last 4 games.
Cut the bullshit, homer. He lost a year of his career because he was giving max effort in a useless preseason game and had his ankle broken.
The Giants are unlikely to win another game until Gettleman and Shurmur are gone.
Quote:
I am not the biggest Gettleman fan.
But I am willing to be patient and give this some time to play out. He was hired and he deserves his 3 years.
McL don't you think the point might have merit that some of these "malcontents" are the result of clashing with our traditional and possibly dated styles.
Don't you find that culture shifts and innovation improvements typically go hand in hand?
Don't we have an alarming number of players with attitude problems compared to other teams? Isn't this potentially very alarming from a numerical perspective?
To this end. Isn't there a case to be made that since much of the scouting staff has remained the same and there is no real evidence that our decision making processes have change that this idea that we are somehow NOW able to assess character might be a far fetched idea?
I agree by the way that this is potentially the right way to go by investing in the lines, I know we share this. However, both the returns we have gotten on these deals. And the way we undermine our players and handle things at the time might indeed affect the returns we get?
I'm linking an article on traits of bad leaders and I think we can see a lot of that here. But "permitting negative gossip" is one that really stands out to me. Any objective analysis that we make that this was a fair return has to include the fact that we shot ourselves in the foot in the way we've handled some of our most high value assets. (Even if you want to color them all as bad seeds) 15 Traits of a Terrible Leader - ( New Window )
Absolutely the "malcontents" and bad attitude players is the result of bad leadership.
But that has to be pinned on Reese and McAdoo.
In a workplace, once people's attitudes has gone sour, I have never seen it get turned around, even with new management. The only way to change the overall attitude of the organization is to purge the people who have gone sour.
I have taken over groups where I had to be the one doing the purging. Never fun, but necessary. So, I can't fault Gettleman for doing what I have done in the past.
That is not to say that their won't be players who will go sour on Shurmur and Gettleman. That remains to be seen.
And the fact that players who so easily soured were brought in is not a good mark for the scouting department. But I don't know what compromises Reese and Co. were making, perhaps the scouting department highlighted the issues, and Reese chose to overlook them.
Since the same scouting department was responsible for the 2005 - 2011 teams which were populated with good character guys, I will give them a pass for now. If we start building with bad character guys again, then the whole lot of FO personnel has to go, coach, GM, directors of pro and college personnel and all the scouts. Blow it up.
What do the Giants have that would give any player reason to buy in? It's not the coach, who's never even had a winning season. It's not the quality of the talent in the locker room. We all know it's non-existent.
I know we obviously agree on that but reading about how Lurie deals with the decision making process now in that ESPN article about the Eagles was a tough read.
I think Gettleman will clearly get 3 years and we are essentially on the same page. But I also think this idea that they might be onto something and it requires patience to let play out is kind of a difficult one to swallow.
Given how Mara clearly is impacted by the fans the idea that we have evidence that whatever produced the bad culture being fixed is a little far fetched?
I think it boils down to yeah, maybe they did this right 10 years ago but a lot has changed since then and maybe the idea that when everyone was essentially throwing darts that any dart thrower was as good as the next but now that some people are throwing darts while others are shooting at the same targets with sniper rifles might play a role in this problem.
I know i'm preaching to the converted on a lot of this but I also think it is kind of dangerous right now to buy into the idea that even if this does work (which we can agree is some probabilistic function that isn't insignificant) that a failure to acknowledge that we might still be at a disadvantage even dispute this is not ideal?
DG is not just jettisoning players he's playing Pick Four straight and boxed
DG is not just jettisoning players he's taking a penny and leaving a penny
DG is not just jettisoning players he's wondering where this other sock went
DG is not just jettisoning players he's getting on a plane and leaving
DG is not just jettisoning players he's giving this guy the business
We're going to pass on the most talented players because they don't fit into some bullshit idea of what old, white guys think players should act like?
If you're a manager, you're job is to manage personnel. If you can't do that, maybe it's time to seek other employment.
Don't bring logic into this.
Stop it Eric. Don't you dare ask relevant questions and question the machine.