Maybe it is how he will fit with this team. Just cleaned out a few guys for that reason. Maybe it is about medical history. Maybe we really like another QB next year. We will find out soon enough.
RE: Maybe it is not about the money to DG and the Giants, Â
Maybe it is how he will fit with this team. Just cleaned out a few guys for that reason. Maybe it is about medical history. Maybe we really like another QB next year. We will find out soon enough.
very possible but we havent heard alot of bad about rosen in his first year. plus he took a fucking beating and dint complain once and he stayed healthy. id said he answered a couple questions about his flaws in his first year
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
RE: RE: Lol couldve had him last yr just drafting Â
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
is seriously a no brainer. you get him for insanely cheap money wise and a 2 or 3 whyen we have 12 picks. if he sucks or he has an attitude we cant just cut bait and go for a 2020 QB. its so low risk high reward, giants would be crazy notto do it if they can agree to a deal.
plus the whole we didnt take him at 2. we liked barkley better. we didnt want to take a chance with 2 overall but with a 3rd, he could be worth a risk to check his attitude and mindset.
Boom ...
RE: RE: RE: Lol couldve had him last yr just drafting Â
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Lol couldve had him last yr just drafting Â
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
sure its possible z team like pats offer #32, but we can offer #37 and a 2020 pick...they might find that more entertaining considering we will probably be bad again.
only way it gets to that is if there is a bidding war. chances are there will be 2-3 teams interested, but the cards dont have much leverage
draft picks than we do to play with. But how much would they want to spend on a guy who will be unhappy sitting behind Brady after being a starter, and how many years will be left on his rookie deal by the time Brady retires? Plus, if Rosen hates Trump, he probably hates Kraft and Brady also, lol.
RE: RE: RE: Lol couldve had him last yr just drafting Â
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
YUP! We could be like Green Bay and steal a Favre-like talent.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lol couldve had him last yr just drafting Â
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
sure its possible z team like pats offer #32, but we can offer #37 and a 2020 pick...they might find that more entertaining considering we will probably be bad again.
only way it gets to that is if there is a bidding war. chances are there will be 2-3 teams interested, but the cards dont have much leverage
Raiders have 3 firsts and the Packers have 2 firsts. Both of those teams could be interested in Rosen.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Lol couldve had him last yr just drafting Â
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
sure its possible z team like pats offer #32, but we can offer #37 and a 2020 pick...they might find that more entertaining considering we will probably be bad again.
only way it gets to that is if there is a bidding war. chances are there will be 2-3 teams interested, but the cards dont have much leverage
Raiders have 3 firsts and the Packers have 2 firsts. Both of those teams could be interested in Rosen.
why on earth would the packers be interested in rosen?
very possible but we havent heard alot of bad about rosen in his first year. plus he took a fucking beating and dint complain once and he stayed healthy. id said he answered a couple questions about his flaws in his first year
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
Quote:
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
plus the whole we didnt take him at 2. we liked barkley better. we didnt want to take a chance with 2 overall but with a 3rd, he could be worth a risk to check his attitude and mindset.
Boom ...
Quote:
In comment 14337076 micky said:
Quote:
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
Quote:
In comment 14337110 Jeff said:
Quote:
In comment 14337076 micky said:
Quote:
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
sure its possible z team like pats offer #32, but we can offer #37 and a 2020 pick...they might find that more entertaining considering we will probably be bad again.
only way it gets to that is if there is a bidding war. chances are there will be 2-3 teams interested, but the cards dont have much leverage
Quote:
In comment 14337076 micky said:
Quote:
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
Quote:
In comment 14337114 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 14337110 Jeff said:
Quote:
In comment 14337076 micky said:
Quote:
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
sure its possible z team like pats offer #32, but we can offer #37 and a 2020 pick...they might find that more entertaining considering we will probably be bad again.
only way it gets to that is if there is a bidding war. chances are there will be 2-3 teams interested, but the cards dont have much leverage
Raiders have 3 firsts and the Packers have 2 firsts. Both of those teams could be interested in Rosen.
Quote:
In comment 14337137 GFAN52 said:
Quote:
In comment 14337114 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 14337110 Jeff said:
Quote:
In comment 14337076 micky said:
Quote:
Now have to give up picks..brilliant..i know barkley barkley barkley.. but no foresight amongst this org now
huh??..so if they get him for a 2nd round pick this year it would be worse than if they used the no 2 overall pick last year ?!?! How is that a bad thing?
yea micky your logic is skewed here...we could have BOTH for a first and a second whereas NO WAY we could acquire barkley for a second. we got INSANELY lucky on the timing of this entire thing. cards hired kings who LOVES murray and they happen to be picking one the year murray comes out. again this is a rare chance to acquire a potential franchise guy without using a serious resource that is a first rounder.
It’s not a given Rosen wouldn’t require a first.
sure its possible z team like pats offer #32, but we can offer #37 and a 2020 pick...they might find that more entertaining considering we will probably be bad again.
only way it gets to that is if there is a bidding war. chances are there will be 2-3 teams interested, but the cards dont have much leverage
Raiders have 3 firsts and the Packers have 2 firsts. Both of those teams could be interested in Rosen.
why on earth would the packers be interested in rosen?