Is the dead money just for 2019 and is that the salary or signing bonus or both? If not, how much is there left in dead money after 2019? Also, with regards to salary and signing bonus, I was always under the impression that the signing bonuses are the "guaranteed" money, but that the salary is off the books and the player does not receive it if they are cut, or does not receive it from the team that trades them, as in the new team picks up the tab. Shouldn't we just owe Vernon and Beckham the signing bonus, why do we have to pay their salary for 2019 too?
Pin it in your favorites for future reference
OTC - ( New Window )
We are getting better...DG had 44M last year....but it may not all be over yet.....
We are getting better...DG had 44M last year....but it may not all be over yet.....
You can designate up to two players per year post June 1 cut. As far as salary spreading, it’s a little more complicated.
OTC June 1 designation - ( New Window )
Quote:
this year....
We are getting better...DG had 44M last year....but it may not all be over yet.....
Hopefully he is done with the blood letting for this year. Cap wise, the team is in great shape for next year, at over $103M; which will probably drop a bit when they sign the 12 draft picks (or whatever the final number is).
From what I've read the Giants have ~15M in 2019 cap space and ~14M required for their draft pool, and then about 77M space in 2020.
Not to say they are in bad shape, they are in good shape -- but I think they have about 25% less than that 103M number.
Quote:
In comment 14343162 Doomster said:
Quote:
this year....
We are getting better...DG had 44M last year....but it may not all be over yet.....
Hopefully he is done with the blood letting for this year. Cap wise, the team is in great shape for next year, at over $103M; which will probably drop a bit when they sign the 12 draft picks (or whatever the final number is).
From what I've read the Giants have ~15M in 2019 cap space and ~14M required for their draft pool, and then about 77M space in 2020.
Not to say they are in bad shape, they are in good shape -- but I think they have about 25% less than that 103M number.