If the Giants decide that Rosen is the best "available" QB addition, I don't believe
pick #37 is enough to get a deal done, especially with NE sitting at 32, with ammo to move up.
I also believe a pure pick #17 is too much. I would offer picks 17 and 95 for
Rosen and the Cards pick #65.
Seems a realistic price for a potential, if tarnished, franchise QB. I would try
to close the deal as soon as possible.
I love this tough guy, greedy approach. Who says nobody else is offering anything?
I wouldn't go any higher that our 37th pick. And that may be too much. Arizona was a bad team last season, but Rosen did not look good. And I wouldn't mind him here if he doesn't cost us a lot of draft capital. We need our 1st rd picks desperately to rebuild.
No need for the giants to negotiate against themselves.
I would say a 2 for Rosen....would be the best Az could hope for
Save the 2019 picks to build
Save the 2019 picks to build
I don’t think you can turn on a force trade feature in real life. You have to give up a 2019 pick.
And for those saying he sucked last year go back and look at Josh Allen and Sam Darnold. Rosen's numbers are right in line with them except he had the worst OL in football. Neither the Jets nor Buffalo are trading their QB. The 37th pick for Rosen is still a huge advantage in our favor. Our third round pick is basically a 3rd round compensatory pick. If that is the best offer that Arizona gets why wouldn't they just hold onto him for 3 more years as insurance and then get a comp pick when he leaves via FA?
And for those saying he sucked last year go back and look at Josh Allen and Sam Darnold. Rosen's numbers are right in line with them except he had the worst OL in football. Neither the Jets nor Buffalo are trading their QB. The 37th pick for Rosen is still a huge advantage in our favor. Our third round pick is basically a 3rd round compensatory pick. If that is the best offer that Arizona gets why wouldn't they just hold onto him for 3 more years as insurance and then get a comp pick when he leaves via FA?
I have watched several Cardinals games from last season since the Rosen opportunity has been in the rumor mill. His OL sucked at pass blocking. However, his throws were almost always high. I like Rosen and would be very happy to get him here with our staff which is better than what he had last beat season in AZ.
The Cardinals can use the draft picks to help rebuild that poor OL for Murray.
suffice is a lousy strategy.
It's the most decisive position in all of sports.
That’s not entirely true. The longer they wait the less time on his rookie contract. Once they take Murray they likely have to trade him to extract value
I wouldn't force it because he's available, but if DG and Shurmur feel he's a franchise QB, you get him at a great price with minimal depreciation for his 1 year of experience.
It would be a coup to get Rosen for a 2nd when you consider you still have 2 1st's a 3rd as meaningful picks and you have added a top 5 RG to your team.
Regardless of what we pay, if we try him at QB and he fails, we'll have wasted another couple of years.
I don't see a realistic scenario where we get him and he comes in immediately and starts, and if he comes in, sits behind eli and plays next year, he's already another year closer to his second contract.
On the other hand, if they don't see Rosen as a franchise guy, don't waste your time, regardless of the price.
2) You think he might be your franchise qb and you want to take a chance
3) you are looking for a cost sonywreolled back up we
The price is dependent on how many teams fall into each category. If there are two teams that think he is a franchise qb then the price should probably be a first Round pick. Teams trade a lot more than 1 first round pick to get a franchise qb, so if you were certain then a forest round might be seen as almost a bargain.
I think most teams with interest fall into category 2. They think he might be but have concerns. The fact that Az is giving up after a year, although it can be explained away about Murray being the better fit, raises concerns. Teams might have concerns but they will be willing to take a calculated risk. A calculated risk on a franchise qb I would guess would be a 2 to 4th round pick. The price depends on how many teams are interested and how much of a risk they think it is.
This like buying a house. Do you want risk losing out because you are trying to underpay. If you miss out it may cost you more to get your next house and you may get more desperate. Sometimes you luck out with a lowball offer, but is it worth the risk. If you really want it and feel you can afford it and still buy all the other things you need, is it really an overlay if the value then goes up after you buy it.
I'm hearing how Jones and Lock are potential 1st rd picks and imo Rosen is much better than either. Plus I think he's better than Haskins.
Regardless of what we pay, if we try him at QB and he fails, we'll have wasted another couple of years.
I don't see a realistic scenario where we get him and he comes in immediately and starts, and if he comes in, sits behind eli and plays next year, he's already another year closer to his second contract.
If we are going to spend considerable resources on any QB this off season then I don't see why we won't have them play at some point in the season.. it won't make any sense to give up a 2nd for Rosen or 6th pick for Murray/Haskins and then not have them play in a real NFL game this season..
Like everyone else, I have no idea what offer AZ would accept to trade Rosen, but chances are multiple teams will be interested. And if that's the case, Rosen will be traded at his MARKET VALUE, not at some bargain price because people think that AZ has to trade him.
Think of it this way. You just accepted an offer for your dream job, but it's out of state and you're going to have to sell your house ASAP.
When your home goes on the market you get three offers within days. Do you lose leverage because you HAVE to sell or do you gain leverage because you have three bidders competing against one another to buy your home?
And I also agree with Robbie. If AZ only gets low-ball offers they may choose to keep Rosen. They could actually let Murray sit for half the season (like Eli did) and start Rosen. And if Rosen showed improvement in year two his value would likely increase.
Like everyone else, I have no idea what offer AZ would accept to trade Rosen, but chances are multiple teams will be interested. And if that's the case, Rosen will be traded at his MARKET VALUE, not at some bargain price because people think that AZ has to trade him.
Think of it this way. You just accepted an offer for your dream job, but it's out of state and you're going to have to sell your house ASAP.
When your home goes on the market you get three offers within days. Do you lose leverage because you HAVE to sell or do you gain leverage because you have three bidders competing against one another to buy your home?
And I also agree with Robbie. If AZ only gets low-ball offers they may choose to keep Rosen. They could actually let Murray sit for half the season (like Eli did) and start Rosen. And if Rosen showed improvement in year two his value would likely increase.
+1
Or at least I hope didn't just toss $5M aside for his roster bonus. If Haskins or Murray is drafted, I could see a succession where they come in like Eli did his rookie year - game 8 or 9 if it is clear we aren't going anywhere. If rosen is here, I don't know what would happen, especially if the team is playing well.
The problem is that teams don't often cut cords with QB's very quickly (and the fact that the Cards might raises other questions). So if rosen is here, he's likely here for a couple of years and if he plays mediocre, we are still at Step 1, regardless of whether we paid a 1st, 2nd or 3rd for him.
Like everyone else, I have no idea what offer AZ would accept to trade Rosen, but chances are multiple teams will be interested. And if that's the case, Rosen will be traded at his MARKET VALUE, not at some bargain price because people think that AZ has to trade him.
Think of it this way. You just accepted an offer for your dream job, but it's out of state and you're going to have to sell your house ASAP.
When your home goes on the market you get three offers within days. Do you lose leverage because you HAVE to sell or do you gain leverage because you have three bidders competing against one another to buy your home?
And I also agree with Robbie. If AZ only gets low-ball offers they may choose to keep Rosen. They could actually let Murray sit for half the season (like Eli did) and start Rosen. And if Rosen showed improvement in year two his value would likely increase.
I agree. I went with a house analogy too and I think it applies in so many ways.
"I'd give them a used pair of socks for Rosen and tell them to take it! I have all the leverage!!!"
"I'd give them a used pair of socks for Rosen and tell them to take it! I have all the leverage!!!"
Makes the pretzel and hot dog offer sound pretty attractive!!
All this talk about a 3rd rounder or even a 2nd rounder getting it done seems like nonsense. Their is no incentive for them to trade him now, zero. I'm also of the opinion that if they draft Murray, Rosen's value still doesn't take that much of a hit.
If they like him and can get him for a 2nd or later then fine, but I don't see that happening. Arizona is going to want a first right now, and we won't part with one (yet).
I guess we found Gettleman's BBI handle.
Deal would probably happen on draft day.
Quote:
If we are going to spend considerable resources on any QB this off season then I don't see why we won't have them play at some point in the season.. it won't make any sense to give up a 2nd for Rosen or 6th pick for Murray/Haskins and then not have them play in a real NFL game this season.
Or at least I hope didn't just toss $5M aside for his roster bonus. If Haskins or Murray is drafted, I could see a succession where they come in like Eli did his rookie year - game 8 or 9 if it is clear we aren't going anywhere. If rosen is here, I don't know what would happen, especially if the team is playing well.
The problem is that teams don't often cut cords with QB's very quickly (and the fact that the Cards might raises other questions). So if rosen is here, he's likely here for a couple of years and if he plays mediocre, we are still at Step 1, regardless of whether we paid a 1st, 2nd or 3rd for him.
While I won't have done the same the $5M shouldn't stop us from trying out our next QB.. unless we are in a realistic playoff run.. Also I get your understanding of why a team would quit on a player so fast.. But its the Cardinals.. during the past few decades the only time they were good was with Bruce Arians and he couldn't wait to get out of there.. I won't trust anything Cardinals do.. plus they have a new HC.. who may or may not share the same view point as the previous HC..
Also I hope the decision on whether or not a player should play out the year should be made on a game by game basis.. you can't come in with the logic that no matter what Eli is starting 16 games.. thats just not a smart way to operate.. But looking at current management I won't put it past them..
Eli's replacement will be drafted this year or next.
I think it's a combination of 1 and 2
Unless you're really high on him.
So, if you're really high on him, he's worth even the #6, and if you're not, you have to think what pick would you risk on a player you believe you may have to cut in two years. Certainly not #6 or #17. #37? Maybe, depending on how much risk you think there is.
Eli's replacement will be drafted this year or next.
I tend to agree, however...
It's entirely possible that teams contacting AZ about Rosen's availability were told that he's not on the market, because they weren't quite yet ready to commit to Murray. In this scenario the Giants could have felt that they had no choice but to pay Eli his roster bonus.
I also think that Mara didn't feel comfortable cutting Eli and wants to give him one last shot this year. But I also think that the Giants want to get their future QB this year as well. And if that's the case, is trading for Rosen and letting him sit until the Giants are out of the playoffs in 2019 really that much different than drafting a QB and having him do the same thing?
I think it's a combination of 1 and 2
Gettleman gave us his window of thought in the Odell trade. The team that calls first is at a disadvantage. If the Giants are interested in Rosen, they should just sit there and wait for the Cardinals to start calling. The moment the Cardinals start calling around about Rosen, his value is diminished because that means teams know they are picking Murray and they will have to deal him. The leverage the Cardinals have is to try to get a bidding war. The general sense is he will cost a 3rd, but if there is a semi bidding war.
I'm still curious about Jt's hint that the Giants will deal Shepard and if he lands another 2nd or 3rd, I think that has to signal the Giants are going to be trading somehow for a QB, either a trade up from 17 (or 6) or to get Rosen.
Regardless of what we pay, if we try him at QB and he fails, we'll have wasted another couple of years.
Agreed, but wouldnt that also be true if we took Murray or Haskins at 6, or even more risky if we bundled several picks and took them at 2 or 3? We would also be paying them a HELL of a lot more. Rosen is $6M over 4 years. That is long snapper money.
At some point we have to take a BIG risk on a QB. A 2nd rounder (and only $6M over 4 years) is such a low investment and risk for a QB with his skill set that I think it would be irresponsible to not pull the trigger (if available).
Give him 2 years and if it doesnt work out you try again in the 2021 draft.
Quote:
#37 today for Rosen, I think Cards would take it. Only reason that hasn't happened is because A) we might not want Rosen B) Giants are waiting to see what Cards do with Murray C) Cards actually want to keep Rosen and not draft Murray
I think it's a combination of 1 and 2
Gettleman gave us his window of thought in the Odell trade. The team that calls first is at a disadvantage. If the Giants are interested in Rosen, they should just sit there and wait for the Cardinals to start calling. The moment the Cardinals start calling around about Rosen, his value is diminished because that means teams know they are picking Murray and they will have to deal him. The leverage the Cardinals have is to try to get a bidding war. The general sense is he will cost a 3rd, but if there is a semi bidding war.
I'm still curious about Jt's hint that the Giants will deal Shepard and if he lands another 2nd or 3rd, I think that has to signal the Giants are going to be trading somehow for a QB, either a trade up from 17 (or 6) or to get Rosen.
Didn't finish my thought, a bidding war will likely mean he will cost a 2nd.
How is it a limited market? You've got 4 or 5 QB's likely to be drafted in the first round in 2020 - seems like the market is huge. Any one of those teams can see Rosen as an infinitely cheaper option even at a late 1st/early 2nd than having to trade up to get one of the other guys.
The QB position doesn't decrease in value.