I really like Kollmann's videos, he gushes for 12 minutes about Williams
"When you get the chance to draft a unicorn, don't over think it. Turn in the card and look up to the football gods and say two words. Thank you."
Built by Bama - (
New Window )
Size, meaurables and tremendous production when he got playing time.
Yet the Giants have moved to a base 3-4 concept where the NT and DEs are mostly meant to eat blockers and free up the linebackers to rush and tackle. Williams isn't an ideal fit for that scheme. He's not a 3-4 NT or DE.
If it were me, and I could get a guy with that kind of talent, I'd rethink the base scheme to find a way to use him. Would Bettcher and the Giants think that way?
Yet the Giants have moved to a base 3-4 concept where the NT and DEs are mostly meant to eat blockers and free up the linebackers to rush and tackle. Williams isn't an ideal fit for that scheme. He's not a 3-4 NT or DE.
If it were me, and I could get a guy with that kind of talent, I'd rethink the base scheme to find a way to use him. Would Bettcher and the Giants think that way?
This is only in a traditional 2-gap 3-4, lots of teams run a 1-gap where penetrating DL are valuable. Based on Betcher's love of hybrid players/creative blitzes, I am betting he would love a player like Williams.
Watch the video... anywhere.
Yet the Giants have moved to a base 3-4 concept where the NT and DEs are mostly meant to eat blockers and free up the linebackers to rush and tackle. Williams isn't an ideal fit for that scheme. He's not a 3-4 NT or DE.
If it were me, and I could get a guy with that kind of talent, I'd rethink the base scheme to find a way to use him. Would Bettcher and the Giants think that way?
That's not our defense, it's a one gap 3-4. It's an attacking front, their primary responsibility is not to free up blockers it is to penetrate the interior gaps. The pass rush in this defense is not just coming from the Edge and LBs. Q fits perfectly.
Yet the Giants have moved to a base 3-4 concept where the NT and DEs are mostly meant to eat blockers and free up the linebackers to rush and tackle. Williams isn't an ideal fit for that scheme. He's not a 3-4 NT or DE.
If it were me, and I could get a guy with that kind of talent, I'd rethink the base scheme to find a way to use him. Would Bettcher and the Giants think that way?
Yes, he can play 3-4 DE. And did so at Alabama.
That said, we have no shot at him at #6. It just isn't going to happen. I said elsewhere I wouldn't be upset with a trade up for him, but with a pressing QB need on the horizon, it is probably not the wisest allocation of assets.
Would love to see him on our DL, though. Transforms the defense immediately.
Kollmann's videos are really well done, I learn a lot about the players and the game by watching them. He does a lot of NFL in-season stuff in addition to college player analysis.
Does anyone see a scenario where something like that could possibly happen?
We're not getting him. Why wouldn't the Jets take him at 3?
We're not getting him. Why wouldn't the Jets take him at 3?
If Murray goes 1, you can basically write in Bosa to the Niners. Do the Jets pass on Allen?
There is a scenario where 2 QBs go Top 5 and the Raiders or Bucs get weird. I wouldn't completely write off a guy like Allen or QW falling, it could happen.
I'd probably do that.
Does anyone see a scenario where something like that could possibly happen?
Trade up from 6 to 3 cost the Jets 3 2nd round picks.
Could trade Shep for an additional 2nd potentially to Pats if Rumors are true.
Though if we got Rosen we may not need next years #1 for the most important thing which would be QB.
I'd probably do that.
Using the trade value chart:
2nd overall- 2,600pts
For
6th overall- 1,600pts
17th overall- 950pts
2600 pts for 2,550 pts
If anything, 49ers may ask for a 5th if they were willing to trade in the first place.
...or if it gets to Oakland's pick and we find that Quinnen Williams is still om the board, I wonder if Gruden would be interested in something involving 6th overall + Shepherd.
I don't care how good Williams is, he's not worth that.
That said, we have no shot at him at #6. It just isn't going to happen. I said elsewhere I wouldn't be upset with a trade up for him, but with a pressing QB need on the horizon, it is probably not the wisest allocation of assets.
Would love to see him on our DL, though. Transforms the defense immediately.
How well do Penn State RB's fare after they've been drafted? The one we got seems fine.
Since you want to deflect rather then discuss the trend, sure why not.
A guy like this, you change your scheme to accommodate.
#6 and Evan Engram for #4.
Not sweet enough? Throw in the Shep.
Q the Q!