for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

#6, #17, #37… EDGE/CB/OT/QB… which one goes unaddressed?

Matt G : 4/12/2019 11:18 am
So I know you draft the player and not the position… And I know the Giants have needs all over the roster… That being said, the general consensus is that EDGE/CB/OT/QB are the most glaring needs heading into the Draft… And the talent level at these four spots falls off pretty significantly between #37 and #95.

So my question is which position does BBI feel most comfortable addressing a bit later in the draft? And which position do you think Gettleman lets slide until late Day 2 / Day 3?

While I’m in the camp of “let’s wait on addressing QB until 2020,” I just get the feeling that we’re either taking Jones on Day 1 or trading #37 for Rosen (I would MUCH prefer the latter of the two options).

There are some great EDGE players but they are going to come off the board early and often. IMO, EDGE falls off pretty quickly between #17 and #37. So if I had to guess one of Sweat, Gary or Ferrell will be wearing an “ny” cap on 4/25.

CB is a glaring need, which for some reason the media doesn’t mention that often… And there just isn’t much there after the first 4-5 players, IMO. I have to think that Murphy would be in play at #17 as well as guys like Baker and Oruwariye at #37. After that it’s a cr*pshoot

OT is probably the deepest of the positions and I think this might be where Gettleman decides to wait. There might be a chance that a guy like Bobby Evans (who is very similar to Darryl Williams who DG drafted with CAR) or Michael Deiter is still around at #95. That being said, I would have a tough time watching us pass on a Williams or Dillard at #17. I think both are Day 1 starters on a revamped OL and eventual replacements for Nate Solder on the blind side.

And then the wildcard is if one of their higher rated big bodied WRs/TEs slides to them.

It’s going to be interesting to say the least… and Gettleman absolutely HAS to nail these first 3 picks.


CB  
JonC : 4/12/2019 11:20 am : link
.
QB  
Jim Bur(n)t : 4/12/2019 11:20 am : link
Fix this DEFENSE & OL
OT - I think they wait until round 3 or 4 and take someone like Hyatt  
Eric on Li : 4/12/2019 11:22 am : link
or Evans who has started a lot of games but doesn't have premium traits.

I also wouldn't be shocked if they went with 2 front 7 players in those first 3 picks.
OT  
Chris684 : 4/12/2019 11:22 am : link
If Remmers is here, wouldn't shock me if OT is left for 95 or the 4th rounders.
OT  
Big Blue '56 : 4/12/2019 11:24 am : link
.
CB  
Harvest Blend : 4/12/2019 11:26 am : link
.
And it's not even that fixed  
SirYesSir : 4/12/2019 11:31 am : link
Wr is a question
ILB might offer best value and is a need
DT might offer best value and is a need

there's a chance 2 or 3 of the four you mentioned don't get addressed in the early rounds
QB  
islander1 : 4/12/2019 11:35 am : link
and don't be surprised if it's OT as well, depending on who's on the board.
QB  
Chip : 4/12/2019 11:42 am : link
I hope. They have to fix the defense. If we get a stop gap in Remmers will be a factor at OT and whether we get one with the first three picks.
I think it's quite possibly we wait  
Lionhart28 : 4/12/2019 11:45 am : link
on CB and OT. Especially with guys like QW and Oliver possibly in play at 6 and Dexter Lawrence, Christian Wilkins possibly availably at 17. If we get Remmers, we can wait on later OT prospects.

Guys like Evans (who I also really like), Chuma Edoga (if he falls), McGary, Scharping, Pipkins, Roemer.

Fwiw, I think Hyatt is a guard in the NFL. Doesn't have the feet or length for tackle.

Corner is also pretty deep and with 12 picks, we can afford to draft a few in mid rounds and see what shakes out.

I too am in the wait until 2020 on QB camp. Ideally I'd like to defense with 6,17 something like Williams, Bush.. Allen, Lawrence, etc. And get BPA at 37 between T, CB, WR and EDGE/DL (whatever we passed on in RD1).
The assumption  
jvm52106 : 4/12/2019 11:48 am : link
is 3 picks 4 needs and each pick will be one of those needs.. Ummm, NO!

CB and OT will both be missed. I suspect we will get a DE/DT, an EDGE and a QB based on the quality of players at those positions at the time of our picks..

OT, CB, WR and G/C will be in rds 3-7.
Good Question  
ZogZerg : 4/12/2019 11:51 am : link
..
The only way I'm willing to wait  
JFIB : 4/12/2019 11:52 am : link
Until 2020 to draft a QB is if we trade some picks in this years draft to amass enough ammo in next years draft to move up in the first round to get the guy we want. We can't expect to go into 2020 with the 11th pick and come away with the next franchise QB.
OT  
MotownGIANTS : 4/12/2019 11:54 am : link
barring WRs go off the board earlier than expected in a cluster. 6 & 17 will most likely be all D or D then QB .... 37 will be BPA regardless of need and position and that will be determined by how the draft falls out ....

I can actually see the 1st 2 picks being defensive front 7 and then WR/CB/QB @ 37.
Good OP  
Jay in Toronto : 4/12/2019 11:56 am : link
QB unless the Giants have a very strong conviction that one could be a quality successor to Eli

I think a RT can be had at #37. ER is clearly a strength of the draft and a real need, so it would be a shame if we didn't come up with one.

As I've argued elsewhere (and tried to raise to a greater level of discussion) I am more concerned about CB than even OL. The top talent sounds like it's thin. There may not be anyone left at 17 or 37 worthy of that pick and I wouldn't want to see a reach based on that need.
not an asshat  
giants#1 : 4/12/2019 11:56 am : link
but I'll all but guarantee that #6 is a pass rusher, though not necessarily an EDGE player since I think guys like Q Williams, Oliver, and Wilkins will be in play (DTs according to Sy). While not necessarily coming off the edge, even in a 34, these guys will all make QBs very uncomfortable.

If Remmers really is all but a done deal, then I don't expect OL depth until the 3rd (or later). If he's not as close as the asshat(s) claim, then I think #17 or #37 will be an OT.

I also think at least 2 of the 3 picks will definitely be on defense. Beyond that though, I think they'll stick to their board and who they take will depend on who falls. If an EDGE guy they like drops to 17 (e.g. Sweat, Ferrell, etc), I wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab him especially if #6 is QWill or Wilkins. Conversely, if they go OLB (Allen, Gray, Sweat, etc), I can certainly see them coming back at 17 and still taking a guy like Wilkins.

CB and ILB I think will also be in play for 17 and 37.

As for QB, I don't get the sense they're going that route other than if Jones is still around mid-20s and they can trade back up with #37+.
You should include DL, LB and OC...  
Torrag : 4/12/2019 11:58 am : link
...because all have needs for starters or significant upgrades. Although I do believe Pulley will eventually beat out halapio and do a serviceable job at OC.
Would ideally love  
Everyone Relax : 4/12/2019 12:03 pm : link
EDGE with #6 then hope Lock falls to #17. I really think Lock is going to be the best QB in this draft but can't see the Giants pulling the trigger on him at #6.
I think OT  
PatersonPlank : 4/12/2019 12:40 pm : link
I expect to sign Remmers, which moves OT down on the list
Need Ranking seems off...  
x meadowlander : 4/12/2019 12:53 pm : link
...I rank team needs as:
NOSETACKLE
Center
WR
OT
Edge
CB
QB

I don't see a Franchise QB in this draft, I'd trade for Rosen if a good deal is available... Presuming no new QB by training camp, I'd make sure a quality vet backup QB is on the roster this season.
'I expect to sign Remmers, which moves OT down on the list'...  
Torrag : 4/12/2019 12:56 pm : link
No it wouldn't. He was an awful RT last season and got shifted inside because of that. A back injury to boot. He'd be a valuable and versatile backup at multiple positions for a friendly contract but to think he'd be 'good enough' to forego taking a RT high in this draft is a mistake.
CB  
UConn4523 : 4/12/2019 12:56 pm : link
or QB. I think EDGE and OT are virtual locks.
I think CB goes unless a talent falls to 37  
Bobby Humphrey's Earpad : 4/12/2019 12:58 pm : link
Edge/pass rusher at 7.
We hit DL/EDGE  
Giantz_comeback : 4/12/2019 1:08 pm : link
2× and skip out on QB/OT 1st 3 picks.
CB is probably one of the few positions where DG won’t feel a need to  
Ivan15 : 4/12/2019 1:25 pm : link
use a high draft pick on.
CB  
Klaatu : 4/12/2019 1:57 pm : link
The need is there, certainly, but it seems like Gettleman prefers to build his teams from the inside out. On defense, front seven first, then the secondary umm...second. Considering where the bulk of the talent is in this draft, that would be the smart thing to do.

As for QB, I'd be fine with not drafting one at all. Don't know how the Giants feel about that, though.
Edge and QB  
TD : 4/12/2019 2:21 pm : link
Maybe OT or WR if value is there at 17 or 37.
Let's keep our fingers crossed and pray they do not draft or trade for  
SterlingArcher : 4/12/2019 2:21 pm : link
a qb. That would be a disaster.
Would rather macro allocate a group of needs  
Bob in Newburgh : 4/12/2019 2:40 pm : link
then take bpa within that group of needs.

Taking a QB within the 2019 group is probably just wasting a pick. I do not see any gotta have talents.

On a roster that contains a healthy Dalvin Tomlinson, a claim that NT is the greatest need is uninformed and most likely ludicrous. I would avoid Dexter Lawrence because of this.
RE: Let's keep our fingers crossed and pray they do not draft or trade for  
Giants38 : 4/12/2019 3:04 pm : link
In comment 14384023 SterlingArcher said:
Quote:
a qb. That would be a disaster.


Yea. I mean, it’s probably a bad idea to have a succession plan in place for a declining - if not already finished - QB in his late 30s. Let’s ride Eli until he keels over on the field. That’s probably a smart way to handle the QB transition.
What passes for a succession plan  
Bob in Newburgh : 4/12/2019 3:11 pm : link
Well he cost a 1st round draft choice, must be worth a 1st round draft choice, right?
RE: And it's not even that fixed  
Matt G : 4/12/2019 3:59 pm : link
In comment 14383688 SirYesSir said:
Quote:
Wr is a question
ILB might offer best value and is a need
DT might offer best value and is a need

there's a chance 2 or 3 of the four you mentioned don't get addressed in the early rounds


DT & WR I could see... Unless it's Devin White at #6, I would be pretty surprised by a LB before Day 3
I have a tough time buying  
Matt G : 4/12/2019 4:08 pm : link
That swapping Brown for Zeitler and Wheeler for Remmers fixes our OL, which Gettleman has already highlighted as the reasons behind Eli's struggles last in the first half of last season...

WR is arguably the deepest position in this entire draft
RE: The only way I'm willing to wait  
joeinpa : 4/12/2019 4:58 pm : link
In comment 14383734 JFIB said:
Quote:
Until 2020 to draft a QB is if we trade some picks in this years draft to amass enough ammo in next years draft to move up in the first round to get the guy we want. We can't expect to go into 2020 with the 11th pick and come away with the next franchise QB.
m

I ve been assured you are mistaken.
Possibly all  
idiotsavant : 4/12/2019 5:53 pm : link
6. DL
17. ILB
37. NT

Or

6. DL
17. NT
37. ILB

Or

6. DL
17. DL
37. FS

Etc
Or  
idiotsavant : 4/12/2019 5:54 pm : link
6. DL
17. NT
37. Center
That is a HUGE stretch  
Matt G : 4/12/2019 6:41 pm : link
But feel free to call me out if any of those 4 scenarios comes to fruition
CB.  
yatqb : 4/12/2019 7:02 pm : link
.
RE: 'I expect to sign Remmers, which moves OT down on the list'...  
Percy : 4/12/2019 11:03 pm : link
In comment 14383860 Torrag said:
Quote:
No it wouldn't. He was an awful RT last season and got shifted inside because of that. A back injury to boot. He'd be a valuable and versatile backup at multiple positions for a friendly contract but to think he'd be 'good enough' to forego taking a RT high in this draft is a mistake.

This is correct. Get the best we can at RT in the draft now. CB? Looks like a crummy draft at that position. So ignore it. We have plenty of other holes. Edge; C; LB; FS (not very strong class in this either, but the need is there -- and it's not a costly position to fill compared to, say, CB); TE. DL star anywhere is worth a high pick. So is RT.
CB  
Jay on the Island : 4/13/2019 11:13 am : link
I don't think they address CB until round 3 at the earliest. I do expect them to use two picks on CB's but likely on day 3. I could see them grabbing Jimmy Moreland in the 4th-5th round.
Whereas I've been very positional biased  
idiotsavant : 4/13/2019 11:57 am : link
In years passed. (Past?)

That typically works best in rds 4-7.

Here, with two 1s and high 2, value grades are huge. Look at barkely

And it just looks like those will be at DL through mid round 2 probably. And we do have need there ..so ..
Back to the Corner