It's as unlikely as any, but I don't know why Murray is universally believed to be the clear #1. He wasn't even the #1 QB when the college season ended. I like him but e's no sure thing and this draft is loaded with defensive talent.
Dillard at #10 is the most questionable pick here to me.
It's as unlikely as any, but I don't know why Murray is universally believed to be the clear #1. He wasn't even the #1 QB when the college season ended. I like him but e's no sure thing and this draft is loaded with defensive talent.
Dillard at #10 is the most questionable pick here to me.
Wow...you really wouldn't trade up for Murray if somehow he was there at 12? I give 17, 37 and the 3rd rounder in a minute. There are no sure things in the draft including each of the defensive players you allude to in your post. At some point this year or next, you've got to take a QB. Murray has the *potential* to be great. I'd have to pull the trigger here.
Picking Gary at 6 would disturb me. How a team could even consider taking a player that high, who by all accounts that I've read or heard, does not produce the results that he should given his physical ability? I can't expect that would change in the pros.
Of trash I’ve read in a couple months. Gary will not be drafted at #6. Fuller will not slide to 12. Some people have literally lost their minds. Football does that to some of us.
Dillard at #10 is the most questionable pick here to me.
Blue Chip @6 ... 17 is a bit more fluid unless someone slides... even then, trade down for extra 2nd, 3rds +.
Dillard at #10 is the most questionable pick here to me.
Wow...you really wouldn't trade up for Murray if somehow he was there at 12? I give 17, 37 and the 3rd rounder in a minute. There are no sure things in the draft including each of the defensive players you allude to in your post. At some point this year or next, you've got to take a QB. Murray has the *potential* to be great. I'd have to pull the trigger here.
Picking Gary at 6 would disturb me. How a team could even consider taking a player that high, who by all accounts that I've read or heard, does not produce the results that he should given his physical ability? I can't expect that would change in the pros.
Most likely but it really wouldn't surprise me if Chucky took him at 4.
It's the kind of site that makes me hit the back button instantly.
Nothing worse than a site completely saturated with ads and slideshows.
Quote:
And I think he would last past our 6th pick though.
Most likely but it really wouldn't surprise me if Chucky took him at 4.
Denver would take him at 10.