Which draft scenario is more likely, ( 6 options)

or don't draft one at all, is my opinion.

They will go with option 2, maybe option 3 if a QB they love falls to say pick 10 or so and they think it’s worth it to trade up a few spots.

With 37 being a 75% chance of non QB. I really think the win now mode wins out because they believe they can squeak out another couple years from Eli. Not just 1 more year.

4 and 5

In comment 14388423 Rjanyg said:

Quote:

4 and 5

I like 5

In comment 14388413 eric2425ny said:

Quote:

They will go with option 2, maybe option 3 if a QB they love falls to say pick 10 or so and they think it’s worth it to trade up a few spots.

If you love a QB, you better draft that guy at 6. In fact, you’d probably be smart to trade up from 6 to get him. In the last three drafts, 10 of the 11 QBs picked in the first round were acquired via trades up.

2016 (Goff, Wentz, Lynch)
2017 (Trubisky, Mahomes, Watson)
2018 (Darnold, Allen, Rosen, Jackson)

Anyone thinking we are sitting at 6 or 17 and getting our guy is not paying attention. Teams trade up to get the guys they want. Simple as that. If the Giants love a QB and play around by thinking they can get him at 17 or via a trade up from that spot, they are playing a dangerous game. After 6, the Broncos, Bengals, Dolphins, and Redskins all need QBs. That’s picks 10, 11, 13, and 15. You’d have to move to pick 9 to guarantee the guy you want, and even then it’s not a guarantee if another team moved to 7 or 8 to secure their QB. If the Giants want a QB they love, they better pick that guy at 6, no matter who it is. Because when it comes to getting your QB, you don’t mess around.

might be possible

If the right player should fall,I think that's one of the better options

In comment 14388423 Rjanyg said:

Quote:

4 and 5

Agree with this.

option 3... Almost a lock that we go Def at 6... Then use 17 to jump some people as QBs fall. Lock or Haskins is my guess at say 12.

or a close variant (trading #37+ to move into late 20s for a QB)

#5 would be my preferred, but it definitely depends on how the draft falls. I absolutely think we are going defense at #6

In comment 14388473 giants#1 said:

Quote:

or a close variant (trading #37+ to move into late 20s for a QB)

bingo

If they think that they can get a defensive stud at 6 (not Gary) and still get Lock. I would say #3

Otherwise #4 with taking Lock at 6.

So 1,2, or 3 most likely. I think at 17 they would like Jones or Lock but possible both are gone.

I think if they pass on a QB at 6 and 17, they would be wise to try to deal 37 for an extra 1 next year. With all the high value assets the past two years, to come away without a franchise QB or any ammunition to make a serious play at the guys next year would be foolish.

and I would look defense or OT at #17, pure BPA at #37.

because I believe that's where the value/BPA will be.

QB at 6 if Haskins or Murray is there. I’d also be fine with a trade for Rosen, but we’ve been told time and again that is not happening. If we get QB at 6, I’d love a RT or DE at both 17 and 37. I’d even be fine with a guy like Hockenson at 17, as he would pair very well with Engram and fit in with the short passing game/run centric offense we want to employ here.

#1. In my judgment, we have a terrific chance to bolster the pass rush and the secondary at #6 and #17.

I think there is either going to be a high value OL or Qb at #37. Just be patient.

Ideally, I would trade out at #6 and move down to accumulate more picks for this year and/or next.

While I would prefer to trade for Rosen, I fear he's truly off the radar at Jints Central.

For 37 and a couple of Day 3 picks.

In comment 14388557 bw in dc said:

Quote:

#1. In my judgment, we have a terrific chance to bolster the pass rush and the secondary at #6 and #17. I think there is either going to be a high value OL or Qb at #37. Just be patient. Ideally, I would trade out at #6 and move down to accumulate more picks for this year and/or next. While I would prefer to trade for Rosen, I fear he's truly off the radar at Jints Central.

I don’t know who posted it, but the success rate for QBs picked in the second round is terrible. I believe it’s 1 in 4. And success rate doesn’t include possibility of becoming a franchise QB. Essentially, if you pass on a QB in the first, you’re better off passing altogether, as picking one in the second is likely to be a waste of a pick.

DL
CB
no QB

6 & 17 DEFENSE & OT either order.
37 DEFENSE

DL at 17

More of the same at 37

#5) QB at 6, defense at 17

Defense
Defense
RT

I think it is highly likely. They just had him in for two days, one week ahead of the draft.

They have been eerily quiet on him in recent weeks. They have not bit hard yet on Rosen. (although I still love the idea of getting him with the 37th pick).

Haskins
Edge
LB

Mid rounds develop a OT and sign Remmers

In comment 14388674 tomjgiant said:

Quote:

6 & 17 DEFENSE & OT either order. 37 DEFENSE

.