question for the masses. The Giants and others have often said they prefer to draft a QB that has started over multiple seasons because they value that experience over a QB that was a "one year wonder".
On defense Quinnen Williams & Josh Allen, as examples, both only had one great year and yet no one seems to throw that out there as a reason to downgrade them compared to defensive players with longer histories.
Why aren't defensive players held to the same have 30+ college starts before we buy-in standard?
I am not a fan of Haskins, and that has nothing to do with him only starting 1 year.
Never heard it about other positions on offense....actually RBs probably are value better with less wear and tear.
I am not a fan of Haskins, and that has nothing to do with him only starting 1 year.
Man, i only just watched his pro-day. Dud you see it? He was gassed. Like sweating and breathing hard in a glorified practice. Wasn’t a great look from an athletic perspective.
Quote:
People will skew any info they want to fit their narrative
I am not a fan of Haskins, and that has nothing to do with him only starting 1 year.
Man, i only just watched his pro-day. Dud you see it? He was gassed. Like sweating and breathing hard in a glorified practice. Wasn’t a great look from an athletic perspective.
Yes, it was not a good look at all ...
I see no appeal with Haskins, and I’ve tried selling myself on him.
His arm is good, he’s accurate, but there’s nothing “special” about him. 6th overall would be laughable.
And he might very well have completed more passes than the typical college QB did back then in 30 games. I'll look it up when feeling energetic.