NGT Thread: Seahawks and Chiefs may make major trade

great return for Seattle. Clark is an excellent pass rusher but he wants Trey Flowers money.

are on the brink of a Super Bowl. They should go for it. Hell, anyone but the Pats in 2019. And if stupid Ford didn't line up offsides, they'd have gone.

2019 1st

Swap of 2019 2nd's

2020 2nd

Not bad at all for Seattle.

In comment 14399615 Matt in SGS said:

Quote:

are on the brink of a Super Bowl. They should go for it. Hell, anyone but the Pats in 2019. And if stupid Ford didn't line up offsides, they'd have gone.

Anyone but the Pats or Browns ( :

Swap of 2019 mid-rounders.

.
Link - ( New Window )

On domestic abusers.

?

Still, great return for Seattle.

So the Chiefs traded Dee Ford for a 2nd and then dumped Houston. I thought bc of cost? Then they trade a 1st and a 2nd for Clark who will be more expensive than Ford, lol

So it's basically Ford and a 1 for Clark. Seems like a weird move but I guess they like the fit with Clark more.

are better off then the were just signing Ford.

KC is out of their freakin mind.

.

In comment 14399645 Dankbeerman said:

Quote:

are better off then the were just signing Ford.

Different kind of player. Clark is stouter at the POA. Ford is more explosive. But KC really struggled against the run last year on defense, probably cost them a trip to the Super Bowl.

Seattle is now well armed to replenish some big need areas quickly.

if i was a KC fan.

Remember the Chiefs hired Spags at DC. Clark is a true 43 DE in the Spags mold.

.

.

In comment 14399650 Go Terps said:

Quote:

.

And sending a cloudy message regarding the character exceptions they're willing and not willing to make on their roster.

Had been a good citizen in Seattle. He�ll of a two way player.

In comment 14399755 RAIN said:

Quote:

Had been a good citizen in Seattle. He�ll of a two way player.

Hunt and Hill were also good citizens until they weren't. Huge risk by the Chiefs and quite baffling considering their recent issues with DV.

With the scheme change it makes sense but that is one hell of a high cost to get him.

Love the trade for Seattle and understand it for KC. I would say right now that Seattle got the better of it. That's a nice haul of picks and now they can use 20 million somewhere else. I think KC will not get back to the AFC Championship game, even with the best QB in the land. Think about what they have lost..the biggest is Hunt imo, tyrek hill may be lost now, Houston, Berry and Ford..wow. Clark is really good but now they don't have that pick so right away its clark vs the picks from this years draft and then its the $ they are tying up in him...interesting. I guess they had to do something to help that shitty d.

He is only 24 and had 15.5 sacks last season. He will get more than Clark. This is one of the huge benefits of taking a QB in round 1. You get 5 years to build up the rest of the roster because you're starting QB is making way less than his market value.

Is more important than finding a QB now � especially in the draft.

Clark�s contract averages 21 mil a year, and you need more than one guy to have a viable pass rush.

Building an elite pass rush via the draft is more valuable than a good QB on a rookie contract.

for known commodities in their primes is always an easy decision

The obsession with the false hope of draft picks always amuses e

Excellent move by KC

and I was hoping we'd take a shot at him. Nice return for Seattle and a good player to KC.

...one thing we know, it wasn't about character or locker room culture. They were so close I just don't get why they fucked with it at all.

In comment 14400336 GothamGiants said:

Quote:

for known commodities in their primes is always an easy decision The obsession with the false hope of draft picks always amuses e Excellent move by KC

Agreed to an extent but they also gave up a lot of money. It wasn�t just picks. That said I don�t blame the Chiefs one bit.