not sure if this has been posted, i didn't check bbi at all last nite..
asshats claimed repeatedly that they would go defense at 6, with QB possible at 17; also claimed definitively the giants would be accumulating more picks between 37 and 95.. spectacular fail there..
give em credit for being right about haskins or rosen not being in play..
Sy nailed Lawrence.
I think the Giants original plan was to go Def and then QB but Denver and Washington seemed like threats to get the QB they wanted. So again, not a huge surprise and most were very adamant that Haskins was not an option. That seems to be right on as well.
And a new one popped up right before the trade back into the first...
Lawrence in the mrng yesterday
Jones in the Asshat what you got Dep thread before the draft
and lawrence in the draft thread before it happened.
not bad for 2 days of effort
Lawrence in the mrng yesterday
Jones in the Asshat what you got Dep thread before the draft
and lawrence in the draft thread before it happened.
not bad for 2 days of effort
So...what's going to happen today :)
Lawrence in the mrng yesterday
Jones in the Asshat what you got Dep thread before the draft
and lawrence in the draft thread before it happened.
not bad for 2 days of effort
I for one appreciate the asshat info!
I don't see day 2 started yet, so we could add more. Hard to consider that an L.
This thread will only drive these people from the site which I don't want to see happen.
Lawrence in the mrng yesterday
Jones in the Asshat what you got Dep thread before the draft
and lawrence in the draft thread before it happened.
not bad for 2 days of effort
Hows retirement treating you ;)
I don't think that any of the sources "got it wrong". I think they were trying to give whatever scraps of info they could to make BBI a more informative/entertaining place. Maybe I'm naïve, but I don't think there was intentional deception by anyone.
I've seen the decision making process at some fairly high levels in corporate America. If there were a few random sources giving out slivers of information during the process up to the decision-making point, it would look a lot like the asshat/BBI environment. All of those sources could have been accurate about the info coming out, but ultimately "wrong" about the final decision.
I hope that none of the sources are discouraged by the outcome or the reaction by BBI. Many thanks for providing what you can, and hopefully it continues.
If you're going to brag about your track record, you should either be right or stop bragging.
Does that make JT plugged into the same people as them? Or plugged into them, like everyone e else, and coming off as an asshat?
The Giants didn't just decide to take Jones at 9pm yesterday. Or 9am yesterday for that matter. The "no QB at 6" statements continued throughout the day yesterday.
It was bad intel, however it came to be acquired.
Quote:
they simply pass along what they are told at the time for better or worse. There are no guarantees.
The Giants didn't just decide to take Jones at 9pm yesterday. Or 9am yesterday for that matter. The "no QB at 6" statements continued throughout the day yesterday.
It was bad intel, however it came to be acquired.
And god forbid anyone disagreed with it....
Quote:
In comment 14410719 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
they simply pass along what they are told at the time for better or worse. There are no guarantees.
The Giants didn't just decide to take Jones at 9pm yesterday. Or 9am yesterday for that matter. The "no QB at 6" statements continued throughout the day yesterday.
It was bad intel, however it came to be acquired.
And god forbid anyone disagreed with it....
But you and others disagreed not because you had different information but because you didn't want him to be right. It was an emotionally-based disagreement because you *wanted* a QB. And then you get one and still complain.
We are in crazy town over here.
Quote:
In comment 14410754 Gatorade Dunk said:
Quote:
In comment 14410719 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
they simply pass along what they are told at the time for better or worse. There are no guarantees.
The Giants didn't just decide to take Jones at 9pm yesterday. Or 9am yesterday for that matter. The "no QB at 6" statements continued throughout the day yesterday.
It was bad intel, however it came to be acquired.
And god forbid anyone disagreed with it....
But you and others disagreed not because you had different information but because you didn't want him to be right. It was an emotionally-based disagreement because you *wanted* a QB. And then you get one and still complain.
We are in crazy town over here.
What the heck are you talking about? I didn't want a QB @ 6, I wanted Josh Allen - the guy jt said we'd run to the podium to take if he was available - which he was, and we didn't.
And when did I complain? I was one of the only guys here last night not throwing a hissy fit even though they didn't do what I'd have done. I literally started a thread telling people to give Jones a chance before burying him.
You might be in "crazy town," but I'm not.
Quote:
In comment 14410754 Gatorade Dunk said:
Quote:
In comment 14410719 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
they simply pass along what they are told at the time for better or worse. There are no guarantees.
The Giants didn't just decide to take Jones at 9pm yesterday. Or 9am yesterday for that matter. The "no QB at 6" statements continued throughout the day yesterday.
It was bad intel, however it came to be acquired.
And god forbid anyone disagreed with it....
But you and others disagreed not because you had different information but because you didn't want him to be right. It was an emotionally-based disagreement because you *wanted* a QB. And then you get one and still complain.
We are in crazy town over here.
His posts were just as emotional. It's obvious that however much of his supposed inside info was legit, there was a ton of his personal hopes for the team's plan intertwined with the info. It's clear now that a lot of the content like "they're not taking a QB at #6 because they believe they can win now" or "they have no interest in Rosen" was JT's own opinion, even if it was based on contextual clues from the inside info that he was receiving.
They weren't all shocked. Hitdog still has the chops.
i also was referring in specific to jtgiants, not to hitdog.
so its more about what i thought should happen vs. what gettleman thought. i won't question him at this point, he's been doing this a long time, but i am definitely disappointed to this point. but what do i know.