Â
All Threads
Football Threads
Non Football Threads
Forum Archives
Old Forum Archives
Forum Stats
Terms of Use
Code Of Conduct
Privacy Policy
FAQ
About Us
Contact Us
Amazon.com
Roster
Depth Chart
Scouting Reports
Transactions
Player Salaries
Contact Info
Administration
Coaching Staff
Coaching History
Annual Records
Hall Of Fame
Retired Jerseys
Ring Of Honor
Schedule
Previews/Reviews
Standings (NFL.com)
Statistics (Giants.com)
Historical Stats
Free Agency
The Draft
Training Camp
Important Dates
Giant Of The Year Award
Articles
Glossary
Links
Login
Register
Activate User
Forgot Login Info
Home
Corner Forum
Gameday
Team
Team Building
Giants Info & History
Info/Links
Log In
Archived Thread
Uproxx predicts top 100 players and Barkley is #8.
1giantblue
: 5/13/2019 10:17 pm
Of course I'm biased and believe he should crack top ten but realistic or not so much?
Link
- (
New Window
)
This article was written last year, so it was analyzing players
Â
PatersonPlank
: 5/13/2019 10:21 pm :
link
going into last season (when Barkley was a rookie)
Oops,did'nt see that. So it's not based on performance.
Â
1giantblue
: 5/13/2019 10:29 pm :
link
So this begs the question. Should he crack top 10?
RE: Oops,did'nt see that. So it's not based on performance.
Â
madgiantscow009
: 5/14/2019 12:19 am :
link
In comment
14442578
1giantblue said:
Quote:
So this begs the question. Should he crack top 10?
yes.
He’s top 5 already,
Â
Big Blue '56
: 5/14/2019 6:09 am :
link
imo
He should be #2
Â
TommytheElephant
: 5/14/2019 6:46 am :
link
And Darnold #1
(;
RE: Oops,did'nt see that. So it's not based on performance.
Â
BMac
: 5/14/2019 7:23 am :
link
In comment
14442578
1giantblue said:
Quote:
So this begs the question. Should he crack top 10?
Seems to me that #8 IS in the top 10, no?
Here's a hint at how prescient that list is
Â
WillieYoung
: 5/14/2019 8:15 am :
link
Allan Hurns is 81 and Goff is 91
RE: RE: Oops,did'nt see that. So it's not based on performance.
Â
1giantblue
: 5/14/2019 8:21 am :
link
In comment
14442715
BMac said:
Quote:
In comment 14442578 1giantblue said:
Quote:
So this begs the question. Should he crack top 10?
Seems to me that #8 IS in the top 10, no?
Yes but this article is based on a prediction and not the final results.
RE: He should be #2
Â
1giantblue
: 5/14/2019 8:23 am :
link
In comment
14442696
TommytheElephant said:
Quote:
And Darnold #1
(;
LOL!
Plus,
Â
River Mike
: 5/14/2019 8:35 am :
link
if you read the article, it was tongue in cheek, not meant to be serious even when it was new.
RE: Plus,
Â
1giantblue
: 5/14/2019 9:48 am :
link
In comment
14442794
River Mike said:
Quote:
if you read the article, it was tongue in cheek, not meant to be serious even when it was new.
I get that Mike but we can still predict where we think he might land just as the article. So is he top 10? I'd say yes.
yes.
(;
Seems to me that #8 IS in the top 10, no?
Quote:
So this begs the question. Should he crack top 10?
Seems to me that #8 IS in the top 10, no?
Yes but this article is based on a prediction and not the final results.
(;
LOL!
I get that Mike but we can still predict where we think he might land just as the article. So is he top 10? I'd say yes.