|
|
Quote: |
Jordan Raanan & #10004; @JordanRaanan Coach Pat Shurmur: Eli Manning is getting ready to have an outstanding year. Daniel Jones is getting ready to play Week 1. Asked if there is a scenario Jones could start Week 1: "You never know what is going to happen." Shurmur says he is "constantly" weighing Eli against Jones and deciding who gives team the best chance to win (which is the stated barometer for who starts). |
Quote: |
Paul Schwartz & #10004; @NYPost_Schwartz Shurmur repeated his stance that Jones "is getting ready to play week 1.'' Also said Eli is the starter now. Could this pecking order change? "You never know,'' Shurmur said. |
Quote: |
Tom Rock & #10004; @TomRock_Newsday As offseason program closes, Pat Shurmur seems to set the stage for a quarterback competition in training camp between Eli Manning and Daniel Jones. |
Quote: |
Tom Rock & #10004; @TomRock_Newsday Replying to @TomRock_Newsday "He's on track with the goal to be ready to play on Day 1," Shurmur said of Jones. "The QB stuff will be on the front burner for everybody. I get that. But he's on track." |
Seriously, if they were even hoping Jones would start this season, they should have cut ties with Eli during the off season.
Quote:
In comment 14469763 .McL. said:
Quote:
He is drawing a stark difference.
Eli is getting ready to have a great season
Jones is getting ready to play
Then he says every player on the has to get ready to play, You never know what might happen.
In other words, Jones is NOT ready to play yet, he is getting is learning and getting ready. If Eli goes down, Jones has to be ready to in there.
Eli, as the starting QB, is working towards a higher goal.
He kept saying what he said was clear and kept repeating it. Take his words exactly as he said them. I don't think he is being very vague at all.
Yes, except he wasn't that clear. And when asked 3-4 times to make his language precise, he didn't specifically say, "Jones will only play if Eli gets hurt."
He said, "Who knows?"
Pat has nothing to gain to verbalize any specifics. In your example, if we are out of playoff contention and Eli is still healthy, then Jones won't see playing time because the specific case is only when Eli gets hurt. Fans and the media latch onto statements to use against them. DG is a liar to some because he said, "We didn't sign him to trade him" only to end up trading OBJ.
Yeah agreed, he has nothing to gain by being more specific now.
If mid season and the Giants are all but out of contention, and the decision is made to let the kid play. Tjey don't want a McAdoo style meltdown. At that point, Eli is still more likely to produce wins, but the long term benefit to the franchise is to let the kid play. But they can never say that, without controversy.
Quote:
Not have a QB controversy and also swear to the world they picked the right guy at 6.
That would be dumb and also contradictory to Gettleman's rep of not needing to justify himself to anyone.
If they're trying to avoid the pitfall of 'When does Jones play?', they're doing an impressively bad job of it with comments such as those. How did we get from 'Jones could sit from 1-3 years' to this point?
Personally I'm glad that Shurmur is saying that it's a competition, even if the reality is that Eli will be the starter.
My biggest fear isn't Eli starting in 2019. It's the Giants extending him. Hopefully Jones shows them enough so that that doesn't happen.
The only way I think this happens is if God forbid Eli missed a few games due to injury but looked really good in those games and Jones looked awful.
Coaches want to win, the idea that Jones might start the season at #1 might be viewed with incredulity by some fans, but given some of the reports and innuendos we have had coming from camp in regard to Eli s arm, it might not be that far fetched to see Jones behind center week 1.
Quote:
When they took Jones at 6, this was part all part of it. It is why Eli cancelled his appearance on Francesca
Eli cancelled the regular appearance 4 days BEFORE the draft.
He could have known that gettleman was locked in on picking a QB at #6