For me it has always been Mike Ditka, Mackey, Winslow, Sr. As the years have gone on however, I now feel Bavaro was the best ALL AROUND TE I have ever seen, albeit his career was shortened with a bad knee.
Interesting that Simms throwing to him(as opposed to Brady) was entered into the argument. I think Simms had a pretty good career considering Bavaro was one of his better receivers. Bavaro was great in his day and was a great blocker. Huge fan. But to compare him to Gronk who has been absolutely dominant at times and was pivotal in multiple Super Bowl runs...I have to say is kind of homerish.
Bavaro was a great player, but not on a plateau of his own Â
the way Lawrence Taylor is. Thinking that he is or was on that Mount Olympus of great tight ends is reasonable, but again he wasn't there by himself.
Gronk, Gonzales, Capser, Mackey, Gates, Winslow and one who way too often gets overlooked Raymond Chester were all terrific players who could block and catch the rock, and run with the rock once it was in their hands. If Bavaro had any significant leg up on any of them as a blocker, remember that on a daily basis in practice he went up against Lawrence Taylor and/or Carl Banks and he openly said in a long interview that blocking those guys regularly in practice upped his blocking game considerably. Parcels ran tough practices, and the D of that era liked to beat the piss out of the offense.
Young folks think Gronk invented the athletic tight end who could also block like a Mack truck, but ironically that was invented by John Mackey of the Colts, the 1st great TE in my memory. Before him, and in his time mostly, the greatest TEs were primarily blockers, like Mike Ditka. But Mackey was a true deep threat, and he set the model for the guys that followed him.
Interesting that Simms throwing to him(as opposed to Brady) was entered into the argument. I think Simms had a pretty good career considering Bavaro was one of his better receivers. Bavaro was great in his day and was a great blocker. Huge fan. But to compare him to Gronk who has been absolutely dominant at times and was pivotal in multiple Super Bowl runs...I have to say is kind of homerish.
I don't remember Ditka well, was too young to watch him at his peak (which was short). Don't have a clear memory of Mackey. Bavaro was great for a short time. But I don't think he was ever GOAT-level.
Hard to argue with Gronkowski. And he had a decently long career, though injury-plagued.
Winslow Sr. was probably 2nd. Gonzalez, great receiver, but I don't think he's at the same level as Gronk and Winslow Sr. for overall game.
"I'll put him there with Bavaro in terms of the guys I've coached," Belichick said of Gronkowski. "I mean, it'd be hard for me to put anybody past Bavaro just because of the number of times he blocked Reggie White with no help. We ran those 38-Boss and all that and they were in that over front and Reggie was the six-technique and Bavaro blocked him. There was no double- team. He just blocked him. Now that was a good battle."
Belichick isn't the only one who fell in love with Bavaro's blocking, check out what John Madden had to say. The same John Madden who coached Dave Casper who is a Top 10 TE all-time and was known for being a great blocker at his position...
His pass catching fell off in that stretch, but he could sure block. In a Monday night game against the Redskins, he was assigned the job of handling the defensive end. The Giants rushed for 202 yards. "Best job of blocking I've ever seen by a tight end," CBS's John Madden said.
I don't think there's anything overly "Giants homer!" about choosing Bavaro for this topic if you aren't valuing longevity and are simply talking Peak performance. Yea, there are a bunch of other worthy choices but his first 4 or so years before his degenerative knee condition killed his career were dominant. He took the term "Two-Way Tight End" to another level.
I'd go Gronk by a mile from guys I've seen, I don't think Gonzalez or Witten are even close. I don't know if Witten is even better than Antonio Gates.
But Bavaro was a different animal from those non-Gronk guys, and in today's era where the middle of the field is wide open he would have put up huge numbers too when he played. He really was a freak.
Not a second of debate for me. What’s sad is Bavaro was better than Gronk for a 3-4 years and good enough for a few additional years and not a sniff of canton. Does Bavaro even get a vote? Criminal.
Especially when you put 60s/70's tight ends in the conversations. It was just a different league back then in terms of what was expected from the position. A different league in terms of offensive philosophy. Ditka was an absolute monster. But he also didn't play in 16 game seasons, or have Tom Brady throwing him the ball, and he actually had to deal with defenders who were allowed to defend
To me the best I've seen is Gonzalez. He worked his ass off to become a good blocker and was always an elite receiver. I mean he caught 83 passes at the age of 37.
Now that doesn't mean Bavaro was the best TE ever - there's a ton of guys you can argue. For me Gronk is the best in modern times - simply unstoppable in all phases. From the earlier years, Mackey or Ditka.
I think Gronk is great, but over rated and benefits from a few things that really skew perception. Brady and Belichick can’t be ignored. They are the GOAT HC and QB and if anyone thinks that doesn’t matter then they’re wrong. It’s also a passing NFL now and more so than even when TG played and much more so than Bavaro, who I think actually stacks up pretty well against Gronk but much less so against TG.
I think Antonio Gates should be in the mix for players that I’ve seen. Shannon Sharpe was a ridiculous mismatch in the passing game. He played in twice as many NFL games as Gronk. I’d put Sharpe and AG in front of Gronk.
TG was a good blocker. I don’t know if he was a great blocker but he certainly wasn’t a bad blocker. He could catch and run routes every bit as well as Gronk, or better. And, for me, this is way I’d say TG is the best I’ve seen, TG player a lot more games. Dude was a force in the NFL for 270 games. I mean, that’s amazing.
Bavaro was a Great Player, not a "very good" player....the slant agaionst TE's was probably more based on the limited use of TE's in the Game....often, they were tied to the line as 3rd Tackles. Bavaro (for that Matter, SIMMS!!!) was limited by his opportunity within the offense they ran.
Unfortunately, Bavaro doesn't have big stats to reinforce what was visible--- in today's game, he'd be a Monster.
I saw all these TE’s play that are mentioned in this thread Â
To me Mackey is the best all around TE. He invented the TE seam pass in the modern era of football. He was also a tenacious in line blocker.
‘56 I loved Bavarro who was a tremendous all around TE but he was not better than John Mackey.
Just MHO.
Different eras, different best TEs in my opinion. Having watched all of these TEs over the decades I have to go with Mackey first. Seam routes, breaking tackles all over the place and could block defensive linemen and did often. Bavarro is a similar version of Mackey; yet the height of his career wasn't as long due to the knee injury (Saw that happen against San Diego. Ouch!). Ditka is a distant 3rd. These guys all had similar styles, attitude (quiet demeanor; yeah even Ditka before he retired.) and did catch, run and block.
Now, concerning Gronk. He is #1 in my book in today's era. Today's top TEs are not particularly tasked with blocking. I pick Gronk over Gonzales and Whitten because he delivered in the big games and won multiple championships. Gonzales could block well when the play called for it; but that was not essential to his success. Catching the ball was.
Really hard to compare time periods with regard to tight ends Â
a lot of TEs today are really big WRs. The Patriots in particular, figured out how to substitute TEs for WRs in the structure of their offense. Gronk has been incredibly productive in an offense that has been designed to take advantage of his skill set. No one was designing an offense around tight end play in the 1970s and 1980s. Those that saw Bavaro can only imagine what he would have done in the current Patriot offense.
While he doesn't have the stats, Bavaro was as tough as anyone who ever played the game. Made big plays and was a total team guy. Best all-around? Hard to say but he was a force on the underappreciated (non-stats) parts of the game.
John Madden once said if he were starting a team Â
I'm not really sure what being the best all-around TE has to do with longevity. It has to do with being great at all facets of the game. In his generation, Bavaro was great at all facets.
But, like Don Mattingly, his peak wasn't strong enough to get him in the Hall. Saying he wasn't that good because he isn't in the Hall is hilarious, but probably understandable from young people who didn't watch him play. He isn't in the Hall for two reasons - his peak was only 2-3 seasons and TE's have only recently been looked at for Hall worthiness (not surprisingly tied to the increase in receiving numbers).
In many ways, Bavaro was the best All-Around TE I've ever seen. I also think Gronk is awesome too. Not sure how this thread got a couple of lunatics to go haywire though.
RE: John Madden once said if he were starting a team Â
and could have any player he wanted in the history of the league, his first pick would be Mark Bavaro.
And he coached a pretty damn good Tight End himself in HOF'er Dave'The Ghost'Casper.
It's not being a homer to suggest Mark Bavaro here.
My only beef: being referred to as a homer just because in THIS case, I happen to laud Bavaro as the best all-around I ever saw.. I guess some were not around when I shit on Fassel and Accorsi daily as well as Eli until he began to win me over during the 2007 season finale against the undefeated Pats.
The Giants offense in the ‘80’s during Bavaros years was just a bit different than the Pats offense of the Gronk years? If you’re too young to have seen Bavaro play and you want to compare stats of two completely different eras, that’s fine. But as someone that HAS seen both play, there is not a TEcthat has ever existed that I’d take over Bavaro in his prime. He played in a different time, in a different offense and had a shorter prime than Gronk. And I don’t blame people say Gronk is the best. But my opinion is, if I have one game to win and I can choose any TE in history to help me win that game, I’m taking prime Bavaro.
Yeah, yeah, yeah...I’m seeing things through blue colored glasses. Or maybe I don’t give a shit about Hall of Fame voting when it comes to two players playing in different eras and different offenses?
so as great a receiver as he was, I wouldn't call him a great ALL AROUND TE. I always thought Bavaro was the best I had seen, until I saw Gronk. As much as I hate the Massholes calling every Patriot the best ever, with Gronk I think they're right.
so as great a receiver as he was, I wouldn't call him a great ALL AROUND TE. I always thought Bavaro was the best I had seen, until I saw Gronk. As much as I hate the Massholes calling every Patriot the best ever, with Gronk I think they're right.
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
First of all, you asked for opinions, I gave mine. I don’t see how anything I said was condescending, just that Winslow’s ineffective blocking prevents me from calling him an all around great.
And I never saw him play? I’m 58, I saw him play plenty.
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
First of all, you asked for opinions, I gave mine. I don’t see how anything I said was condescending, just that Winslow’s ineffective blocking prevents me from calling him an all around great.
And I never saw him play? I’m 58, I saw him play plenty.
I wasn’t referring to you at all. I was referring to earlier posters on this thread
I can see where you thought I was addressing you. Â
Two caveats, though:
1) His prime was brief, about four years.
2) Simms, despite his other limitations, was among the very best ever throwing the deep seam pass. We're talking Marino/Elway level, and possibly better than either. That unique skill, combined with Bavaro's hands and fearlessness in the middle of the field, made MB a much more effective deep threat than would otherwise have been possible, since he wasn't particularly fast.
Bavaro, even in his prime was never an all-world receiver. Had great hands, and could run that seam route with the best, but he's not even the best receiving TE in GIANTS history, never mind NFL (Bob Tucker, Shockey).
That said, Bavaro is MY FAVORITE TE of all-time - absolutely lovable - quiet, tough as nails, MONSTER blocker.
RE: RE: I can see where you thought I was addressing you. Â
I did. It was intended to be a piggyback off your post, pointing out that even though you saw Bavaro play, you still went with Gronk and that was fine. My bad
so as great a receiver as he was, I wouldn't call him a great ALL AROUND TE. I always thought Bavaro was the best I had seen, until I saw Gronk. As much as I hate the Massholes calling every Patriot the best ever, with Gronk I think they're right.
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
Sorry, bro, Bavaro wasn't half the receiver Gronk is - I went to MANY of the games in the 80's, I LOVE Bavaro and HATE Gronk so that's hard to say, but it's a fact. Gronk is a fucking FORCE as a receiver and will be a first ballot HOF.
So for me, Mark Bavaro was not only the toughest SOB I ever saw play TE (can you imagine playing the position with your jaw wired shut?), he was the best all-around TE I ever saw, period.
Bavaro, even in his prime was never an all-world receiver. Had great hands, and could run that seam route with the best, but he's not even the best receiving TE in GIANTS history, never mind NFL (Bob Tucker, Shockey).
That said, Bavaro is MY FAVORITE TE of all-time - absolutely lovable - quiet, tough as nails, MONSTER blocker.
Shockey wasn't a better receiver than Bavaro imo. Shockey was an overrated talent imo. He had pretty good hands but a weak catch radius. His biggest strength was his YAC, but that was limited because he struggled to catch the ball while staying on his feet. He was more hype than anything imo.
I may be biased, but Bavaro is my favorite Giants player of all time. He blocked like a tackle and caught everything. He brought such toughness to the offense. Imagine being a young TE and coming in having to line up against LT and Carl Banks! You could certainly make a case for other TEs, but I will take Bavaro and go to war every time.
I did. It was intended to be a piggyback off your post, pointing out that even though you saw Bavaro play, you still went with Gronk and that was fine. My bad
I see, no worries. Like I said, Bavaro in his prime was as good as any TE I’ve seen. I’d give Bavaro a slight edge over Gronk in blocking, but Gronk was like Winslow as a receiver, just a freak. And I want to hate the guy.
And I don’t want to look like I’m dissing Winslow. If the questions was the best TE of all time, he’s in the conversation. He revolutionized the position, and was the perfect player for a Coryell offfense, he just wasn’t a great blocker.
He's certainly in consideration as the Best Offensive Player Ever....there'e simply no comparison to Him as a TE.
His blocking ability...His Pass Catching and After the Catch...Probably the Biggest "Field Tilter" in the History of the Game.
No he's not and that's a ridiculous assertion, when you put him in the same class as Jim Brown, Jerry Rice, Gayle Sayers, Joe Montana, Peyton Manning and his own QB Tom Brady. In fact, I could name 10 more offensive players in a heartbeat that were greater than Gronk. Give me a break...
Walter Payton? OJ simpson?
Gronk probably isn't in the same class as Earl Campbell or Eric Dickerson, either...
Gronk is among the top 5 TEs ever, but not the top 5 offensive players all time, IMO.
how many times you type all around in capital letters it's not going to make Bavaro a better all around player than Gronk.
You also apparently did not read my post where I said I only saw him play via highlights.
How come the hall of fame voters don't agree with you? A guy who can't get in vs a guy everyone on the planet knows will go in 1st ballot. Can't use the excuse that they didn't see both play.
No, but you can cite the fact that injuries shortened his career and took him out of HoF contention. I've watched Bavaro and Gronkowski (and not just on highlights). I've been watching pro football for more than 60 years. Bavaro is the best I've ever seen followed by Mackey, Witten, and then Gronk.
Where am I going to find fans who saw Bavaro in his prime 30+ years ago? On here? Sure and we’ll see what they opine. I will NEVER pay any attention to any fan who never saw him play. Never.
How about hall of fame voters who have seen him play?
Um, Bavaro doesn’t have enough prime years to qualify due to the knee..But during his prime years, I have never seen a better all
around TE than him. NOTHING to do with homerism. Everything to do with what I personally saw
Love the stuff you posted on Bavaro. Those quotes alone should make him a HOF lock.
Shockey? You're wrong there. He was a great player early. One of the best players in the league. Not just a receiving threat, he battled in the run game too.
could move well and was a willing blocker, but he wasn't some stud vs. the run. I think he was a good player, worthy of a Pro Bowl or two in his best couple of years.
But even before people here turned on him because of his personality, I thought he was overrated because I hated how he was physically incapable of catching a ball over his head without maintaining balance. It pissed me off so much, we missed out on a ton of big plays because of this flaw in his game. This is one of the reasons he was a poor fit with young Eli, who threw the ball high often.
on Reggie White, Belichick also had some quotes om Bavaro vs LT and Banks in practice.
Was this posted? Maybe.
But this was when Belichick was asked to compare Bavaro and Gronk during Gronk's rookie season.
Quote:
...."I don't mean that in any way to slight any of our players. He set the bar up there pretty high. He could block, he could catch, he could run, and run after the catch. He was a great competitor. Mark was there every single week," Belichick said. "That's a guy you could count on. We lined up every year at training camp and he could block Carl Banks and Lawrence Taylor. Not too many guys blocked them. You talk about competitive battles -- if you like football, that's about as good as you could find right there."...
For me it's Bavaro, no one asked about longevity or the HOF, but best two-way TE is Bavaro.
Gronk is next, he was like Bavaro but bigger, so to be that athletic, strong, and have Gronk's size - creating offensive mis-matches just made him the perfect weapon for this era.
Gronk, Gonzales, Capser, Mackey, Gates, Winslow and one who way too often gets overlooked Raymond Chester were all terrific players who could block and catch the rock, and run with the rock once it was in their hands. If Bavaro had any significant leg up on any of them as a blocker, remember that on a daily basis in practice he went up against Lawrence Taylor and/or Carl Banks and he openly said in a long interview that blocking those guys regularly in practice upped his blocking game considerably. Parcels ran tough practices, and the D of that era liked to beat the piss out of the offense.
Young folks think Gronk invented the athletic tight end who could also block like a Mack truck, but ironically that was invented by John Mackey of the Colts, the 1st great TE in my memory. Before him, and in his time mostly, the greatest TEs were primarily blockers, like Mike Ditka. But Mackey was a true deep threat, and he set the model for the guys that followed him.
THOSE WHO SAW HIM PLAY HAVE WEIGHED IN [sarcasm]
Hard to argue with Gronkowski. And he had a decently long career, though injury-plagued.
Winslow Sr. was probably 2nd. Gonzalez, great receiver, but I don't think he's at the same level as Gronk and Winslow Sr. for overall game.
I think Gates is very underrated too.
Belichick isn't the only one who fell in love with Bavaro's blocking, check out what John Madden had to say. The same John Madden who coached Dave Casper who is a Top 10 TE all-time and was known for being a great blocker at his position...
His pass catching fell off in that stretch, but he could sure block. In a Monday night game against the Redskins, he was assigned the job of handling the defensive end. The Giants rushed for 202 yards. "Best job of blocking I've ever seen by a tight end," CBS's John Madden said.
https://www.si.com/vault/1987/09/09/116127/nfc-east-legend-in-the-making-after-only-two-seasons-tight-end-mark-bavaro-has-quietly-become-a-giant-among-giants
I don't think there's anything overly "Giants homer!" about choosing Bavaro for this topic if you aren't valuing longevity and are simply talking Peak performance. Yea, there are a bunch of other worthy choices but his first 4 or so years before his degenerative knee condition killed his career were dominant. He took the term "Two-Way Tight End" to another level.
I'd go Gronk by a mile from guys I've seen, I don't think Gonzalez or Witten are even close. I don't know if Witten is even better than Antonio Gates.
But Bavaro was a different animal from those non-Gronk guys, and in today's era where the middle of the field is wide open he would have put up huge numbers too when he played. He really was a freak.
To me the best I've seen is Gonzalez. He worked his ass off to become a good blocker and was always an elite receiver. I mean he caught 83 passes at the age of 37.
Now that doesn't mean Bavaro was the best TE ever - there's a ton of guys you can argue. For me Gronk is the best in modern times - simply unstoppable in all phases. From the earlier years, Mackey or Ditka.
I think Antonio Gates should be in the mix for players that I’ve seen. Shannon Sharpe was a ridiculous mismatch in the passing game. He played in twice as many NFL games as Gronk. I’d put Sharpe and AG in front of Gronk.
TG was a good blocker. I don’t know if he was a great blocker but he certainly wasn’t a bad blocker. He could catch and run routes every bit as well as Gronk, or better. And, for me, this is way I’d say TG is the best I’ve seen, TG player a lot more games. Dude was a force in the NFL for 270 games. I mean, that’s amazing.
Joe Walton 1961-1964
Aaron Thomas 1962-1970
Bob Tucker 1970-1977
Gary Shirk 1976-1982
Zeke Mowatt 1983-1991
Mark Bavaro 1985-1990
Howard Cross 1989-2001
Jeremy Shockey 2002-2007
Kevin Boss 2007-2010
His blocking ability...His Pass Catching and After the Catch...Probably the Biggest "Field Tilter" in the History of the Game.
Unfortunately, Bavaro doesn't have big stats to reinforce what was visible--- in today's game, he'd be a Monster.
‘56 I loved Bavarro who was a tremendous all around TE but he was not better than John Mackey.
Just MHO.
Now, concerning Gronk. He is #1 in my book in today's era. Today's top TEs are not particularly tasked with blocking. I pick Gronk over Gonzales and Whitten because he delivered in the big games and won multiple championships. Gonzales could block well when the play called for it; but that was not essential to his success. Catching the ball was.
While he doesn't have the stats, Bavaro was as tough as anyone who ever played the game. Made big plays and was a total team guy. Best all-around? Hard to say but he was a force on the underappreciated (non-stats) parts of the game.
And he coached a pretty damn good Tight End himself in HOF'er Dave'The Ghost'Casper.
It's not being a homer to suggest Mark Bavaro here.
I'm not really sure what being the best all-around TE has to do with longevity. It has to do with being great at all facets of the game. In his generation, Bavaro was great at all facets.
But, like Don Mattingly, his peak wasn't strong enough to get him in the Hall. Saying he wasn't that good because he isn't in the Hall is hilarious, but probably understandable from young people who didn't watch him play. He isn't in the Hall for two reasons - his peak was only 2-3 seasons and TE's have only recently been looked at for Hall worthiness (not surprisingly tied to the increase in receiving numbers).
In many ways, Bavaro was the best All-Around TE I've ever seen. I also think Gronk is awesome too. Not sure how this thread got a couple of lunatics to go haywire though.
And he coached a pretty damn good Tight End himself in HOF'er Dave'The Ghost'Casper.
It's not being a homer to suggest Mark Bavaro here.
My only beef: being referred to as a homer just because in THIS case, I happen to laud Bavaro as the best all-around I ever saw.. I guess some were not around when I shit on Fassel and Accorsi daily as well as Eli until he began to win me over during the 2007 season finale against the undefeated Pats.
Gronk
Witten
In that order.
Yeah, yeah, yeah...I’m seeing things through blue colored glasses. Or maybe I don’t give a shit about Hall of Fame voting when it comes to two players playing in different eras and different offenses?
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
First of all, you asked for opinions, I gave mine. I don’t see how anything I said was condescending, just that Winslow’s ineffective blocking prevents me from calling him an all around great.
And I never saw him play? I’m 58, I saw him play plenty.
Quote:
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
First of all, you asked for opinions, I gave mine. I don’t see how anything I said was condescending, just that Winslow’s ineffective blocking prevents me from calling him an all around great.
And I never saw him play? I’m 58, I saw him play plenty.
I wasn’t referring to you at all. I was referring to earlier posters on this thread
Fair enough, but you did quote my comment.
1) His prime was brief, about four years.
2) Simms, despite his other limitations, was among the very best ever throwing the deep seam pass. We're talking Marino/Elway level, and possibly better than either. That unique skill, combined with Bavaro's hands and fearlessness in the middle of the field, made MB a much more effective deep threat than would otherwise have been possible, since he wasn't particularly fast.
That said, Bavaro is MY FAVORITE TE of all-time - absolutely lovable - quiet, tough as nails, MONSTER blocker.
Quote:
Instead of saying “you” I should have said “one”
Fair enough, but you did quote my comment.
I did. It was intended to be a piggyback off your post, pointing out that even though you saw Bavaro play, you still went with Gronk and that was fine. My bad
Quote:
so as great a receiver as he was, I wouldn't call him a great ALL AROUND TE. I always thought Bavaro was the best I had seen, until I saw Gronk. As much as I hate the Massholes calling every Patriot the best ever, with Gronk I think they're right.
And that is fine. If you believe Gronk was the best you ever saw, say it and move on. Don’t disparage or be condescending to a fan who has a differing opinion about a player you never saw play
That said, Bavaro is MY FAVORITE TE of all-time - absolutely lovable - quiet, tough as nails, MONSTER blocker.
Shockey wasn't a better receiver than Bavaro imo. Shockey was an overrated talent imo. He had pretty good hands but a weak catch radius. His biggest strength was his YAC, but that was limited because he struggled to catch the ball while staying on his feet. He was more hype than anything imo.
I did. It was intended to be a piggyback off your post, pointing out that even though you saw Bavaro play, you still went with Gronk and that was fine. My bad
I see, no worries. Like I said, Bavaro in his prime was as good as any TE I’ve seen. I’d give Bavaro a slight edge over Gronk in blocking, but Gronk was like Winslow as a receiver, just a freak. And I want to hate the guy.
And I don’t want to look like I’m dissing Winslow. If the questions was the best TE of all time, he’s in the conversation. He revolutionized the position, and was the perfect player for a Coryell offfense, he just wasn’t a great blocker.
His blocking ability...His Pass Catching and After the Catch...Probably the Biggest "Field Tilter" in the History of the Game.
No he's not and that's a ridiculous assertion, when you put him in the same class as Jim Brown, Jerry Rice, Gayle Sayers, Joe Montana, Peyton Manning and his own QB Tom Brady. In fact, I could name 10 more offensive players in a heartbeat that were greater than Gronk. Give me a break...
Walter Payton? OJ simpson?
Gronk probably isn't in the same class as Earl Campbell or Eric Dickerson, either...
Gronk is among the top 5 TEs ever, but not the top 5 offensive players all time, IMO.
You also apparently did not read my post where I said I only saw him play via highlights.
How come the hall of fame voters don't agree with you? A guy who can't get in vs a guy everyone on the planet knows will go in 1st ballot. Can't use the excuse that they didn't see both play.
No, but you can cite the fact that injuries shortened his career and took him out of HoF contention. I've watched Bavaro and Gronkowski (and not just on highlights). I've been watching pro football for more than 60 years. Bavaro is the best I've ever seen followed by Mackey, Witten, and then Gronk.
His blocking ability...His Pass Catching and After the Catch...Probably the Biggest "Field Tilter" in the History of the Game.
Best offensive player ever? Better than Jim Brown, Jerry Rice, Gayle Sayers, Joe Montana, etc, etc.? Take a breath, please.
Quote:
In comment 14478212 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
Where am I going to find fans who saw Bavaro in his prime 30+ years ago? On here? Sure and we’ll see what they opine. I will NEVER pay any attention to any fan who never saw him play. Never.
How about hall of fame voters who have seen him play?
Um, Bavaro doesn’t have enough prime years to qualify due to the knee..But during his prime years, I have never seen a better all
around TE than him. NOTHING to do with homerism. Everything to do with what I personally saw
+1
Shockey? You're wrong there. He was a great player early. One of the best players in the league. Not just a receiving threat, he battled in the run game too.
But even before people here turned on him because of his personality, I thought he was overrated because I hated how he was physically incapable of catching a ball over his head without maintaining balance. It pissed me off so much, we missed out on a ton of big plays because of this flaw in his game. This is one of the reasons he was a poor fit with young Eli, who threw the ball high often.
Was this posted? Maybe.
But this was when Belichick was asked to compare Bavaro and Gronk during Gronk's rookie season.
For me it's Bavaro, no one asked about longevity or the HOF, but best two-way TE is Bavaro.
Gronk is next, he was like Bavaro but bigger, so to be that athletic, strong, and have Gronk's size - creating offensive mis-matches just made him the perfect weapon for this era.