So this article about franchise values got me into a heated debate with a couple friends who are Cowboy fans. They tried arguing to me that the Cowboys are the most recognizable sports franchise.... in the world. Me as a Yankee fan had to come to my teams defense and let them know that when it comes to American sports franchises around the world nobody comes close to the Yankees. Having traveled all over Europe I have never seen anything but Yankees or Dodgers hats on the people out there. I have never seen a single piece of Cowboy paraphernalia on anyone. Keep in mind neither of them have ever been outside of the united states/mexico
When it comes to recognizable franchises I don't think anyone comes close to Manchester United or Real Madrid when we are speaking globally.
What say you BBI family....?
American sports teams recognized globally? Yankees and it's not close.
The Far Side by Gary Larson - ( New Window )
Football is much more popular in America than baseball, and there are a lot of Cowboys fans outside of Dallas.
I actually would at least somewhat buy the argument in the US only.
Globally, though - no way. Not even close. You won't see anyone wearing Dallas Cowboys shit overseas. The Yankees are an international brand.
Football is much more popular in America than baseball, and there are a lot of Cowboys fans outside of Dallas.
I actually would at least somewhat buy the argument in the US only.
Globally, though - no way. Not even close. You won't see anyone wearing Dallas Cowboys shit overseas. The Yankees are an international brand.
The Yankees are every opposing team's max draw(iirc). Yankees arrive, ticket sales go up substantially
This. Globally it’s not even close
You know what people really think of when they think of America? Cowboys and specifically Texans, cowboy boot wearing, truck driving, gun toting, don't mess with Texas, independent arrogant SOBs. Most the rest of the world thinks Americans are a bunch of Cowboys and football is the most American sport. And the star represents that.
So I'd say there are more people impacted by the performance of the Cowboys than the Yankees, but the Yankees are more "well-known."
Quote:
You have to consider the difference in sports. NFL revenue was like 5 BILLION dollars more than MLB last year - despite baseball playing a 162 game season and football playing a mere 16.
Football is much more popular in America than baseball, and there are a lot of Cowboys fans outside of Dallas.
I actually would at least somewhat buy the argument in the US only.
Globally, though - no way. Not even close. You won't see anyone wearing Dallas Cowboys shit overseas. The Yankees are an international brand.
The Yankees are every opposing team's max draw(iirc). Yankees arrive, ticket sales go up substantially
I think the Red Sox might actually be the top visiting team in MLB, attendance-wise, but that's a function of the Yanks being the visiting team in tiny Fenway while the Sox get to be the visiting team in Yankee Stadium. If you net out the games between those two, then the Yanks are the top visiting draw in the league.
Quote:
In comment 14504336 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
You have to consider the difference in sports. NFL revenue was like 5 BILLION dollars more than MLB last year - despite baseball playing a 162 game season and football playing a mere 16.
Football is much more popular in America than baseball, and there are a lot of Cowboys fans outside of Dallas.
I actually would at least somewhat buy the argument in the US only.
Globally, though - no way. Not even close. You won't see anyone wearing Dallas Cowboys shit overseas. The Yankees are an international brand.
The Yankees are every opposing team's max draw(iirc). Yankees arrive, ticket sales go up substantially
I think the Red Sox might actually be the top visiting team in MLB, attendance-wise, but that's a function of the Yanks being the visiting team in tiny Fenway while the Sox get to be the visiting team in Yankee Stadium. If you net out the games between those two, then the Yanks are the top visiting draw in the league.
I was talking about all the teams. I did a quick look and the Cubs are #1(67% increase in sales), Yankees #2 (54%) and way back are the Red Sox(31%) at #3. This is increased attendance over normal caused by a visiting team.
Visitor Draws - ( New Window )
Meanwhile, I've seen Yankees stuff almost everywhere I've traveled. Hell, I even bought knock-off Yankee stuff in Hong Kong before. I've frequently asked if there's anything I can bring to people when I've gone to travel and several times, the response was a Yankees hat or t-shirt. But that question can elicit some interesting responses from Tylenol to Timberland boots - requested twice by two different people!
Quote:
In comment 14504346 section125 said:
Quote:
In comment 14504336 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
You have to consider the difference in sports. NFL revenue was like 5 BILLION dollars more than MLB last year - despite baseball playing a 162 game season and football playing a mere 16.
Football is much more popular in America than baseball, and there are a lot of Cowboys fans outside of Dallas.
I actually would at least somewhat buy the argument in the US only.
Globally, though - no way. Not even close. You won't see anyone wearing Dallas Cowboys shit overseas. The Yankees are an international brand.
The Yankees are every opposing team's max draw(iirc). Yankees arrive, ticket sales go up substantially
I think the Red Sox might actually be the top visiting team in MLB, attendance-wise, but that's a function of the Yanks being the visiting team in tiny Fenway while the Sox get to be the visiting team in Yankee Stadium. If you net out the games between those two, then the Yanks are the top visiting draw in the league.
I was talking about all the teams. I did a quick look and the Cubs are #1(67% increase in sales), Yankees #2 (54%) and way back are the Red Sox(31%) at #3. This is increased attendance over normal caused by a visiting team. Visitor Draws - ( New Window )
Two things flawed with that link:
1) that's SeatGeek's data for sales on their platform, not overall ticket sales through all primary and secondary ticketing channels.
2) they're using ticket pricing above average as their metric, not attendance above average. The two do tend to go hand in hand, but it's not absolutely 100% correlative.
If fans of the Red Sox (or Yankees, or whatever team) are buying their tickets through any other channel than SeatGeek, that's not reflected in the link you provided. And then within SeatGeek's own environment, if amateur resellers (read: season ticket holders selling off some of their tickets) for whatever reason price the Red Sox games lower than Yankees or Cubs, that also factors into the way SG is calculating their results.
By using pricing exclusively as their only data point, and not including any context for dynamic pricing along a sales curve, their data is inherently dirty: for example, assuming that even an amateur reseller understands to increase pricing as sales velocity rises, a rabid fan base can skew the numbers by being so quick to buy secondary market inventory that the resellers miss out on the chance to react with price increases on sufficient seats to balance the data.
By using pricing exclusively as their only data point, and not including any context for dynamic pricing along a sales curve, their data is inherently dirty: for example, assuming that even an amateur reseller understands to increase pricing as sales velocity rises, a rabid fan base can skew the numbers by being so quick to buy secondary market inventory that the resellers miss out on the chance to react with price increases on sufficient seats to balance the data.
You would think this would be an easy look up, but it is not. I finally got one that showed average attendance home and away through ESPN and the Dodgers were #1, Yanks #2, Cubs #3 for 2018 for away attendance.
Not easy to decypher.