it truly will be matter of opinion subject to the officials opinion if it was important enough to the game to overturn. Sorry, can't buy it. if the replay is ambiguous or not quite clear, be conservative and don't overturn. But that one was clearly, unambiguously against the rules.
it truly will be matter of opinion subject to the officials opinion if it was important enough to the game to overturn. Sorry, can't buy it. if the replay is ambiguous or not quite clear, be conservative and don't overturn. But that one was clearly, unambiguously against the rules.
you are going to have that type of contact several times a game.
Look at how many times Beckham was mugged.
These aren't the type of calls replay is supposed to remedy. It is supposed to be game-altering blatant calls like the NO game.
Think about what kind of calls this will overturn in key spots
oh my God the NFL has no idea what it has done. I tell you what, this is going to cause throwing downfield to be much more productive kind of like three point shot in basketball. Now pass interference is going to encourage the downfield game. Big receivers are going to have a big year. The Giants should throw downfield to Engram a lot.
it truly will be matter of opinion subject to the officials opinion if it was important enough to the game to overturn. Sorry, can't buy it. if the replay is ambiguous or not quite clear, be conservative and don't overturn. But that one was clearly, unambiguously against the rules.
I get it - but that play is exactly why the rule will suck. We are going to go back and look for arm bars or hand grabs and make game-altering calls. It is going to suck. Hell, we'd have had a beef in several games with OBJ getting grabbed.
That's not the type of play the rule was meant for - and it is a terrible and reactionary rule anyway
Again funny I thought it was a questionable pick
at the time man he sticks like a burdock .
That was a spectacular catch by White ..
Well anybody questioning the past two drafts
all this negative crap on DG have a nice dish of Crow .
it truly will be matter of opinion subject to the officials opinion if it was important enough to the game to overturn. Sorry, can't buy it. if the replay is ambiguous or not quite clear, be conservative and don't overturn. But that one was clearly, unambiguously against the rules.
So we're putting more on the refs' plates when it comes to subjective calls. Spot fouls that decide games are now up to the refs to decide if "it's import enough to the game to overturn"? So you're saying the refs now can't be consistent and have to go beyond what they see on the tape and decide whether the call is "important enough" to overturn?
The refs get a lot of shit but the league doesn't do them any favors, this is another example. That call was obvious but you can find by the book PI on almost every play, I don't want a football game decided by whether or not that ref wants to call it by the book or use his discretion based on game situation.
Heading. Getting contributions from our middle round picks is huge. We had nearly a decade of just not good drafts. The draft is more than the 1st and 2nd round and the Giants haven’t done that under Reeces tenure. Gentleman seems to be getting us on the right track. I see a more well rounded team here.
it truly will be matter of opinion subject to the officials opinion if it was important enough to the game to overturn. Sorry, can't buy it. if the replay is ambiguous or not quite clear, be conservative and don't overturn. But that one was clearly, unambiguously against the rules.
So we're putting more on the refs' plates when it comes to subjective calls. Spot fouls that decide games are now up to the refs to decide if "it's import enough to the game to overturn"? So you're saying the refs now can't be consistent and have to go beyond what they see on the tape and decide whether the call is "important enough" to overturn?
The refs get a lot of shit but the league doesn't do them any favors, this is another example. That call was obvious but you can find by the book PI on almost every play, I don't want a football game decided by whether or not that ref wants to call it by the book or use his discretion based on game situation.
You're misinterpreting that. I was replying to Fatman's assertion that it should only be called it its important enough to the game. I am definitely not in favor of that. It should be called if it is clearly shown to violate the rules … unambiguously.
Bit of both, hang time didn’t appear too good
Boo to you!
This is great.
Sorry, that reply was for Fatman
Alfieri?
Look at how many times Beckham was mugged.
These aren't the type of calls replay is supposed to remedy. It is supposed to be game-altering blatant calls like the NO game.
Think about what kind of calls this will overturn in key spots
Boo to you!
This is great.
Amen, this is where the meat and potatoes part of the roster comes together. Good stuff
I get it - but that play is exactly why the rule will suck. We are going to go back and look for arm bars or hand grabs and make game-altering calls. It is going to suck. Hell, we'd have had a beef in several games with OBJ getting grabbed.
That's not the type of play the rule was meant for - and it is a terrible and reactionary rule anyway
Very nice throw by Lauletta.
Human error is part of it, although you try to do the best you can.
On the interception, technically it probably should have been overturned as well since the first one was called.
This rule opens up a huge fan of worms
at the time man he sticks like a burdock .
That was a spectacular catch by White ..
Well anybody questioning the past two drafts
all this negative crap on DG have a nice dish of Crow .
And can return kicks too...pretty impressive for a guy coming from a small school.
So we're putting more on the refs' plates when it comes to subjective calls. Spot fouls that decide games are now up to the refs to decide if "it's import enough to the game to overturn"? So you're saying the refs now can't be consistent and have to go beyond what they see on the tape and decide whether the call is "important enough" to overturn?
The refs get a lot of shit but the league doesn't do them any favors, this is another example. That call was obvious but you can find by the book PI on almost every play, I don't want a football game decided by whether or not that ref wants to call it by the book or use his discretion based on game situation.
Great trade up, Jerry.
Great trade up, Jerry.
Was that his only trade up ffs?
yup, thought i saw the same
They'll stash him on IR
Quote:
it truly will be matter of opinion subject to the officials opinion if it was important enough to the game to overturn. Sorry, can't buy it. if the replay is ambiguous or not quite clear, be conservative and don't overturn. But that one was clearly, unambiguously against the rules.
So we're putting more on the refs' plates when it comes to subjective calls. Spot fouls that decide games are now up to the refs to decide if "it's import enough to the game to overturn"? So you're saying the refs now can't be consistent and have to go beyond what they see on the tape and decide whether the call is "important enough" to overturn?
The refs get a lot of shit but the league doesn't do them any favors, this is another example. That call was obvious but you can find by the book PI on almost every play, I don't want a football game decided by whether or not that ref wants to call it by the book or use his discretion based on game situation.
You're misinterpreting that. I was replying to Fatman's assertion that it should only be called it its important enough to the game. I am definitely not in favor of that. It should be called if it is clearly shown to violate the rules … unambiguously.