Does this phrase annoy the shit out of everyone like it does me? Not sure why but I want to punch my computer screen every time I see it. Maybe it's just me.
often (rarely post) and I don't really keep track of who are good posters and who are whackos. There is something about that phrase that is so god damn grating. If that is his purpose (which would certainly be a peculiar goal), well done because I cringe when I read it.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Bullshit. You don't use it because the Daily News did 30 years ago. You use it because you know it annoys people. At least be honest about it.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
It sounds extremely condescending.
No, he uses it to be condescending. People get irritated when it is used, so he keeps using to get as much reaction as possible.
But it is because it annoys people. And, it’s like your fine wine. Potency increases with age.
I guess it's become a tagline of sorts.
But I'm certainly not going to use it because someone has an issue with it. It's really very silly this whole thing...especially this theory I use it to lump all the optimists together. That is just the best thing I've read in quite some time...
fairly common parlance I think. It’s equivalent to “the Giants braintrust” and is neither positive nor negative. A bit or reporter shorthand.
It comes off as condescending because bw comes off as condescending most of the time. But he’s not a true troll, he cares about the team and makes a case for his view, pessimistic though it often is. He was part of the old “realist” group with Mark S., Alan, et al. I’m glad he’s back around condescending or not, it’s a more interesting site with him posting.
fairly common parlance I think. It’s equivalent to “the Giants braintrust” and is neither positive nor negative. A bit or reporter shorthand.
It comes off as condescending because bw comes off as condescending most of the time. But he’s not a true troll, he cares about the team and makes a case for his view, pessimistic though it often is. He was part of the old “realist” group with Mark S., Alan, et al. I’m glad he’s back around condescending or not, it’s a more interesting site with him posting.
I could buy this if he hadn’t outed himself as a skins fan last week.
Jints instead of Giants has been used in NY newspaers for decades Â
I remember headlines using that as far back as the 1970's. "Jints Central" was then used to lump the management of the organization into the same phrasing (Jints instead of Giants) but often done when criticizing them instead of lauding them.
bw has used this as long as I remember him posting going back to the 90's. I never took him to mean any posters but the brain trust of the organization. He just piggy backed on what some papers did.
Does phrasing it that way kind of take a little poke at them, sure that's probably why bw has enjoyed doing it, but he had been consistent and certainly didn't invest the phrase.
I never cared for it when I saw it used in headlines, but bw making a habit of it is nothing more than his style and getting a reaction from people because of it probably gives him a laugh. Just like he used to use $'s when typing Strahan. It's a subtle dig and people react.
Read my posts. It's completely clear I am referring to the Giants Org - Mara, DG, whomever - 100% of the time.
I’ve been on the receiving end of them. It’s stupid and doesn’t bother me, but you definitely reference posters as part of “Jints Central.” It’s a cute little catch phrase you’ve got for yourself.
Read my posts. It's completely clear I am referring to the Giants Org - Mara, DG, whomever - 100% of the time.
I’ve been on the receiving end of them. It’s stupid and doesn’t bother me, but you definitely reference posters as part of “Jints Central.” It’s a cute little catch phrase you’ve got for yourself.
Totally incorrect.
But if you want to continue to think I'm that conniving, then knock yourself out...
It’s been a long time indeed. BBI is 25, it can rent a car now, WTF? Hope all is well.
Hard to believe - BBI has withstood the test of time.
Life is good. A few kids, fun family, lots of travel (son is an aspiring baseball player, so we travel up and down the east coast), and back to kicking it around at BBI once in a while...
Back in the 60’s and 70’s the NY Daily News called the Giants the “Jints” many times in their articles covering Giants games.
I have used it many times on BBI in the past on threads when referring to Giants.
It is not offensive at all.
It’s for the sole reason to mock Mara and DG and anyone who supports them. It’s so obvious and the denial is more pathetic than actually using the phrase.
RE: Jints instead of Giants has been used in NY newspaers for decades Â
I remember headlines using that as far back as the 1970's. "Jints Central" was then used to lump the management of the organization into the same phrasing (Jints instead of Giants) but often done when criticizing them instead of lauding them.
bw has used this as long as I remember him posting going back to the 90's. I never took him to mean any posters but the brain trust of the organization. He just piggy backed on what some papers did.
Does phrasing it that way kind of take a little poke at them, sure that's probably why bw has enjoyed doing it, but he had been consistent and certainly didn't invest the phrase.
I never cared for it when I saw it used in headlines, but bw making a habit of it is nothing more than his style and getting a reaction from people because of it probably gives him a laugh. Just like he used to use $'s when typing Strahan. It's a subtle dig and people react.
The olde timers on here should chime in. I always remember from the 70s&80s as sort of a derogatory term for Giants management when they were poorly run. As a diehard fan my dad hated the term. I would believe this is why it gets under the skin of some. Once they started winning the term dropped. Well until the Giants started doing poorly again.
RE: RE: Jints instead of Giants has been used in NY newspaers for decades Â
The olde timers on here should chime in. I always remember from the 70s&80s as sort of a derogatory term for Giants management when they were poorly run. As a diehard fan my dad hated the term. I would believe this is why it gets under the skin of some. Once they started winning the term dropped. Well until the Giants started doing poorly again.
You need to check your history. The NYDN was using it in the '80s and '90s.
Let me give you an example of a derogatory term - Redskins.
and I most certainly remember the tabloid newspapers using the term "Jints". I thought is was asinine then and I think it;s asinine now. It's not like it's saving time like a nickname or anything like that. It's just stupid.
Now nicknames is another thing. If you don't know someone personally, don't call then your clever nickname. "getts", 'Spags". Just my thing I'm sure
Jints was definitely used in at least The Daily News Â
It doesn't offend people. It annoys people and yet you still do it knowing that.
Who? The Maras, Tisches, Gettlemans?
This thread has actually been worthwile, for those who have limited history about the Giants, to get insights from others who actually understand the term. And what it means.
I sort of see it like the Eagles being called the Iggles.
It’s for the sole reason to mock Mara and DG and anyone who supports them. It’s so obvious and the denial is more pathetic than actually using the phrase.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Is just one more example of fans believing their perception of things are actually factual.
I don’t take too seriously any opinion of people who when expressing themselves on a given topic it becomes obvious that they don t know what they don’t know.
You should just ignore and or dismiss their perception on this topic rather than waste energy getting worked up about it.
Not much interaction transpires on this board that s worth getting upset about. It s just a football forum
It’s the intent behind it. BW has been here, like me, for decades. He’s one of the long standing contributors here. I usually disagree with his perspective, but his usage of Jints Central has a specific intent. And he’s been consistent for decades with it. To deny the intent is being disingenuous.
It’s the intent behind it. BW has been here, like me, for decades. He’s one of the long standing contributors here. I usually disagree with his perspective, but his usage of Jints Central has a specific intent. And he’s been consistent for decades with it. To deny the intent is being disingenuous.
Except when we were winning of course...
The intent is to mock the team and the decisions they make. Pretty sad if you ask me.
RE: Bw is not denying why and how he uses it...at all Â
the idea that it bothers any of you enough to openly argue about it in a thread is classic.
You all need an enema...
He is, he definitely is. Again, I do t give a shit, would be nice if he’s honest about it though. It’s no different than the “Luddite” garbage that is ever so popular when the Giants aren’t winning.
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
RE: RE: Bw is not denying why and how he uses it...at all Â
the idea that it bothers any of you enough to openly argue about it in a thread is classic.
You all need an enema...
Don't you live in Georgia?
So, Ya'll need an enema
You're welcome
Sincerely,
crick
Not born here but I will go ya’ll from time to time. Didn’t think this thread was appropriate to use slangish words as posters seem to get too upset...
RE: RE: Bw is not denying why and how he uses it...at all Â
the idea that it bothers any of you enough to openly argue about it in a thread is classic.
You all need an enema...
He is, he definitely is. Again, I do t give a shit, would be nice if he’s honest about it though. It’s no different than the “Luddite” garbage that is ever so popular when the Giants aren’t winning.
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
He has stated multiple times in this thread he uses it as a negative towards management
I've never seen him use it in that context. Although I'm not sure what's the point of the distinction. I'm sure he will freely admit that he disagrees with and sometimes pokes fun at other posters.
I've never seen him use it in that context. Although I'm not sure what's the point of the distinction. I'm sure he will freely admit that he disagrees with and sometimes pokes fun at other posters.
He most certainly does. You will notice the EFC moniker when referring to them (Eli Fan Club).
If people can’t see he is doing to troll the site and make fun of the Giants, then I don’t know what to tell you. It’s as clear as day.
many of the cutsey nicknames given to sports teams by media or the fans that gets somewhat annoying when overused. Didn't the papers also use something like "Mara Tech" in a similar way as "Jints Central"?
RE: RE: RE: RE: Bw is not denying why and how he uses it...at all Â
Positive all the time and thinks we will win the Super Bowl every year, head over to extreme skins.
I like a good debate, seeing all sides to the argument and some friendly banter. I think BW add to this site more than some 100% positive poster who don't bother to think for themselves. Nothing against those guys, it's probably the best way to root on a team, but it doesn't add much to an online discussion forum.
Positive all the time and thinks we will win the Super Bowl every year, head over to extreme skins.
I like a good debate, seeing all sides to the argument and some friendly banter. I think BW add to this site more than some 100% positive poster who don't bother to think for themselves. Nothing against those guys, it's probably the best way to root on a team, but it doesn't add much to an online discussion forum.
agree. The issue is some people can’t handle friendly banter and debate - they get very angry and crazy
is a time for every team's fans where we tend to get carried away with positives. That's normal and not a problem, but it helps to have someone around who helps to keep expectations at a reasonable level.
It's most certainly not effecting my real life, only when I come on here. LOL
Exactly.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
It sounds extremely condescending.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Bullshit. You don't use it because the Daily News did 30 years ago. You use it because you know it annoys people. At least be honest about it.
Quote:
here we go again.
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
It sounds extremely condescending.
No, he uses it to be condescending. People get irritated when it is used, so he keeps using to get as much reaction as possible.
Yeah, I know. I'm sure he gets a big laugh out of it, too.
Bullshit. You don't use it because the Daily News did 30 years ago. You use it because you know it annoys people. At least be honest about it.
I am being honest about it.
I've always used. Dating back to BBI's inception.
Quote:
Bullshit. You don't use it because the Daily News did 30 years ago. You use it because you know it annoys people. At least be honest about it.
I am being honest about it.
I've always used. Dating back to BBI's inception.
That’s true.
But it is because it annoys people. And, it’s like your fine wine. Potency increases with age.
Do we need a glossary now?
I always thought he used it to refer to ownership/GM/hc
Never got the impression it referred to posters.
That’s true,
It it’s not a “substitute”. It’s done to mock the Org and thereby mock and annoy the org’s fans.
That’s true.
But it is because it annoys people. And, it’s like your fine wine. Potency increases with age.
I guess it's become a tagline of sorts.
But I'm certainly not going to use it because someone has an issue with it. It's really very silly this whole thing...especially this theory I use it to lump all the optimists together. That is just the best thing I've read in quite some time...
We have a poster in the board, I believe, named Jints in Carolina. Right?
This really makes me laugh. I just love it here... ;)
Quote:
Read my posts. It's completely clear I am referring to the Giants Org - Mara, DG, whomever - 100% of the time.
That’s true,
It it’s not a “substitute”. It’s done to mock the Org and thereby mock and annoy the org’s fans.
Half true. Absolutely to mock the Org.
If that annoys the fans that's just incidental...
Can be used in so many ways
It comes off as condescending because bw comes off as condescending most of the time. But he’s not a true troll, he cares about the team and makes a case for his view, pessimistic though it often is. He was part of the old “realist” group with Mark S., Alan, et al. I’m glad he’s back around condescending or not, it’s a more interesting site with him posting.
Quote:
Bullshit. You don't use it because the Daily News did 30 years ago. You use it because you know it annoys people. At least be honest about it.
I am being honest about it.
I've always used. Dating back to BBI's inception.
Oh, puh-leeze. It's obvious that you use it as a pejorative, regardless of why or when you started, which is why it bothers people.
But, you do you. Write what you will. The rest of us will survive.
Hope things are well.
It comes off as condescending because bw comes off as condescending most of the time. But he’s not a true troll, he cares about the team and makes a case for his view, pessimistic though it often is. He was part of the old “realist” group with Mark S., Alan, et al. I’m glad he’s back around condescending or not, it’s a more interesting site with him posting.
I could buy this if he hadn’t outed himself as a skins fan last week.
bw has used this as long as I remember him posting going back to the 90's. I never took him to mean any posters but the brain trust of the organization. He just piggy backed on what some papers did.
Does phrasing it that way kind of take a little poke at them, sure that's probably why bw has enjoyed doing it, but he had been consistent and certainly didn't invest the phrase.
I never cared for it when I saw it used in headlines, but bw making a habit of it is nothing more than his style and getting a reaction from people because of it probably gives him a laugh. Just like he used to use $'s when typing Strahan. It's a subtle dig and people react.
I’ve been on the receiving end of them. It’s stupid and doesn’t bother me, but you definitely reference posters as part of “Jints Central.” It’s a cute little catch phrase you’ve got for yourself.
Quote:
Read my posts. It's completely clear I am referring to the Giants Org - Mara, DG, whomever - 100% of the time.
I’ve been on the receiving end of them. It’s stupid and doesn’t bother me, but you definitely reference posters as part of “Jints Central.” It’s a cute little catch phrase you’ve got for yourself.
Totally incorrect.
But if you want to continue to think I'm that conniving, then knock yourself out...
Hard to believe - BBI has withstood the test of time.
Life is good. A few kids, fun family, lots of travel (son is an aspiring baseball player, so we travel up and down the east coast), and back to kicking it around at BBI once in a while...
Oh, puh-leeze. It's obvious that you use it as a pejorative, regardless of why or when you started, which is why it bothers people.
But, you do you. Write what you will. The rest of us will survive.
I absolutely use it to criticize ownership and the front office. Nothing more, nothing less.
I can't control what offends people in this hyper-sensitive world. Either you take my explanation as fact, or we have very little to discuss.
I never really cared for the "word" but didn't think it had any meaning other than as a shorter version of "Giants".
When bw uses the term I assume he simply means the Giants organization/ownership/management.
Why anyone would even care that he uses the term let alone get worked up enough about it to start a callout thread is baffling.
I have used it many times on BBI in the past on threads when referring to Giants.
It is not offensive at all.
bw has used this as long as I remember him posting going back to the 90's. I never took him to mean any posters but the brain trust of the organization. He just piggy backed on what some papers did.
Does phrasing it that way kind of take a little poke at them, sure that's probably why bw has enjoyed doing it, but he had been consistent and certainly didn't invest the phrase.
I never cared for it when I saw it used in headlines, but bw making a habit of it is nothing more than his style and getting a reaction from people because of it probably gives him a laugh. Just like he used to use $'s when typing Strahan. It's a subtle dig and people react.
The olde timers on here should chime in. I always remember from the 70s&80s as sort of a derogatory term for Giants management when they were poorly run. As a diehard fan my dad hated the term. I would believe this is why it gets under the skin of some. Once they started winning the term dropped. Well until the Giants started doing poorly again.
The olde timers on here should chime in. I always remember from the 70s&80s as sort of a derogatory term for Giants management when they were poorly run. As a diehard fan my dad hated the term. I would believe this is why it gets under the skin of some. Once they started winning the term dropped. Well until the Giants started doing poorly again.
You need to check your history. The NYDN was using it in the '80s and '90s.
Let me give you an example of a derogatory term - Redskins.
Quote:
Oh, puh-leeze. It's obvious that you use it as a pejorative, regardless of why or when you started, which is why it bothers people.
But, you do you. Write what you will. The rest of us will survive.
I absolutely use it to criticize ownership and the front office. Nothing more, nothing less.
I can't control what offends people in this hyper-sensitive world. Either you take my explanation as fact, or we have very little to discuss.
It doesn't offend people. It annoys people and yet you still do it knowing that.
Now nicknames is another thing. If you don't know someone personally, don't call then your clever nickname. "getts", 'Spags". Just my thing I'm sure
Damnit Jints, you're too controversial.
It doesn't offend people. It annoys people and yet you still do it knowing that.
Who? The Maras, Tisches, Gettlemans?
This thread has actually been worthwile, for those who have limited history about the Giants, to get insights from others who actually understand the term. And what it means.
I sort of see it like the Eagles being called the Iggles.
What denial?
Now nicknames is another thing. If you don't know someone personally, don't call then your clever nickname. "getts", 'Spags". Just my thing I'm sure
Seriously?
Jints Central was a common phrase used in the Daily News in the early '90s - I forget the exact writers/reporters - to obviously reference the Giants decisions makers - GM, Owners, etc.
I found it catchy and harmless. Frankly, I have no idea why anyone would get so irritated by it.
Denial.
Would you mock and laugh at them if they got hurt too? POS.
Do we need a glossary now?
Denial
Denial
Quote:
Bullshit. You don't use it because the Daily News did 30 years ago. You use it because you know it annoys people. At least be honest about it.
I am being honest about it.
I've always used. Dating back to BBI's inception.
Denial
Jersey - Giants get it?
I don't know if this place is overrun by stupidity or trolls but sadly it's just not worth the time anymore.
Jersey - Giants get it?
I don't know if this place is overrun by stupidity or trolls but sadly it's just not worth the time anymore.
Pretty sure it dates back to well before they moved to the meadowlands and come from the NYer accent pronouncing Giants.
But we are the stupid ones.
I don’t take too seriously any opinion of people who when expressing themselves on a given topic it becomes obvious that they don t know what they don’t know.
You should just ignore and or dismiss their perception on this topic rather than waste energy getting worked up about it.
Not much interaction transpires on this board that s worth getting upset about. It s just a football forum
WHAT’S IN A NAME? ; ORIGIN OF ‘JINTS’ MONIKER PROVING TO BE GIANT PUZZLE - ( New Window )
You all need an enema...
Except when we were winning of course...
The intent is to mock the team and the decisions they make. Pretty sad if you ask me.
You all need an enema...
Don't you live in Georgia?
So, Ya'll need an enema
You're welcome
Sincerely,
crick
You all need an enema...
He is, he definitely is. Again, I do t give a shit, would be nice if he’s honest about it though. It’s no different than the “Luddite” garbage that is ever so popular when the Giants aren’t winning.
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
Quote:
the idea that it bothers any of you enough to openly argue about it in a thread is classic.
You all need an enema...
Don't you live in Georgia?
So, Ya'll need an enema
You're welcome
Sincerely,
crick
Not born here but I will go ya’ll from time to time. Didn’t think this thread was appropriate to use slangish words as posters seem to get too upset...
Quote:
the idea that it bothers any of you enough to openly argue about it in a thread is classic.
You all need an enema...
He is, he definitely is. Again, I do t give a shit, would be nice if he’s honest about it though. It’s no different than the “Luddite” garbage that is ever so popular when the Giants aren’t winning.
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
He has stated multiple times in this thread he uses it as a negative towards management
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
So a fan can’t poke fun at his team when they are in a slide, or whenever??
Quote:
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
So a fan can’t poke fun at his team when they are in a slide, or whenever??
Of course he can. But like I’ve said 3 or 4 times now he does it to posters who agree with any move the Giants make that he doesn’t agree with.
Not a big deal, just stating the obvious. Don’t be such a luddite.
I've never seen him use it in that context. Although I'm not sure what's the point of the distinction. I'm sure he will freely admit that he disagrees with and sometimes pokes fun at other posters.
Quote:
he includes posters.
I've never seen him use it in that context. Although I'm not sure what's the point of the distinction. I'm sure he will freely admit that he disagrees with and sometimes pokes fun at other posters.
He most certainly does. You will notice the EFC moniker when referring to them (Eli Fan Club).
If people can’t see he is doing to troll the site and make fun of the Giants, then I don’t know what to tell you. It’s as clear as day.
Quote:
In comment 14526649 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
I didn’t hear either term much when we were in the playoffs and winning Super Bowls. Again, just admit it and move on.
So a fan can’t poke fun at his team when they are in a slide, or whenever??
Of course he can. But like I’ve said 3 or 4 times now he does it to posters who agree with any move the Giants make that he doesn’t agree with.
.
beats me...maybe he does. So what?
I like a good debate, seeing all sides to the argument and some friendly banter. I think BW add to this site more than some 100% positive poster who don't bother to think for themselves. Nothing against those guys, it's probably the best way to root on a team, but it doesn't add much to an online discussion forum.
I like a good debate, seeing all sides to the argument and some friendly banter. I think BW add to this site more than some 100% positive poster who don't bother to think for themselves. Nothing against those guys, it's probably the best way to root on a team, but it doesn't add much to an online discussion forum.
This thread is a great test of this fact.
And admitted it last week. Freudian slip but even so.
And admitted it last week. Freudian slip but even so.
That was funny. Fat-Mara was lying in the weeds ready to pounce with that one...
Quote:
And admitted it last week. Freudian slip but even so.
That was funny. Fat-Mara was lying in the weeds ready to pounce with that one...
as you said, it’s going to be a long while before you live that one down.
When people talk about being DC-area fans, I have a natural distaste to that!!
That was very funny.