for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Jay Glazer in Q& A gave really good insight on Giants and Eli

chuckydee9 : 10/4/2019 11:09 am
in one short paragraph.. when asked about, do organizations care about fan unhappiness... He replied back with a yes and used Eli as the example.. Its very telling because Jay has been right about Giants org on many things..

Based on his answer its clear that since his benching the organization was pressured to start him simply because of the fan outcry.. For any non-biased fan it seemed like Eli was done from 2016.. and when the HC finally had the guts to bench a non-performing player.. he got fired.. Not that I am defending McAdoo.. things would've been a lot different over the past 2 years if we had decided to move on from Eli after 2016 and moved up to draft Mahomes..

Regardless we've moved on..
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: McAdoo..  
flycatcher : 10/4/2019 4:01 pm : link
In comment 14611781 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
fucked with his own career - period.

This is a guy who showed up looking like Doug Heffernan on Day one and transformed himself into Gordon Gecko after a year where we had a very good turnover ratio and incredibly good health.

And after finally finding a suit that fit and reshaping his butt-cut hairdo, he alienated the team to the point where defensive players walked off the field and refused to go back into a game.

Then he pulled the stunt of benching Eli for Geno.

He fucked himself by letting a decent year go to his head and completely lost a team.

That has nothing to do with owndership

That’s a great capsule. It’s astonishing how much has happened in this organization over the past 3 years.
RE: I don't think the uproar was benching Eli.  
djstat : 10/4/2019 4:03 pm : link
In comment 14611691 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
It was starting Geno instead of Webb.
EXACTLY.
RE: He was fired  
UberAlias : 10/4/2019 5:40 pm : link
In comment 14611794 JonC said:
Quote:
because he'd lost the team and benched Eli for the wrong QB, out of desperation to hang onto his job. This included Reese. They must have known they were dangling, otherwise there wouldn't have been out of character desperate moves.

The former would've led to his dismissal after the season. Soiling Eli and his streak leading to the fan outcry compounded the former, and led to his early ouster.
Spot on. He was fired for losing the team and the mishandling of Eli benching accelerated the move.
When McAdoo Benched Eli  
Samiam : 10/4/2019 5:56 pm : link
Most everyone here criticized McAdoo for benching Eli and starting Geno instead of Davis Webb including me. I’m now of the mind we had it wrong. Aside from the obvious that Webb sucked (as did Geno), I think McAdoo wanted to get a mobile QB in the game in large part because the OL was horrible. Geno is a bad QB but at least he can move. Eli and Webb are like statues. Shurmur wanted Eli out this year when Eli had a decent OL (at least much better) and Barkley so there was a threat of play action. Both McAdoo and Shurmur wanted mobility. The problem with McAdoo decision was he had no good choices. Shurmur did.
I was all over the place with Eli the last few years  
djm : 10/4/2019 10:08 pm : link
But I always came back to defending him and lamenting the team around him. Wanted the young qb but didn’t mind Eli starting. He was a worthy placeholder but there’s no doubt that he Eli was done. I finally saw enough week 1 this season. I don’t think it’s fair to crush the giants for playing him because up until now there wasn’t another qb here to push him. I’m just glad that when the giants did go big, it appears they got a good one in jones and they didn’t wait too long to play him. Maybe they should have drafted a big time qb sooner but I I love that they got jones and Barkley and Engram before him, in round 1. Those guys are building blocks. Jones will reap the rewards...
One thing we all have forgotten about the Eli benching  
jeffusedtobeonwebtv : 10/5/2019 7:13 am : link
They were going to start him that game to keep his consecutive streak going, and then take him out in the 2nd quarter no matter how he or the team played. Eli said no way, that is not how the game is played.
To this I say BS  
Matt M. : 10/5/2019 9:09 am : link
First, the issue most fans had with benching Eli was not the benching itself. It was a combination of the unprofessional manner in which it was handled and the fact that Smith was the starter. That made no sense in the short or long term. Had they started the young, question mark QB, it would have been received much differently.

As for fan happiness, if that was foremost in ownership's mind this awful stadium would be different, the eay the team us run would be different, etc. Mara has shown no interest in the fans.
At least Eli's benching incident gave BBI  
Jimmy Googs : 10/5/2019 9:18 am : link
something to ponder.

Talking about starting Nate Stupar at LB just doesn't have the same zing...
RE: Eli  
Junior22 : 10/5/2019 9:27 am : link
In comment 14611878 Montana_Giant said:
Quote:
Is still the whipping boy. I watched the Dallas game with a long time NFL head coach and he said Eli looked good but that he scheme sucked and the bad passes were do to not having any real game chemistry with his recievers, Barkley in particular due to the limited snaps during preseason. The coach felt that he would have won at least 2 Super Bowls if Eli was on his team, a perennial playoff team. I hope DJ becomes a great qb but if he continues to run with the ball his career will be short lived. If a qb has to run this team is doomed.


hahahaha
RE: To this I say BS  
ron mexico : 10/5/2019 9:28 am : link
In comment 14612472 Matt M. said:
Quote:
First, the issue most fans had with benching Eli was not the benching itself. It was a combination of the unprofessional manner in which it was handled and the fact that Smith was the starter. That made no sense in the short or long term. Had they started the young, question mark QB, it would have been received much differently.

As for fan happiness, if that was foremost in ownership's mind this awful stadium would be different, the eay the team us run would be different, etc. Mara has shown no interest in the fans.


If Davis Webb played like Davis Webb the fan outrage would have been just as loud for different reasons, and he likely would have had to pull the plug before halftime. Imagine the fan outrage if the streak was broken for a guy who couldn’t last a half and Eli having to come in to game in relief?
...  
christian : 10/5/2019 10:41 am : link
It's no surprise everyone picks their favorite, and runs with the chapter of the story that bests supports their legacy.

The utter incompetence and failure of the org from 2013-2018 allows for mutually inclusive sucking by all the characters.

Coughlin fizzled, Reese couldn't build a winner, Mara made a number of bad decisions, Manning had or was rapidly hitting the end, MacAdoo was in over his head.

A good org can absorb bad performance at one of those key roles, the Giants were just lucky enough to get all of them sucking for a 5 year period.

RE: IIRC, Geno did *slightly* better than Eli had been doing,  
GeofromNJ : 10/5/2019 11:18 am : link
In comment 14611915 81_Great_Dane said:
Quote:
but it was pretty much the same offense. If he had come in and made a difference, and the offense had looked a lot better (as Jones has done), he would have been vindicated.

The whole thing was a clusterfuck in the truest sense of the word. The brass fucked thing sup. They switched QBs, the new guy was a small improvement but not a significant one, and then they switched back. If you're switching QBs, you have to give the new guy a chance. They didn't.

As for Geno being on the roster, he was a reasonable reclamation project, but there was no point in benching Eli for the guy. He wasn't going to be the new QB.

I remember when Little Bill benched Bernie Kosar for Vinnie Testaverde. The move was despised in Cleveland. But Testaverde was better. Little Bill took the heat and stood by the move. The Giants lacked the testicular fortitude to do that. Embarrassing.

The Giants would have won the Oakland game if Geno hadn't fumbled twice. Yeah, I know, the fumbling is on Geno, but minus one of those turnovers and the Giants win the game and Geno starts from then on. Not saying Geno is a great quarterback, just saying that we came that close to seeing the last of Eli.
There's one problem I have with the criticism of the first benching  
jcn56 : 10/5/2019 11:41 am : link
Everyone keeps focusing on WHO Eli was benched for.

The truth is - the who was irrelevant. The idea was to see someone else at the controls, to see how much the surrounding cast was to blame for the offensive performance.

Remember - it originated by telling Eli, in a season that was already circling the drain, that they would pull him as the game went on to see how the team would do with another QB at the helm. At that point, Eli said no, just bench me.

They would have been able to evaluate the surrounding talent and determine just how bad the OL, WR, RB positions were with a change at QB, to see whether Eli was holding the team back or whether it was the other way around.

The net results with Geno Smith at the controls weren't much different - and that was huge red flag #1.

Eli wasn't benched for Geno Smith. He was benched because he was the one variable in that controlled experiment that they needed to change to see how the rest would perform.
RE: There's one problem I have with the criticism of the first benching  
christian : 10/5/2019 11:53 am : link
In comment 14612550 jcn56 said:
Quote:
Everyone keeps focusing on WHO Eli was benched for.

The truth is - the who was irrelevant. The idea was to see someone else at the controls, to see how much the surrounding cast was to blame for the offensive performance.

Remember - it originated by telling Eli, in a season that was already circling the drain, that they would pull him as the game went on to see how the team would do with another QB at the helm. At that point, Eli said no, just bench me.

They would have been able to evaluate the surrounding talent and determine just how bad the OL, WR, RB positions were with a change at QB, to see whether Eli was holding the team back or whether it was the other way around.

The net results with Geno Smith at the controls weren't much different - and that was huge red flag #1.

Eli wasn't benched for Geno Smith. He was benched because he was the one variable in that controlled experiment that they needed to change to see how the rest would perform.


This is the most accurate, and intellectually honest assessment of the situation I've seen posted here.

I don't blame Manning not wanting to be part of making a regular season effectively a pre-season game.

Let's be real, that is exactly what was about to happen. Manning was asked to play some amount of series and then give the ball to the backups.

But it was his choice. The crying scene really changed my view of him.

Webb was never going to start that game. He was not the 2nd string QB that week, and was never ready. By the time it fell apart in the middle of the week, there was no chance Webb would be ready.
RE: RE: There's one problem I have with the criticism of the first benching  
Matt M. : 10/5/2019 8:44 pm : link
In comment 14612554 christian said:
Quote:
In comment 14612550 jcn56 said:


Quote:


Everyone keeps focusing on WHO Eli was benched for.

The truth is - the who was irrelevant. The idea was to see someone else at the controls, to see how much the surrounding cast was to blame for the offensive performance.

Remember - it originated by telling Eli, in a season that was already circling the drain, that they would pull him as the game went on to see how the team would do with another QB at the helm. At that point, Eli said no, just bench me.

They would have been able to evaluate the surrounding talent and determine just how bad the OL, WR, RB positions were with a change at QB, to see whether Eli was holding the team back or whether it was the other way around.

The net results with Geno Smith at the controls weren't much different - and that was huge red flag #1.

Eli wasn't benched for Geno Smith. He was benched because he was the one variable in that controlled experiment that they needed to change to see how the rest would perform.



This is the most accurate, and intellectually honest assessment of the situation I've seen posted here.

I don't blame Manning not wanting to be part of making a regular season effectively a pre-season game.

Let's be real, that is exactly what was about to happen. Manning was asked to play some amount of series and then give the ball to the backups.

But it was his choice. The crying scene really changed my view of him.

Webb was never going to start that game. He was not the 2nd string QB that week, and was never ready. By the time it fell apart in the middle of the week, there was no chance Webb would be ready.
No, of course Webb was never going to be ready. That is 100% on McAdoo. He never even took significant snaps during the summer. He was mishandled from the start. But, for many, the benching ultimately did come down to 2 things. One, how McAdoo, Reese, and Mara handled it and two, Smith starting. Smith was never in their long term plans and with the season done, there were no short term plans. Manning should have been benched when Webb was ready. Smith shouldn't have even been on the roster at that point.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner