Smoltz talks a LOT more. Voices are similar.
That's what analysts do nowadays, irregardless of the
particular sport, they talk a LOT more.
Less is more to me.
Smoltz talks a LOT more. Voices are similar.
That's what analysts do nowadays, irregardless of the
particular sport, they talk a LOT more.
Less is more to me.
Yea he does talk a lot more. I kind of like Smoltz. I'm not sure I'm learning a whole lot but he has an easy presence in the booth.
Kaat was a master. They might sound the same but that’s where it ends. At least for me.
Hmmm, I don't thinks so. Smoltz is very good. And yes he talks a touch to much.
I think Smoltz is informative, I love listening to pros about the nuances of pitching. That’s also why I loved Kaat and Cone is awesome too in that regard. The issue I have is he never has time to talk Yankees. When the Astros are in the field, he’s blabbing on about whoever is on the mound. When the Yankees are in the field he’s blabbing on about how awesome the hitter is that’s up. He did the same damn thing in the Twins series. Drives me nuts. Although I’m probably biased and the Astros fans think the same thing so who knows
I'd never compare Kaat to Smoltz,IMO they're on different levels Â
when it comes to describing the game,knowing when to interject a nuance & telling what is right & wrong w/the game right now. Kaat does all that & more. Smoltz cannot speak w/o showing his biases on whatever or whoever he's talking about. Smoltz knows the game but doesn't do himself justice by how he goes about describing it!
I don't think Smoltz is a good in-game broadcaster Â
That's what analysts do nowadays, irregardless of the
particular sport, they talk a LOT more.
Less is more to me.
That's what analysts do nowadays, irregardless of the
particular sport, they talk a LOT more.
Less is more to me.
Yea he does talk a lot more. I kind of like Smoltz. I'm not sure I'm learning a whole lot but he has an easy presence in the booth.
Hmmm, I don't thinks so. Smoltz is very good. And yes he talks a touch to much.
Ron Darling is a better announcer IMO. Even Tim McCarver was better (though towards the end he was a tough listen).
Quote:
Kaat was a master. They might sound the same but that’s where it ends. At least for me.
Hmmm, I don't thinks so. Smoltz is very good. And yes he talks a touch to much.
I think Smoltz is informative, I love listening to pros about the nuances of pitching. That’s also why I loved Kaat and Cone is awesome too in that regard. The issue I have is he never has time to talk Yankees. When the Astros are in the field, he’s blabbing on about whoever is on the mound. When the Yankees are in the field he’s blabbing on about how awesome the hitter is that’s up. He did the same damn thing in the Twins series. Drives me nuts. Although I’m probably biased and the Astros fans think the same thing so who knows