I mean I like the kid, he has some versatility but they don't use him. According to Pro football reference he has played in only 15% of offensive snaps. He doesn't appear to be a special teams star. I know he's not the reason why they are losing, but whats the point of having him on the team?
Would they be better off with another TE (considering EE's fragility) or another WR?
Tanney is an absolute blemish on this staff's ability to prove they deserve more time. As I mentioned elsewhere here, once you decided to keep Eli for 2019 and draft a QB #1 then tanney became worthless. KL would have been a bit more understandable as he would be a development backup QB for 2020 but Tanney and Eli at the same time is beyond stupid. It became even worse once Jones was named the starter as now any reason you had before to keep Tanney just went out the window. Yet, we still keep 3 QB's. It is not a reason this team struggles or a spot that would make a huge difference BUT, it does speak to the thought process and lack thereof our GM and HC have and something that doesn't bode well for future success.
We keep a FB on the roster and we never use them effectively. I have no idea if Penny can block or not because I haven't seen much of him in the backfield.
Personally Id like to see more sets with a FB in for protection or lead blocking for Barkley.
Except that Penny ISN'T a bad blocker. Shurmur just doesn't utilize a FB much, which is a mistake in my opinion.
remember hedgecock and hynoski and even jim finn? it was nice having a Full back and the idea that we'll have an actual run game.
everyone complains gettleman is building a team to win in the 80's but our last two coaches have been running these weak finesse offenses.
I've defended the Giants as just hitting a rough patch & was willing to blame everything on Reese & Ross but they've lost me. Thank God for Tom Coughlin, John Fox, Sean Payton, Accorsi, Gilbride & some pretty good coaches that have come through here or we're the Redskins. Had Belichick evaluated as a loser (perhaps the worst decision any pro sports team ever made). Hired Fassell instead of Parcells. We look clueless and getting rid of Coughlin looks dumber by the week. No wonder he wouldn't shake Mara's hand at the end. He knew. Sucks getting blamed for someone else's incompetency.
I've defended the Giants as just hitting a rough patch & was willing to
blame everything on Reese & Ross but they've lost me. Thank God for Tom Coughlin, John Fox, Sean Payton, Accorsi, Gilbride & some pretty good coaches that have come through here or we're the Redskins. Had Belichick evaluated as a loser (perhaps the worst decision any pro sports team ever made). Hired Fassell instead of Parcells. We look clueless and getting rid of Coughlin looks dumber by the week. No wonder he wouldn't shake Mara's hand at the end. He knew. Sucks getting blamed for someone else's incompetency.
Amen .... Well said ... I had high hopes for both Shurmur and Bettcher but both have shown me absolutely nothing but dopey roster selection, game mgmt and bad play calling. Time to start over ... again.
3 passes 2 rec 9 yards yeah he is a dynamo !
--- Yours truly, Alex Tanney
Technically Penny is 1st string - no one else is ahead of him so yes he should be more important than Slade. Slade is about to get more snaps in this upcoming game than Penny has the entire season. What does that tell you?
Quote:
We are talking about the 44th man of 46 on the active roster. Is he any less important then say, Chris Slade or Nick Gates who never get in the game except on XPs?
Technically Penny is 1st string - no one else is ahead of him so yes he should be more important than Slade. Slade is about to get more snaps in this upcoming game than Penny has the entire season. What does that tell you?
Technically he is not 1st string. FB is not a starting position on the Giants nor virtually every team in the NFL.
And as far as Slade starting, he is replacing an injured player. When Penny becomes an OT, remind my why he isn't playing ahead of Slade.
I think a FB has to be a dominant, consistent blocker. Don't think Penny is there, and may never get there.
Either you have a FB who meets the job description or you don't.
I think a FB has to be a dominant, consistent blocker. Don't think Penny is there, and may never get there.
Either you have a FB who meets the job description or you don't.
Your opinion. They should block well, but guards don't blow people up. Penny catches well, and blocks well enough.(yeah my opinion)
re: "blow people up - yeah a bit of overstatement"