Talking this morning with a co-workers about our beloved Giants and how disastrous the OL has been for a number of years now. We both started reminiscing about when the OL was solid, and some of the great players that anchored the line. I mentioned how I long for the days of guys like William Roberts, Bart Oates, Chris Snee etc, and said how to me Snee was the best linemen the team has had in this millennium. He brought up that he’d take Ron Stone over Chris Snee.
I ended up looking up both players stats, and they are similar in all-pro and pro-bowl selections. So the question I have is, if you were building an OL and had to choose between either Snee or Stone, who you taken?
Link - ( New Window )
...but Snee played at an All-Pro level for a few seasons.
I can't believe I remember people on this board actually complaining about Luke Pettigout back in the day. I mean he was no HOF don't get me wrong, but Nate Solder makes Luke look like Jonathon Ogden.
Then again, Ereck Flowers made Nate Solder look like Walter Jones.
His peak was probably a little lower than Snee, but his peak was very good. He also didn't completely fall off like Snee.
It's a lot closer than some here are posting.
Kerry Collins. .........Didn’t want to disappoint you😄
Actually if I had to win 1 game, Montana might be the all time pick
I can't believe I remember people on this board actually complaining about Luke Pettigout back in the day. I mean he was no HOF don't get me wrong, but Nate Solder makes Luke look like Jonathon Ogden.
Then again, Ereck Flowers made Nate Solder look like Walter Jones.
At this point that's debatable.