The league is serious about a proposal to lop off roughly 25% of the minor league teams, taking aim in particular at the short-season leagues like Appy, New York Penn, and the Pioneer leagues. Some of the more successful of those teams (eg Pulaski in the Appy league) would be pushed over to other leagues. They say they want to improve facilities, cut down travel time, and limit the number of players under a team's control to 150, give or take. The draft would be cut to 20 rounds and draftees would sign contracts for the following season (analogous to what IFA signings do now). It's an interesting proposal with a lot of ramifications for the communities subject to contraction and for the way development is done.
Interesting - the proposal is to move the Cyclones to the Eastern League to replace Binghamton as the Mets AA team. Bad for Binghamton, but for us locals, kind of cool to have bigger name prospects playing here.
On the one hand, this really sucks for a lot of small towns who spent money on stadiums and supported these teams. It's a real kick in the teeth and I expect it will have wide-ranging effects on MLB fandom.
On the other hand, advanced metrics and superior evaluation and training techniques means that a lot of these extra levels aren't really needed for player development. Teams would like to reduce the number of org guys on their payroll with zero shot of sniffing AAA, let alone the big club.
MLB’s minor league hit list would kill 42 teams that cities spent hundreds of millions on stadiums for - ( New Window )
...
The project is funded from $2.5 million in state funds secured by Flanagan and Akshar through the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York. The City of Binghamton will contribute $2.5 million to match the state grant. NYSEG Stadium has been a city-owned facility since its construction in 1992. Team ownership will contribute $100,000 to the overall project.
Link - ( New Window )
Is that true?
Eastern League Attendance - ( New Window )
Is that true?
It is, but the amount of money at stake is a relative pittance compared to their overall budgets. They could give significant raises across the board for the cost of a utility infielder.
They agreed to move to Worcester and ground has broken on the "Woo Sox" (i hate that name) new field called Polar Park.
I live equi-distant from Boston and Worcester (and Providence - a little closer to Boston than the other two, but not much) so I definitely planned to go to Worcester Red Sox games.
Worcester is a shit hole, but really shows some signs of breaking out of it, they need stuff like this stadium though.
If you want to see undrafted players, you could go see a Ducks game. There are plenty of little, independent baseball leagues all over the country.
You might have a little better talent available since they plan to reduce the draft to twenty rounds, but it's still not a big winner.
I can remember seeing guys like Pitcher Al Downing and Shortstop Al "Campy" Campaneris play for the Trips at old Johnson Field in Johnson City. Also some highly touted prospects who didn't make it, like Pitcher Steve Kraly who hurt his arm and that cost him his career.
And that's not to mention the old Negro League games that were played there with teams on tour. That's how I got to see Satchel Paige pitch live.
But they really f'ed up by putting the new field in the WRONG place (downtown Binghamton jammed up against the river where parking is a problem) and it has never been the same since Johnson Field was closed and torn down. It's really not surprising that their attendance sucks.
is 100% correct. Start adding up the states and multiply x 2 to see the number of Senators involved.
Binghamton has been a slowly dying city for 50 years, average per capita income in the region is staggeringly low at $27,830. (Trenton is $42,268 for comparison) THAT is why attendance is weak - minor league hockey team has the same problem. A couple of defense contractors, hospitals and Binghamton University are all that are floating the region right now, not enough to fill that little stadium.
is 100% correct. Start adding up the states and multiply x 2 to see the number of Senators involved.
You forgot to subtract out all the Senators that receive large campaign donations from MLB execs.
is 100% correct. Start adding up the states and multiply x 2 to see the number of Senators involved.
Yeah. I have a feeling that will stifle this to some extent.
Quote:
...But they really f'ed up by putting the new field in the WRONG place (downtown Binghamton jammed up against the river where parking is a problem) and it has never been the same since Johnson Field was closed and torn down. It's really not surprising that their attendance sucks.
Weird. I go several times a year, have NEVER had any problems with parking - there are always spots available on Pine St. - where else would you have put the stadium? downtown is the population center - while I don't like the design of the ballpark (boring), I LOVE the trains outside the fence, the beautiful rolling hills in the distance - it's proximity to downtown bars and restaurants is ideal.
Binghamton has been a slowly dying city for 50 years, average per capita income in the region is staggeringly low at $27,830. (Trenton is $42,268 for comparison) THAT is why attendance is weak - minor league hockey team has the same problem. A couple of defense contractors, hospitals and Binghamton University are all that are floating the region right now, not enough to fill that little stadium.
Spot on. Plenty of parking, easy in and easy out. Nice little ballpark. Lots of old Yankees played there, Munson, Downing, Boyer, Pepitone, Skowron, etc.
Cutting these costs goes right to the grassroots, but so much of player development is international that they probably are correct in that its not going to impact MLB talent level.
But how do you raise a new generation of fans on $75 tickets? Shrinking the minor league product will not help.
I thought that most (or many) of these MLB teams were independently owned and operated, but just affiliated with a major league team.
is that not the case? I know the Mets (Sterling enterprises) own some teams like Brooklyn and I think they bought Syracuse recently, but they don't own Binghamton or Columbia - as far as I know.
I'm just not entirely clear what problem MLB is trying to solve here.
I thought that most (or many) of these MLB teams were independently owned and operated, but just affiliated with a major league team.
MLB teams pay payroll and coaching salaries. (Maybe some other expense as well, but salaries are the big thing). And with increasing pressure to up pay for minor league players, that makes having so many affiliated teams unappealing for the major league owners.
Cutting these costs goes right to the grassroots, but so much of player development is international that they probably are correct in that its not going to impact MLB talent level.
But how do you raise a new generation of fans on $75 tickets? Shrinking the minor league product will not help.
The minors probably benefit international prospects as much or more than American prospects, at least college draftees. Cutting out the low minors and having a limit on prospects under control makes it hard to stash a kid you sign at 16 in short season until he's 19 or 20 to see if something pops.
that's where independent leagues maybe come in (for the older players), but it would also get players to the majors younger.
There was a trend a while back or so it seemed that the best prospects were making jumps from AA to the majors or at least not spending significant time in AAA.
So, not having teams fill up AAA rosters with borderline major leaguers or non-prospects in case they need to have them spot start or pinch hit might help solve some of the budget problems.
The usual suspects, some real forward looking orgs, will REALLY massively take advantage of these changes and refocus on player dev.
The usual suspects, some real forward looking orgs, will REALLY massively take advantage of these changes and refocus on player dev.
Disagree. Yes they have a lot of experience, but so does their competition. The elite talents have confused us as to what the usual trajectory is for prospect development. It is still very common for a prep draftee or IFA sign to do 5-7 years in the minors before making it to the bigs.
What I think the league is selling short though is the role of these feeder teams in generating interest in the sport in parts of the country that is simply inaccessible to MLB. Burlington, for instance, has the Lake Monsters. Appalachia has a dozen teams at a number of levels, most of which are the only game in town prior to the beginning of high school and college football. The Pioneer League has a similar function. Driving three, five, ten hours to watch an MLB game isn't necessarily realistic more than once a year, if that. In-person baseball does a lot more to cultivate interest than watching it on television.
Many minor league parks really cater to family entertainment.
The ones that don't are missing an opportunity.
Living in Boston, my kids went to 5 or 6 Pawtucket Red Sox games before ever stepping foot in Fenway, where they've still only been a few times.
Still, the players there are pretty far down on the talent ladder. The odds of me seeing anyone good or interesting are pretty low.
I've been meaning to go see a Cyclones game, but the drive into the Brooklyn is much less convenient and the short season and super low minors make it less appealing. If they switch to AA that would definitely motivate me to see a few games during the course of the season.
For over a century, Congress has taken numerous actions specifically designed to protect, preserve, and sustain a system and structure for both Major and Minor League Baseball to flourish.
Link - ( New Window )