He has never gotten to the NFC championship game. He is 2-3 in playoffs. He has tried to build the team to look like the SB teams of the 90’s. He struggles against top tier coaches. The team does have superior talent. Dak is average and has padded his stats against weak teams. He is not accurate and cannot consistently throw receivers open. Teams beat the Cowboys by stopping Zeke and making Dak beat them.
Garrett is not a difference maker that could mold this team.
and he’s 2-3 in the playoffs. How can anyone defend that? I watch him continually make really stupid decisions, similar to the in game mistakes we’ve dealt with.
So we want him leading a roster with less talent?
And those two wins involved a bogus call that kept them alive against Detroit and a Seattle game that was somehow close late despite an overwhelming talent advantage for Dallas.
Hell no to Jason Garrett.
RE: RE: RE: Are they really underachieving if his teams have won the division Â
3 of the last 5 years and put up a very good winning %?
Were they supposed to win the superbowl in each of those years?
Winning this division, with as bad as the Skins and Giants have been isn’t some great achievement. No one thinks Garrett is terrible, but he certainly isn’t “very good”. He’s an average NFL head coach and I want more.
Would you be happy with what Garrett has done the last 9/10 years on the Giants? I wouldn’t. Look at McCarthy - that SB bought him a ton of time but he should have been axed years ago. Garrett doesn’t even have that.
I am not arguing he's great, nor winning the division once is either. But he has done it 3 of the past 5 years, and in the once in a blue moon years the Giants or Redskins played well.
Is it possible us Giant fans have overrated the Cowboys talent and underestimated what it takes to win there? Is it possible Garrett actually provides more than just what we think is conservative gameplans?
I tend to lean towards this line of thinking...the talent is there because the head coach created it...it didn’t just appear and Garrett keeps screwing it up and losing games.
and he’s still on a rookie contract - if they elect to pay him $35 mil against their annual cap... then he could become a coach killer
When you look up bad contracts and qb killers in the dictionary - Jared Goff says hi
Garrett is not a difference maker that could mold this team.
So we want him leading a roster with less talent?
And those two wins involved a bogus call that kept them alive against Detroit and a Seattle game that was somehow close late despite an overwhelming talent advantage for Dallas.
Hell no to Jason Garrett.
Quote:
In comment 14695360 Jimmy Googs said:r
Quote:
3 of the last 5 years and put up a very good winning %?
Were they supposed to win the superbowl in each of those years?
Winning this division, with as bad as the Skins and Giants have been isn’t some great achievement. No one thinks Garrett is terrible, but he certainly isn’t “very good”. He’s an average NFL head coach and I want more.
Would you be happy with what Garrett has done the last 9/10 years on the Giants? I wouldn’t. Look at McCarthy - that SB bought him a ton of time but he should have been axed years ago. Garrett doesn’t even have that.
I am not arguing he's great, nor winning the division once is either. But he has done it 3 of the past 5 years, and in the once in a blue moon years the Giants or Redskins played well.
Is it possible us Giant fans have overrated the Cowboys talent and underestimated what it takes to win there? Is it possible Garrett actually provides more than just what we think is conservative gameplans?
I tend to lean towards this line of thinking...the talent is there because the head coach created it...it didn’t just appear and Garrett keeps screwing it up and losing games.