The only thing we’ve heard from ownership is a brief comment from Tisch which included no vote of confidence for Gettleman or Shurmur.
Tisch referenced the need for “honest conversations” with Mara.
In the midst of the longest losing streak in franchise history, we’ve heard nothing from Mara. Shurmur is hanging out there like a piñata; there is no comment from ownership stating there is trust with the people in charge, nothing about seeing the plan through.
I think the silence is very telling. That coupled with Tisch’s comments makes me think we will see big changes.
A certain chunk of the commentariat here loves nothing more than a grumpy old fart who spews silly cliches and sounds like he's talking tough. That's a real football man!
This roster has good players. Why is literally no one playing up to their potential? Can anyone name 1 player on this team that we're getting the most out of? An average player whose a perfect scheme fit that overproduces?
I mean the answer for me is literally zero. No one. Not 1 out of 53.
We all agree the coaching sucks right?
So how can we accurately decipher whose playing terribly because of the coaching compared to a guy who simply sucks? Its gotta be a mixture of both, but i'd say many fall in the former category.
And thats arguably the worst position to be in, not really knowing what we have in a lot of these guys.
Who hired Shurmur? Dave or John?
If Dave Gettleman gets fired, my hunch is he really vouched hard for Shurmur. If he stays, i think Mara pushed for Pat. Just a hunch though.
Gettleman recommended Shurmur and Mara rubber stamped it.
Everyone in that front office had a singular goal - build a team, through players and coaches, to give Eli a chance for a grand send off. That's why Mara hired Accorsi to hire Gettleman who hired Shurmur. Do you think when they all came out in 2018 declaring their love for Eli - based on some apparent film study - that that was just coincidence?
I'm okay with the position that this coaching staff is abysmal. I'm not okay, however, assuming the players Gettleman drafted are really good and are simply victims of that poor coaching. That's an easy for the Gettleman Brigade...
We paid dipshit Beckham $16M this year for nothing. Gettleman had 8 months from the moment he got the job to trade Beckham. You'll remember rumors were swirling especially that SF wanted him. I'd bet a paycheck that we turned down a better deal from SF BEFORE he signed the contract than we got from Cleveland AFTER he signed the contract.
Since Gettleman took over everything about the way this team operates has been shambolic and amateurish. He took a terrible team and somehow made it worse.
I can't believe the appetite for sticking up for these people at 7-22. I really can't.
So because he didn’t move Beckham when he could have based on unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and he didn’t cut Eli when you wanted him to, he botched the moves? Sounds completely logical and unemotional.
The niners rumor is just that, a rumor. No one knows if there was an offer or what the offer was.
The Eli situation happens all the time in the NFL. Why didn’t the Ravens cut Joe Flacco the second after they drafted Lamar in 18? Flacco’s cap hit was 24.75 million (more than Eli) and he stuck around the entire year. I don’t see you shitting on Ozzie Newsome for the same move.
You and a handful of others here are simply blinded by hate and can’t be reasoned with.
If I want him gone it's because his performance has been catastrophic.
If I want him gone it's because his performance has been catastrophic.
You were also vocal about getting rid of JPP and all of the overpaid under performing vets — which he did.
Gettleman could hire Rhule as HC and 3 analytics guru’s to hold his dick while he took a piss and you’d still find a way to shit on the moves.
Quote:
I liked the hire!
If I want him gone it's because his performance has been catastrophic.
You were also vocal about getting rid of JPP and all of the overpaid under performing vets — which he did.
Gettleman could hire Rhule as HC and 3 analytics guru’s to hold his dick while he took a piss and you’d still find a way to shit on the moves.
He completely failed to reassemble the team. Totally and utterly. The FA signings have been a disaster. The Barkley pick was a disaster. The QB transition was delayed and clumsily achieved, costing a lot of cap space unnecessarily.
He tore up a bad team. That was his service. He then built a worse team.
Two wasted years.
Gettleman could hire Rhule as HC and 3 analytics guru’s to hold his dick while he took a piss and you’d still find a way to shit on the moves.
Wait are the analytics guru's holding Gettleman or Rhule's dick?
I feel like your argument loses a lot of credibility with this confusion.
It's great you like the management and direction of the team, but you also repeated a number of times how the league was sleeping on the Giants coming into this year. And they are dismal and very far from competing. To be so profoundly bad, both the roster and coaching require being really, really bad.
The team Gettleman inherited was a year removed from an 11 win season.Eleven wins is an eternity from where this team is.
Haven't both GT and BW been repeatedly endorsing that specific thing?
The reality is Gettleman had to be perfect in FA and the draft to turn this around in year 2. There was nothing to build around when he got here.
He wasn’t perfect. He got the HC wrong in a weak class. He’s had a bunch of FA misses. But he’s had some really good drafts, cleaned up the cap, and found the QB of the future.
I’m pro DG at the moment but I’m reserving judgment until this off-season plays out. He has to get the HC right. He has to make the right moves in FA this year and he has to have another good draft. I expect him to be a man of his word and fix the trenches. This may sound like a big ask but the opportunity will be there this year to accomplish most if not all of these tasks.
There is not an appreciation for how poor the roster was when Gettleman took it over and the depth of the rebuild that has to happen. We went almost 5 full seasons of bare drafts and an overpay in 2016 for FA that crippled the cap.
In a scenario like that, the GM has to be perfect to turn things around. But what Gettleman did was many things people wanted. He tore down the roster. He got rid of malcontents. He drafted a QB to replace Eli. This is what people asked for and now they are screaming, "But he didn't do it right!!" and I'm not convinced that is true. Like mentioned above, John Lynch looked like an idiot his first couple of seasons, and he also has the highest cap allocation to the RB position - something that is universally regarded as being a major pock mark on the chance to win.
Gettleman has presumably delivered our replacement QB and a stud RB. That alone should buy him time to finish the work
Quote:
In comment 14715266 Go Terps said:
Quote:
I liked the hire!
If I want him gone it's because his performance has been catastrophic.
You were also vocal about getting rid of JPP and all of the overpaid under performing vets — which he did.
Gettleman could hire Rhule as HC and 3 analytics guru’s to hold his dick while he took a piss and you’d still find a way to shit on the moves.
He completely failed to reassemble the team. Totally and utterly. The FA signings have been a disaster. The Barkley pick was a disaster. The QB transition was delayed and clumsily achieved, costing a lot of cap space unnecessarily.
He tore up a bad team. That was his service. He then built a worse team.
Two wasted years.
Gettleman’s biggest failure was hiring the wrong coach. The talent on the roster is good enough right now to be winning the division.
Ultimately that falls on Gettleman but I’m willing to give him another crack at it given the fact that the candidates who got hired that year were pretty weak across the board. Gettleman commented in an interview soon after he got hired that he preferred a defensive minded HC. That leads me to believe that he either settled on Shurmur or ownership leaned in that direction, or a combination of both.
This year looks to be a much stronger class of candidates. Rivera would be a fine hire and is much more aligned philosophically with Gettleman than Shurmur is or ever will be.
I know it’s fashionable to shit on the organization right now but I’m willing to ride this out another year before turning to the dark side.
Yet Lynch is lauded as a genius and Gettleman is a senile buffoon.
I believe Gettleman is batting a little under .500, and Shurmur and the staff below that.
Gettleman chose to dump clean the roster. I don't disagree the roster had some jerks. Maybe it's the head coach's job to handle some jerks. It was a bad team so, all told I don't miss anyone he dumped.
My fear is the players he's invested in aren't doing well. The list of veteran acquisitions he's missed on has been litigated to death.
What Gettleman has shown is he can get first round picks right, and beyond that, the luck of the draw in the draft doesn't spare him.
On the other hand, they did sign him immediately to a long term contract and we don't even know we will be able to accomplish that, and he has contributed meaningfully as part of a rotation to one of the best D's in the league so... I'm not sure we can brandish it as a reason to give Gettleman kudos.
This roster winning this division isn’t some pipe dream. 5 wins has them leading the division right now. Better coaching wins Cards, Lions, Jets, Bears, second Dallas game, and Eagles. That’s 6 extra wins.
Quote:
Might be talented enough to win this apocalyptic division if it were coached by Bill Walsh or something. I highly doubt it -- we still have no respectable back 7 and no way to hinder even the most narcoleptic of pass rushes. But I suppose it isn't as impossible as, say, Gettleman turning us into a perennial playoff team is.
This roster winning this division isn’t some pipe dream. 5 wins has them leading the division right now. Better coaching wins Cards, Lions, Jets, Bears, second Dallas game, and Eagles. That’s 6 extra wins.
Better players could have won those 6 games too. See how easy that is?
Worst OL and defense; "roster isn't all that bad, though."
Uh-huh.
Quote:
Might be talented enough to win this apocalyptic division if it were coached by Bill Walsh or something. I highly doubt it -- we still have no respectable back 7 and no way to hinder even the most narcoleptic of pass rushes. But I suppose it isn't as impossible as, say, Gettleman turning us into a perennial playoff team is.
This roster winning this division isn’t some pipe dream. 5 wins has them leading the division right now. Better coaching wins Cards, Lions, Jets, Bears, second Dallas game, and Eagles. That’s 6 extra wins.
5 additional wins? At this rate that would be spread out over 2 additional seasons.
In a scenario like that, the GM has to be perfect to turn things around. But what Gettleman did was many things people wanted. He tore down the roster. He got rid of malcontents. He drafted a QB to replace Eli. This is what people asked for and now they are screaming, "But he didn't do it right!!" and I'm not convinced that is true. Like mentioned above, John Lynch looked like an idiot his first couple of seasons, and he also has the highest cap allocation to the RB position - something that is universally regarded as being a major pock mark on the chance to win.
Gettleman has presumably delivered our replacement QB and a stud RB. That alone should buy him time to finish the work
As usual, you conveniently leave at the catastrophic mistakes.
Gettleman was complicit in aiding and abetting the strategy to keep Eli. And many of us saw right through that as detrimental to the course correction. That led to a ripple effect that has accelerated the spiral downward:
-- re-signing OBJ so Eli had his ace WR
-- drafting a RB at #2
-- rebuilding an OL with the wrong investments
-- drafting a 4th round QB and mismanaging his development
-- keeping Eli for a second year
-- likely being hamstrung in 2019 from making
further investments because of Eli's $18M still on the
books
And, as to be expected, you have the Lynch narrative wrong. As I wrote about earlier above, the 9ers/York signed Shanahan and Lynch to six year deals. That was very unusual in length. But that was because they admitted up from there were in rebuild mode; and they asked their fans to be respectful and understand their "3 Ps" - the process, patient, and partnership - in that rebuild effort.
There was no bullsh-t being tossed around that they were competing for the playoffs...So comparing Gettleman to Lynch is way off.
The talent on the roster is good enough right now to be winning the division.
This may be the quote of the year.
What it is however, is one of the worst coached Giants football teams EVER. The head coach is an unmitigated disaster that has failed in nearly every major category the job entails. Ill conceived game plans. Failure to adapt to what is occurring on the field. Mediocre player development. Horrific clock management, use of timeouts and challenges. Harebrained roster decisions like playing haley and halapio all year when they are among the worst players in the entire NFL.
Incredibly his choice for DC may be an even worse coach than he is. I've watched football as an avid fan for many years. I've never seen so many completely blown assignments by one defense. It's numerous plays every single week. It's the worst example of on field communication I've ever seen. I mean that...EVER.
And they're dealing with all this while navigating through the growing pains of starting a rookie QB for most of the season.
I know to some of you this seems like Armageddon but it's not as bad as you think it is. In 1983 the Giants suffered through a debacle of a 3-13-1 season. What followed was a quick turnaround where we went 9-7 followed by 10-6 including a playoff win. In just the third season since that nightmare three win season we won the all time franchise record 17 games en route to hoisting our first Lombardi Trophy EVER. There was talent on that 1983 roster that struggled so much but a lot of it was young and inexperienced. If there wasn't we couldn't have won Superbowl XXI.
You really are a vile and loathsome person. If it wasn't such an act of brilliant misdirection well beyond the capabilities of the regime running the Giants to use such an unlikable cozener such as you, I would suspect you of having a closet full of Giants freebies. (Since I am sure you don't know what a cozener is: it is a person who is a cheat, liar, and twister of facts, perfect description of you)
First, let me ask you, are really sure you want to align yourself with that particular poster... He seems to be getting slammed pretty hard for some of his ideas. Do you really share them? Really?
Second, you complained about me revisiting the Halapio thread... And here you are revisiting old threads as well. That makes you a hypocrite as well. Speaking of the Halapio thread, you called smug, arrogant and a bunch of other vile things on that thread for pointing out that Halapio makes mental mistakes particularly on stunts that come into his space. An observation that Sy himself made later in the season. You said on that thread that if you were wrong that you would gladly piss out of your skull... I am waiting to see that, since clearly you were wrong. In lieu of that I will accept a humble apology. But I know you are too smug and arrogant to ever do that.
Also, I noticed you never responded to me on the other thread where you brought this up... You know where I posted a few articles talking about how to succeed running a fan based business in the digital age. Basically they stress 2 things...
1. That 5% of fans drives 80% or more of revenues (obviously in the case of the NFL TV revenues are paramount, so lets limit this to merchandising).
2. How important it is to directly engage with fans, that the number and scale of these interaction is critical to growing the brand.
I also pointed out that what I said was that it would be cheap and easy for the team to go on social media sites (including fan message boards) and have an intern spend a little time
1. Prepare a few summaries of fan feelings and reactions for the top management.
2. Put their message out on various media outlets.
Never did I say that there was a large scale initiative.
https://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&thread=591518&show_all=1#14711744
https://www.strategy-business.com/article/How-to-Make-Entertainment-and-Media-Businesses-Fan-tastic?gko=977b5
https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/how-to-turn-fans-engaged-superfans/
Participate in Conversations
Your fan adds their voice to your marketing through actions like comments or direct emails. The scale and frequency of the dialogue matters, but any dialogue at all is a sign of deeper engagement.
Also you made your response to me on the angry voice thread...
In comment 14711703 FatMan in Charlotte said:
I love the logic of Ace.
The pessimistic voices are balanced but the positive voices are shills hired by the team!!
Perfectly logical!!
You are angry voice number 1. I replied and asked you some questions you never answered
Oh and you're other MO is when you can't attack the post with anything of merit... Attack the poster with some made up twisted crap... Twist the facts, scream louder, use foul language and lots of exclamation points. That is all you know how to do. But you are very good at it, even though it amounts to nothing.
Let me ask you a few questions. Did you post anything of substance? How many exclamation points did my post have? How many exclamation points did your reply to me have with about 1/10 the number of words?
FYI: my post had 0 exclamation points.
Also how often do you resort to cussing and name calling posters rather than discussing anything of merit?
How often do I cuss?
How often do I make posts supported by some substantial 3rd party evidence? That is how you post things of merit!
You call me smug and arrogant, I think you are projecting.
I almost alyas post supporting evidence to whatever I am saying. In doing so, I post with a certain amount of confidence. There is a huge difference between confidence because you know you have evidence, vs. being smug and arrogant. You just don't like what I post because it often contradicts your unsupported and mostly vacuous opinions.
Unfortunately you are projecting that the young players will eventually be proven talents. Pretty much none of them are proven talents right now. There are question marks next to all of them. Many will never improve to the point of answering those questions. Its just the way the NFL is.
It would be more accurate to say that the roster is young and unproven. There is hope for a number of them, and your opinion is that it's worth holding staying with the status quo (at least in the FO) to see if they make progress.
It is an equally valid opinion that these same players have not progressed to the degree that you can have confidence that more picks by the same FO will produce plus results.
Quote:
In comment 14715277 WillVAB said:
Quote:
In comment 14715266 Go Terps said:
Quote:
I liked the hire!
If I want him gone it's because his performance has been catastrophic.
You were also vocal about getting rid of JPP and all of the overpaid under performing vets — which he did.
Gettleman could hire Rhule as HC and 3 analytics guru’s to hold his dick while he took a piss and you’d still find a way to shit on the moves.
He completely failed to reassemble the team. Totally and utterly. The FA signings have been a disaster. The Barkley pick was a disaster. The QB transition was delayed and clumsily achieved, costing a lot of cap space unnecessarily.
He tore up a bad team. That was his service. He then built a worse team.
Two wasted years.
Gettleman’s biggest failure was hiring the wrong coach. The talent on the roster is good enough right now to be winning the division.
Ultimately that falls on Gettleman but I’m willing to give him another crack at it given the fact that the candidates who got hired that year were pretty weak across the board. Gettleman commented in an interview soon after he got hired that he preferred a defensive minded HC. That leads me to believe that he either settled on Shurmur or ownership leaned in that direction, or a combination of both.
This year looks to be a much stronger class of candidates. Rivera would be a fine hire and is much more aligned philosophically with Gettleman than Shurmur is or ever will be.
I know it’s fashionable to shit on the organization right now but I’m willing to ride this out another year before turning to the dark side.
Wait. You seriously think this current NYG roster, at optimal health is good enough to win this division?
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Quote:
In comment 14715174 WillVAB said:
Quote:
In comment 14714927 MookGiants said:
Quote:
what has Gettleman done to earn a 3rd season? And having a GM who is year to year if the team doesnt perform is a disaster waiting to happen when you hire a new coach. If they keep Gettleman and he gets fired next year you either force the existing coach on a new GM which is an awful idea or you fire another coach after just 1 year, also a bad look.
It doesn't make sense to fire Shurmur and not Gettleman on any level. He hasn't done anything to deserve the benefit of the doubt and his free agent deals have been a disaster, last thing we should want is a guy that knows he needs to win next year spending a ton of money this off-season.
What did John Lynch do to earn a 3rd season?
The 49ers didn’t become 11-2 overnight. They would have been better than 4-12 last year if Garrapolo hadn’t gotten hurt and they didn’t have to start Mullen’s and Beathard.
The mantra is it’s all about W-L from GoTerps and his merry band of dick riders.
If Gettleman should be fired based on the team’s record during his tenure then Lynch should’ve been fired as well.
Another poster made an interesting post about all of the suspect moves Lynch has made during his tenure — and how he was under fire until the team started winning this year. BBI would explode if Gettleman did some of the shit Lynch has done.
Merry band of dick riders?
And yet here we are with you defending the competence of a man you've never met.
What it is however, is one of the worst coached Giants football teams EVER. The head coach is an unmitigated disaster that has failed in nearly every major category the job entails. Ill conceived game plans. Failure to adapt to what is occurring on the field. Mediocre player development. Horrific clock management, use of timeouts and challenges. Harebrained roster decisions like playing haley and halapio all year when they are among the worst players in the entire NFL.
Incredibly his choice for DC may be an even worse coach than he is. I've watched football as an avid fan for many years. I've never seen so many completely blown assignments by one defense. It's numerous plays every single week. It's the worst example of on field communication I've ever seen. I mean that...EVER.
And they're dealing with all this while navigating through the growing pains of starting a rookie QB for most of the season.
I know to some of you this seems like Armageddon but it's not as bad as you think it is. In 1983 the Giants suffered through a debacle of a 3-13-1 season. What followed was a quick turnaround where we went 9-7 followed by 10-6 including a playoff win. In just the third season since that nightmare three win season we won the all time franchise record 17 games en route to hoisting our first Lombardi Trophy EVER. There was talent on that 1983 roster that struggled so much but a lot of it was young and inexperienced. If there wasn't we couldn't have won Superbowl XXI.
Good post.
People here under estimate the impact coaching has on the results of a NFL team. I’d argue coaching has more of an impact on W-L in the NFL than any other major sport.
This was mentioned on another thread and worth mentioning here. “Good players can’t overcome bad coaching” — BB. Highly recommend the HBO show with Saban and BB. There’s no doubt in my mind a quality HC would have this team competing for the division right now.
The roster is a work in progress but the talent has flashed. I see a foundation of quality players that needs a little help at some key spots.
This division is wide open moving forward. From a roster perspective, I’d much rather have the Giants current group and cap situation moving forward than anyone else in the division.
Quote:
So I can only say I hope Sean is right. Major changes is needed.
It really is strange that you always need to let us know you're getting hammered regularly.
Quote:
It's really not. It's a very young roster with talent at a lot of positions. There is a core to build around. There are also deficiencies in some key positions.
What it is however, is one of the worst coached Giants football teams EVER. The head coach is an unmitigated disaster that has failed in nearly every major category the job entails. Ill conceived game plans. Failure to adapt to what is occurring on the field. Mediocre player development. Horrific clock management, use of timeouts and challenges. Harebrained roster decisions like playing haley and halapio all year when they are among the worst players in the entire NFL.
Incredibly his choice for DC may be an even worse coach than he is. I've watched football as an avid fan for many years. I've never seen so many completely blown assignments by one defense. It's numerous plays every single week. It's the worst example of on field communication I've ever seen. I mean that...EVER.
And they're dealing with all this while navigating through the growing pains of starting a rookie QB for most of the season.
I know to some of you this seems like Armageddon but it's not as bad as you think it is. In 1983 the Giants suffered through a debacle of a 3-13-1 season. What followed was a quick turnaround where we went 9-7 followed by 10-6 including a playoff win. In just the third season since that nightmare three win season we won the all time franchise record 17 games en route to hoisting our first Lombardi Trophy EVER. There was talent on that 1983 roster that struggled so much but a lot of it was young and inexperienced. If there wasn't we couldn't have won Superbowl XXI.
Good post.
People here under estimate the impact coaching has on the results of a NFL team. I’d argue coaching has more of an impact on W-L in the NFL than any other major sport.
This was mentioned on another thread and worth mentioning here. “Good players can’t overcome bad coaching” — BB. Highly recommend the HBO show with Saban and BB. There’s no doubt in my mind a quality HC would have this team competing for the division right now.
The roster is a work in progress but the talent has flashed. I see a foundation of quality players that needs a little help at some key spots.
This division is wide open moving forward. From a roster perspective, I’d much rather have the Giants current group and cap situation moving forward than anyone else in the division.
So you’re saying you think the NYG have a better situation right now for success over the next say 5 years than Dallas or even Philadelphia? I don’t think there is a sane person associated with the NFL who would agree with you, but OK.
The division is comically bad this year and that's near-universally recognized. The division "leaders" are a cowboys team that only knows underachieving and plays down to it's competition, and a chronically injured eagles team getting by on the strength of it's coaching.
It's setting a low bar in an attempt to support an argument.
Quote:
Ironically Gettleman has done many of the things they cried for — finding Eli’s replacement, getting rid of Odell, and tearing the whole team down.
The reality is Gettleman had to be perfect in FA and the draft to turn this around in year 2. There was nothing to build around when he got here.
He wasn’t perfect. He got the HC wrong in a weak class. He’s had a bunch of FA misses. But he’s had some really good drafts, cleaned up the cap, and found the QB of the future.
I’m pro DG at the moment but I’m reserving judgment until this off-season plays out. He has to get the HC right. He has to make the right moves in FA this year and he has to have another good draft. I expect him to be a man of his word and fix the trenches. This may sound like a big ask but the opportunity will be there this year to accomplish most if not all of these tasks.
There is not an appreciation for how poor the roster was when Gettleman took it over and the depth of the rebuild that has to happen. We went almost 5 full seasons of bare drafts and an overpay in 2016 for FA that crippled the cap.
In a scenario like that, the GM has to be perfect to turn things around. But what Gettleman did was many things people wanted. He tore down the roster. He got rid of malcontents. He drafted a QB to replace Eli. This is what people asked for and now they are screaming, "But he didn't do it right!!" and I'm not convinced that is true. Like mentioned above, John Lynch looked like an idiot his first couple of seasons, and he also has the highest cap allocation to the RB position - something that is universally regarded as being a major pock mark on the chance to win.
Gettleman has presumably delivered our replacement QB and a stud RB. That alone should buy him time to finish the work
It was good ol' Dave who decided that the way to rebuild was to get rid of everyone so he had even more holes to fill. So, let's not poor Dave about the bad roster he took over. He had a hand in creating this 2-11 team and did so purposefully.
While turning the roster into that of an expansion team is a bizarre and debatable method of re-building, what is done is done and the question is whether Dave G is the guy who can acquire sufficient players quickly enough to have a contender.
Quote:
all 53 members of this team suck?
This roster has good players. Why is literally no one playing up to their potential? Can anyone name 1 player on this team that we're getting the most out of? An average player whose a perfect scheme fit that overproduces?
I mean the answer for me is literally zero. No one. Not 1 out of 53.
We all agree the coaching sucks right?
So how can we accurately decipher whose playing terribly because of the coaching compared to a guy who simply sucks? Its gotta be a mixture of both, but i'd say many fall in the former category.
And thats arguably the worst position to be in, not really knowing what we have in a lot of these guys.
Who hired Shurmur? Dave or John?
If Dave Gettleman gets fired, my hunch is he really vouched hard for Shurmur. If he stays, i think Mara pushed for Pat. Just a hunch though.
Gettleman recommended Shurmur and Mara rubber stamped it.
Everyone in that front office had a singular goal - build a team, through players and coaches, to give Eli a chance for a grand send off. That's why Mara hired Accorsi to hire Gettleman who hired Shurmur. Do you think when they all came out in 2018 declaring their love for Eli - based on some apparent film study - that that was just coincidence?
I'm okay with the position that this coaching staff is abysmal. I'm not okay, however, assuming the players Gettleman drafted are really good and are simply victims of that poor coaching. That's an easy for the Gettleman Brigade...
I hear you on the first part - however, in the second part, just b/c Gettleman did it doesn't automatically make it bad either.
You can't throw the baby out with the bath water.
There are more serviceable players on this roster than the one he inherited.
Look at the year to year. In 2016, they had 11 million in cap space. In 2017, with a ton of players on injured reserve, they had little cap room. In 2018, due to Dave Gettleman's roster purges, the giants had $43 million dollars in dead cap In 2019, we are at $40.9 million dollars in dead cap. These are self-inflected wounds he does not get a pass for.
In this 4 year window, the NFL cap has grown from 167 million to 188 million, and the Giants have not allowed themselves to compete with the rest of the league.
The offense needs a few linemen, other than that were in good shape. Not stating i believe having good skill guys is more important, i don't. I just believe its close to being an excellent offense. I've thought this before but they never seem to fill out 5/5. Time will tell.
I like the defensive line, needs a stud pass rusher. Second level is absolutely devoid of talent and who knows how Connelly will bounce back. Secondary is young so i'm giving everyone time. Some here think Jabrill sucks, i thought he played well considering how bad Bethea is.
Again, are we bringing in a stud coach? He wants his own guy? Ok then Gettleman can go.
But you get out of messes like this by drafting well and Dave Gettleman potentially found 5 starters in this past draft. 5. I'm not gun ho on throwing a guy to the curb who has shown he can draft.
The 81 team made the playoffs and the 82 was in contention until the strike. The 83 team was hit hard with injuries and with a rookie HC. There was no FA, so a team could keep players around forever if it wished and build. Finally, George Young was in charge and the Maras were required to keep hands off.
We are dealing here with meddlesome owners, a GM of iffy talents, an incompetent boob as a HC and a roster that was deliberately deconstructed in an era where your good players are free to leave for more winning pastures. How long would it have taken that 83 team to make the SB if Simms, Carpenter, Haynes, Martin, Carson etc had been traded off the team or let go after the 82 season because Young decided to tear down the roster and rebuild or Carson, Haynes, Martin and Simms decided to leave for greener pastures. I don't see this situation at all similar to 1983.
It doesn't make sense to fire Shurmur and not Gettleman on any level. He hasn't done anything to deserve the benefit of the doubt and his free agent deals have been a disaster, last thing we should want is a guy that knows he needs to win next year spending a ton of money this off-season.
I am not anti-Gettleman, but this makes sense.
.McL. : 2:30 am : link : reply
You really are a vile and loathsome person. If it wasn't such an act of brilliant misdirection well beyond the capabilities of the regime running the Giants to use such an unlikable cozener such as you, I would suspect you of having a closet full of Giants freebies. (Since I am sure you don't know what a cozener is: it is a person who is a cheat, liar, and twister of facts, perfect description of you)
I'm such a vile and loathsome person that you are going to take the time to put a half page response to that nobody is going to take the time to fucking read, nor cares to.
Why don't you just ignore me? Or maybe you'll put together a full page response referencing back to posts that don't pertain to the discussion. Why don't you add in a bar graph too? That usually keeps the audience's attention....
Quote:
Than the day DG started “kicking ass” 2 years ago. Both he and the Shurminator need to be shown the door on Black Monday. If Dave stays and predictably hires a desperate to work again Ron Rivera, it’s another colossal mistake by this ownership.
You’re a fool if you really believe this.
The roster part?
Gentleman inherited a team with 2 all pro players, and a handful of guys who had been to pro bowls in the 2 years prior to that and the giants have been getting worse and worse.
Quote:
.McL. : 2:30 am : link : reply
You really are a vile and loathsome person. If it wasn't such an act of brilliant misdirection well beyond the capabilities of the regime running the Giants to use such an unlikable cozener such as you, I would suspect you of having a closet full of Giants freebies. (Since I am sure you don't know what a cozener is: it is a person who is a cheat, liar, and twister of facts, perfect description of you)
I'm such a vile and loathsome person that you are going to take the time to put a half page response to that nobody is going to take the time to fucking read, nor cares to.
Why don't you just ignore me? Or maybe you'll put together a full page response referencing back to posts that don't pertain to the discussion. Why don't you add in a bar graph too? That usually keeps the audience's attention....
Yes... I am a treasure.
Stop avoiding my questions... ACE.
Am I supposed to re-visit the Halapio shit every thread? Am I supposed to accept that shills are planted on BBI because you think so? What questions, Professor??
With every one of your posts that go unread because of sheer volume of words and lack of focus by referring to past threads and multiple links, I really want to just sit you down and have a Planes, Trains and Automobile conversation with you.
Neal Page to Dell: " And by the way, you know, when, when you're telling these little stories, here's a good idea. Have a point. It makes it so much more interesting for the listener!"
Am I supposed to re-visit the Halapio shit every thread? Am I supposed to accept that shills are planted on BBI because you think so? What questions, Professor??
With every one of your posts that go unread because of sheer volume of words and lack of focus by referring to past threads and multiple links, I really want to just sit you down and have a Planes, Trains and Automobile conversation with you.
Neal Page to Dell: " And by the way, you know, when, when you're telling these little stories, here's a good idea. Have a point. It makes it so much more interesting for the listener!"
With you, your duchery knows no bounds, so there are many points.
Since you have shown your hypocritical side by continually referencing old threads, lets work with the Halapio thread for now. You called me a bunch of vile things on that thread, and said if you were wrong you would gladly piss out of your skull. Sy confirmed it, you were wrong.
Start pissing out of your skull... Buddy!
You stated that Halapio didn't have the mental acuity to play the position. Sy confirmed his mental acuity??
Do you desperately seek affirmation, Captain?
Start pissing out of you skull, Buddy.
Way to not be hypocritical, Ace!
Way to not be hypocritical, Ace!
You said you would do it. I didn't come up with those words myself... They are yours.
Truth hurts.
There was no bullsh-t being tossed around that they were competing for the playoffs...So comparing Gettleman to Lynch is way off.
Wow, what a novel concept: a front office that doesn't act cowed by the fanbase and media and is proactive getting the messaging out about their rebuild.
Instead, we have to listen to people say that the Giants had no choice but to try and compete in 2018 or the fans would riot or something.