First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
Not a chance we attract those guys... Appreciate ur optimism though.. If I am wrong.. I will eat my hat on BBI... But I stand by my position.
Quote:
is anywhere close, why would Conklin leave the Titans for the Giants? We'd have to blow it out with a massive contract offer.
NO WAY Conk will sign wit the Giants... We need to build through the draft... The only players coming here in FA in '20 are "role guys"... Late in career or victims of #'s who have "want it"...
Highly disagree. Giants will spend money and bring in a couple key players. Many free agents are young and in prime.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
The Titans and niners have competent passers. The Ravens don’t.
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
Being conservative when protecting a lead only works if you can run the football. Otherwise you hand the momentum to your opponent and that lead of yours evaporates pretty quickly.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
A good defensive team will negate any QB. The Vikings held Brees to 6.3 YPA.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
The Titans and niners have competent passers. The Ravens don’t.
Ok. Tannehill is going to throw for less than 100 yards in back to back games.
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
They don't? I'm not sure what you've been watching but since he took over they've been one of the best teams in the league. He might not be a great QB but he's definitely a good one.
His first two TD throws tonight we're pretty damn good as was his run for one.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
I wasn't interested in Greg Roman either unless he was bringing the offensive line with him. Even then I don't want 4.8 Daniel Jones running the read option.
A good defensive team will negate any QB. The Vikings held Brees to 6.3 YPA.
They are forcing him to throw the ball. Put it this way - the Ravens are the #1 seed, and they got there by running the ball. Force Jackson to pass and they don't even resemble a playoff team.
Reposting the thread of the SD game doesn't seem to be so hilarious as it was last week when people were patting themselves on the back discussing Jackson's greatness.
bc i had a feeling this team was going to win. they are well coached, control the trenches, have henry, and tannehill is play mistake free.
i got lucky bc they went up early which plays directly into the game flow that makes them win, but i'm telling you, this team is legit and vrabel is a hell of a coach.
i don't think they can beat KC though. KC can score fast w hill, kelce, etc -- the ravens have hollywood and that's it
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
The Titans and niners have competent passers. The Ravens don’t.
Ok. Tannehill is going to throw for less than 100 yards in back to back games.
So? He didn’t turn it over and he made enough plays to keep the defense honest.
Lamar doesn’t win in the playoffs. You have to be able to make plays from the pocket.
The Titans gave him all day to throw from the pocket for the most part. No blitzing. Any competent QB would’ve shredded the Titans rushing 4 and playing zone every down.
That tells you all you need to know about what the Titans thought about his ability to beat them w his arm.
I wasn't interested in Greg Roman either unless he was bringing the offensive line with him. Even then I don't want 4.8 Daniel Jones running the read option.
His offensive line got the shit kicked out of it too.
A good defensive team will negate any QB. The Vikings held Brees to 6.3 YPA.
They are forcing him to throw the ball. Put it this way - the Ravens are the #1 seed, and they got there by running the ball. Force Jackson to pass and they don't even resemble a playoff team.
Reposting the thread of the SD game doesn't seem to be so hilarious as it was last week when people were patting themselves on the back discussing Jackson's greatness.
Exactly. I doubt the Titans would look like this rushing 4 and playing zone all day w no pressure vs Brees.
Quote:
I guess "Today's NFL" isn't all it's cracked up to be. Maybe those Ivy League analytics guys can come down on the field to block and tackle.
Ah yes, nothing like taking a small sample size and using it to justify anything
You bet especially when I have been hearing this total bullshit all season.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
Quote:
In comment 14774079 GiantEgo said:
Quote:
I guess "Today's NFL" isn't all it's cracked up to be. Maybe those Ivy League analytics guys can come down on the field to block and tackle.
Ah yes, nothing like taking a small sample size and using it to justify anything
You bet especially when I have been hearing this total bullshit all season.
Because it’s not bullshit.
That's one candidate I wasn't really excited about. Defense has not been the strength of this team and they've mostly been protecting leads.
Quote:
In comment 14774029 Eric from BBI said:
Not a chance we attract those guys... Appreciate ur optimism though.. If I am wrong.. I will eat my hat on BBI... But I stand by my position.
Quote:
is anywhere close, why would Conklin leave the Titans for the Giants? We'd have to blow it out with a massive contract offer.
NO WAY Conk will sign wit the Giants... We need to build through the draft... The only players coming here in FA in '20 are "role guys"... Late in career or victims of #'s who have "want it"...
Highly disagree. Giants will spend money and bring in a couple key players. Many free agents are young and in prime.
Fowler
Yannick
Dupree
Judon
Conklin
Littleton
Schobert
Barret
Not all will make it to FA but all of those guys are younger side of things and would be quality adds
Give me
Littleton
Judon
Resign
Golden
Williams
Then go and have a killer draft
Well the Giants do have more cap space than the Titans. I believe it's about 13-15 mil more and that's before any cuts like Ogletree, Ellison etc.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
Quote:
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
The Titans and niners have competent passers. The Ravens don’t.
One guy can’t get it done by himself no matter how great.
Quote:
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
2 playoff games in a row.
This is the same shit Greg Roman tried with Tyrod.
Quote:
Doesn’t negate a full season of what Lamar did.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
A good defensive team will negate any QB. The Vikings held Brees to 6.3 YPA.
Quote:
Doesn’t negate a full season of what Lamar did.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
Well said.
Quote:
In comment 14774083 Jim from Katonah said:
Quote:
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
The Titans and niners have competent passers. The Ravens don’t.
Ok. Tannehill is going to throw for less than 100 yards in back to back games.
Imagine hiring Greg Roman coming off this game?
Quote:
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
They don't? I'm not sure what you've been watching but since he took over they've been one of the best teams in the league. He might not be a great QB but he's definitely a good one.
His first two TD throws tonight we're pretty damn good as was his run for one.
Quote:
Doesn’t negate a full season of what Lamar did.
They were out coached, couldn’t block and the defense played soft
It doesn't negate it. What it highlights is that a strong defensive team that can make Jackson 1-dimensional will be able to stop the Ravens. If you make Jackson thrown the ball to beat you, he'll likely fail, and in the playoffs, you'll face teams that can do that very thing.
Completely agree with this.
Imagine hiring Greg Roman coming off this game?
I wasn't interested in Greg Roman either unless he was bringing the offensive line with him. Even then I don't want 4.8 Daniel Jones running the read option.
Fully expected it
They are forcing him to throw the ball. Put it this way - the Ravens are the #1 seed, and they got there by running the ball. Force Jackson to pass and they don't even resemble a playoff team.
Reposting the thread of the SD game doesn't seem to be so hilarious as it was last week when people were patting themselves on the back discussing Jackson's greatness.
Would LOVE for the Giants to sign him this offseason.
i got lucky bc they went up early which plays directly into the game flow that makes them win, but i'm telling you, this team is legit and vrabel is a hell of a coach.
i don't think they can beat KC though. KC can score fast w hill, kelce, etc -- the ravens have hollywood and that's it
Henry running like a supercharged Riggins.
It is. These dudes are tuff.
I wanna see them do it to everybody.
Quote:
on these little boys
Henry running like a supercharged Riggins.
That's exactly what it looks like.
Quote:
In comment 14774091 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 14774083 Jim from Katonah said:
Quote:
First the Niners pound it out, and now the Titans. Maybe the league is starting to come back to run/pass balance again.
Not really. The Titans don’t have a good QB.
Jimmy G played a role in both the early touchdowns and the 49ers had a lead for most of the game, and in the postseason you’re going to get conservative earlier with a lead and less risk adverse.
The Titans and niners have competent passers. The Ravens don’t.
Ok. Tannehill is going to throw for less than 100 yards in back to back games.
So? He didn’t turn it over and he made enough plays to keep the defense honest.
Lamar doesn’t win in the playoffs. You have to be able to make plays from the pocket.
The Titans gave him all day to throw from the pocket for the most part. No blitzing. Any competent QB would’ve shredded the Titans rushing 4 and playing zone every down.
That tells you all you need to know about what the Titans thought about his ability to beat them w his arm.
Just said to my son I haven't seen a hole like that here in NY since 2011
KWALL wasn't bullshitting
widmerseyebrow : 10:39 pm : link : reply
.
About?
Quote:
Ravens 6 points.
Imagine hiring Greg Roman coming off this game?
I wasn't interested in Greg Roman either unless he was bringing the offensive line with him. Even then I don't want 4.8 Daniel Jones running the read option.
His offensive line got the shit kicked out of it too.
Quote:
A good defensive team will negate any QB. The Vikings held Brees to 6.3 YPA.
They are forcing him to throw the ball. Put it this way - the Ravens are the #1 seed, and they got there by running the ball. Force Jackson to pass and they don't even resemble a playoff team.
Reposting the thread of the SD game doesn't seem to be so hilarious as it was last week when people were patting themselves on the back discussing Jackson's greatness.
Exactly. I doubt the Titans would look like this rushing 4 and playing zone all day w no pressure vs Brees.