Maybe this means that we can actually keep info like who we want in the draft under wraps, unlike in years past when the pick was seemingly taken right in front of us.
Does this signify that we've ushered in a new period of institutional discipline? If it does, while I hate this waiting for news, I'm all for us being able to control what gets out and what doesn't.
Judge clearly learned something from Bill.
Won't really be able to answer until I know the full picture. So far, so good.
Look how butt hurt Francesca was..
Goodnight on Gettleman for running a tighter ship.
Eric, any thoughts on OL coach ?
Eric, any thoughts on OL coach ?
Callahan has to be very appealing to them. But as Yankee28 pointed out, there was some tension between Garrett and him.
Thanks.
The nerve... ;-P
Look how butt hurt Francesca was..
Goodnight on Gettleman for running a tighter ship.
Not true at all - last year around this time (right around the Senior Bowl) rumors were all over regarding the Giants interest. Vacchiano posted his pre-draft prediction, and had it right just like he had the years prior.
The only leaks that were plugged were those coming from the locker room, in the form of players who had been purged.
They put passwords on all of the Commodore 64s they use. Sure, the passwords are all "password," but it's a step in the right direction.
"I have a lot of respect for Jason," Callahan said. "I think he was tremendously well-organized. He was a really good communicator with the players.his messages were always spot-on with the opponents we were playing. He was very demanding as a staff member as to what he wanted. He demanded precision."
Link - ( New Window )
Especially after those first four which came quickly.
Perhaps the others were told to zip it?
Quote:
Part of the reason there was such media backlash about the Daniel Jones pick was because the media felt deceived by the pre draft "leaks" they got
Look how butt hurt Francesca was..
Goodnight on Gettleman for running a tighter ship.
Not true at all - last year around this time (right around the Senior Bowl) rumors were all over regarding the Giants interest. Vacchiano posted his pre-draft prediction, and had it right just like he had the years prior.
The only leaks that were plugged were those coming from the locker room, in the form of players who had been purged.
Huh?
Ralph always had us taking Haskins
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/ralph-vacchianos-mock-nfl-draft-10-has-giants-taking-mannings-replacement/303553018
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/7-round-mock-nfl-draft-has-giants-nabbing-franchise-qb-o-line-help/304776168
It wasn't until right before the draft that Ralph pivoted to Jones
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/nfl-source-says-giants-will-take-daniel-jones-at-no-6-in-nfl-draft-thats-their-guy/306546210
Quote:
the coaching candidates themselves haven't let anything leak out.
Especially after those first four which came quickly.
Perhaps the others were told to zip it?
Or the are still coaching this weekend?
Huh?
Ralph always had us taking Haskins
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/ralph-vacchianos-mock-nfl-draft-10-has-giants-taking-mannings-replacement/303553018
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/7-round-mock-nfl-draft-has-giants-nabbing-franchise-qb-o-line-help/304776168
It wasn't until right before the draft that Ralph pivoted to Jones
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/nfl-source-says-giants-will-take-daniel-jones-at-no-6-in-nfl-draft-thats-their-guy/306546210
Help me out jlukes - in an attempt to prove your point that Gettleman silenced leaks - you included an article from BEFORE THE DRAFT with Vacchiano stating the Giants would select Jones at 6, and including this tidbit:
That tells you he's keeping this quiet?
Look how butt hurt Francesca was..
Goodnight on Gettleman for running a tighter ship.
The leaks may have been coming from admin staff who are in a good position to know. For example, secretaries and admin assistants.
Given how tight of a ship BB runs, I would guess that JJ will also want to keep things tight lipped.
Quote:
Huh?
Ralph always had us taking Haskins
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/ralph-vacchianos-mock-nfl-draft-10-has-giants-taking-mannings-replacement/303553018
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/7-round-mock-nfl-draft-has-giants-nabbing-franchise-qb-o-line-help/304776168
It wasn't until right before the draft that Ralph pivoted to Jones
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/nfl-source-says-giants-will-take-daniel-jones-at-no-6-in-nfl-draft-thats-their-guy/306546210
Help me out jlukes - in an attempt to prove your point that Gettleman silenced leaks - you included an article from BEFORE THE DRAFT with Vacchiano stating the Giants would select Jones at 6, and including this tidbit:
Quote:
In fact, multiple NFL sources have echoed that sentiment in conversations with SNY in recent days -- that Jones is the Giants' target and that waiting to take him until 17 would be risky. The Washington Redskins, at 15, are another team believed to be highly interested in the 6-5, 221-pound quarterback from Duke.
That tells you he's keeping this quiet?
It seemed as if every media member was told something different.
Right before the draft Ralph had us taking Jones, others had us taking Haskins, others had us going defense.
Mixed messages were absolutely sent out.
Quote:
In comment 14783712 jlukes said:
Quote:
Huh?
Ralph always had us taking Haskins
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/ralph-vacchianos-mock-nfl-draft-10-has-giants-taking-mannings-replacement/303553018
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/7-round-mock-nfl-draft-has-giants-nabbing-franchise-qb-o-line-help/304776168
It wasn't until right before the draft that Ralph pivoted to Jones
https://www.sny.tv/giants/news/nfl-source-says-giants-will-take-daniel-jones-at-no-6-in-nfl-draft-thats-their-guy/306546210
Help me out jlukes - in an attempt to prove your point that Gettleman silenced leaks - you included an article from BEFORE THE DRAFT with Vacchiano stating the Giants would select Jones at 6, and including this tidbit:
Quote:
In fact, multiple NFL sources have echoed that sentiment in conversations with SNY in recent days -- that Jones is the Giants' target and that waiting to take him until 17 would be risky. The Washington Redskins, at 15, are another team believed to be highly interested in the 6-5, 221-pound quarterback from Duke.
That tells you he's keeping this quiet?
It seemed as if every media member was told something different.
Right before the draft Ralph had us taking Jones, others had us taking Haskins, others had us going defense.
Mixed messages were absolutely sent out.
That’s what I recall
Grimes and Judge have a history together. From 2004-2008, I think
It seemed as if every media member was told something different.
Right before the draft Ralph had us taking Jones, others had us taking Haskins, others had us going defense.
Mixed messages were absolutely sent out.
Your own article states very clearly that MULTIPLE NFL SOURCES believed that Jones would be the pick, and would be picked at 6.
Just like any other Giants draft year. No magical keeping quiet, no matter how you guys might like to pretend otherwise. That's an article from before the draft saying that teams already pegged who the Giants would be picking and which 1st round pick they'd be using.
If you want to promote Gettleman fine, try to do it on merit. I know it's not easy, but don't just start making shit up.
In NE Belichick has to deal with an owner. in NJ Judge has to deal with 4 active owners in the building, half a dozen other owners around the building and dozens and dozens of other owner family members of all different ages.
Quote:
It seemed as if every media member was told something different.
Right before the draft Ralph had us taking Jones, others had us taking Haskins, others had us going defense.
Mixed messages were absolutely sent out.
Your own article states very clearly that MULTIPLE NFL SOURCES believed that Jones would be the pick, and would be picked at 6.
Just like any other Giants draft year. No magical keeping quiet, no matter how you guys might like to pretend otherwise. That's an article from before the draft saying that teams already pegged who the Giants would be picking and which 1st round pick they'd be using.
If you want to promote Gettleman fine, try to do it on merit. I know it's not easy, but don't just start making shit up.
This is absolutely ridiculous. If you’re being honest with yourself, you’d admit that leading up to the draft, you could read ten different articles and get ten different opinions on who the Giants would take. It was all over the map. In fact, there were some jokes around that time that regardless of the confusion and conflicting reports, no matter who the Giants took, some posters would still claim that the Giants obviously leaked who they would take. And, here we are....
I don’t think that is true
In NE Belichick has to deal with an owner. in NJ Judge has to deal with 4 active owners in the building, half a dozen other owners around the building and dozens and dozens of other owner family members of all different ages.
It's a family tradition.
In comment 14783938 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
after the Reese administration was shown the door. That's where the leaking problems were.
I don’t think that is true
Based on the public shock of the Daniel Jones pick, I sure do.
Quote:
It seemed as if every media member was told something different.
Right before the draft Ralph had us taking Jones, others had us taking Haskins, others had us going defense.
Mixed messages were absolutely sent out.
Your own article states very clearly that MULTIPLE NFL SOURCES believed that Jones would be the pick, and would be picked at 6.
Just like any other Giants draft year. No magical keeping quiet, no matter how you guys might like to pretend otherwise. That's an article from before the draft saying that teams already pegged who the Giants would be picking and which 1st round pick they'd be using.
If you want to promote Gettleman fine, try to do it on merit. I know it's not easy, but don't just start making shit up.
It has to stop - the needless bashing Gettleman posts. I don't give a rats ass if Ralphie thought it would be Jones. There were really only two QBs to be drafted at 6 -Jones or Haskins. That was it. And we all know that Gettleman really wanted Allen at 6 and Jones at 17. But the rumors were out about DC, Denver and one or two others between 6 and 17 for Jones. So Ralphie was on Haskins until he changed his mind..for whatever reason.
It's not Gettleman bashing - if you make shit up, and written evidence exists to prove that you're wrong, expect to be called out on it. For fuck's sake the guy making the claim PROVIDED the proof he was wrong, and didn't at least own it, he just doubled down on the stupidity.