and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
Fucking stupid post is stupid.
1) He was HC, not OC in Dallas, the reviews wouldn't be anywhere near as good if we hired him as a HC.
2) We shit on all of our rivals. That's what fans do.
He had very little role in the scouting and selection Â
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
You realize the duties of a HC are wildly different than an OC, don’t you? If you do then you’d now how ridiculous this post is.
I think Garrett isn’t made to be a HC - just isn’t good with in game management at all, IMO. But now he doesn’t have to do that, or take time to oversee defense and specials. He can focus 100% if his time to Jones and the offense - basically what he’s actually good at.
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
Um he was the head coach there and not even calling plays 🙄
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
You realize the duties of a HC are wildly different than an OC, don’t you? If you do then you’d now how ridiculous this post is.
I think Garrett isn’t made to be a HC - just isn’t good with in game management at all, IMO. But now he doesn’t have to do that, or take time to oversee defense and specials. He can focus 100% if his time to Jones and the offense - basically what he’s actually good at.
Well put. Looking forward to Garrett to improving offense...hopefully he gets a healthy roster to do it next season.
When watching the Cowboys under Garrett play, I never thought they Â
is he will definitely have chip on his shoulder. I think our offense is going to look a lot different next year. TEs running seam routes. SB in space/screen plays. I think we also look to draft a bruising RB(or cheaper FA) to pound the ball when needed.
What Judge has made crystal clear is that he is not about having "A System" other than a commitment to putting the players on the team in the best position to use their strengths and minimize their weakness, combined with NE-style flexibility to tailor each week's game plan to exploit the opponent's weaknesses and neutralize their strengths. I have to guess that over 2 days of meetings, Garret got the message and Judge is confident that he has bought in.
And for what it's worth, a friend who knows Jason and the Garrett family quite well tells me his primary focus will be on improving the OL so that the running game can be productive.
RE: When watching the Cowboys under Garrett play, I never thought they Â
were badly coached. I did feel that way about the McCarthy coached Packers.
Thinking back that's actually an excellent point. When we beat them it was our players making plays and yet it was always a dog fight and usually, 2-3 plays made the difference. They never lost because of coaching.
What do we know about how much input he had in those selections? Â
is he will definitely have chip on his shoulder. I think our offense is going to look a lot different next year. TEs running seam routes. SB in space/screen plays.
Too bad he won't be going up against the Giants' defense in games.
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
Ok Boomer
RE: RE: When watching the Cowboys under Garrett play, I never thought they Â
were badly coached. I did feel that way about the McCarthy coached Packers.
Thinking back that's actually an excellent point. When we beat them it was our players making plays and yet it was always a dog fight and usually, 2-3 plays made the difference. They never lost because of coaching.
He lost close games in big spots not to bad calls, but more so becuase of a players mistake or limitation.
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
If I was a Denver fan I would be super happy about the Shurmur hire just as many of us are about the Garrett hire. Will it work? Who knows but it is a hire with upside
Without using the word experience, tell me the things that he has impressed you with.
That is all I see. Working as a yes man for Jerry and Stephen Jones. Maybe getting away from Dallas will be good for him and us. Looks like a Mara special.
RE: RE: Can anyone tell me what you like about Garrett? Â
Without using the word experience, tell me the things that he has impressed you with.
That is all I see. Working as a yes man for Jerry and Stephen Jones. Maybe getting away from Dallas will be good for him and us. Looks like a Mara special.
That's all I see as well. Almost surely forced by Mara and the dead opposite of Joe Judge's vision of flexability and forward thinking. He is going to bring in a 15 year old playbook and stick with it. I don't understand how anyone is excited about this hire.
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
No inconsistency at all. HJ45 with another negative post that is as irrelevant as bell bottom pants.
Do you ever post a GD thing that is positive, or just sit in your parents cellar in your shorts and spew venom. You, Terps and jcn56 need a break from BBI and give the rest of us a break from insistent negativity. It is truly grating. Have a few month of happiness for once in your life.
People love to get on Garrett for the low hanging fruit Â
He claps his hands and smiles on the sidelines. Dallas lost some brutally close postseason games and the fans nitpick the playcalling. Yeah I don’t really give a fuck. Garrett is a solid football mind. He’s helped young players grow into good and great players. That’s all I care about and why I feel he’s going to help this franchise. Garrett is the best HC mind we’ve had here since coughlin, and he’s not even the HC.
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
You realize the duties of a HC are wildly different than an OC, don’t you? If you do then you’d now how ridiculous this post is.
I think Garrett isn’t made to be a HC - just isn’t good with in game management at all, IMO. But now he doesn’t have to do that, or take time to oversee defense and specials. He can focus 100% if his time to Jones and the offense - basically what he’s actually good at.
I would also strongly consider Garrett for a FO position/GM.
It won't matter who our offensive coordinator is... Â
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
No inconsistency at all. HJ45 with another negative post that is as irrelevant as bell bottom pants.
Do you ever post a GD thing that is positive, or just sit in your parents cellar in your shorts and spew venom. You, Terps and jcn56 need a break from BBI and give the rest of us a break from insistent negativity. It is truly grating. Have a few month of happiness for once in your life.
As ever, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about.
Criticizing the Giants and casting a skeptical eye on them isn't negativity. It's just reacting to reality.
There are a bunch of mouth breathers on this board that would support the Giants' decision to sign an inanimate carbon rod to play left tackle... Which is basically what they actually did.
We aren't being negative. The team actually does suck. It actually has been poorly run. These are facts, like saying grass is green.
If that's too much for you to take, then you're too fucking sensitive.
Callahan
Columbo (not quite so proven as the other 2 but was successful).
He made 1 bad hire in between, but he fired that guy quick and brought in Columbo.
Fucking stupid post is stupid.
1) He was HC, not OC in Dallas, the reviews wouldn't be anywhere near as good if we hired him as a HC.
2) We shit on all of our rivals. That's what fans do.
You realize the duties of a HC are wildly different than an OC, don’t you? If you do then you’d now how ridiculous this post is.
I think Garrett isn’t made to be a HC - just isn’t good with in game management at all, IMO. But now he doesn’t have to do that, or take time to oversee defense and specials. He can focus 100% if his time to Jones and the offense - basically what he’s actually good at.
Um he was the head coach there and not even calling plays 🙄
Quote:
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
You realize the duties of a HC are wildly different than an OC, don’t you? If you do then you’d now how ridiculous this post is.
I think Garrett isn’t made to be a HC - just isn’t good with in game management at all, IMO. But now he doesn’t have to do that, or take time to oversee defense and specials. He can focus 100% if his time to Jones and the offense - basically what he’s actually good at.
Well put. Looking forward to Garrett to improving offense...hopefully he gets a healthy roster to do it next season.
And for what it's worth, a friend who knows Jason and the Garrett family quite well tells me his primary focus will be on improving the OL so that the running game can be productive.
Thinking back that's actually an excellent point. When we beat them it was our players making plays and yet it was always a dog fight and usually, 2-3 plays made the difference. They never lost because of coaching.
Ugh...I hope we lose that terminology soon.
Quote:
we call them Hog Mollies around here. Get with the program.
Ugh...I hope we lose that terminology soon.
There is one clean way of getting rid of it...
Too bad he won't be going up against the Giants' defense in games.
Ok Boomer
Quote:
were badly coached. I did feel that way about the McCarthy coached Packers.
Thinking back that's actually an excellent point. When we beat them it was our players making plays and yet it was always a dog fight and usually, 2-3 plays made the difference. They never lost because of coaching.
He lost close games in big spots not to bad calls, but more so becuase of a players mistake or limitation.
If I was a Denver fan I would be super happy about the Shurmur hire just as many of us are about the Garrett hire. Will it work? Who knows but it is a hire with upside
Quote:
Without using the word experience, tell me the things that he has impressed you with.
That is all I see. Working as a yes man for Jerry and Stephen Jones. Maybe getting away from Dallas will be good for him and us. Looks like a Mara special.
That's all I see as well. Almost surely forced by Mara and the dead opposite of Joe Judge's vision of flexability and forward thinking. He is going to bring in a 15 year old playbook and stick with it. I don't understand how anyone is excited about this hire.
That is the biggest + about adding this man to our organization because as you all know this OL has been a disaster for about a decade now...
Called in this AM to espn NY and said the same just before this post was made... coincident? Or did you hear me on air gidifor?
Lol... only about 6 months too early for me hit up the Cape. Enjoy.
No inconsistency at all. HJ45 with another negative post that is as irrelevant as bell bottom pants.
Do you ever post a GD thing that is positive, or just sit in your parents cellar in your shorts and spew venom. You, Terps and jcn56 need a break from BBI and give the rest of us a break from insistent negativity. It is truly grating. Have a few month of happiness for once in your life.
Quote:
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
You realize the duties of a HC are wildly different than an OC, don’t you? If you do then you’d now how ridiculous this post is.
I think Garrett isn’t made to be a HC - just isn’t good with in game management at all, IMO. But now he doesn’t have to do that, or take time to oversee defense and specials. He can focus 100% if his time to Jones and the offense - basically what he’s actually good at.
I would also strongly consider Garrett for a FO position/GM.
Quote:
and most of you spent the last 6 or 7 years pointing out what a failure he was. Now, he's the next Vince Lombardi. Yeah, ok. Barkeep, I'll have another BBI Inconsistency
No inconsistency at all. HJ45 with another negative post that is as irrelevant as bell bottom pants.
Do you ever post a GD thing that is positive, or just sit in your parents cellar in your shorts and spew venom. You, Terps and jcn56 need a break from BBI and give the rest of us a break from insistent negativity. It is truly grating. Have a few month of happiness for once in your life.
As ever, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about.
Criticizing the Giants and casting a skeptical eye on them isn't negativity. It's just reacting to reality.
There are a bunch of mouth breathers on this board that would support the Giants' decision to sign an inanimate carbon rod to play left tackle... Which is basically what they actually did.
We aren't being negative. The team actually does suck. It actually has been poorly run. These are facts, like saying grass is green.
If that's too much for you to take, then you're too fucking sensitive.