Anyone else following along with this guys twitter criticism of Eli’s career? I won’t quote them all but he essentially says compiling stats isn’t impressive and durability is more luck than anything. He was citing this in regards to Eli’s HOF candidacy.
I think PFF is highly flawed and this guy is a bit of blowhard but to me these arguments are insane. He doesn’t think it’s valuable a starting QB never missed a game? He blames it on luck and “genes”. Does he really think toughness doesn’t play a part?
I don’t think Eli is the greatest QB of all time but these arguments were just so dumb. How can you dismiss those numbers and ability to play in that many NFL games?
Because it's HARD.
Eli Manning isn't necessarily an "all time great".
What he is, is a franchise quarterback who helped bring two championships to the Giants.
Isn't that basically what he was brought here for?
This clown is still trying to argue Jones isn’t good and Mayfield is a top 10 QB. He clearly won’t admit when he’s wrong.
I also find it ironic the “numbers guy” completely dismisses the enormous stats Eli has put up.
He is also a Giants hater.
Clownshow.
I told him to stop spreading misinformation when he said Matt Rhule was only ever considering taking the Panthers job or going back to Baylor.
He blocked me.
Silva’s even worse than this clown. Silva wrote in 2013 “ Tony Brady was a complete liability to the Pats offense and they need to move on”
I'll never understand why some people seem to think that BBI is a single entity with a single opinion that changes from day to day, rather than thousands of individuals each with their own opinion.
Quote:
I can never keep track.
I'll never understand why some people seem to think that BBI is a single entity with a single opinion that changes from day to day, rather than thousands of individuals each with their own opinion.
BBI doesn't understand that, either.
Eli benefitted from some excellent defenses, which will help any win-related, playoff-appearance related data point.
Eli rarely ever benefited from *excellent* defenses. Outside of 2016, 2008, and most of 2007 - a lot of the defenses he played with were nothing to write home about. Certainly not *excellent.*
You'd expect the *Lead Analyst* of PFF to be better at analyzing.
This.
He'd fit right in on BBI.
Why get worked up over nonsense - he's clearly wrong, aside from injuries. Injuries are certainly very much a luck thing. The point you want to make there is Eli played through them when he did get hurt.
Terry B? Please
Joe M? Please
John Elway? Shannon and Terrell
Jim P? Cliff B and Gene and Marcus
Roger S? Please
Bart Starr? Please
Bob G? Please
Troy Aikman? Please
Tom B? Gronk and Moss (didn’t win a SB w Moss)
Bettis is a HoFer but really on his last legs when Ben won with him. Hines Ward has a good shot too.
Lead analyst?? LOL
Quote:
are nauseating sometimes. Evan Silva is the worst of them all. Earlier in the year he went on a sarcastic rip fest of Eli, so I tweeted at him "you're the worst". He blocked me for that. Thin skinned loser.
Silva’s even worse than this clown. Silva wrote in 2013 “ Tony Brady was a complete liability to the Pats offense and they need to move on”
Silva blocked me because I asked him if he ever played a down of football in his life lol. Oh well fuck em.
That's another little thing about PFF that people don't know or overlook.
PFF started in the UK (and I believe is still based there). So for their initial years, the majority of their analysts were in the UK watching film and breaking down snap counts and formations.
When they began doing player ratings a couple years later, UK analysts made up the bulk of the graders. While breaking down snap counts and formations is a task anyone can do, to do grades would logically require knowledge of the game. Some of the analysts didn't follow American football. It is one of the reasons that when their ratings started becoming more prevalent (corresponding to when Collinsworth invested), they tried to add some authenticity by having former coaches and "football guys" act as tiebreakers or approval gates for the reviews.