cutting Nate Solder

In comment 14806089 UConn4523 said:

Quote:

It would have to take Judge and Co thinking he's completely toast which I can't see them possibly knowing until camp - and then its too late to find his replacement unless its already on the roster (which could be the case).

The Giants can go to the UFA market and shop for a LT who projects to be healthier, cheaper, and more productive.

The new staff has access to his medical records and the tape of his performance the last 2 years.

If they find a player who matches that criteria, they can cut Solder.

Every cut is a calculated risk for this staff, having not been here to evaluate first hand last year. But they do have to make them, and don't get the benefit of a try out for everyone.

In comment 14806057 Gatorade Dunk said:

Quote:

In comment 14805999 Milton said: Quote: In comment 14805927 UConn4523 said: Quote: The $6.5m savings isn't enough to bring in even a mid-tier FA Tackle let alone a top tier FA. They save $13M by cutting him before his $3M roster bonus is due on March 18th. This isn't correct. $13M is his dead cap number, independent of his roster bonus. His dead money escalates to $16M upon execution of his roster bonus on 3/18.

It would be pretty damn stupid to give him his $3M roster bonus and then cut him. I'm not sure what you think is incorrect about what I wrote but I clearly state that if they are going to cut him it needs to be before March 18th. The $13M that they save is the $3M roster bonus, the $100K workout bonus, and the $9.9M in salary. It's just a coincidence that the $13M potential dead cap hit and the $13M in 2020 compensation is the same number. Maybe that's where the confusion is coming from on your part.

The juice isn't worth the squeeze. The cap savings aren't significant enough this season to cut him.

In comment 14806111 Dnew15 said:

Quote:

much more tolerable.

This is not true. Please take the time to read my 12PM post. Whether the dead cap hit is $13M this year or is instead divided between $6.5M this year and $6.5M next year makes no difference whatsoever. The Giants won't come close to maxing out their cap dollars in 2020 and will be rolling cap room into 2021 to help pay for the second year on all the contracts that are signed this year.

In comment 14806132 Torrag said:

Quote:

The juice isn't worth the squeeze. The cap savings aren't significant enough this season to cut him.

They are if Solder is operating as a turnstile and getting your young QB killed. Of course, priority number 1 is finding an actual center who can identify simple stunts and call out protections. Not only can't Halapio block, but he isn't a true center and therefore can't identify simple stunts. The OL needs to operate as a unit, and it is nearly impossible to do that without a real center.

every attempt should be made to ensure that he plays a minimal number of downs in 2020.

Best case scenario - the Giants find two tackles and he's a reserve. Worst case, he's manning the right side. Absolute worst case, he's back on the blindside again.

In comment 14806132 Torrag said:

Quote:

The juice isn't worth the squeeze. The cap savings aren't significant enough this season to cut him.

The surest road to cap hell is to believe you can spend $13M on a liability just because you happen have loads of cap room in one particular year. They won't always have $70 or $80M in cap room.

He's either worth $13M or he isn't. It's a new system anyway so think of him like you'd think of any other OL free agent. Put a price on his value and stick with it. If it's the right price, the cap ramifications will take care of themselves. If it's the wrong price, they will pay for it down the road. That's what happens when good money chases bad money. You just exacerbate the problem.

In comment 14806127 christian said:

Quote:

In comment 14806089 UConn4523 said: Quote: It would have to take Judge and Co thinking he's completely toast which I can't see them possibly knowing until camp - and then its too late to find his replacement unless its already on the roster (which could be the case). The Giants can go to the UFA market and shop for a LT who projects to be healthier, cheaper, and more productive. The new staff has access to his medical records and the tape of his performance the last 2 years. If they find a player who matches that criteria, they can cut Solder. Every cut is a calculated risk for this staff, having not been here to evaluate first hand last year. But they do have to make them, and don't get the benefit of a try out for everyone.

His roster bonus is due the same day FA begins - there's no guarantee we get our FA target.

I'm all for an upgrade however the Giants see fit, I just don't think that's happening this offseason unless we are tacking a Tackle at 4.

In comment 14806167 UConn4523 said:

Quote:

His roster bonus is due the same day FA begins - there's no guarantee we get our FA target.

There's the three day tampering window right before free agency, so they should have a pretty good idea.

STA

when we don't cut Solder, don't address LT in the offseason, and then everyone will start posting how they expect a big comeback year from Solder.

In comment 14805907 Jay on the Island said:
[quote] I am not suggesting he will be great but I think they he will be a league average LT. Let’s just hope there is an early draft pick as insurance. [/quot.
At this point in his career he shouldn’t need much coaching

In comment 14806097 Dnew15 said:

Quote:

being a constant problem with Giants. I would love to just see them do what the Cowboys did and just load up on 1st rd OL studs... Biggest problem with that solution - I don't think there's a blue chip OL in this year's draft.

We tried that, sort of. 2 first round picks and a high 2nd round pick. Too bad they turned into Ereck Flowers, Justin Pugh, and Weston Richburg.

Yah he had a few obvious whiff's the almost got the QB killed, but the vast majority of his play was good.

The classic do 9 things right and no one notices, but do 1 wrong and everyone notices.

The criticism is warranty only because of the contract. He's a top 2/3 OT being paid as the best in the league. But that is sunk cost now, you don't throw away a 2/3rd OT for nothing.


Zeitler has just as many whiff's and no one is calling for him to be cut.
------------------------------------------------------
But this post above is the dumbest fucking post ive seen in a while, Are you Nate Solder's brother? He was the worst LT in the NFL every metric and analysis says so. He was absolutely horrendous. I agree he can have a bounce back especially if we get A LT and he plays RT. Much better coaching and his son's horrible disease not on his head but he was the worst LT or bottom 5 LT in the NFL and he personally almost got DJ killed. For you to say he wasn't that bad...you should have your posting rights taken away for a week. Just say anything else next time..it will be smarter then saying Solder wasn't that bad.

In comment 14805960 Greg from LI said:

Quote:

In comment 14805941 rasbutant said: Quote: Yah he had a few obvious whiff's the almost got the QB killed, but the vast majority of his play was good. No, it really wasn't. He was awful.

Solder was just too slow off the snap. Quick players made him look foolish.

His presence in the locker sends a powerful message to the team that you can suck, make millions and get on with your life with no repercussions.

How can the Giants actually turn things around when they hang to overpriced garbage. If management isn't accountable for their mistakes, players wont be either

in any meaningful fashion is really just wishful thinking. The economics point to him staying on the roster for one more year but he is no longer a dependable starter whatsoever.

It’s up to DG to ensure he has better/other alternatives at Tackle. Solder is best shown on the roster as a reserve, despite his pay.

Otherwise DG is doubling down on stupidity with this bad signing.

debacle just pisses me off more than anything else from the past couple years of Giants ineptitude. Maybe its good I'm not the GM because you can't bring emotions into it, but I'll be damned if I want to watch Solder earn his historic contract while he is putting Jones on his ass all game for another year. Based on the last two seasons, finding a viable replacement should not be hard.

He also played with neck, back and elbow injuries virtually all season long and stepped up and played through it all.

In comment 14805883 George from PA said:

Quote:

No one could have his mind into his work....with his boy fighting for.his life, imo. Beside, with the NE connection with the coaches and the hugh cap hit... He gets another year

Pio was a much bigger problem at C than Hernandez was at LG. And that issue kept Daniel from stepping up into the pocket which causes a ton of backdoor chops on the QB.


In comment 14806073 Rudy5757 said:

Quote:

before you get rid of what you have.Can the new staff get more out of him or create an offense that can work with him as the LT. When you have a guy struggling you have to provide help with chips, double teams, rollouts or play action/screens to slow the opponent down. The OL as a whole did not function well. The push up the middle doesn't give the tackles the ability to ride guys out of the play because the QB can't step up. there is a lot more to it than he just didnt play well. the unit as a whole needs to be fixed, Hernandez hasnt played well either ad people opverrate his play based on his draft position. Many of us don't know what to look for when evaluation OL. Columbo has a big job to do and I suspect Solder will be part of this team in 2020.

In comment 14805941 rasbutant said:

Quote:

Yah he had a few obvious whiff's the almost got the QB killed, but the vast majority of his play was good. The classic do 9 things right and no one notices, but do 1 wrong and everyone notices. The criticism is warranty only because of the contract. He's a top 2/3 OT being paid as the best in the league. But that is sunk cost now, you don't throw away a 2/3rd OT for nothing.

Exactly, he's nowhere near the worst starting LT of 2019. That is a BBI-ism that has no basis in truth. Watch other teams. Solder wasn't great but that's a position that has a lot of teams wanting improvement.

The cheerleader fans again trying to change the narrative. It doesn't make a difference if SOlder was worst or 2nd worst etc. He was bad. Unaccpetably so. Yet they'll try to change to change the narrative that because he wasn't the worst, it meant he was pretty good.

He was a bad LT that is aging causing his performance to go in the wrong direction. The quicker they get a replacement at LT the better for a rebuilding team. They just have so many holes though. everything depends on what they are going to do in FA.

In comment 14806418 VinegarPeppers said:

Quote:

He also played with neck, back and elbow injuries virtually all season long and stepped up and played through it all. In comment 14805883 George from PA said: Quote:

Yay!! Dave Gettlemen brought in an aging LT who is getting more injury prone on a rebuilding team! (sarcasm)

But it's not DG's fault or Nate Solder's fault. It's the coaching. After all, why should anyone expect an aging player to become more injury prone? (sarcasm)

And -- atta boy that he played hard while hurt. OFC no other player in the history of the NFL played hard while being hurt and did well. (sarcasm)

So the heck with performance. YAaay team he played hard!!! (sarcasm)

Has a very sick child and it is why he signed with NYG, doctors. If DG tells him that he will cut him, I’m sure Solder would restructure so he remains.