The past few days it seems a “foregone conclusion” that 1917 will win best picture which is quite strange to me. I liked the film but don’t think it’s worthy to win best picture over at least 4-5 of these other films. It was a great year for movies...here’s my predictions of what will win vs what should win:
Best picture: Parasite or Once Upon a Time in Hollywood should win, think 1917 will win
Best Actor: Leo should win, Phoenix will win
Best Actress: Zellweger should and will win, but Scarlett has a case
Best Supporting Actor: Pitt should and will win, but Pesci was phenomenal
Best supporting actress: Florence Pugh should win, Dern will win based on her career/all the hype
Best director: Bong Joon-Ho should win, Mendes will win as it seems 1917 is getting all the love
Have at it!
Didn’t Laura Dern also date Baron Davis?
But I digress. Great speech by her.
That's exactly why I have stopped watching all those shows. ALl these celebrities uses those stages as their own personal political forum and I hate it. Stick to what you are there for, like Ricky Gervais said
Quote:
enough for the Oscars.
He’s a tv actor. He’ll be in the one for the Emmys. Same with Luke Perry.
I think you’re right but I just thought both had enough movie experience for a mention.
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Zellwegger’s speech was just flat out weird. Too much amphetamines?
Quote:
to lead off his speech
That's exactly why I have stopped watching all those shows. ALl these celebrities uses those stages as their own personal political forum and I hate it. Stick to what you are there for, like Ricky Gervais said
The counter arguments are so aggressive now. Its fine if you don't want to listen to it, but its not like everything said is some wild hot take that shouldn't make you question things a bit.
I liked a lot of what Phoenix said. Some of it over the top but his main point is something I think is important. People lose sight of the things he spoke of all the time - why shouldn't he be able to speak about that?
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
It's like you're trying to say people are applauding Leach instead of the actual explanation - people didn't hear what he said.
The fact that his comments "went viral" should tell you that he'd get the same response Pitt is getting about sticking to football.
Quote:
In comment 14807873 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
I'm not okay with any of it. I just think it's silly to compare a college football coach's press conference to the Academy Awards where Brad Pitt, one of the most famous actors in the world, willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him.
Quote:
In comment 14807909 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807873 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
I'm not okay with any of it. I just think it's silly to compare a college football coach's press conference to the Academy Awards where Brad Pitt, one of the most famous actors in the world, willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him.
And then those aggrieved members of the fan base can use their wallets to not pay to see any of his future films. So the consequence falls on him. So who cares?
It’s not like he’s advocating for mass murder, I don’t see what the big deal is. I hate politics and don’t want to hear it either, I just tune it out.
Quote:
In comment 14807909 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807873 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
I'm not okay with any of it. I just think it's silly to compare a college football coach's press conference to the Academy Awards where Brad Pitt, one of the most famous actors in the world, willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him.
That's one way to look at it. Another is to admire the guy for speaking his convictions in the face of significant blowback that could damage career etc. I don't want to get this thread banned, so I'll keep it general without other specific examples.
It’s not like he’s advocating for mass murder, I don’t see what the big deal is. I hate politics and don’t want to hear it either, I just tune it out.
It’s not like he’s advocating for mass murder, I don’t see what the big deal is. I hate politics and don’t want to hear it either, I just tune it out.
Quote:
In comment 14807919 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807909 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807873 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
I'm not okay with any of it. I just think it's silly to compare a college football coach's press conference to the Academy Awards where Brad Pitt, one of the most famous actors in the world, willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him.
And then those aggrieved members of the fan base can use their wallets to not pay to see any of his future films. So the consequence falls on him. So who cares?
Oh I agree, and it doesn't bother me at all. I tune it out or change the channel. I'm just adding my two cents to the convo.
But to believe that he'll receive significant blow back for this is comical. He'll be treated like a hero in Hollywood
For the record, I do not think Pitt’s comment even qualifies as lengthy political commentary. It was a throwaway line. Get thicker skin.
Quote:
enough for the Oscars.
He’s a tv actor. He’ll be in the one for the Emmys. Same with Luke Perry.
I get to watch them on /r/publicfreakout
But to believe that he'll receive significant blow back for this is comical. He'll be treated like a hero in Hollywood [/quote]
I think nowadays, there seem to be consequences for speaking out at these events, and Pitt seems like the type of person who's perceptive enough to get that. I highly doubt he said what he said to get patted on the back by his piers.
These aren't the toughest people in the world you're talking about...
Quote:
In comment 14807931 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807919 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807909 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807873 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
I'm not okay with any of it. I just think it's silly to compare a college football coach's press conference to the Academy Awards where Brad Pitt, one of the most famous actors in the world, willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him.
And then those aggrieved members of the fan base can use their wallets to not pay to see any of his future films. So the consequence falls on him. So who cares?
Oh I agree, and it doesn't bother me at all. I tune it out or change the channel. I'm just adding my two cents to the convo.
But to believe that he'll receive significant blow back for this is comical. He'll be treated like a hero in Hollywood
I don't believe that he'll receive significant blow back for this. You literally just said he 'willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him". If that's true, then there should be significant blowback in terms of tickets sold.
Quote:
people really refuse to watch the Oscars because they can't stand to listen to 30 seconds of mostly rambling political commentary that they don't agree with? What happens when someone disagrees with you in real life?
i have a conversation with them which I can’t do with a television screen. However that is not the reason I don’t watch. I don’t give a crap.
Yeah, there a million different reasons to watch or not watch but it was specifically stated that some don't watch because of the politics in the acceptance speeches. The Oscars are the Super Bowl for movies and Hollywood. If you like that stuff, it just seems odd to boycott over a few seconds of someone talking.
Have you heard of Google?
Quote:
In comment 14807956 Chris in Philly said:
Quote:
In comment 14807931 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807919 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807909 Giants in 07 said:
Quote:
In comment 14807873 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 14807566 LBH15 said:
Quote:
to lead off his speech
I didn’t have a problem with it, he didn’t spend his whole speech on it, and he couldn’t be more right.
BTW, anyone hear Mike Leach, coach of Mississippi State last week during his presser? And his political input is fucking batshit crazy, but I don’t hear people telling him to stick to football.
Probably because nobody watches a Mississippi St press conference unlike the millions that watch the Oscars.
Bizarre comparison to say the least
All of this political shit becomes viral, I don't watch Mississippi St pressers either, but when you pick a side, and you have a voice, it becomes national news.
You don't understand my context, and I'm trying to understand yours. Are you saying your ok with Leach spewing his theories(putting it nicely), and not Pitt, because he has a bigger audience?
I'm not okay with any of it. I just think it's silly to compare a college football coach's press conference to the Academy Awards where Brad Pitt, one of the most famous actors in the world, willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him.
And then those aggrieved members of the fan base can use their wallets to not pay to see any of his future films. So the consequence falls on him. So who cares?
Oh I agree, and it doesn't bother me at all. I tune it out or change the channel. I'm just adding my two cents to the convo.
But to believe that he'll receive significant blow back for this is comical. He'll be treated like a hero in Hollywood
I don't believe that he'll receive significant blow back for this. You literally just said he 'willingly ostracizes half of his fan base just to receive a round of applause from other celebrities that already agree with him". If that's true, then there should be significant blowback in terms of tickets sold.
I thought we were talking about blowback in terms of the media or by his peers.
But I'd agree that that is the path that people should take though (ticket sales etc) if they feel so strongly about it. Did I roll my eyes when I saw the clip of his comments? Yes. Will it stop me from seeing a movie he's in? Absolutely not
I guess you didn't see any of his award acceptance speeches for prior to the Oscars...
Shia has had a weird past but his last movie about the guy with down syndrome wanting to be a wrestler was great. People are accusing him of laughing or growing impatient with him on the stage. There is no fucking way he was acting like that. Shia and Zach from all i have been reading, has a friendship that no one could break. It was the highlight of the night for me
Quote:
So very well deserved. Don't really care about any of the other awards, TBH. Did get a kick out of some the geeks trying to political. Hollywood men and women throwing a public temper tantrum over politics (or anything, really) is always the BEST. I'll never get tired of that and NEVER want them to stop throwing those political temper tantrums. They're hilarious to observe. Don't understand why anyone who loves being entertained and loves seeing overpaid crybabies who are used to having everything they want in life not able to get their way when it comes to politics. It's glorious.
I guess you didn't see any of his award acceptance speeches for prior to the Oscars...
Re-read my post. I have no problem with these people talking politics publicly. I encourage and hope it continues strictly for the laughs they provide.
The president's a whiny celebrity too, so there should absolutely be a kinship.
yep
I do find it hilarious that those who criticize Hollywood "elite" for voicing their opinions, voted for a reality TV game show host as President
I am still stunned that the Best Picture of the year won the Best Picture Oscar
Quote:
In comment 14808272 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
So very well deserved. Don't really care about any of the other awards, TBH. Did get a kick out of some the geeks trying to political. Hollywood men and women throwing a public temper tantrum over politics (or anything, really) is always the BEST. I'll never get tired of that and NEVER want them to stop throwing those political temper tantrums. They're hilarious to observe. Don't understand why anyone who loves being entertained and loves seeing overpaid crybabies who are used to having everything they want in life not able to get their way when it comes to politics. It's glorious.
I guess you didn't see any of his award acceptance speeches for prior to the Oscars...
Re-read my post. I have no problem with these people talking politics publicly. I encourage and hope it continues strictly for the laughs they provide.
Yeah, you don't have a problem with it at all.
Whatever people’s reasons, last night was the lowest rated Oscars in history.
As much as a derelict shit show the Giants have mostly been since 2011, I'd think his character the Joker would be a huge Giants' fan.
Heeeheee!
Quote:
In comment 14808283 speedywheels said:
Quote:
In comment 14808272 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
So very well deserved. Don't really care about any of the other awards, TBH. Did get a kick out of some the geeks trying to political. Hollywood men and women throwing a public temper tantrum over politics (or anything, really) is always the BEST. I'll never get tired of that and NEVER want them to stop throwing those political temper tantrums. They're hilarious to observe. Don't understand why anyone who loves being entertained and loves seeing overpaid crybabies who are used to having everything they want in life not able to get their way when it comes to politics. It's glorious.
I guess you didn't see any of his award acceptance speeches for prior to the Oscars...
Re-read my post. I have no problem with these people talking politics publicly. I encourage and hope it continues strictly for the laughs they provide.
Yeah, you don't have a problem with it at all.
Why would I? It's entertaining as hell.
Link - ( New Window )
hell'd you do???