for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

If the Giants opt to tag Williams, would the best option

Big Blue '56 : 2/15/2020 8:18 am
be the non-exclusive rights tag?

RV on LW:

Quote:


By the way, assuming the Giants use the "non-exclusive" tag, Williams could solicit offers from other teams. The Giants would have the right to match. But more importantly, if they don't, they'd get two first-round picks in return -- which would turn this trade into a huge win for them. Obviously that's unlikely to happen.


Just askin’
.  
Big Blue '56 : 2/15/2020 8:19 am : link
.
Link - ( New Window )
I like the transition tag  
superspynyg : 2/15/2020 8:24 am : link
It gives him the chance to let the market set his rate and gives us right t9 match.

I think he thinks he is worth 15 mil but he will find that he is not so rather then a nasty holdout. When some team offered 12-13 we cZn match and we are not the bad guys.

With the non-exclysive tag, the Giants should just match  
LBH15 : 2/15/2020 8:30 am : link
the offer.

Leonard is clearly worth more than 2 first round picks.
I would rather they use the transition tag.  
Diver_Down : 2/15/2020 8:36 am : link
It comes with a lower cap hit, and it allows for LW to negotiate with other teams to determine his market value. While the non-exclusive tag allows for LW to also negotiate with other team, the higher cap hit along with possibility of sending draft pick compensation in the event the offer is not matched actually restricts any other team from negotiating.

The assumption is that DG wants to extend LW. We just don't want to overpay based on an inflated market value that LW thinks he is worth and DG saving face for the trade. Having LW able to negotiate with other teams allows for his true market value to be determined without the hindrance of draft capital being forfeited in the event we do not match. We want other teams to do our negotiating for us.
According to Torrag and Gatorade Dunk...  
bw in dc : 2/15/2020 8:55 am : link
because LW’s total comp last year was $14+M, we can’t get the benefit of the projected lower transition tag amount. Which is around $12.5M for DTs.

In other words, the player’s salary can’t go backwards.

Since the FT for DTs is projected to be $15M+, LW would get that or his last salary + 120%.

So 120% of $14M+ - LW’s last comp - is $17M. Since that’s greater than the projected $15M FT, that would be his FT amount.

Welcome, again, to the perils of an awful trade...
The transition tag seems like the obvious move  
ZogZerg : 2/15/2020 8:58 am : link
.
RE: With the non-exclysive tag, the Giants should just match  
superspynyg : 2/15/2020 8:58 am : link
In comment 14811634 LBH15 said:
Quote:
the offer.

Leonard is clearly worth more than 2 first round picks.


If he is worth 2 first rd picks he is worth max money

Which he is not.

Trans tag should carry a 12-13 mil number with the chance to match.
Transtion tag number  
ray in arlington : 2/15/2020 9:30 am : link
for an player has to be at least 120% of his current salary.

So it appears that bw is correct when he says trans tag for LW is 1.2 x 14.2 = 17M, not the 12-13M number people get when they just look up a number for the position.
That’s a whole lot of juice  
LBH15 : 2/15/2020 9:37 am : link
I think we just got squeezed.
RE: With the non-exclysive tag, the Giants should just match  
Section331 : 2/15/2020 10:14 am : link
In comment 14811634 LBH15 said:
Quote:
the offer.

Leonard is clearly worth more than 2 first round picks.


No he is not, and no team would offer him a contract knowing they would lose picks. The problem with this strategy is you’re committing to paying LW over $17M, which is more than he is worth.
Hard to believe that DG and Abrams did not know  
NYRiese : 2/15/2020 10:14 am : link
all of the above arguments and decision points going in.
Couldn’t they Transition Tag him,  
Simms11 : 2/15/2020 10:14 am : link
see what kind of offers he could get and then pull it to sign a long-term deal? That would at least give the Giants an opportunity to match without worrying about losing him and the picks they gave up for nothing. Or will they have to leave the TT in place once they Tag him?
RE: With the non-exclysive tag, the Giants should just match  
Ten Ton Hammer : 2/15/2020 10:17 am : link
In comment 14811634 LBH15 said:
Quote:


Leonard is clearly worth more than 2 first round picks.


Who is this "clear" to?
You all need more coffee  
LBH15 : 2/15/2020 10:32 am : link
this morning.
RE: RE: With the non-exclysive tag, the Giants should just match  
Big Blue '56 : 2/15/2020 10:33 am : link
In comment 14811670 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
In comment 14811634 LBH15 said:


Quote:




Leonard is clearly worth more than 2 first round picks.



Who is this "clear" to?


He’s being fucking facetious
...  
christian : 2/15/2020 10:57 am : link
The transition tag seems fine, as it buys the Giants time, and let's them focus their time and energy at the start of free agency on better targets.

I truly hope Williams isn't the prize of UFA or main focus of Gettleman, and certainly wouldn't want signing Williams to financially be a blocker a of better player.
Folks cringing about the 17 mil the tag would cost...  
BlueLou'sBack : 2/15/2020 11:05 am : link
Miss the point that LW won't want that since it's a one year deal only.

He would certainly prefer to come to a long multi year term deal with some team that will get him 40 mil or so guaranteed.

Du'oh.

Regarding the picks, it's not all or nothing. If I remember correctly  
Ira : 2/15/2020 11:33 am : link
a team that wants Williams can negotiate with the Giants for lesser pick(s). Even a single 2nd round pick would be a plus.
You can tell how blindly some people want to justify the trade  
chuckydee9 : 2/15/2020 12:21 pm : link
By bringing up ridiculous things that are n no where near true are applicable to a DT with 0.5 sack in a 16 game season..

When are we going to create another thread about us trading for a lower third round pick again so that we can give that to the Jets rather than our third?
RE: You can tell how blindly some people want to justify the trade  
Big Blue '56 : 2/15/2020 12:27 pm : link
In comment 14811735 chuckydee9 said:
Quote:
By bringing up ridiculous things that are n no where near true are applicable to a DT with 0.5 sack in a 16 game season..

When are we going to create another thread about us trading for a lower third round pick again so that we can give that to the Jets rather than our third?


Nothing is being justified here. We’re ONLY discussing tag possibilities
This would guarantee he is a Giant next year.  
St. Jimmy : 2/15/2020 12:41 pm : link
No GM would make an offer if they are losing two first round picks.
This is the tag they should use on Williams.  
Klaatu : 2/15/2020 12:50 pm : link
I'm sure Abrams and Getts knew  
Dave on the UWS : 2/15/2020 1:26 pm : link
all the ramifications of bringing Williams aboard. Which means they are fully prepared to pay him $15 million per. Personally I don't see him being worth that, but I would think that Judge and Graham will have input into that. If they tell Gettleman how they plan to use him and what they think his worth is (and that doesn't add up to a $15 million player, then he will walk (and they will lose the draft picks for nothing). When you make a regime change, sometimes stuff like this happens.
I would imagine Judge and Graham’s input was something like  
LBH15 : 2/15/2020 1:45 pm : link
“You realize he was a free agent this year, right?”

.  
Danny Kanell : 2/15/2020 1:52 pm : link
It was one of the worst trades I’ve ever seen this team make. I’d rather we just cut our losses and move on. LW is ok but he is not a difference maker. Paying him what a tag is going to cost or what the contract he wants is going to cost is a big mistake and imo will just keep us spinning wheels.
Even the thought of 2 first rd picks for LW's  
micky : 2/15/2020 2:03 pm : link
Is hilarious
I just don't see the Giants paying him the tag 'premium' for a year  
Torrag : 2/15/2020 3:32 pm : link
Could they slap the tag on him for negotiating position to apply pressure for a long term deal? Maybe.
They should franchise him  
GiantsFan84 : 2/15/2020 6:04 pm : link
I don’t want them to commit to him long term. And he’s not worth the money. But by franchising him they have him for one more year. A year where hopefully that offseason they aren’t signing a bunch of free agents which would negate his return comp pick.

By franchising him, you get to see him in a new system but also are able to not resign him after next year and hopefully get a 3rd round comp pick when he signs elsewhere then. Or they get lucky and some team wants to trade for him now and is willing to surrender picks.

They have enough cap room this year to do it. That shouldn’t be an issue. And when he leaves after next year there will be zero cap hit.
RE: With the non-exclysive tag, the Giants should just match  
sb from NYT Forum : 2/15/2020 7:53 pm : link
In comment 14811634 LBH15 said:
Quote:
the offer.

Leonard is clearly worth more than 2 first round picks.


February 2020
LW is a plus player  
JonC : 2/15/2020 9:15 pm : link
but I wouldn't pay $15M per to keep him, and no team is spending two #1 picks to get him.
Giants tried to get Buckner from SF for OBJ  
JonC : 2/15/2020 9:17 pm : link
it tells you they highly value that type of 3-4 part, Arik Armstead as well. The problem is LW hasn't played at their level yet in the NFL.
RE: .  
eric2425ny : 2/15/2020 11:23 pm : link
In comment 14811779 Danny Kanell said:
Quote:
It was one of the worst trades I’ve ever seen this team make. I’d rather we just cut our losses and move on. LW is ok but he is not a difference maker. Paying him what a tag is going to cost or what the contract he wants is going to cost is a big mistake and imo will just keep us spinning wheels.


I agree, it was an odd trade for sure. I kind of expected to see a deal done before the end of the season and it would be like oh yeah we made that trade to keep the cost low. But here we are, weeks from free agency and they are either going to overpay with a franchise tag, or let him walk and waste draft picks. I have supported DG so far, but this has the makings of a head scratcher.
RE: Giants tried to get Buckner from SF for OBJ  
bw in dc : 2/16/2020 10:11 am : link
In comment 14811929 JonC said:
Quote:
it tells you they highly value that type of 3-4 part, Arik Armstead as well. The problem is LW hasn't played at their level yet in the NFL.


I agree. But I’m not getting how you suggest in a prior post LW is a “plus” player? Where?

LW is a “plus” player?  
Torrag : 2/16/2020 11:17 am : link
LW is among the best 3-4 DE run defenders in the league. He's also among the leaders in QB pressures, hits, hurries and knockdowns. He hasn't been among the sack finishers and that's the only ability he isn't among the elite at his position. He's definitely a 'plus' or above average player at his position. Both the statistical data and eyeball test supports that.

I could link the relevant stat page but we've regurgitated this debate for weeks and it won't change. He isn't 'elite' but he is definitely above average or 'plus' and certainly in the top 10 among 3-4 DE's.

As has often been suggested that isn't a $15M player. I won't be at all surprised if he signs a long term deal with an AAV of better than $11m.
To take this discussion in a different direction...  
Torrag : 2/16/2020 11:38 am : link
How does the LW situation effect our overall free agent and roster building strategy?

I'd say this. I would go into free agency to sign impact players in their prime at positions of need. That's what our roster, especially our defense, lacks. So attack the Tier 1 free agents first. We can certainly afford to operate in that market this time around with our available cap space.

For me that group would include DL Chris Jones, Edge Shaq Barrett or Matt Judon, S Justin Simmons or Anthony Harris, LB Cory Littleton, OT Anthony Castonzo(I keep hearing he may retire blah, blah, blah but he would have done it by now and he's better than Conklin).

Once the dust has settled on the top players I'd look to the next tier and that includes LW.

How does that effect our Draft day approach? At DL for example if we don't come away with a DL to round out our group then Derrick Brown comes into play without a doubt. A group of Lawrence, Tomlinson, Hill, McIntosh and Slayton isn't close to good enough.

That's the way free agency creates that domino effect. If you can't fill the obvious holes in your roster it elevates the pressure to address that position in the Draft.
This is also an area where pure stats are over-rated  
Bob in Newburgh : 2/16/2020 11:59 am : link
Jets had very little pass rush in 2019.

LW got no sacks where the QB moved away from pressure and into his arms. Got no cheap sacks.
RE: To take this discussion in a different direction...  
Rjanyg : 2/16/2020 3:47 pm : link
In comment 14812062 Torrag said:
Quote:
How does the LW situation effect our overall free agent and roster building strategy?

I'd say this. I would go into free agency to sign impact players in their prime at positions of need. That's what our roster, especially our defense, lacks. So attack the Tier 1 free agents first. We can certainly afford to operate in that market this time around with our available cap space.

For me that group would include DL Chris Jones, Edge Shaq Barrett or Matt Judon, S Justin Simmons or Anthony Harris, LB Cory Littleton, OT Anthony Castonzo(I keep hearing he may retire blah, blah, blah but he would have done it by now and he's better than Conklin).

Once the dust has settled on the top players I'd look to the next tier and that includes LW.

How does that effect our Draft day approach? At DL for example if we don't come away with a DL to round out our group then Derrick Brown comes into play without a doubt. A group of Lawrence, Tomlinson, Hill, McIntosh and Slayton isn't close to good enough.

That's the way free agency creates that domino effect. If you can't fill the obvious holes in your roster it elevates the pressure to address that position in the Draft.


Good post Torrag
I think people including reporters have the Tag rules incorrect  
Rudy5757 : 2/17/2020 10:24 am : link
In both the Franchise or Transition tag situation for LW, he will get $17,040,000.

The rules for the tags are the same. for the franchise tag its the average of the top 5 players or a 20% increase in salary whichever is higher. for the transition tag its the average of the top 10 players or a 20% increase in salary whichever is higher.

He was paid $14,200,000 last year so not matter which tag you use its going to be at the $17m number. I dont think we are tagging him. You can't tag a guy and pay him less than he was making, thats not how it works. He played on the 5th year option which is all salary which was $14,200,000. He's not taking less than that unless its a long term deal.
FT him  
MotownGIANTS : 2/17/2020 10:58 am : link
even if a deal with him cant be had think outside the box ... trade him for multiple 2s or a future 1st and 2nd,3rd this year ... we recoup our 3rd get and extra 2nd retain our future 4th and get a 1st in '21/'22 hell even if it is '23 so what? What did we lose? It would be all gain.
Defenderdawg noted this from SI article  
LBH15 : 2/17/2020 11:05 am : link
"This week, Leonard Williams pushed back on the notion that he’s asking for $15 million from the Giants. But maybe he shouldn’t? Given that the team forked over a third-round pick and a conditional fifth-rounder to get him, and his franchise tag number would be around $16 million (not happening), Williams has considerable leverage here."
bw  
JonC : 2/18/2020 8:13 am : link
Torrag covered it. LW is an excellent run defender and creator of havoc when he's on. Admittedly, consistency and maturity on the football field do not always show up, and that's part of my hesitation with paying him (or any player who suddenly shows up during their contract year) open market dollars.
RE: Hard to believe that DG and Abrams did not know  
Gatorade Dunk : 2/18/2020 8:42 am : link
In comment 14811666 NYRiese said:
Quote:
all of the above arguments and decision points going in.

Is it?

Because DG also either doesn't know how compensatory picks work, or he's a bold-faced liar who thinks fans and media are dumb enough to not understand the actual truth. It's probably the latter, but would you assign that a 100% likelihood? And if there's a chance that he doesn't understand comp picks, isn't there also a possibility that he was not considering the 120% rule?

Typically, it's invoked for a player's second consecutive tag, not one coming off a 5th year option, so this is a fairly rare scenario - I don't think it's completely unrealistic that given the time constraints of a deadline deal, that DG and KA didn't consider the tag element since it would take a very specific set of circumstances for this particular scenario to play out.
RE: I think people including reporters have the Tag rules incorrect  
christian : 2/18/2020 8:59 am : link
In comment 14812438 Rudy5757 said:
Quote:
In both the Franchise or Transition tag situation for LW, he will get $17,040,000.

The rules for the tags are the same. for the franchise tag its the average of the top 5 players or a 20% increase in salary whichever is higher. for the transition tag its the average of the top 10 players or a 20% increase in salary whichever is higher.

He was paid $14,200,000 last year so not matter which tag you use its going to be at the $17m number. I dont think we are tagging him. You can't tag a guy and pay him less than he was making, thats not how it works. He played on the 5th year option which is all salary which was $14,200,000. He's not taking less than that unless its a long term deal.


It’s amazing this basic point keeps getting missed by the press.
Back to the Corner