for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: UNC's men's basketball...

SFGFNCGiantsFan : 2/17/2020 9:05 pm
In a span of 9 days, I've watched them choke away a double digit lead to Duke @ home, lose on a last second 3 to UVA, & now blow another double digit lead/lose on a last second 3 to ND. I didn't catch their loss to FSU.

Season from hell Heels fans. Season from hell. 6 game losing streak.

Just venting.
I've never seen a team lose on buzzer beaters  
Greg from LI : 2/17/2020 9:08 pm : link
three straight times before.

Can't say I'm too broken up about it.
Aw..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/17/2020 9:10 pm : link
shucks Roy!
ACC had better enjoy it...  
bw in dc : 2/17/2020 9:14 pm : link
because help is on the way next year. Ole Roy has a helluva class for 2020/21.
Greg/FMIC, no arguments here.  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 2/17/2020 9:19 pm : link
Horrible season for the Heels. And I hated when Roy came out & said this was the least gifted team he's had at Chapel Hill. He shouldn't be saying that.
RE: ACC had better enjoy it...  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 2/17/2020 9:24 pm : link
In comment 14812863 bw in dc said:
Quote:
because help is on the way next year. Ole Roy has a helluva class for 2020/21.


Yup. Help is coming soon enough. Sharpe, Kessler, & Love...UNC did well on the recruiting trail.
Just brutal.  
Pete in MD : 2/17/2020 9:44 pm : link
It going to be tough for those players to concentrate in their fake classes tomorrow.
RE: RE: ACC had better enjoy it...  
Aloha Alan : 2/17/2020 10:40 pm : link
In comment 14812871 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
In comment 14812863 bw in dc said:


Quote:


because help is on the way next year. Ole Roy has a helluva class for 2020/21.



Yup. Help is coming soon enough. Sharpe, Kessler, & Love...UNC did well on the recruiting trail.


#1 recruiting class for college basketball next year. Doesn't guarantee squat, but there'll be substantially more Tar Heel wins next year.
RE: Greg/FMIC, no arguments here.  
Jim from Katonah : 2/17/2020 11:29 pm : link
In comment 14812867 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
Horrible season for the Heels. And I hated when Roy came out & said this was the least gifted team he's had at Chapel Hill. He shouldn't be saying that.


Brutal year for me: Giants, Knicks, UNC. And Altuve sitting on Chapman’s 2-1 curve (almost like he knew was coming ....)
You forgot  
lugnut : 2/18/2020 8:29 am : link
A 17-point loss to a terrible Wake Forest team.

I have limited sympathy - UNC is an institution and almost always great. They “deserve” a bad year. Just wish Duke would have one too.
RE: RE: RE: ACC had better enjoy it...  
Greg from LI : 2/18/2020 8:57 am : link
In comment 14812902 Aloha Alan said:
Quote:
#1 recruiting class for college basketball next year. Doesn't guarantee squat, but there'll be substantially more Tar Heel wins next year.


I've seen a lot of Heels fans consoling themselves with this, but....they had a top ten class this year, you know.
Karma is great ...  
Spider56 : 2/18/2020 8:58 am : link
Maybe it’s because their “athletes” are actually going to real classes this year.
A few years ago ND vs UNC  
Metnut : 2/18/2020 9:02 am : link
was an Elite 8 matchup and the teams were competing for ACC titles. Sad to see the matchup reduced to what last night was (despite the game being good).

Of course, we can't get around the obvious. UNC will bring in another top class and will be back into the mix at some point. ND will have no such benefit. ND's basketball recruiting has completely cratered and it remains to be seen whether Brey can get them back to relevance at some point.
I enjoy watching the local section 2 kid play -  
GiantsUA : 2/18/2020 9:08 am : link
Platek.

He competed against Kevin Huerter (Hawks), and although a different division played at the same time as Joe Cremo (UAlbany/Villanova).

Also out of Section 2 - Joe Girard is coming along at SU.
I always thought Brey was a very good coach  
Greg from LI : 2/18/2020 9:09 am : link
They never had truly top talent but usually punched above their weight class. Wonder what has happened there. It's kind of like Jamie Dixon at Pitt - the bottom just suddenly fell out after a long run of good seasons.
RE: I always thought Brey was a very good coach  
Spider56 : 2/18/2020 9:27 am : link
In comment 14813021 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
They never had truly top talent but usually punched above their weight class. Wonder what has happened there. It's kind of like Jamie Dixon at Pitt - the bottom just suddenly fell out after a long run of good seasons.


Maybe it’s because the schools refuse to adjust their academic standards.
If so, kudos to them.
RE: I always thought Brey was a very good coach  
Spider56 : 2/18/2020 9:28 am : link
In comment 14813021 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
They never had truly top talent but usually punched above their weight class. Wonder what has happened there. It's kind of like Jamie Dixon at Pitt - the bottom just suddenly fell out after a long run of good seasons.


Maybe it’s because the schools refuse to adjust their academic standards.
If so, kudos to them.
RE: RE: I always thought Brey was a very good coach  
Jim from Katonah : 2/18/2020 11:21 am : link
In comment 14813044 Spider56 said:
Quote:
In comment 14813021 Greg from LI said:


Quote:


They never had truly top talent but usually punched above their weight class. Wonder what has happened there. It's kind of like Jamie Dixon at Pitt - the bottom just suddenly fell out after a long run of good seasons.



Maybe it’s because the schools refuse to adjust their academic standards.
If so, kudos to them.


I think there is an almost complete disconnect between academic standards and the revenue-producing college sports. And the greater the athlete’s talent, the more this relationship becomes attenuated. It’s a nice little fiction that the athletes at a particular school are subject to more rigorous admissions standards than at other schools — but it’s just not true. College athletes go through a completely different admissions process. And it’s not just at the UNCs and Dukes (remember Marvin Bagley?), it’s even at the elite non-major conference private schools and Ivies. I know someone who is playing hoops for an elite Ivy program next year — the only kid on my daughter’s high school that got in — and this person could never sniff an Ivy if it’s wasn’t for the fact they were 6’6.” And I have a family member who played football at a super-elite private school, who scored in the 50th percentile on his standardized tests. Etc. etc. it’s two different tracks.

The disconnect seems to get greater and greater every year as admissions has become more competitive than ever. It makes me wonder sometimes, what IS college sports at this point? The increased geographic boundaries of conferences — the ACC now spans the entire Eastern coast and west to Indiana — and the tremendous time burdens and the separation from the student body (separate dorms, dining facilities, gyms) makes it feel more than ever that sports teams are a mercenary force to bring in $ and build school spirit. Doesn’t stop me from watching it and rooting for my alma mater, but I’d wager that 80-90% of the Notre Dame football team didn’t score in the 98th plus percentile on the SAT/ACT that you need to get in as a non-athlete. So the kids come in at much lower performing levels, then spend 40 hours plus per week on football-related activities and travel ... while the non-athlete brainiacs are cramming in the library ... I mean c’mon, one has almost nothing to do with the other.



It's true that admission standards are different for athletes  
Greg from LI : 2/18/2020 11:28 am : link
than ordinary students. It's not true, however, that they don't vary from school to school. Part of what sunk Al Groh at UVA was that he kept recruiting players who were great football players but who never stood a chance in hell of actually being admitted. He had some very good classes, especially in his early years, but they always ended up underwhelming because every one of them would have multiple academic casualties who never suited up. I'm sure the same is true at some other schools like Stanford and Notre Dame. Doesn't mean that they have to meet the same standards of the student body in general, though, not arguing that.
Duke, NC St and UVa also have well regarded classes coming  
Mad Mike : 2/18/2020 11:30 am : link
in next fall. Conference should be pretty stacked.
The Hoos also have Sam Hauser eligible next year  
Greg from LI : 2/18/2020 11:33 am : link
If he didn't have to sit out this year, this season would have been very different.
RE: It's true that admission standards are different for athletes  
Jim from Katonah : 2/18/2020 11:46 am : link
In comment 14813195 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
than ordinary students. It's not true, however, that they don't vary from school to school. Part of what sunk Al Groh at UVA was that he kept recruiting players who were great football players but who never stood a chance in hell of actually being admitted. He had some very good classes, especially in his early years, but they always ended up underwhelming because every one of them would have multiple academic casualties who never suited up. I'm sure the same is true at some other schools like Stanford and Notre Dame. Doesn't mean that they have to meet the same standards of the student body in general, though, not arguing that.


Yeah, maybe my blanket statement went too far. Yes, I would agree that UVA over the years likely had much higher standards than say, Oklahoma State or something. In my (antecdotal) experience in fact, UVA has always had some of the highest standards of “major” college teams.

That said ... I’m sure you know how hard it is to get into UVA these days. It’s ... crazy hard. 99th percentile hard. Same thing for UNC out-of-state, which my does-three-hours-of-homework-a-night daughter just got into (likely with the help I’m sure of alumni preference) when other kids that got into Ivies didn’t. Maybe UVA has continued the Groh tough standards .., but even these enhanced standards leave the vast majority of the UVA revenue sports kids way behind to start ... add in 40 hours plus per week of prep, play, and travel, and you’d have to be pretty remarkable to compete on the same terms as the non-athlete.

Doesn’t it make you wonder sometimes what the point of it is? I’m pretty good at repressing it, but athletics are a world within a world. And it especially kills me when a guy like Coach K waxes poetic on student athletes when he’s figuring out ways to beat the system with the Marvin Bagleys.
RE: It's true that admission standards are different for athletes  
Jim from Katonah : 2/18/2020 11:55 am : link
In comment 14813195 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
than ordinary students. It's not true, however, that they don't vary from school to school. Part of what sunk Al Groh at UVA was that he kept recruiting players who were great football players but who never stood a chance in hell of actually being admitted. He had some very good classes, especially in his early years, but they always ended up underwhelming because every one of them would have multiple academic casualties who never suited up. I'm sure the same is true at some other schools like Stanford and Notre Dame. Doesn't mean that they have to meet the same standards of the student body in general, though, not arguing that.


I just googled college sports admissions and saw an article in US News and World Report from 2008. UVA had among the best stats for football teams, with their players averaging a 980 on their SATs. That’s great, I see how alumni can feel a bit better than at some schools ... but it’s still WAY lower than the rest of the student body. Add in their full-time job as football players, and it’s pretty much a sub-college within a college.
Unfortunately the problem goes way beyond admissions standards ...  
Spider56 : 2/18/2020 1:06 pm : link
When you look at the academic scandal that went on at UNC and how that was essentially swept under the rug without significant penalties to any of the revenue producing sports.
RE: Unfortunately the problem goes way beyond admissions standards ...  
Jim from Katonah : 2/18/2020 1:12 pm : link
In comment 14813348 Spider56 said:
Quote:
When you look at the academic scandal that went on at UNC and how that was essentially swept under the rug without significant penalties to any of the revenue producing sports.


I agree with you. They should have been hammered.
UNC also signed McDonald All American  
Bingo : 2/19/2020 8:31 am : link
RJ Davis from Stepinac in White Plains. He also has a 3.8 gpa.
Just in the NC/VA..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/19/2020 8:40 am : link
area alone last season, the NCAA had power to deny a player's request to transfer without losing a year of eligibility to be closer to his mother fighting cancer, but yet claimed they didn't have the power to take action in the UNC fake class scandal.

Their hypocrisy is off the charts. And that's not even listing the petty shit they've done where they strip eligibility from someone who shows up in a calendar that is sold for a fundraiser and things like that. Meanwhile, an institution of higher learning oversaw academic fraud and that's something they can't step in on?
FMIC  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 2/19/2020 8:51 am : link
I don't think anybody would argue that the NCAA isn't a complete joke.
RE: FMIC  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/19/2020 8:55 am : link
In comment 14813809 SFGFNCGiantsFan said:
Quote:
I don't think anybody would argue that the NCAA isn't a complete joke.


Oh, I know I'm preaching to the choir, but it is so damn maddening that UNC provided a blueprint on how to fend off the NCAA no matter how bad the situation - get a team of high-priced lawyers who threaten to tie things up in litigation for years.

Meanwhile, watching the SU-Duke game a couple weeks ago I realized they still have 101 wins taken away from Jim Boeheim while the rat-faced fuck on the other side is the all-time wins leader.
RE: Just in the NC/VA..  
Jim from Katonah : 2/19/2020 8:58 am : link
In comment 14813802 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
area alone last season, the NCAA had power to deny a player's request to transfer without losing a year of eligibility to be closer to his mother fighting cancer, but yet claimed they didn't have the power to take action in the UNC fake class scandal.

Their hypocrisy is off the charts. And that's not even listing the petty shit they've done where they strip eligibility from someone who shows up in a calendar that is sold for a fundraiser and things like that. Meanwhile, an institution of higher learning oversaw academic fraud and that's something they can't step in on?


What bums me out about the whole thing is that UNC didn’t need to do this crap, they already have every advantage, amazing funding, great reputation, were in the catbird seat. Guess it was just greed, hubris, whatever. Sheesh.
RE: RE: FMIC  
Greg from LI : 2/19/2020 8:59 am : link
In comment 14813813 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
Meanwhile, watching the SU-Duke game a couple weeks ago I realized they still have 101 wins taken away from Jim Boeheim while the rat-faced fuck on the other side is the all-time wins leader.


Well, look, there are many advantages to being the Prince of Darkness....
What happened  
MookGiants : 2/19/2020 9:48 am : link
with the academic thing was not right by any stretch, but as far as the NCAA goes, they didn't decide to go away because UNC was ready to fight it in court for years. The NCAA knew they would lose in court. Jay Bilas covered this very well while it was going on. Just because they would lose in court doesnt mean what happened was fine or anything, but the NCAA could not do anything about it as far as a punishment goes.

The idea that UNC wasn't punished at all is absurd though. The NCAA dragged this out for a long time and I believe they did because they knew thats the only way they could punish UNC. Which is fine, they deserved something but the idea that they got off with nothing isnt true. The black cloud hanging over the program for multiple years and the inability to even get the top recruits to visit during those years was the punishment. And this year is part of the punishment, the junior and seniors on this team suck, the Plateks and Robinsons and Manley's/Huffmans of the world never even get an offer from UNC without the academic scandal.

It's just been one of those years. Cole missed most of the season and now he's back but the season was already in the shitter and the Duke game took all the steam out of their sails.

The grad transfers have been busts too although Keeling is playing better recently.

Anything that can go wrong has gone wrong this year. Injuries, bad luck, poor play, poor coaching, everything.

They are dreadful from 3 and are dreadful from the free throw line. That's not a winning combination is todays game
RE: Just in the NC/VA..  
MookGiants : 2/19/2020 9:51 am : link
In comment 14813802 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
area alone last season, the NCAA had power to deny a player's request to transfer without losing a year of eligibility to be closer to his mother fighting cancer, but yet claimed they didn't have the power to take action in the UNC fake class scandal.

Their hypocrisy is off the charts. And that's not even listing the petty shit they've done where they strip eligibility from someone who shows up in a calendar that is sold for a fundraiser and things like that. Meanwhile, an institution of higher learning oversaw academic fraud and that's something they can't step in on?


They clearly did not have the power to take action against UNC. Whether or not you agree with it is a different story. But they would have been crushed in court if they did anything
I'm a UVA fan  
PaulBlakeTSU : 2/19/2020 1:06 pm : link
UNC not being punished pisses me off, but I always liked the school and I do like Roy Williams.

I can't remember a team seemingly having worse luck in so many big games as UNC has had this year.

I guess it's better to have all that bad luck in one year than spread out, but boy, it has to be absolutely brutal this year for a tarheel fan.
Back to the Corner