for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

The Giants failed in FA. What to do?

BillT : 3/24/2020 10:02 am
With FA basically over, the Giants have not accomplished what they set out to do. DG said two important things in his combine press conference. First, that they want to use FA to get enough players so they can pick BPA in the draft.

Second, that “Last time I checked it’s really difficult to complete a pass when you’re on your back.” Or in other words our current OL isn’t adequate. Well, at the moment Solder, Fleming and Pulley (Gates?) are all likely starters on the OL. If that is true then they haven’t used FA to get enough players so they can pick BPA in the draft.

Now, to be fair I never thought they could accomplish getting enough players in FA so they could pick BPA in the draft. There were far too many needs and only certain players are available in FA

So, given that you can rarely count on any draft choice past the 2nd round to become an immediate starter, what does that mean for the draft. Are you comfortable with Solder, Fleming and Pulley (Gates?). Can they pass on a tackle in the 1st and a center in the 2nd.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
....  
BleedBlue : 3/24/2020 10:04 am : link
i dont think they failed at all Bill.

We cant sign everyone and there werent many OL available that are worth the money. I think we were always going to make this an OL heavy draft and im fine with that
IMO I think the Giants taking a tackle in rd 1 is a known quantity  
Jim in Forest Hills : 3/24/2020 10:06 am : link
at this point. As in insiders would be surprised if it didnt happen.

For me, it's whether DG will/can trade down and still pick up the OT of his preference (same grade) or will he stay at 4 to pick "his guy."
RE: ....  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:06 am : link
In comment 14847940 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
i dont think they failed at all Bill.

We cant sign everyone and there werent many OL available that are worth the money. I think we were always going to make this an OL heavy draft and im fine with that

So OLs 1 and 2 even if they're not "BPA".
Failed? They did fantastic!  
Saquads26 : 3/24/2020 10:07 am : link
So glad to have Judge on board, what a smart man. Great offseason so far.
I'm not impressed  
JerryNicklebag : 3/24/2020 10:07 am : link
With any of the FA pickups outside of Bradberry.

I also fully expect to be disappointed after the first round of the draft.
RE: RE: ....  
BleedBlue : 3/24/2020 10:08 am : link
In comment 14847943 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 14847940 BleedBlue said:


Quote:


i dont think they failed at all Bill.

We cant sign everyone and there werent many OL available that are worth the money. I think we were always going to make this an OL heavy draft and im fine with that


So OLs 1 and 2 even if they're not "BPA".


they may go BPA but Bill you cant shop hungry right? we cant force it if the OL talent isnt there in FA....
I think we did fine to date.  
Big Blue '56 : 3/24/2020 10:09 am : link
Nothing sexy, but positive, imo
RE: RE: RE: ....  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:10 am : link
In comment 14847946 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 14847943 BillT said:


Quote:


In comment 14847940 BleedBlue said:


Quote:


i dont think they failed at all Bill.

We cant sign everyone and there werent many OL available that are worth the money. I think we were always going to make this an OL heavy draft and im fine with that


So OLs 1 and 2 even if they're not "BPA".



they may go BPA but Bill you cant shop hungry right? we cant force it if the OL talent isnt there in FA....

Agree, but that doesn't answer the question. Stay with who we have on the OL or draft OLs no matter what.
OL  
Mike in NY : 3/24/2020 10:11 am : link
Which ones signed were worth their contracts? If we didn't sign Martinez or Bradberry instead offered big money to Vaitai and others the lament would be we would have to take Simmons or Okudah even if they were not BPA. The Giants had far too many needs than could be addressed in one Free Agency period. Would I have liked Martinez for a little less per season, yes, but if you add that difference to Flemings salary it was not getting us a better OL in Free Agency.
Supply and Demand  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:11 am : link
There were precious few OL and Edge answers available via UFA, and the top guys were tagged or wicked expensive.

The bottom line is this roster is not a one offseason fix, you've got to look further down the line in terms of finished product. It is quite possible the 2020 Giants return some players who won't be here in 2021, just because they need to field a team in 2020.

I hope they won't force OL picks in the draft, but it's quite possible they could because a number of jobs are a stake.
RE: IMO I think the Giants taking a tackle in rd 1 is a known quantity  
Reale01 : 3/24/2020 10:13 am : link
In comment 14847941 Jim in Forest Hills said:
Quote:
at this point. As in insiders would be surprised if it didnt happen.

For me, it's whether DG will/can trade down and still pick up the OT of his preference (same grade) or will he stay at 4 to pick "his guy."


Exactly what I think will happen as well.
RE: Supply and Demand  
BleedBlue : 3/24/2020 10:14 am : link
In comment 14847953 JonC said:
Quote:
There were precious few OL and Edge answers available via UFA, and the top guys were tagged or wicked expensive.

The bottom line is this roster is not a one offseason fix, you've got to look further down the line in terms of finished product. It is quite possible the 2020 Giants return some players who won't be here in 2021, just because they need to field a team in 2020.

I hope they won't force OL picks in the draft, but it's quite possible they could because a number of jobs are a stake.


I agree, but to this point and to address bill

picking becton or wills at 4 isnt forcing anything. they are ranked near there. taking a center at 4 is forcing a pick because there arent any ranked THAT highly

so sure, could they go OL over simmons when they have simmons 4 and the OT 6 or whatever...sure but thats not really forcing picks. thats where need meets BPA. lucky for us, i think #4 is a great spot to go OT as need does come close to meeting BPA
Prepare for another lost season.  
The_Boss : 3/24/2020 10:14 am : link
I’m ready. Are you?
"Stay with who we have on the OL or draft OLs no matter what"  
Torrag : 3/24/2020 10:15 am : link
They won't have to force anything. There are OT worthy of the #4 pick straight up. Also OC/OT worthy of the #36 pick. And OC worthy of the #99 pick.



and after the first round is over  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:15 am : link
and DG speaks to the media, the player will have been the highest prospect on their board either way.
RE: Supply and Demand  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:15 am : link
In comment 14847953 JonC said:
Quote:
There were precious few OL and Edge answers available via UFA, and the top guys were tagged or wicked expensive.

The bottom line is this roster is not a one offseason fix, you've got to look further down the line in terms of finished product. It is quite possible the 2020 Giants return some players who won't be here in 2021, just because they need to field a team in 2020.

I hope they won't force OL picks in the draft, but it's quite possible they could because a number of jobs are a stake.

Exactly. I think they'll take OLs at the top of the draft. Can't see an alternative.
RE:  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:16 am : link
In comment 14847960 Torrag said:
Quote:
They won't have to force anything. There are OT worthy of the #4 pick straight up. Also OC/OT worthy of the #36 pick. And OC worthy of the #99 pick.

Don't tell the Simmons folks that.
The Giants have handled free agency well IMO  
mfsd : 3/24/2020 10:16 am : link
I love the Bradberry signing...the others are eh, TBD, but we didn’t give out any ridiculous Solder contracts this time around.

I would have liked to see us sign Bulaga or Conklin to play RT, but they both had some question marks and other aggressive suitors
"player will have been the highest prospect on their board either way"  
Torrag : 3/24/2020 10:17 am : link
They always are eh? Haha.
Saying success or failure  
crick n NC : 3/24/2020 10:17 am : link
In free agency right now is extremely short sighted. The lack of wait and see philosophy for situations that deem that approach is a bit frustrating.
Don't tell the Simmons folks that.  
Torrag : 3/24/2020 10:17 am : link
Who cares what they think.
BillT  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/24/2020 10:17 am : link
This isn't revisionist history on my part because I've said the same thing for years.

This team is in bad shape. It is not a few players away. The worst thing they could have done - which they have done in recent years - is spend future cap room on overrated unrestricted free agents (they are almost ALL overrated now).

The best way to build a team is to draft well, re-sign the right draft picks on their second deals, and sprinkle in smart, non-cap destroying free agents.

Spoiler alert.... the Giants aren't going to the Super Bowl in 2020. And they probably aren't going to the playoffs. The fact that Judge can't even bring his team together in April is a terrible situation for a new coach too.
Is this a serious post ?  
Spider56 : 3/24/2020 10:18 am : link
You can judge this FA period in the fall ... not now.
Some of you guys are so predictably miserable..  
bLiTz 2k : 3/24/2020 10:18 am : link
That no matter what they do it would be a failure.

If they mortgaged the future on high priced names at Edge and Tackle there would be just as many threads calling it a failure.

(Yes I get it...the Giants have been bad, they only warrant pessimism blah blah). If everything they do is gonna draw the ire of fans, why do they even engage in off-season discussions? It's mind boggling.
RE:  
BleedBlue : 3/24/2020 10:18 am : link
In comment 14847965 Torrag said:
Quote:
They always are eh? Haha.


exactly. a GM will NEVER say he wasnt highest on our board lol

why would they do that to their newest player? why would they let any info about how they do business out? the PC answer is always, we love him, he is the highest on our board
Eric  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:19 am : link
well said.
It makes perfect sense to take a Tackle at the top of the draft  
Chip : 3/24/2020 10:19 am : link
It allows the Giants to release Solder next season. Also, LT make more money than LB and DB. I like what they have done.
RE: BillT  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:23 am : link
In comment 14847969 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
This isn't revisionist history on my part because I've said the same thing for years.

This team is in bad shape. It is not a few players away. The worst thing they could have done - which they have done in recent years - is spend future cap room on overrated unrestricted free agents (they are almost ALL overrated now).

The best way to build a team is to draft well, re-sign the right draft picks on their second deals, and sprinkle in smart, non-cap destroying free agents.

Spoiler alert.... the Giants aren't going to the Super Bowl in 2020. And they probably aren't going to the playoffs. The fact that Judge can't even bring his team together in April is a terrible situation for a new coach too.

Couldn't agree more. They would have been in a tough spot no matter how FA went as I said. But the OL seemed a priority based on what DG said and that's what is left undone. With Jones and Barkley I can't see how it can't be left as is.
RE: It makes perfect sense to take a Tackle at the top of the draft  
The_Boss : 3/24/2020 10:24 am : link
In comment 14847978 Chip said:
Quote:
It allows the Giants to release Solder next season. Also, LT make more money than LB and DB. I like what they have done.


Be ahead of the game: Penei Sewell. Will be a top 3-5 pick next year. Chances are the 2020 NYG will be in the running for him. Yes, I think we’re gonna be top 5 bad again this year.
RE: RE:  
aGiantGuy : 3/24/2020 10:26 am : link
In comment 14847975 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 14847965 Torrag said:


Quote:


They always are eh? Haha.



exactly. a GM will NEVER say he wasnt highest on our board lol

why would they do that to their newest player? why would they let any info about how they do business out? the PC answer is always, we love him, he is the highest on our board


He actually said Jones had the same grade as Allen though...
If their plan is aligned  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:27 am : link
they need two tackles, and a C, and swing interior OL in the pipeline.
Was going to make a couple comments  
Biteymax22 : 3/24/2020 10:27 am : link
But Eric beat me to 90% of them, they're not going to the Super Bowl this year and hopefully Judge has talked sense into the organization as to how to build for sustained success.

The other point I was going to make is regarding the draft vs FA. Believe me, teams take a hard look as to what is available in the draft before making FA decision. With this years tackle and C class, I would not be shocked if they felt comfortable finding contributors in the 3rd or 4th round this year. Not the case for MLB where really only 2 players can be looked at as starters in the draft. CB has a big fall off after Okudah.

As for the pass rush, yes having a big name guy is a huge advantage, but sacks are a team effort. Bringing in Clowney to face a triple team is worthless if your other players can't get there. They are obviously taking the approach of building a base on defense before making the big splash. This is the right approach.
RE: and after the first round is over  
joeinpa : 3/24/2020 10:28 am : link
In comment 14847961 JonC said:
Quote:
and DG speaks to the media, the player will have been the highest prospect on their board either way.


Always. I laugh at the BPA mantra. Maybe I m wrong though. Maybe the Giants are just lucky enough each year that when their turn comes in the draft, the BPA just happens to be a position of need.
BillT  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/24/2020 10:32 am : link
They aren't done with the OL, probably in free agency too.

But the Nate Solder contract is a warning. His signing was a disaster for the team. Throwing money at a problem is usually the smart way to fix something. The guy had never been to a Pro Bowl... not even close... and they made him the highest paid OL in football.
We are all Giants focus and Yes, they have plenty of flaws  
George from PA : 3/24/2020 10:32 am : link
But who doesn't ?

Dallas has gotten weaker.

The Eagles might be team to beat...but I feel we are getting closer...

So I will not have definitive declaration....

yes, the Giants have too many holes to fill in FA. A new staff under current condition is an added hurdle....but we are getting better....we have gotten closer to Dallas and Philadelphia...so who knows.

Let hope.the draft is a home run
Bill  
ZogZerg : 3/24/2020 10:33 am : link
Giants are drafting the top tackle on their board.
He will be an immediate starter at one of the Tackle spots.

If they signed JC, you are paying huge money for both tackles and the guy you drafted doesn't have a spot. If you miss out on the top tackle, then who plays LT next year or the year after?

Center is certainly a glaring hole. Not sure what the plan is there.
should read  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 3/24/2020 10:33 am : link
not the smart way
RE: If their plan is aligned  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:33 am : link
In comment 14847988 JonC said:
Quote:
they need two tackles, and a C, and swing interior OL in the pipeline.

Which would probably take a cluster draft with 3 OL in say the first 4(?) rounds. I'm ok with that.
was not a failure  
Dankbeerman : 3/24/2020 10:34 am : link
they clearly valued Bradberry and Martinez and went after them aggressively and signed them. You may not place the same value on them but cant grade the moves until they play.

Fackrel and Fleming provide coverage in areas which we will be adding to in the draft.

CB and LB are not the needs they were before FA and edge and Tackle were always gonna need to be doubled up on.

They clearly determined there was better talent at OT and Edge in the draft then FA.

Only thing not addressed at all has been C.

and BPA being a tackle when there are 4 going top 11 is not a stretch.
RE: and after the first round is over  
BMac : 3/24/2020 10:35 am : link
In comment 14847961 JonC said:
Quote:
and DG speaks to the media, the player will have been the highest prospect on their board either way.


Has any GM anywhere ever said, "Well we had him ranked lower on our board, but we needed X position so we took him?" I think not.
RE: Bill  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:35 am : link
In comment 14848007 ZogZerg said:
Quote:
Giants are drafting the top tackle on their board.
He will be an immediate starter at one of the Tackle spots.

If they signed JC, you are paying huge money for both tackles and the guy you drafted doesn't have a spot. If you miss out on the top tackle, then who plays LT next year or the year after?

Center is certainly a glaring hole. Not sure what the plan is there.

Exactly what I hope for and I think will happen.
Completely disagree with the OP premise. You fill holes as best you  
Victor in CT : 3/24/2020 10:36 am : link
can in FA without overpaying a la Solder. The rest you do in the draft. You can't build a team in FA
In regards to C  
aGiantGuy : 3/24/2020 10:39 am : link
I can see them being comfortable with any of the top 4 centers in the draft as long as there is value. 2nd- Ruiz 3rd- Biadasz 4th- Cushenberry 5th- Hennessy. They have a lot of options.
RE: BillT  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:40 am : link
In comment 14848004 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
They aren't done with the OL, probably in free agency too.

But the Nate Solder contract is a warning. His signing was a disaster for the team. Throwing money at a problem is usually the smart way to fix something. The guy had never been to a Pro Bowl... not even close... and they made him the highest paid OL in football.

You're preaching to the choir Eric but there isn't starting OL talent left in FA that I can see so I think drafting OL early ad often is the only solution.
RE: RE: If their plan is aligned  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:41 am : link
In comment 14848010 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 14847988 JonC said:


Quote:


they need two tackles, and a C, and swing interior OL in the pipeline.


Which would probably take a cluster draft with 3 OL in say the first 4(?) rounds. I'm ok with that.


It doesn't have to be all done in this draft, that's the short view mistake. Fans look at the season at hand, but building a roster requires a long view beyond 2020.
With a brand new coaching staff  
M.S. : 3/24/2020 10:41 am : link

The Giants are in Year One of their re-build.

That means:

(1) Go gentle with Free Agency;
(2) The Draft means everything;

The Giants have accomplished #1.
RE: RE: and after the first round is over  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:42 am : link
In comment 14848012 BMac said:
Quote:
In comment 14847961 JonC said:


Quote:


and DG speaks to the media, the player will have been the highest prospect on their board either way.



Has any GM anywhere ever said, "Well we had him ranked lower on our board, but we needed X position so we took him?" I think not.


That's what I was saying.
RE: Completely disagree with the OP premise. You fill holes as best you  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:42 am : link
In comment 14848014 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
can in FA without overpaying a la Solder. The rest you do in the draft. You can't build a team in FA

Never said you could build a team in FA. Just quoted our GM on his perspective and what he said was his priority.
RE: RE: RE: If their plan is aligned  
BillT : 3/24/2020 10:45 am : link
In comment 14848021 JonC said:
Quote:
In comment 14848010 BillT said:


Quote:


In comment 14847988 JonC said:


Quote:


they need two tackles, and a C, and swing interior OL in the pipeline.


Which would probably take a cluster draft with 3 OL in say the first 4(?) rounds. I'm ok with that.



It doesn't have to be all done in this draft, that's the short view mistake. Fans look at the season at hand, but building a roster requires a long view beyond 2020.

Absolutely Jon but are you trotting out Jones and Barkley behind the current OL. I think they have to make a significant improvement or Jones and Barkley will suffer and that'snot acceptable.
GM has to deliver a msg to the fan base  
JonC : 3/24/2020 10:45 am : link
which hits the right notes and inspires confidence and optimism ... but, there's no guarantee the supply will match up with demand, and it has not entirely. Watch what adults do, not what they say, as Bill2 would astutely point out.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner