for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Making Sense of the Giants and #4 Pick (Sorry For Length)

ASK777 : 3/28/2020 11:19 am
In reading Burying The Ghosts – The 1986 New York Giants post on BBI, I could not help but focus on the section detailing the Giants selection of six defensive players in a row in the first three rounds of the 1986 draft. As a high school senior, I remember being surprised especially after the Bears blanked the Giants in the playoffs and wondering if the Giants had enough offense to beat the Bears. However, I trusted George Young because of how right he was in retrospect when he selected Carl Banks as the 3rd pick of the 1984 draft despite already having two elite linebackers in LT and Carson along with other linebackers Andy Headen, Byron Hunt and Robbie Jones on the roster. The point is that the GM had a consistent philosophy of drafting the Best Player Available (BPA) and hardly ever deviated from this approach no matter what other needs the team had. After all, the best football teams maintain their stature in large part because of this drafting approach and do not deviate from it. Teams such as New England, Pittsburgh and Baltimore are excellent examples of this approach.

When the Giants have deviated from selecting the BPA for need, the results have not been good. Think of previous 1st round selections such as Luke Petitgout, William Joseph (the 10th DT/DE taken in the 1st round), Aaron Ross (guy was 25 years old), Justin Pugh (5th OT taken in the first 19 picks – where we learned all about short arms for an OT) and Ereck Flowers—all picks that were considered reaches but were made because it was more about need. Even George Young got burned with sacrificing BPA for need when he selected OG Eric Moore in 1988 with the 10th pick. Moore was a decent player but was not projected to go that high and his career reflected that he was not worth the 10th pick. In fairness, when the Giants have selected the BPA these past 20 years, it has been a mixed bag (success – Jeremy Shockey, Eli Manning, Hakeem Nicks, JPP, OBJ, Saquon Barkley; decent: Mattias Kiwanuka; injury/disappointment: Kenny Phillips, Prince Amukamara, David Wilson, Eli Apple, Evan Engram) but that can be considered acceptable because it is a consistent approach and the team obviously had some success with these selections. Plus, we can see why they selected a player who got hurt like Phillips and wonder how good a player he may have turned out to be. Even Amukamara played productively in the league once he stayed healthy after leaving the Giants.

In 2018, Gettleman and ownership stupidly thought this team could compete with Manning and selected Barkley. Barkley is a tremendous talent but considering the lifespan of a running back (very few manage to be great in a second contract much less make it to a second contract), the value of the 2nd overall pick and a realistic take of the franchise at that time, the Barkley pick was not a prudent one. If Gettleman could go back to the 2018 NFL draft knowing what he knows now about the Giants needing a full rebuild, do you think he drafts Barkley? Not saying he drafts one of those quarterbacks but perhaps he would have drafted Bradley Chubb or traded down to select Quenton Nelson. That mistake in assessing the status of the Giants was quickly acknowledged the following offseason with the trading of Beckham (among other players) and the selecting of Daniel Jones. Jury is still out on Jones but he showed enough promise this first year. However, the Giants did compromise their 2019 draft board by selecting Jones over Josh Allen because Jones could not have been on the same tier as Allen but the Giants justified the pick by saying it was close and the need at quarterback warranted the pick.

So that takes us to this year’s draft and this General Manager’s approach to the 4th pick. Yes, the Giants have a distinct need at OT especially if they think this is Nate Solder’s last year as LT and they have no faith that Cam Fleming or Nick Gates can be starting RTs this year. However, the Giants have a distinct need for an impact defensive player. This team does not have one impact defensive player on the roster and the team is lacking in overall team speed on defense. Will they ever be able to cover a tight end?

Drafts are made of tiers and this draft is no different. It is widely viewed that the 1st Tier has Chase Young and Joe Burrow on it with Jeffrey Okudah, Isaiah Simmons, Derrick Brown and Tua Tagovailoa on the 2nd Tier. None of the four tackles (Tristan Wirfs, Mekhi Becton, Andrew Thomas and Jedrick Willis) are considered on that 2nd Tier. In fact, none of these four tackles would be on the level of the lineman taking in the top 6 in the past 5 drafts (Brandon Scherff, Ronnie Stanley, Laremy Tunsil (would have been picked in top 6 but fell for other reasons) or Nelson). Perhaps, these OTs are on the same level as Jack Conklin or Michael McGlinchey who were both picked 9th in their respective drafts but as we know, being picked 9th in a draft is much different than being picked 4th, value wise.

Here are the scenarios:

• Giants be consistent to their board (and yes, nobody knows their board) and take a player like Simmons or even Okudah/Brown, players that are widely regarded better than any of these OTs

• Giants reach at 4 and select one of these OTs

• Giants are able to find a suitable trade partner, move down and appropriately select one of these OTs at the lower draft position

I clearly would be a proponent of the first and third option. The funny thing is that if Young were to slip to 4, everybody would say that the Giants should forego the OT need and select Young because he is the best player available. Wouldn’t the same argument hold true about Simmons if the Redskins drafted Young and Simmons was available at 4? I guess people who want an OT would argue that Simmons is overrated because he is position-less or the gap between Simmons and these OTs is slim at best. It still does not change the fact that none of these OTs are worth the 4th pick.

One final note – In reviewing his past moves in order to gain some insight on how he will approach this selection, please note the following when it comes to Gettleman:

• He has never traded down. Yes, that is true but here is the other thing he has never done: he has never taken an offensive lineman in the 1st round.

• Gettleman has a history of building offensive lines in rounds 2 through 7 and undrafted free agents

• Gettleman did draft Shaq Thompson in the 1st round, a comparable hybrid player to Simmons

My hope is that Joe Judge has significant influence on this organization and his loud statements about position versatility at his press conference (i.e. Simmons) will result in the Giants not reaching for need at the 4th pick.

But these are our current Giants and the one thing that makes sense is that the Giants do not make sense when it comes to not having a consistent approach. I can still be hopeful in this difficult and crazy time.
Shaq  
UGADawgs7 : 3/28/2020 11:40 am : link
Shaq Thompson is 6 feet and played in college 228, bulked up 2lb and plays at 6 feet 230. Simmons is taller and only has 8 lbs on him. Thompson is a much more physical player than Simmons is, and I think that plays a huge part in his success. Also, Thompson I believe was 25th overall draft pick. Murray/Baun may be in that conversation in 3 years about a steal who should have been a top 15 pick if it was a re-draft.
Personally don’t think Simmons has the lateral quickness that Thompson and others in this draft Murray, Baun, Gauthier maybe even Chinn have. Simmons has that straight line speed but won’t be a major thing in the next level. Can see Wills, Wirfs possibly being pro bowl caliber players at LT/RT/RG at the next level. I see Wirfs as a tackle who would move to Guard once Zietler leaves if taken by Giants.
I definitely agree that trading down a few spots could be the best case scenario if it means getting the desired tackle.
Your message is simple  
Des51 : 3/28/2020 11:44 am : link
You want the Giants to draft the BPA at whatever position they wind up at in the 1st round. Howeveer you contradict yourselve, when the Giants did draft the best player in the whole 2018 draft, you find fault with it.
You say it's a widely held veiw that no OT is worth pick 4 and that none is in tier 1. Well Dave-Te' has Wirfs as his 4th best player in the draft, Brown is rated 4th and QB Burrow is not even in his top 50. Yes he has Simmons 1st, Young 2nd and Okudah 3rd.
Correctio on the above post  
Des51 : 3/28/2020 11:47 am : link
DT Brown is ranked 9th and view not veiw.
It all depends on the board, and there is a lot of opinions!  
edavisiii : 3/28/2020 11:58 am : link
Dave T has Simmons #1 on his board over Chase Young at #2. Wirfs, despite his few flaws is #4 on Dave's board. Wirfs is real Young and he is probably going to grow and get better technique as he matures. So, who knows? I still think Solder will play better with the new staff. RTs and Centers can be had in the later rounds. Fleming sucked as a LT in Dallas, but he never was a starting LT. In NE he played well as a RT and I think her will be an upgrade over Remmers. I don't think Remmers had fully recovered from his back surgery. I'd be happy with Simmons but I would also be happy with a Tackle. Besides, what if Young and Simmons are 1,2 on Wash and Det's boards? They will both be gone at 4!
Good points about DG’s tendencies and past history. This is where you  
Ivan15 : 3/28/2020 12:01 pm : link
really have to trust the a Giants FO and scouting to properly rank players. One of GY’s problems was overvaluing some positions. That is how FBs and TEs were drafted too high.

For sure, no matter how the draft develops, BBI will melt down. It will continue for months until we start seeing football again.
I see some reports and scenario's that 4 OT can go in the first  
PatersonPlank : 3/28/2020 12:05 pm : link
12 picks. I've also seen OT's listed in the top 5 BPA (some Wills some Wirfs).

If there are players listed in the top 10 players then they are certainly in play for us at #4. You can't be too fine grain about this. If the guy you like is #9 you take him. Its not realistic to say well lets trade down to #9 because he may go earlier, and you may not have a trading partner. Plus BPA isn't real either. What if Burrows falls to us at #4, do we take him? I would guess no.
Taking Brown would not improve us all that much, if at all  
Bob in Newburgh : 3/28/2020 12:21 pm : link
Fine with Simmons if Judge really wants him and has a plan (subject to camp revision of course) as to how to use him. Would then try to eliminate future need at RT or C with #2.

If going all in at OT, it would demonstrate mediocrity or worse on DG's part if he did not at least attempt to trade down, being willing to go as far as #9 to pick up a high 2nd in 2020.
RE: Your message is simple  
Chocco : 3/28/2020 12:39 pm : link
In comment 14852198 Des51 said:
Quote:
You want the Giants to draft the BPA at whatever position they wind up at in the 1st round. Howeveer you contradict yourselve, when the Giants did draft the best player in the whole 2018 draft, you find fault with it.
You say it's a widely held veiw that no OT is worth pick 4 and that none is in tier 1. Well Dave-Te' has Wirfs as his 4th best player in the draft, Brown is rated 4th and QB Burrow is not even in his top 50. Yes he has Simmons 1st, Young 2nd and Okudah 3rd.

That's why it doesn't make sense to never trade down ( or up) if you draft true BPA. Trading gives you the flexibility to Pick BPA at a position more needed. By adding compensation through a trade you are able to get a position more of need and not reach for a player devaluing your original pick.
ASK - good OP but too much of it all falls apart  
LBH15 : 3/28/2020 12:40 pm : link
when you suggest that these OTs are not in the top tier. That is like suggesting the mock drafts know what they are doing AND have insight into 32 teams draft boards. And you and they don't.

I have asked before and will again...tell me why one/any of these OTs may not also be the BPA at #4?

Simply put, BPA doesn't have to be a guy who's name is found in a box score.
RE: Good points about DG’s tendencies and past history. This is where you  
Reb8thVA : 3/28/2020 12:45 pm : link
In comment 14852218 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
really have to trust the a Giants FO and scouting to properly rank players. One of GY’s problems was overvaluing some positions. That is how FBs and TEs were drafted too high.

For sure, no matter how the draft develops, BBI will melt down. It will continue for months until we start seeing football again.


Sounds more like Jerry Reese
Tiers  
LBH15 : 3/28/2020 12:52 pm : link
What I am trying to suggest is that it may very well be that the tiering this year based on true prospective talent is something like this:

Tier 1: Burrow, Young
Tier 2: about 12 different players (including several OTs)

Can anyone find any major ranking provider  
twostepgiants : 3/28/2020 12:57 pm : link
Or scout?

That actually grades one of these OL over Simmons?

In particular, Whirfs?

I haven’t. Not one

NFL.com lists Simmons as #3 overall and Whirfs as the 4th OL and 21st overall. That’s not saying that’s definitive but just an example.
RE: Can anyone find any major ranking provider  
BillT : 3/28/2020 1:30 pm : link
In comment 14852269 twostepgiants said:
Quote:
Or scout?

That actually grades one of these OL over Simmons?

In particular, Whirfs?

I haven’t. Not one

NFL.com lists Simmons as #3 overall and Whirfs as the 4th OL and 21st overall. That’s not saying that’s definitive but just an example.

Positional value counts as well. Don't see Simmons position (whatever that is) with the value of a top OLT. Maybe that's just me.
twostep  
LeonBright45 : 3/28/2020 1:54 pm : link
Go check Walter's and Great Blue North
RE: twostep  
twostepgiants : 3/28/2020 2:40 pm : link
In comment 14852325 LeonBright45 said:
Quote:
Go check Walter's and Great Blue North


Thanks. Becton ranks higher
RE: Tiers  
FStubbs : 3/28/2020 6:36 pm : link
In comment 14852262 LBH15 said:
Quote:
What I am trying to suggest is that it may very well be that the tiering this year based on true prospective talent is something like this:

Tier 1: Burrow, Young
Tier 2: about 12 different players (including several OTs)


This seems more accurate. These offensive linemen seem pretty good to my untrained eyes. And if Simmons was that dynamic of a player, Detroit would grab him at #3 anyway.
RE: Shaq  
section125 : 3/28/2020 7:36 pm : link
In comment 14852195 UGADawgs7 said:
Quote:
Shaq Thompson is 6 feet and played in college 228, bulked up 2lb and plays at 6 feet 230. Simmons is taller and only has 8 lbs on him. Thompson is a much more physical player than Simmons is, and I think that plays a huge part in his success. Also, Thompson I believe was 25th overall draft pick. Murray/Baun may be in that conversation in 3 years about a steal who should have been a top 15 pick if it was a re-draft.
Personally don’t think Simmons has the lateral quickness that Thompson and others in this draft Murray, Baun, Gauthier maybe even Chinn have. Simmons has that straight line speed but won’t be a major thing in the next level. Can see Wills, Wirfs possibly being pro bowl caliber players at LT/RT/RG at the next level. I see Wirfs as a tackle who would move to Guard once Zietler leaves if taken by Giants.
I definitely agree that trading down a few spots could be the best case scenario if it means getting the desired tackle.


You don't think Simmons has the lateral quickness of the other LBs in the draft? You obviously have never see him play. He has the speed of a CB with the size of a LB.

He may not be physical enough or have the mental make up to play LB, but he certainly can play sideline to sideline.
RE: Can anyone find any major ranking provider  
PatersonPlank : 3/28/2020 7:50 pm : link
In comment 14852269 twostepgiants said:
Quote:
Or scout?

That actually grades one of these OL over Simmons?

In particular, Whirfs?

I haven’t. Not one

NFL.com lists Simmons as #3 overall and Whirfs as the 4th OL and 21st overall. That’s not saying that’s definitive but just an example.


Not sure how you classify major, and a lot of these seem to be mocks not rankings, but a quick search:
CBS Sports : Simmons 3, Wills 6 (at #4 that's a pick-em to me)
Drafttek: Simmons 3, Wirfs 7 (again a pickem at pick #4)
Athlon Mock: Giants take Becton, Simmons goes #6 to S.D.
Walter Football: Giants take Wirfs, Simmons goes #9 to Jax

I know we all can pick these apart, but the point here is that OT's are ranked right there too, so if we need an OT it should not be a "reach" to take one.
RE: RE: Tiers  
MeadowlandsMike : 3/28/2020 8:00 pm : link
In comment 14852529 FStubbs said:
Quote:
In comment 14852262 LBH15 said:


Quote:


What I am trying to suggest is that it may very well be that the tiering this year based on true prospective talent is something like this:

Tier 1: Burrow, Young
Tier 2: about 12 different players (including several OTs)




This seems more accurate. These offensive linemen seem pretty good to my untrained eyes. And if Simmons was that dynamic of a player, Detroit would grab him at #3 anyway.


Yes it is closer to that. Although some could put Tua as tier 1 with an asterisk for injury.

And some teams might see Simmons and Okudah with 1 or 2 of their top OTs as tier 2.

For instance:

Tier 1: Young, Burrow, Tua*
Tier 2: Simmons, Okudah, Becton, Wills,Jeudy
Tier 3: Thomas, Wirfs,Kinlaw,Lamb, etc.

Teams generally take the guy in the top tier who meets their highest need or perceived team impact.

Since a great OT could help unlock the full potential of both Barkley and Jones, I think the OT is the pick (unless Young drops).
If it goes Burrows, Young and TUA (trade) and no one wants  
SGMen : 3/28/2020 8:30 pm : link
to trade up with the Giants (or don't offer enough) than the Giants take Okudah or Simmons if they see Simmons as a big FS who can cover the whole backfield.

Honestly, BPA over Wirfs or whomever at OT.
RE: If it goes Burrows, Young and TUA (trade) and no one wants  
MeadowlandsMike : 3/28/2020 8:58 pm : link
In comment 14852609 SGMen said:
Quote:
to trade up with the Giants (or don't offer enough) than the Giants take Okudah or Simmons if they see Simmons as a big FS who can cover the whole backfield.

Honestly, BPA over Wirfs or whomever at OT.


Grade close enough with Wills or Becton and the team overall impact with the stud OT is greater
RE: RE: If it goes Burrows, Young and TUA (trade) and no one wants  
SGMen : 3/28/2020 9:01 pm : link
In comment 14852632 MeadowlandsMike said:
Quote:
In comment 14852609 SGMen said:


Quote:


to trade up with the Giants (or don't offer enough) than the Giants take Okudah or Simmons if they see Simmons as a big FS who can cover the whole backfield.

Honestly, BPA over Wirfs or whomever at OT.



Grade close enough with Wills or Becton and the team overall impact with the stud OT is greater
See, my gut tells me Okudah is the #2 defensive player in this draft after Young with Simmons 2B, depending upon how you see him. I see him as a big FS.
Back to the Corner