NFT: Francesa is on this morning

(better options defensively at 4)

Bigger problem than the offense; this doesn’t seem to be mentioned that often

Lock it up.

(But staying with the "Draft D at 4" thinking of this thread...)

BBIers should check out Colin's article on GBN where he compares the Giants' 2019 offensive vs defensive rankings. Colin makes a pretty strong case as to why a defensive stud should be a priority over OT @ 4.

Bobby, agree. He can and often is a jerk and ultra arrogant, but he is a good commentator (had some very good stuff couple of weeks ago re Cam Newton's challenge to re-invent himself and some Giants stuff).

'Uncut Gems' just watched it last night (totally not what I expected) and there the Pope is, two different scenes, as a bookie--seemed to fit LOL)

And, boy, joe and Boss who want to go D at 4 (or wherever we trade down to), I get that there may be A BPA there, I just lean to upping DJ's and SB's productivity by finally getting serious with the OL

In comment 14853058 Jim in Tampa said:

Quote:

(But staying with the "Draft D at 4" thinking of this thread...) BBIers should check out Colin's article on GBN where he compares the Giants' 2019 offensive vs defensive rankings. Colin makes a pretty strong case as to why a defensive stud should be a priority over OT @ 4.

Only if we ignore the 3 (maybe 4) defensive starters we got in FA this year or the 2, 1st round defensive draft choices we got in last year's draft or the 3, 3rd round and one 4th round defensive players we got in the last two drafts or the former 1st round defensive pick we got in the OBJ trade. Folks seem to want to ignore that DG has spent more premium resources on defensive players than offensive ones.

Can we take up a donation to get JJ's assessments here? (:

As many have opined, no doubt in my mind that his will have considerable weight in DG's approach.