Colin Lindsay and Pigskin Paul Guillemette have once again generously volunteered to answer draft-related questions from BBI posters today from 1:30-3:00 PM.
Most BBI'ers are familiar with Colin's website, but if you haven't checked it out, please see the link below...
Great North Blue Draft Report - (
New Window )
What have you heard and what's your take as to who it's gonna be and ought to be?
How do you compare these three?
What have you heard and what's your take as to who it's gonna be and ought to be?
How do you compare these three?
and as a follow up - do you think Dave Gettleman's Draft history has any bearing on how to read the first round pick?
Related, in FA they brought in an OT and two blocking TEs, "meaning" it's far more likely they take a C before an OT -- agree or disagree?
Do you see Tanner Muse as a S or LB? If the latter, do you see him as an OLB in a 3-4? Or is he more of a special teams guy with limited defensive potential?
Do you see Ben Bartch as a 3rd round area OT? Do you think he is a long way from starting because of his small school background?
Who is the one player not being talked about who it would not shock you if the Giants drafted?
Who is the one player not being talked about who it would not shock you if the Giants drafted?
Eric - I'm in the OT or Simmons or trade down and get an OT camp. The notion of what you asked scares the hell out of me. :)
Just a couple of intro comments before we begin to frame the discussion. I will be joined by Pigskin Paul Guillemette (if he can find his way here!!) my partner in crime at the GBN. Pigskin will be answering questions regarding individual players, while I will try and focus on the more general aspect of the Giants’ draft process and likely direction etc.
With regard to the discussion of individual players, we would appreciate it we stuck with the more prominent top 100-150 prospects likely to be available in the first four rounds or so. While everyone loves looking for those diamond in the rough sleeper types, fact is, the likelihood of the Giants ever actually drafting one of those deep dive prospects is maybe 2-3%. And there’s maybe a 5-10% possibility the guy actually makes the team. Just not a great use of our time or resources.
The other thing is would be really helpful if people spread their questions out a little. We WILL try and answer every question so if there are already 2-3 unanswered ones on the board maybe wait until those have been answered before posting more questions. Also if some people would hold off until 2 or 2:30 to post their questions then we maybe we won’t feel quite as rushed trying to keep up and we will be able to be a little more thoughtful when posting replies.
Lastly, we don’t get paid for this. I do it because I’m a lifelong Giants (since 1957) fan and would do it every day if I had the chance. We do have bills to pay though and it would help out if people were over at the GBN and clicked an ad or two.
Thanks in advance for your co-operation!
sheesh.... insights
In fact, when one takes the emotion out of it and goes by the numbers the Giants biggest weak link last year were the coverage units in the defensive back seven. Fact is, to have any chance of competing in the NFL, you really need 3-4 solid corners, otherwise your opponents are just going to find the mismatches and shred your D on a weekly basis. CB Bradberry was a terrific get in free agency, but the rest of the CB corps is made up of totally unproven younger players. The Giants could conceivably live with that group next year to see how they develop, but it’s a scary thought! Meanwhile, the central pass defenders were arguably the slowest unit in the league up the middle last fall and while Martinez represents something of an upgrade over Ogletree, it’s still a slow group. Plus they still don’t appear to have anyone at all at FS.
I should also point out that I am not a ‘we have too many holes to fill!’ guy. Not that the Giants don’t have more than their share of units desperately in need of an upgrade, but the goal here is to build a championship quality team and the best teams in the league are by and large the teams with the most dynamic playmakers that make the most dynamic plays.
Viewed in that context - and to answer Eric's question about a surprise pick - it certainly wouldn’t shock me if the Giants were to think WR with one of their first two picks. Indeed, I have been making the case (apparently to an audience of no one) that while the OL needs to be upgraded, what would really put the scare in opposing defensive coaches would be a legit #1 receiver with the potential to take the top off their defenses. Last year, for example, the Giants had no one who scared opposing defenses deep so the other guys were consistently bringing 9-10, even 11 guys into the box fixing to stop #26 and just daring the Giants to beat them deep. Slayton did come on late, but add another legit big-play threat and you would start to force opponents to play their safeties much deeper, which in turn would open up the underneath zones for guys like Shepard, Tate and Engram, not to mention, almost by definition, give Saquon some space as opponents just aren't going to be able to bring so many guys to the LOS. And if they do, hammer them over the top. In the first we hear the CeeDee lambi back to being close to a top5 pick, while WR is the strength of the draft in the latter part of the opening round and early second with a bunch of guys like Baylor’s Denzel Mims, USC’s Michael Pittman, Brandon Aiyuk of Arizona State, Chase Claypool of Notre Dame, Penn State’s KJ Hamler and Jalen Reagor OF TCU. Of course, the Giants could opt to add a WR with either their late 3rd or early 4th round picks and they’ll be some good ones there, but they’re all more complimentary type guys rather than potential go-to receivers.
My sense is that the Giants will try and focus on OL early, and may as a consequence cluster draft some day three edge rushers.
What do you think of Alex Highsmith and Tyler Biadasz in the late third and early fourth rounds?
What day three edge rushers might intrigue the Giants?
Thanks again.
Quote:
after year, to share what you know and hear with us in addition to your personal incites. You add a lot of great food for quality thought and it is much appreciated.
sheesh.... insights
We don’t know yet. He might incite..😜😜
Can you discuss the secondary OTs (Jackson, Jones, Cleveland, Niang) a bit?
Who is the one player not being talked about who it would not shock you if the Giants drafted?
I obviously can't speak for Colin or Paul, but I would not be shocked if the Giants drafted Derrick Brown, especially after a trade down. I do assume if they did so that Tomlinson would be traded.
Kingblue: Given that the Giants don''t appear to have a FS at a;; one would think they'd be looking for one in this draft, but the picksings are some slim. see above for the possibility of a round one trade up. Other guys to watch in the early second include Davis of Cal, who is a really intriguing guy, Jeremy Chinn of Southern Illinois or Minnesota's Antoine Winfield who is a really good player but not very durable.
thx
Quote:
My OC list, in order is Ruiz, Biadasz, Cushenberry, Hennessey!
Everyone thinks the Giants are going to draft Simmons or an OL with the first pick.
Who is the one player not being talked about who it would not shock you if the Giants drafted?
Eric - I'm in the OT or Simmons or trade down and get an OT camp. The notion of what you asked scares the hell out of me. :)
My choice considering that Young is not going to be there for us would be Okudah, OT, Brown and then Simmons. But I also am warming to the idea of a stud WR.
Also if we take brown would we then recind the tag on Williams?
I wouldn't call them sleepers tho.
In comment 14856171 Mike in NY said:
We should also note that there isn't much right now to the dream of trading down with a team looking for a QB and picking up a passle of picks. There are several teams that would trade up for Burrow, but with his injury history we hear the market for Tua is coldish (and its no longer guaranteed that the Lions get many offers at #3), and it seeks unlikely anyone is going to offer much for Herbert. But it only takes one team so we'll see what happens on the 23rd but it doesn't look promising
In comment 14856235 NYG22 said:
This is great stuff, I think you answered it here. An OT especially one with potential to play LT is likely gone by 36 unless he is a highly developmental guy.
That in itself probably means LT with the top pick. Or the oft chance of getting fancy with a tradedown and then a trade up back into the first round for a guy like Cleveland because maybe Josh Jones and Austin will be gone by late round 1 too.
Agree on the upside of Becton its rare and he could be an absolute dominant LT if things come together. But I also think the intangible/tangible package in its entirety is what makes someone like Wills so good. He may not have that rare /size speed you look for in the top 5. But the other things are so good including the footwork, awareness, character, football IQ etc. that I strongly believe he will be an elite LT in this league.
Schrager has heard from multiple teams he is the first OT off the board.
We should also note that there isn't much right now to the dream of trading down with a team looking for a QB and picking up a passle of picks. There are several teams that would trade up for Burrow, but with his injury history we hear the market for Tua is coldish (and its no longer guaranteed that the Lions get many offers at #3), and it seeks unlikely anyone is going to offer much for Herbert. But it only takes one team so we'll see what happens on the 23rd but it doesn't look promising
If you are saying Okudah fills a major need, you've either soured on Baker given his poor rookie year or you think he's more of a slot CB.
Good take on Brown. Not really a pass rush force and therefore somewhat redundant to what we already have.
Thanks!