With the cancellation of OTAs, rookie minicamps, pretty much all offseason activities, knowing what we know now would we still have fired Shurmur and hired a first-time head coach in Joe Judge?
Shurmur was one of the worst head coaches in the league, but at least he was experienced. It's certainly not ideal for a rookie head coach to go into the season without the necessary offseason activities.
This is not a huge vote of confidence for Judge--just a recognition that Shurmur was very, very bad as a head coach.
I will counter - why in heaven's name would the Giants keep Shurmur after the past two years? What makes you think that Judge could be any worse than Shurmur?
Definitely helps! True.
I think it's a legitimate question. Obviously no one wanted Shurmur gone more than me and I'm happy he was gone, but I do wonder if we would've done this knowing what we know now.
I will counter - why in heaven's name would the Giants keep Shurmur after the past two years? What makes you think that Judge could be any worse than Shurmur?
Well, the former is certainly true :P No need to speculate. I do have too much time on my hands these days. Haha
Quote:
Really?
I think it's a legitimate question. Obviously no one wanted Shurmur gone more than me and I'm happy he was gone, but I do wonder if we would've done this knowing what we know now.
It really isnt. I can't believe I am even responding. When you know someone isn't the guy you move on. But let's assume what you say is true and you want an experienced guy in here. What the fuck is the purpose? Did you think we were winning anything this year? This year is a building block toward the future not a year to go all in. Then what? You fire Shurmur at the end of the year and now you are a year behind? Ridiculous.
Quote:
In comment 14858744 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
Really?
I think it's a legitimate question. Obviously no one wanted Shurmur gone more than me and I'm happy he was gone, but I do wonder if we would've done this knowing what we know now.
It really isnt. I can't believe I am even responding. When you know someone isn't the guy you move on. But let's assume what you say is true and you want an experienced guy in here. What the fuck is the purpose? Did you think we were winning anything this year? This year is a building block toward the future not a year to go all in. Then what? You fire Shurmur at the end of the year and now you are a year behind? Ridiculous.
No one is saying Shurmur was the guy. It was clear he wasn't.
But IDK, I'm not convinced that this isn't a win-now team. After all, if the reports are true, this is a make or break year for Gettleman. If we don't show marked improvement, it could be Gettleman's head.
But perhaps cover your face and make sure to social distance
Think about it. He technically is at an advantage when it comes to first time head coaches. The leagues best don’t get to install their proven game winning atmosphere and and are forced to change things on the fly for the first time, in some cases like BB, decades.
Personally I think this is helpful to JJ from a rookie HC view point.
Definitely. I never felt he was the right guy. He was so underwhelming every step of the way. I think he was the second worst head coach in the NFL behind Freddie Kitchens (jury's out on Zac Taylor, I guess).
Think about it. He technically is at an advantage when it comes to first time head coaches. The leagues best don’t get to install their proven game winning atmosphere and and are forced to change things on the fly for the first time, in some cases like BB, decades.
Personally I think this is helpful to JJ from a rookie HC view point.
Interesting way of looking at things. Thanks
With that...the defensive coaches and OL coaches had to go....never seen a more poorly prepared team....I understand plenty of rookies were playing.....but it were the 2nd year guys making the most mistakes....and the most experienced, were the worse playing ones.
Bad HC, but a good man.
Unfortunately the only experience he has is losing.
We are better off. 100%
Think about it. He technically is at an advantage when it comes to first time head coaches. The leagues best don’t get to install their proven game winning atmosphere and and are forced to change things on the fly for the first time, in some cases like BB, decades.
Personally I think this is helpful to JJ from a rookie HC view point.
I think this is at least as likely as any other scenario. I wouldn't second-guess firing Shurmur, and I think Judge is going to be very good. I would just like to have an NFL season to see this all play out ...
The only positive was his work with DJ. But maybe that was Tanneys job anyway.
I also wasn't consulted when it was either Coughlin or Reese, and WE didn't choose to stick with Coughlin when the problems were clearly personnel -- not coaching.
I am so excited by what I have seen from Joe Judge, he is a nature leader, and that’s what I want in my head coach. Leave the X’s and O’s To the coordinators.
Interesting thought I had the other day, I have no idea what position coach Tom Coughlin was...was he offense? Defense? I don’t know...to me he has always just been Coach.
I am so excited by what I have seen from Joe Judge, he is a nature leader, and that’s what I want in my head coach. Leave the X’s and O’s To the coordinators.
Interesting thought I had the other day, I have no idea what position coach Tom Coughlin was...was he offense? Defense? I don’t know...to me he has always just been Coach.
He was a WR coach on the 1990 Super Bowl team
He was like a quant in finance. Super smart, but do you want them leading a division? Super great with numbers, but actually conveying information to people? Results speak for themselves.
Um.... when?
Me personally? Absolutely fire Shurmur. He turned out to be awful.
This is what made them bad head coaches and what got them fired. They got the chance to be head coaches because of there football brains.
Since there is no field in this scenerio and it has everything to do with adjusting, planning and execution, I have no doubt it was been handled terribly.
Now is this a bad hand dealt for a new coach who is trying to install a new system. Absolutely yes! This does suck for coach judge which is why we will have to be even more leanent in our options of this new coaching administration.
However, I feel we picked judge for his intellect on how to create a process and follow through with execution which is exactly the kind of coach you want during this type of crisis.
Also it is good we have DG and Garret because it is not the first rodeo. We may be lucky that we did not fire DG because having a new GM at this time might caused a bigger of a hill to climb.
Agree that when you have to adapt you want a process intense/data driven guy in charge
Quote:
He’s a good guy and a good coach, but he’s not a CEO.
I am so excited by what I have seen from Joe Judge, he is a nature leader, and that’s what I want in my head coach. Leave the X’s and O’s To the coordinators.
Interesting thought I had the other day, I have no idea what position coach Tom Coughlin was...was he offense? Defense? I don’t know...to me he has always just been Coach.
He was a WR coach on the 1990 Super Bowl team
Yup, and an interesting point of comparison about Coughlin’s early days as a WR coach...Parcells and Belichick have both commented about how detail oriented and organized Coughlin was back then as a position coach.
Sounds similar to the way the guy who’s been the Patriots special teams coach (and WR coach too last year) has been consistently described.
Why the Fuck would you keep him?
To waste yet another year?
I think some of you need to get out of the house.
RE: Shurmur - up isn't always better. Some people's best landing spot is at the position coach level, coordinator, etc. The way the system is there is pressure to climb the ladder. They'd be better off paying rpemium coordinators at premium pay. Make it more competitive with HC pay.
Me personally? Absolutely fire Shurmur. He turned out to be awful.
Exactly my sentiments. I would've cut bait regardless.
[quote] They both proved to me they were incapable to make successful adjustments or to plan properly.
This is what made them bad head coaches and what got them fired. They got the chance to be head coaches because of there football brains.
Since there is no field in this scenerio and it has everything to do with adjusting, planning and execution, I have no doubt it was been handled terribly.
Now is this a bad hand dealt for a new coach who is trying to install a new system. Absolutely yes! This does suck for coach judge which is why we will have to be even more leanent in our options of this new coaching administration.
However, I feel we picked judge for his intellect on how to create a process and follow through with execution which is exactly the kind of coach you want during this type of crisis.
Also it is good we have DG and Garret because it is not the first rodeo. We may be lucky that we did not fire DG because having a new GM at this time might caused a bigger of a hill to climb. [/quote
Great post
But are you out of your freaking mind?!
He’s bored.
Maybe this break gives him more time to prepare. From what Ive read, Judge is a guy that comes very prepared. I'll look at it that more time = more preparedness.
I am so excited by what I have seen from Joe Judge, he is a nature leader, and that’s what I want in my head coach. Leave the X’s and O’s To the coordinators.
Interesting thought I had the other day, I have no idea what position coach Tom Coughlin was...was he offense? Defense? I don’t know...to me he has always just been Coach.
It's absurd the Giants org never took away playcalling from him when it was an obvious problem.
Hope all is well in your part of the world.