for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Remember when the Giants had the best LBs in football?

truebluelarry : 4/5/2020 3:56 pm
While deep-diving on research for the 1986 season I came across this great training camp article on LT, Carson, Banks & Co.

While this brings back great memories of course, it also saddens me to think that the span of time betweem Sam Huff (who is referenced in the article) and this 1986 group is smaller than the gap between the end of LTs career and where we are now. Since 1993 the only LB to make the Pro Bowl in a Giant uniform is Jessie Armstead - and that was almost 20 years ago! It's on the verge of becoming as bad as the WR drought between Homer Jones and Amani Toomer.

Anyway, I highly recommend this article, its worthwile reading.
Giant Linebackers: Keepers of the Flame - ( New Window )
Remember when some in the media  
smshmth8690 : 4/5/2020 4:05 pm : link
used to make believe that the Saints LB's were better? They were good, so were the Bears, but the Giants were the best,
RE: Remember when some in the media  
truebluelarry : 4/5/2020 4:07 pm : link
In comment 14860015 smshmth8690 said:
Quote:
used to make believe that the Saints LB's were better? They were good, so were the Bears, but the Giants were the best,


The Saints were good. Rickey Jackson was one of those players drafted to be "the next LT."

The Bears were a 4-3 team built around their DL, very different than the Giants & Saints 3-4.
Remember when the giants had the best defensive line in the NFL?  
dschwarz in westchester : 4/5/2020 4:14 pm : link
Sorry couldn’t resist.

More seriously, the giants elected to move to. 4-3 and shifted resources to the DL - which they did VERY well for years.

Really the headline is the giants scouting group falling apart somewhere after 2007....
Except for some of the dark years in the ‘60s, we have had  
Big Blue '56 : 4/5/2020 4:15 pm : link
a collection of solid LBs, imv. Van Pelt, Kelly, Pat Hughes, Dan Lloyd (before Lymphoma), Files..Then of course the usual mid-80s guys we loved. And the back-ups? Robbie Jones, Byron Hunt, etc..
RE: Except for some of the dark years in the ‘60s, we have had  
truebluelarry : 4/5/2020 4:24 pm : link
In comment 14860026 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
a collection of solid LBs, imv. Van Pelt, Kelly, Pat Hughes, Dan Lloyd (before Lymphoma), Files..Then of course the usual mid-80s guys we loved. And the back-ups? Robbie Jones, Byron Hunt, etc..


And Andy Headen, who the NFLPA used at the impetus for Plan B Free Agency. He and Hunt could have easily started for most of the other teams in the NFL.
RE: RE: Except for some of the dark years in the ‘60s, we have had  
Big Blue '56 : 4/5/2020 4:30 pm : link
In comment 14860029 truebluelarry said:
Quote:
In comment 14860026 Big Blue '56 said:


Quote:


a collection of solid LBs, imv. Van Pelt, Kelly, Pat Hughes, Dan Lloyd (before Lymphoma), Files..Then of course the usual mid-80s guys we loved. And the back-ups? Robbie Jones, Byron Hunt, etc..



And Andy Headen, who the NFLPA used at the impetus for Plan B Free Agency. He and Hunt could have easily started for most of the other teams in the NFL.


Yup, I just blanked on him..Also Johnny Cooks in the late ‘80s was a valuable contributor for a few years as I recall
RE: RE: RE: Except for some of the dark years in the ‘60s, we have had  
truebluelarry : 4/5/2020 4:38 pm : link
In comment 14860033 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 14860029 truebluelarry said:


Quote:


In comment 14860026 Big Blue '56 said:


Quote:


a collection of solid LBs, imv. Van Pelt, Kelly, Pat Hughes, Dan Lloyd (before Lymphoma), Files..Then of course the usual mid-80s guys we loved. And the back-ups? Robbie Jones, Byron Hunt, etc..



And Andy Headen, who the NFLPA used at the impetus for Plan B Free Agency. He and Hunt could have easily started for most of the other teams in the NFL.



Yup, I just blanked on him..Also Johnny Cooks in the late ‘80s was a valuable contributor for a few years as I recall


Yeah, Cooks was another "the next LT" when he was drafted. Ironic that he ended up on the Giants, and was a key contributor to the 1990 Super Bowl run.
Just found this.  
Big Blue '56 : 4/5/2020 4:46 pm : link
Thoughts?
Link - ( New Window )
Loved Blackburn for how he contributed,  
Big Blue '56 : 4/5/2020 4:48 pm : link
but ranked 11th?
The Saints  
Spike13 : 4/5/2020 4:48 pm : link
LB’ers, gave them a run for their money.
No one gave us a run.  
Carl in CT : 4/5/2020 4:54 pm : link
As a Unit Headen and Hunt (backups) would have started on 25 teams. We won’t talk starters.
I'd move Michael Barrow up - after Pierce  
Ira : 4/5/2020 4:55 pm : link
.
Had a quarantine watch  
BigBluesman : 4/5/2020 5:19 pm : link
party (me and my one friend across town) of the Niners at Giants 1986 divisional yesterday. My buddy and I were so envious of the fans that were able to regularly watch the roving pack of wolves that were our LBs back then. That team was seriously badass. As a Giants fan in my early 30s, I can only remember watching three excellent linebackers; Armstead, Barrow, and Pierce.
As someone else mentioned,  
BigBluesman : 4/5/2020 5:20 pm : link
I have definitely seen some pass rushers in my lifetime though. You could do worse than Strahan, Osi, Tuck, and JPP. We were pretty lucky to have those guys as well.
Toomer never made it to the pro bowl  
Coach Red Beaulieu : 4/5/2020 5:58 pm : link
according to bbi that makes him bad.

Plaxico didn't either iirc.
Svare, Huff, Svaboda Not a bad group in the development of the 4/3 ‘d’  
plato : 4/6/2020 1:30 am : link
quite an exciting group for the era. doubt any would make a splash today, but i don’t know really. but they sure as hell ex item this teenaged college freshman.
I still laugh at myself  
Bubba : 4/6/2020 7:15 am : link
when I questioned why the Giants drafted LT saying we already have good LBs.
RE: Just found this.  
EricJ : 4/6/2020 7:20 am : link
In comment 14860046 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
Thoughts? Link - ( New Window )


The top 10 are amazing....

then it immediately turns into a group of average guys at best. It is amazing how this team has only been able to find two LBs (pierce and armstead) since the 1991 Superbowl
RE: Svare, Huff, Svaboda Not a bad group in the development of the 4/3 ‘d’  
Big Blue '56 : 4/6/2020 7:21 am : link
In comment 14860334 plato said:
Quote:
quite an exciting group for the era. doubt any would make a splash today, but i don’t know really. but they sure as hell ex item this teenaged college freshman.


Livingston, then Tom Scott we got from the Eagles. Terrific group indeed.
RE: Toomer never made it to the pro bowl  
Ten Ton Hammer : 4/6/2020 8:18 am : link
In comment 14860114 Coach Red Beaulieu said:
Quote:
according to bbi that makes him bad.

Plaxico didn't either iirc.


It's not that he was bad. He played in the same era as guys like Torry Holt and Tim Brown. Toomer wasnt a top level WR when those guys are the class of the position group across the league. He was clearly a second-tier talent.
The idea that the giants are a LB kind of team is really odd  
JesseS : 4/6/2020 8:18 am : link
And there’s a lot of cherry picking from one or two eras.

If you look at the past 30 years, there’s a handful of phenomenal guys from the edge of that 30 years and a ton of hot garbage. It’s ancient history.

That list is brutal after the top 10. I’m just about 40. Minus a year here or there, the giants have had horrendous linebackers and frequently had horrendous defenses - for decades.
Generating that list beyond the first 15 LBs or so  
LBH15 : 4/6/2020 8:33 am : link
must have been painful.

And the difference between Brian Kelley at #10 and Chase Blackburn at #11 is immense.

RE: The idea that the giants are a LB kind of team is really odd  
EricJ : 4/6/2020 8:49 am : link
In comment 14860386 JesseS said:
Quote:


That list is brutal after the top 10. I’m just about 40. Minus a year here or there, the giants have had horrendous linebackers and frequently had horrendous defenses - for decades.


I agree..
I am older than you are and was fortunate enough to see the Giants through the 70s as a kid and the 80s as a teenager.

Back then, the NFC and AFC (for the most part) had very distinct qualities. With just a couple of exceptions, the NFC (in the 80s) was considered the more physical and punch you in the mouth, defensive style of play. Meanwhile, the AFC was more of the offensive minded style of play.

USUALLY.. when an NFC team would meet up with an AFC team, it was going to be a game where the NFC team was more physical and the AFC team would have to win with finesse.

I feel like with the arrival of Dan Reeves, this team began to shape itself more like an AFC team. I guess that makes sense since Dan came from the AFC and he brought some of those players over. However, that seemed to have continued. The Giants were no longer a team that other teams feared to play physically. Teams like the Ravens took over in that respect in the early 2000's and even the Steelers got that back again after losing it from back in the 70's.

I guess this is why I liked hearing what Judge had to say in his first press conference. Getting back to being a tough physical team in the end is what I am looking forward to... in addition to winning.
The miss on that list is Jim Files  
BillT : 4/6/2020 9:03 am : link
He would have been a great one but retired young to become a minister.
uh, Rickey Jackson was drafted in the same 1981 draft in the 2nd round  
Victor in CT : 4/6/2020 9:27 am : link
and Cooks in the 1982 draft.

The Saints were a good unit, maybe 2nd best behind the Giants.

I always thought Singletary was overrated. He was good, bu HArry Carson always better, and betetr in coverage too. MS got way too much mileage out the that bulging eyeball, head swivel clip from NFL Films.
I am going to go out on a limb and will say this...  
EricJ : 4/6/2020 9:51 am : link
If Andy Headen was not LTs backup and started his career AFTER LT retired, he would likely be #11.
Andy Headen and Byron Hunt...  
x meadowlander : 4/6/2020 11:56 am : link
...would've started for most other teams.

I get the disappointment in moving away from Linebacker focused D, but the Giants never stopped producing excellent front-7 players. Instead of Taylor-Carson-Banks, we had Osi-Tuck-Strahan-JPP.

Personally, I prefer the 3-4 - I think it adds versatility to a defense, makes it much harder to predict with multiple hybrid players.
I don't get whats happend with the position....  
cpgiants : 4/6/2020 5:51 pm : link
Its like someone decided that LBs are no longer valuable, except for one thing....

All the good teams still seem to have good ones!!!!

Ffs.
I read this article along with others Larry sent me  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/6/2020 7:05 pm : link
and what a lot of you guys don't get, if you weren't alive and aware in '86; we all believed that the 86' Giants were cockey, awesome and could make a run. I certainly believed they could do it.

Except for 2008 - can you name a year in the 2000's were you believed and were confident that the Giants were a team to be feared, and be confidently believe that they should go all the way before the season started?

That 86' group oozed confidence from the coach on down. They were bad. Big and bad. And they exuded it! And it was the defense boys, not the offense that gave you this confidence.

We all had a love/hate relationship with Simms. He was not the Mr consistency that Eli Manning was to that point, the offense, with the exception of Joe Morris was not inspiring. Phil McConky is a hero now but he was cut before the season started. OJ Anderson wasn't on the team in training camp. Bavaro was injured. There was no reason to believe in the offense, but the defense - they were were frikken awesome. They could take over any game they were in.
RE: I read this article along with others Larry sent me  
PatersonPlank : 4/6/2020 8:13 pm : link
In comment 14861063 gidiefor said:
Quote:
and what a lot of you guys don't get, if you weren't alive and aware in '86; we all believed that the 86' Giants were cockey, awesome and could make a run. I certainly believed they could do it.

Except for 2008 - can you name a year in the 2000's were you believed and were confident that the Giants were a team to be feared, and be confidently believe that they should go all the way before the season started?

That 86' group oozed confidence from the coach on down. They were bad. Big and bad. And they exuded it! And it was the defense boys, not the offense that gave you this confidence.

We all had a love/hate relationship with Simms. He was not the Mr consistency that Eli Manning was to that point, the offense, with the exception of Joe Morris was not inspiring. Phil McConky is a hero now but he was cut before the season started. OJ Anderson wasn't on the team in training camp. Bavaro was injured. There was no reason to believe in the offense, but the defense - they were were frikken awesome. They could take over any game they were in.


Yep. The season before ended in Chicago in the playoffs. The Bears were unbelievable that season. In fact the Bears considered us their only real thread. Our defense pretty much shut down the Bears offense, but our offensive issues and Landeta just killed us. They ended up beating the Rams by 24, in the Super Bowl the Pats by 36.

That's the only thing that stopped us, so we knew we could get back.
Well, in '09 when we started 5-0  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 4/6/2020 8:22 pm : link
& was kicking ass, I thought that was a team that could go to the Super Bowl. Other than that, no.
When I first became a Giants fan half way thru 1979...  
BillKo : 4/7/2020 12:14 pm : link
...we had the best LB's and the best punter (Dave Jennings).

And that was it!
86 and 08...  
x meadowlander : 4/7/2020 1:11 pm : link
...were the only 2 years since I've been a fan that felt 'predestined'.

I believe the 86' Giant Defense and the 08' Offense are the 2 best units I have and ever will see the New York Giants field.

I still believe Plax ruined a 3rd SuperBowl for Manning.
Back to the Corner